Which m.2, sata, hdd did you used?

@@JR_Hossain was wondering the same thing. M.2 can use either NVME or SATA.

Thanks for Video and Music. God Bless You Bro

As a hdd user, every progress feel life ending.

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Legit

Really 😂✨

100% true my old hdd took a whole day to install win10.

lite version 😂

absolutely yes🤣🤣

Jesus Loves You ❤.77

it maybe took me 3-4 minutes on my sata ssd for all of windows 10 (Excluding the final updates and drivers)

@@Progressmoving Allah loves you too

You could have gone to get lunch

@@Antepithesis ❤️

I got a second hand 2tb hard drive for €28

Lol, never saw those SDDs, I am living in germany. Probably because I'm not often seaching for things like that

@@xNINJUTSZUx Jesus Loves You ❤.

@@xNINJUTSZUx Schwachsinn. Welcher Office-Rechner o.ä. braucht bitte 1TB? Ist ja schön, wenn du hier angeben willst. Prakmatisch und wirtschaftlich, gerade in Hinblick auf Unternehmensebene, denkst du nicht.

@@xNINJUTSZUx Weiß echt nicht worüber du redest.

So true !!!

Nah... cpu, ram, gpu is what really matters, notebook with no gpu and slow cpu will not run better with ssd, i botted my pc with that "slow" notebook hdd and it was pretty fast, but on notebook it doesnt matter because of cpu.

It only matters if you have a bloated windows

@@Yizqo all hardware comes from Asian countries lol.

You know that meme this person has 500gb of child prn? That is why people defend hdd

@@ProAvgeek6328 hdd is just good for dump files, its pure trash

Eu uso um SSD de 1TB não é preciso ter u HDD e nunca usar pois ele deixa o Pc com capacidade muito baixa

@@divyanshverma2296 he meant over sea seller not manufacturer.

It's stupid to use only SSD, you should have like a 500gb or 1tb SSD and like 4tb hard disk. Because only few game have really long loading and you pay way less than having all ssd.

@@Nicolo-ue9xuman, paying $200 to save hours and hours of my time every year is more than worth it for me. I actually just ran some math to figure out whether the ssd was actually worth it practically speaking. Let's assume I play 3 games a day, 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Let's assume each game takes over a minute to load with a hard drive and boot times are about 1 minutes slower with hard drives. That means an SSD saves me 4 minutes a day, 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year, which comes out to 1248 minutes saved each year. 1248 minutes is 20.8 hours saved by having an ssd every year. Let's also assume I make 17 bucks an hour, and my ssd costs me 200 bucks. That means my ssd costs me about 12 hours of work to buy. If my ssd saves me 20 hours per year, and costs 12 hours to buy, my ssd gives me a net savings of 8 hours in 1 year.

@@ShadowLancer128 pls stop your numbers is hurting my brain

@@ShadowLancer128 man only really few game take 1 minute to load and with just 500gb or 1tb SSD is fine but having all ssd is not worthy. In online game is even less worthy because you need to wait other to load so just don't waste a lot of money in like 4 tb of ssd

@@Nicolo-ue9xu did u not just read what he said

Jesus Loves You ❤.7

Get like half a tb of ssd and 2tb of her.

@@burner1011 Jesus Loves You ❤ 🙏🏾

Try longer duration then you'll know

Google gmail

lol

lmao i have win 11 on my hdd

@@robbiegiron8536 F

I did , now my pc auto restart and crash for without any reason

I have a SATA SSD from 2012 that was in a laptop that broke and I put it in my first gaming PC the other day and it installed Windows in like 6 minutes, it boots in like 20 seconds also

sata is dead end unfortunately because it hits connector limit and limit of queues. it is like running sports car engine strapped to bed frame. yes you can do it but it is inefficient as hell. single nvme dunks of sata ssd raids any day and it is sata pcie 3.0 nvme that dunk on them.

Because probably Sata M.2 SSD was used. Nvme is way faster than that.

I think the limiting factor here is where the Windows installation was running from. If it was a USB 2.0/SATA SSD then SATA is faster/equal to and therefore the M.2 SSD would be about the same speed regardless. Regardless, M.2/NVMe is by far much faster and I'm still not sure why we didn't have this technology 5-10 years ago. It couldn't have been THAT hard to think of. Was heating the issue? Voltage?(???) Practical limitation I couldn't think of? Trends? Cost? I am curious and if anyone can answer me, I'd like to hear about it.

@@Not_interestEd- well, we definitely had it 5 yrs ago lol. i bought my current motherboard (asus m270) in 2017 and it has (2) M.2 NVME ports right on it lol. They were just super expensive back then when i built my current pc, but now its soo much cheaper. When i built mine, i went with a regular Samsung SATA SSD bc it was "cheaper" (still almost $275 for just 500gb) but the m.2 nvme was almost double that for half the space. Now, i just bought a Samsung 2TB m.2 nvme yesterday...for $120 lol. So to answer your question, i do believe it was just price at that point in time lol

so do I go for a sata SSD?

@@glasscannon4723 if your motherboard support nvme m.2 go for that or else sata would be better than hdd even if its a cheap one

@@AintPopular ty my man and if it does and i have one installed already, could I upgrade it to a 2 TB and will everything still work correctly and smoothly? Just the difference being i can have more games now?

@@glasscannon4723 if you already have one installed you have to move / clone all the data on the current one to the bigger one first and after that it should work fine

@@schtormm ok thanks I was wondering tht too ty so much

Thanks!!

I'm planning on recording something a little more in depth with windows 11

hdd one is true, but sata ssd can only boot up 1.5 times slower

i have a HDD pc to and my pc boots in similiar time

@@microsoftexpert5293 make the video then. Go on. You didn’t even do it

@@microsoftexpert5293 I have windows in my Nvme ssd HDD. I ve a NAS 64 TB storage also. But games seem to load almost as fast as my SSD now from my NAS storage. What is happening... Is it the magic f new gen games like Call of Duty, Battlefield, TombRaider or will these be slow if all windows and data be stored in HDD

X2 XD

X3 XDD

mi HDD se demora 2 minutos en prender y apagar

bullshit this hdd is faster

As A Dualbooter of SSD And HDD I Can Double Confirm That This Is Real. 😂

same here, mine takes like 6 or something seconds

Windows boot can depend on motherboard as well, some can boot in 4 seconds but some in 15 even with same ssd and sata type

Okay ✅ I’ll just have

No I just need a new phone

Nooooooooo

Yo tenía una laptop de hace 7 años Y sin tener que comprar una nueva solo le compré una SSD sata y la siento como nueva xd

But SSD is not really for save data. You must use a HDD + SSD to complement them

SSD в первую очередь это системный диск, плюс некоторые игры и программы чувствительные к скорости загрузки данных с диска, но hdd в качестве файлопомойки по прежнему рулят.

hdd's are actually very fragile you must mean hdds are for large files or something

HDD is good for big companies only for backups nothing more.

until you drop it ;)

Jesus is king 🤴

Jesus Loves You ❤.7

I used some ncs songs. Sorry i can't give you a list now. Next time I will put the titles.

If you wanna know the song names, just use Shazam app ☺️

May be its not nvme

@@wrench_in It obviously was NVME. Reality is in normie tasks SATA SSD and M.2 NVME SSD's are pretty much the same. Average user won't be able to tell the difference between them at all. The only time you can tell a difference is when you're transferring large files. The big jump is from HDD to SSD, due to SSD having lot faster random read and writes. Random reads and writes are far more important for overall user experience than maximum bandwidth.

@@teemuvesala9575 m.2 could be NVME or SATA. Seeing how a SATA M.2 and regular SSD have the same theorical speed and the close results I am more inclined to believe that was a M.2 SATA drive

@@konrad999999 SATA M.2 are extremely rare these days and there are multiple tests showing SATA SSDs and even NVME M.2 gen 4 SSDs having barely any difference in most real world use cases. The only major difference is in large file transfer speeds. Here's a blind test LinusTechTips conducted between SATA, PCIE 3.0 and PCIE 4.0 SSDs: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aqp7f6Ro3J_JlXU.html Spoiler alert; they couldn't tell the difference between any of them.

@@teemuvesala9575 But even if you only save a couple seconds every time you boot, and a fraction of a second in normal tasks the time adds up over many uses. It may be worth the extra $50 in the long run even if you can't tell the difference for individual loading tasks.

I don't remember the sata SSD, but the NVME is a Samsung 970 EVO Plus (Gen3 NVME SSD). If you are enterested I made a new one with more specifics.

@@microsoftexpert5293 Just making a feedback :)

😂😂😂😂😂 me too

Satan will win

Jesus Loves You ❤.7

@@Progressmoving satan satan satan

HDDs are not all the same speed, so this is a fairly pointless comparison. Most HDDs are either 5400RPM or 7200RPM, which could determine that difference.

so sata and m.2 are the same speed??

m.2 just a socket, but different working mode can be apply.

@@thotdestoryer4203 form factor consists of 1) M.2(small ssd that we get now close to 10cm in length) 2) 2.5 inch(similar to traditional hdd size) Interface determine the speed, those are SATA(350-580mbps speed) Nvme pcie(above 900mbs can go above 4gbps speeds too)

@@anujeetswain7368 well, my ssd is only 7cm long

@@thotdestoryer4203 nvme m.2 is faster than sata but sata m.2 doesnt make a huge difference

If you're saying so then try. At worst it will make your pc experience a lot easier. BTW what game is it?

@@microsoftexpert5293 Just a normal game called league of Legends. Not AAA game 🤣

@@microsoftexpert5293 100% disc usage makes my computer laggy and sometimes freeze.

Ok. I was asking beacouse it never happened to me.

Then buy a sata SSD, It's going to be enough.

My HDD is a Seagate 500gb sata3, the sata SSD is a Kingston 120Gb and the M.2 SSD is a Samsung 970 evo plus (250Gb)

Off course..M.2 is using bigger size and better brandmark (EVO) than SSD SATA

@@hiok3754 size doesn't matter

@@kicktroll (thats what she said)

@@microsoftexpert5293 if u use 1tb hdd then u will see difference

It depends on the hdd's performance and the SATA controller

@@microsoftexpert5293 my hdd's speed is around 180mbps sequential r/w i forgot the random r/w tho

An SSD makes a gigantic difference in almost all daily activities! Booting is obviously much faster but there's a huge improvement in opening programs and files during every day use.

@@TheBozBazooka i know that...but was not sure for sata ssds

@@thechannelofrandomness7670 it is the same for sata ssd , you won't be able to take full advantage of a sata ssd in your system but it'll make a huge difference Im using crucial Bx500 250gb(500mbps+ on sata 6gbps) with i5 3570 , which supports sata 3gbps only, but I get around 280-300mbps due to sata 3 but its still a day and night difference compared to hdd . Everything becomes responsive AF in any ssd. But as you said I also used to get ,4-8mins of windows loading time but now it takes 25-35 sec

Yes, you just need to be patient when the pc is booting