Tell her, i got a few other cool models. One with a satin cover. Maybe that would make it less aggressive? If she likes i can deliver one to Frankfurt.

if you do too just use sponsorblock plugin and set it to skip fillers. It's the only way I watch her news cause otherwise it's just a waste of time

She's not the only one. The skit was funny the first few times, but now they're just annoying to me too...

0:56 because she misses me.

I love the way she can talk without moving any part of her face other than her mouth.

The mathematical formula for air pressure does include gravity as a factor

Does lower gravity make for higher tides?

What? Even better than looking out the window? That's amazing!

Maybe they can finally tell you its going to rain befire it actually does (Wait, is that my doppelganger above me?)

@@76rjackson Yes and no, it may be substantially under a percent higher due to lower pull from Earth, but over all, they end up being lower. So lower tides, or higher tides, depending on your reference point. If there were an island in the Indian Ocean Geoid Low, they may experience a slightly (and I mean SLIGHTLY) higher tide than elsewhere in the world, when compared to local average sea level. But over all, sea level in a lower gravity area is generally lower than average, as Sabine explained. In the case of the Indian Ocean Geoid Low, it's around 340 feet lower than, or just over 100 meters below, average sea level. This is actually because gravity is what causes water to "seek its level" AKA move downwards until it can't anymore. In a lower gravity area, there is less pull on the water, so it's going to pull less of the water there, therefore there will be less water in an area of less gravity. Seems kind of counterintuitive, I know, but it's true. On the flip-side, neither the Moon's gravity or the Sun's gravity are affected by the IOG Low, and so the effect of tides on the area is almost the same. Of course, the Earth doesn't pull back as hard, but it's still pulling with way more than 99% of its gravitational strength in that area, so the effect on tides from the Sun and Moon are generally almost the same in the area.

Dude, I built an accelerator in my undergrad. Sure, it wasn't THAT big, but it made x-rays that surprised a few of the guys in the doctoral program.

​@@kayakMike1000 Not to belittle your work, but I don't think that basic Cyclotrons are enough to find a nucleus that lives for so little time. Don't have much experience in particle physics though. You can build something to get good X-ray, but another problem is that for X-ray diffraction it is good to have monochromatic X-ray and synchrotron light light is everything but monochromatic. It would be a very longer project to get something really useful, but for learning scientific instrumentation, it is very nice.

Her masters thesis dum dum.

What a dream to have an access to a physics program with enough resources and conducive place to learn.

All cars have an accelerator!

Some teachers try to obtain this skill whole life and never get there (my math teacher from high school was one of them - incredible mathematician and rather moderate lecturer). And there are some unique ones, that do get it perfectly:) Feynman technique is here quite useful.

Considering a few simulated astronauts in a simulated Mars base, you can ask prisoners! There must be *ALREADY* lots of psychological research about people locked in small spaces.

@@simonmultiverse6349 Yes, but there is actually a VERY big difference between a prison and a habitat. In first, you are "thrown" usually against your own will, in the second case, you enter there from your own will and usually you have a lot of work to do there.

Time flies like a thief. Fruit flies like a banana.

Actually a biologist has just as much trouble understanding a physics journal as anyone else and vice versa.

I could do without the political ones. Their tendency is just "haha I can insult someone," and would work just as well with any [insert celebrity or politician here], so they're only funny if you happen to think the person selected is sufficiently hate-worthy. "Famous wrecks? Oh, I thought you meant [Biden/Trump/Putin/Hunter Biden/DeSantis/Don Lemon/LeBron James/Walter White]!" All equally "funny" as long as you hate or despise the person named thoroughly enough. Her apolitical jokes about objects and events tend to be better. Still delivered in her deadpan voice and awkward style, they get a snort at the cheek, at least, because they're not slapping half the audience in the face for having different sociopolitical views.

I kind of like the idea of using a fruit fly brain to understand Jordan Peterson’s tweets, but that’s just me

@@ttcc5273 Okay, now replace "Jordan Peterson's tweets" with "Joe Biden's word salads." See how it works equally well if you accept the premise that whoever it's mocking doesn't make sense? All it really says is, "I have chosen to mock this person as speaking poorly." (Honestly, I think the Biden one works a little better because at least his word salads are a meme, fair or not; this is the first I've heard of Jordan Peterson allegedly making incomprehensible tweets. Maybe I just missed the memes, though.)

I look forward to the science news vids

The solution to the climate is to purge all billionaires and everyone who is not a multimillionaire.

Are there really 8918 other people using the name numbersix?

@petehiggins33 Who knows what's going on with YT, really?

new atomic nucleus =/= new element

Its a new isotope. Not a new element.

@@eleventy-seven Thanks for clearing that up.

Not real

The seaweed clip seemed pretty idiotic to me. We've already been successful creating an algae farm to sequester carbon for 4 years using a single boat. 2012. Russ George, Haida Nation, 100 tons of iron sulfate, boosted salmon stocks for 4 years. Wildly successful. Mostly, suppressed and other than that, mostly mischaracterized.

@@MatthewElvey do you have a KZfaq video o. It? I'm sure Sabine wouldike to see it

@@borntobemild- I wouldn't be able to provide a link if I did. Actually I just searched and one comes right up. I'll post it in a comment in a moment... but you don't see it, do you?

@@borntobemild- Almost as good - here's the title. Haven't watched it though. "The highly controversial plan to stop climate change | Russ George for Heretics"

@@borntobemild- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n5p4odmQv7C3gY0.html

Scientists will be like: "We only have a few thousand years to fix this, give or take a few thousand years!!" Then laypeople: "Eh, we'll get around to it sometime within the next few thousand years."

:) "...and some minor dings to the ole' chronometer."

Given what their error bars usually look like, I'd change that to, "Couple minutes, give or take a few million years."

@@jcortese3300 You should probably take a look at some different journals.

😂please announce that we have been running a small real black (white) Invisible conscious Marvelous nuclear bomb absorbing group of machines.We have collected from all the governments and Rascal rogue groups to date Over 400 000 mega tons of nuclear matter and energy and. This means none of the nuclear weapons of mass have any power to do any of the damages all the scientists on earth claim can be done any more .So if you would kindly pass this message to all the nuclear war power leaders of the world .this can help to reduce a lot of stress on a lot of preganant moms and worried young dads who are trying their. best to be good loving warrior dads and moms. .with a positive future for all the grand children on the earth.This does make other issues for awhile..eg nuke subs will have to surface.Aircraft carriers every where will loose lots of fuel rod power.even the replacement rods are being depleted as you read this Sabrina.The next announcement is with salt..for the wounded egos that said this can t be happening..but it has is and is continuing.in the area off conventional weapons..they eithe wont fire... or have enough power to get out of the gun barrels or Sabine..yes it is more even then this. .Thankyou Sabine ..now a phone call from Elon to explain what is going on...and perhaps some old Tesla .Einstein andHawking Documents left in a basement in Harvard could have been downloaded into umm a chat. GPT ..the secret newest model. .Jeff and Zuck what a bunch of scampies you have become ..naughty ..naughty...❤Thanks Sabine the Soldiers in The world may not like it theis drones ..grenades and bombz dont explode.Oh my oh my.Its hand to hand combat.Hello Kim you may find poison no longer works to kill relatives and enemies.

That is no different than the majority of humans . Garbage in garbage out

Thank you for this nice (and accurate) way of thinking about current AI.

Sabinews 😁

Sabrina was a chesty model in the 1950s.

Her name is Sabine Hossenfeffer and don't you forget!

I love your wonderful country, greetings form germany.

How is trump a wreck are you confusing him with Biden

@@osmosisjones4912 One is an entitled billionaire and science denier and the other is a person with obvious signs of dementia. LOL. I kind of like it. The worst decisions you guys make with domestic politics the less money you have to wreck the rest of the world with pointless wars. Keep choosing lunatics for presidents!

@@osmosisjones4912 both... both are wrecks in differing ways.. No politician survives getting to that position without a few pokes.. Let's now leave politics out of the science or else red tape will appear out of the bureaucrats' desks..

@@osmosisjones4912 How is the twice impeached, one-term, indicted, many times bankrupt loser a wreck? Now we finally know you're not a bot at least. Bots aren't this dumb.

Until AI doesn't have the abilities of a fly it would never be a real AI. The big question for AI-solution is to find out what triggers the fly to do what a fly does on a millisecond-by-millisecond basis. In humans, that translates into How does the brain form questions and seek their answers?

Political humor sucks

@@HerbieHerbHerb It's ok kiddo, you'll get it when you get big.

@@filonin2 thanks sport

Until AI doesn't have the abilities of a fly it would never be a real AI. The big question for AI-solution is to find out what triggers the fly to do what a fly does on a millisecond-by-millisecond basis. In humans, that translates into How does the brain form questions and seek their answers?

@@reasonerenlightened2456 I would argue that without qualia AI could never become sentient and thereby form their own questions and answers.

@@EJBert Daniel Dennett, argue that qualia do not exist and are incompatible with neuroscience and naturalism

Or a brand new music video/song?❤

I'm wondering if we could make a full simulation of a fly. As in, a "real" virtual fly with a full brain. Surely if that's possible, it would be a strong argument that we could make general AI.

I don't get Petersons jokes

Then I balance your out your reaction. I like my science without a political taint.

@@commentatron who is the politician here?

@@Jay-cf6dz what?

@@Jay-cf6dz or what?

I didn’t get it. But then am not on Twitter…

Could you please explain to me what the Peterson joke is about?

@@MrPozytron It's a snarky intrusion of politics, masked as humor, intruding into science. You know, SIOPMAHIIS.

@@commentatron Is it really left wing or right wing to point out that his tweets have gotten weirder over time?

Lol if you got troubles with peterson ’s tweets i can help you😂

Nicht aber der Mond. They can run Mars habitat experiments in Texas *whenever* they want to. (and they don't need to get used to a 22 minute coms delay for Lunar habitation)

@@manifold1476 I mean the picture at that timestamp! That's the moon, right

@@tysonprice5058 It bugged me too! Yeah, it's a picture of a lunar eclipse, I think.

Microsurgeons.

Scanning and computer imaging of some kind is my very uneducated guess.

I would think they start point to point ,on how it works in different scenarios ,via chemical & computer modelling & then collecting & making 3d vin diagram of that now they would have isolated the flight control mechansim & work on an AI model from that

They used a banana.

they freeze the fly. Then they cut out the head. They put the head under an electronic microscope, MRI and other imaging techniques. Then they process all the images. Then they do it all over again with another fly, then again and again. In many cases they slice the head and process each slice. they also use chemicals to color certain types of molecules. They can also use radioactive compounds that attach themselves to certain molecules, etc. Over time the gaps in the geometrical model of the fly-brain are filled in and the complete picture emerges. It is simple, it is just a matter of money. It does not mean that they know how all this is working electronically. Also, doing it to humans could require few billion humans heads to complete the mapping. It would result in reducing the number of humans which in turn would benefit the environment.

As little as a few milligrams.

Not necessarily m8, if you're assuming that the purpose of the study was to "Map a fly brain", when for all we know the study was in fact interested in developing better mapping techniques and technologies. The fly brain "breakthrough" is just the part that is easily communicated to the public via the media, perhaps. Also why would you NOT be interested in mapping fly brains based on having functional maps of entirely different species with vastly different nervous systems? Mapping mouse brains probably doesn't tell you much about insect nervous systems ..... You seem to be assuming that there is some kind of hierarchy of research subjects, which may or may not actually be the view of researchers involved. Research is at heart an attempt to gain functional knowledge we did not possess previously, to that end mapping the brains of most animals (as we are busy doing with Genome mapping) is probably fairly functional research, imposing narrow and artificial hierarchies doesn't help achieve anything.

@@Blowfeld20k Mapping a mouse brain is incredibly much more work, I would assume.

​@@the-quintessenzCertainly based on the numbers of neurons.

@@Blowfeld20k They are not doing it for the funsies or for the sake of it. I have no doubt that they're doing it so they can eventually move up to human brain to better understand it, by mapping bigger and bigger and more complex brains.

think of the applications,better AI control & drone managment

Also, thanks Sabine, as usual

JP is a self help guru... Like Oprah or Osteen. Nothing he says is based on fact.

Like anything said about JP here, it seems.

JP aka Dr Charlatan

Until AI doesn't have the abilities of a fly it would never be a real AI. The big question for AI-solution is to find out what triggers the fly to do what a fly does on a millisecond-by-millisecond basis. In humans, that translates into How does the brain form questions and seek their answers?

@@reasonerenlightened2456 This appears to be a biological model and mapping not an AI model, AI is to focused, at least as far as I can tell, on matching or exceeding human level general intelligence. This research on the other hand appears to be focused on exploring more of what we do not know about nervous systems or even life in general, I feel like this is more like artificial life (a-life) then artificial intelligence, if either.

I do it every day, singing her great song 'Catching Light'

This isn't a problem with the models, but with the media, who give disproportionate weight to the most extreme predictions, and have no concept of margin for error.

There are two other factors to consider, though. The first is that climate change is nonlinear. Changes tend to accelerate, and current data indicates we may be reaching a period of rapid change, especially in some regions. The other factor is the unreliability of human memory. The climate has probably changed more since you were a child than you realise.

Wow, still not tired of this always the same climatechange denier´s blabla?

I hsve s picture of me taken in front of s Swiss glacier in 1975. I visited it again years ago. It has melted upwards about 200 meters due to climate change. It’s real alright.

​@@matthewparker9276 Climate can change without one realizing. But you can easily look at reference points and compare to old photos to check sea levels. No memory trickery there. I think potholer54 has a video on sea levels not rising, I'm on mobile and will have to watch later.

@Taponmyprofiletoreachout434 And what does that mean?

She's liberally possessed. That much is obvious.

The words are understandable, they just make no sense.