Well yes

except that the stupid players end up in your own team so the effectiveness is really questionable unless u want to TK

Man am I lucky I never got past T7

You all probably dont give a damn but does anybody know of a tool to log back into an instagram account? I was dumb lost my login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me

@Devon Abraham Instablaster :)

I remember when that ship first came out and it had better AA than most ships even at tier 4 due to the dual purpose main batteries.

Remember when Black Swan was god tier due to the only T1 ship having AP?

@@SoldierOfFate Team Hermelin all the way, but Black Swan is cool.

The french t1 is op I assure you.

i drive orlan with full reload build

So much for H-class battleships... which were made for stupid people and against stupid people.

mhm

hmm

Edit #2 this song is actually an imperial Russian army song before the lyrics were changed in 1914 at the start of world war 1, before once again having its lyrics changed for use by the Russian white guard during the civil war before having more lyrics changes in the 1930’s-1940’s for use by the USSR before it’s last lyric change for use as the anthem for a federation oblast fleet after the Soviet Union collapsed

@@PLUMMITE thanks! That's quite interesting

@@PLUMMITE Despite many people think Stalin is merely a continuation of Lenin, this along with many other things clearly show otherwise, even without looking at those political changes (changes in Comintern policies, Stalin constitution, the gulag and secret police, etc.). The fact that Farewell of Slavianka, a former imperial marching song and White Army song is being reused (by a workers' state supposed to end the exploitative traditions of Tsarism) is a very strong indication that Stalin clearly drifted away from internationalism and a genuine transformation of society. (the Soviet version lyrics is very much nationalistic too)

He also said Slava means victory... it doesn't it means glory. Победа means victory T34 was also extremely well armored for when it was introduced. T34 was introduced in 1934, the KV1 came shortly after to replace the ideal of the land battleship that failed in the winter war.

The KV-1 only had 75mm max of armour at the time of the tiger. It was never really upgraded so the KV was able to be punched through by almost every tank with a gun 75mm or higher

@@truesniper8975 A) The Sherman 75mm was only capable of that at near point blank range, and only if there was absolutely no angling of the tank and from the side. B) The KV-1 Model 1939 had 90mm max armor. Remind me again what year the Tiger came out? The KV-1E, which would have been the variant which was a contemporary with the earliest Tigers, had 110-120mm of armor. The only 75mm that's penetrating those are the PaKs and the Panzer IV F2, which was just being introduced. You could make an argument for the 17 pounder as well, but that doesn't start seeing service on vehicles until '44 for the most part. In short, you're just plain wrong on all accounts. If you really knew your stuff, you'd know that the issue with the KV-1 was never its armor, but its firepower and maneuverability.

@@Gustav_Kuriga And this ladies and gentleman is prove: You gotta be a Commiboo. Else you wouldn't agrue on a TWO YEAR old feed under a video that has utterly NOTHING to do with your topic. I myself answered a comment that was made 2 months ago from now and had atleast in part to do with the video itself.

@@Choukai_Chan So your best explanation for someone being knowledgeable about WWII tanks and responding to a notification that appeared in their notifications is that they're a... Commiboo? Despite me also mentioning the huge drawbacks of the KV-1 (firepower and maneuverability were very poor, transmission was awful), on top of others I didn't mentions, such as the cost of production be much more expensive than contemporary medium tanks? Saying the KV-1 was well armored is just a fact. You didn't see much better armor until the late war heavy tanks (and the Panther). Absolutely astounding logic, my good sir. And my first comment is directly in response to something in the video, so cry more I guess. He literally says, and I quote, "it's like having a Tiger turret on a KV-1" in the video. This is quite literally directly addressing the video.

I see what you did there.

Disappointed that the torpbeat montage didn't use a hardbass version of Boney M's Rasputin however.

That would have been amazing 🤩

Ra ra ra Slava, Russia's greatest snipe machine! There was HP that really was gone!

@@SaiIor_Moon Молодец, товарищ Сейлор Мун! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8qlq6WGmK-Wn6c.html

Not inaccurate.

She's a Triple S: Soviet Sniper Spy. You can put Sadistic if you want for those Masochistic broadsiders.

On welfare then.

I'm winded just reading that. Does anyone have a quarter pounder w/ cheese ? 😂

Because consistency and pen is a thing. Slava has insane pen for 406 guns, it can't Overmatch stuff like Kremlin but it's pen is...well, you can see. Sure every other BB can do the same but it ultimately leads to consistency which Slava is. At least more than other BBs I assume

because iowa never gets cits

Because Slava has unironicly phsyics breaking guns, like the math makes no sense. Shikishima has shells that weigh 3X as much but have less pen at all ranges, including point blank. not to mention the ballistic curve, the shells fly very flat and very fast, something that makes no sense by having the lightest 406MM shells in the game according to ship stats, nothing makes sense about this soviet fantasy, the very rules of the universe bend around it to make the RU players pay pig RP grind.

I see that profile pic a lot in yuros videos, who is it???

@@Miokomata serb wargaming

@@tr5427 ty XD

Well maybe I'm tryhard devil's advocate in here, but the "joke" may be pointing at people who think that "muh turtleback" makes them impossible to citadel like ever. I remember when german BBs were released first alot of people complained how it is totally impossible to citadel those OP monstrocities :P (and I recall specifically answering to those people that you counter them by denying them brawls and plunging fire). I may be wrong and it may be just yuro falling into the dark side of not knowing what turtleback is, of course, but I prefer to stay hopefull :P

will it be effective if the turtle-back is upside down/the triangle moves inward.

@@juicemeister1984 it wouldnt really do anything other than make plunging shots bounce inside the ship and close range shots to bounce down into the ship if they hit the angled plate

Doesn’t Slava mean glory in Russian?

His means here is old name - Pobeda (means victory), old name of Slava is Pobeda (currently name of Soviet Tier 8 CV) before change to Slava

So I will now call it Victory-class Super Star Destroyer 😁 Edit : Star Wars Legends reference.

i love your nightcores

@@ismailaliyavuz9671 thx

IKR I was crying cause I laughed so hard

Yeah this is true. Back when I played, I'd seen more Bourgognes than Slavas.

This is true. Slava already fell out now that they introduced Superships which Slava struggle to deal with. She is still strong in certain games but her guns lack the overmatch needed to deal with angled ships especially Superships. I seen more Ohios and Thunderers now.

What use is sleeping anyways

@@Bobert2020 being ready to binge watch all yuro videos the next day (in memory of the good old days)

@@jaimegonzaloelices3346 ye

@@Bobert2020 btw love your profile pic

@@jaimegonzaloelices3346 Thanks

Ohio probably

Did you not watch the video? He literally said @5:23 that Ohio is straight-up better.

Siegfried is going to get gutted by the skill rework from the looks of it, so there's no point. The secondaries are her best selling point, and cruisers don't get any secondary skills. WG said they will probably buff her range to compensate, but she still loses Manual Secondaries.

Agir with BB guns Just go hunt BBs You get overpens on cruisers

Bruh he arleady start upload wows video five years ago when the game first came out. How do you think he just start playing that game?

Nah, Conq was a really stupid ship, able to heal 66% of normal pen dmg and was basically uncitadellable. Together with the HE that you can't angle agaist it just was there to burn you to death and there was nothing you could do to stop it. It still does but is a tad easier to counter.

VidZarg Well, about 45% of the shells I have fired are AP actually,also I get a lot of Dreadnought with even a trash ship like monarch.So the citadel raise to me is just like WG slapping my face and saying:“How dare you a HE spammer tanking at the front!This is the wrong way to play RN BB and you will never have another chance to do this!” The issue with this ship is that BBs are all vulnerable to fire,and this happen to be her strength.What WG should do is buffing the ability to against fire or HE damage(like shorter DCP or RP) for BBs and encourage them to push,not stupidly focus on single question.It’s like I broke my leg bone so I chop it off,then I no longer suffer from fracture. Back to the conqueror,the nerf should be done is decrease the long range spamming ability,like using the same ballistic model as conqueror’s AP. For me,the nerf to conqueror is good,but not this kind of nerf that ignores smart players who really know how to play the ship but pretending them as stupid as spammers.

Did you catch the part near the end where he said to get the Ohio instead?