If you'd like to join the discord server, here is a link: discord.gg/aboeMCU. There are over 800 members so far. Love to have you be part of the conversation!

It's always cool whenever companies release tie-in material for moves/TV/video games that are in-universe books. Disney does this a lot, actually, so it's awesome that we got Scott's actually book to read!

Thanks for doing this, I was probably never gonna find the time to read this myself. A few comments: 9:33 The memory spell is really weird but I think we have to assume it manipulated documents across the universe too (that's the only way it'd be effective) so no matter what, Scott would probably have to refer to Peter as Spider-Man in this book. 10:11 I think it’s unlikely prisoners of the Raft have the location disclosed to them, because if they ever got out/escaped, a lot of them wouldn't have any reason to not blab about it. Probably not a location the governments want public? I think it's safe to assume Scott is just saying this to dress up his sentence (at least, I hope so for consistent writing's sake). 17:35 I was really afraid they'd describe it this way where there wasn't much drawback to the reverse-aging in terms of mentality. Introducing an actual fountain of youth in the MCU without drawbacks is really terrible and messy, and with how much they commercialized and expanded Pym-tech in Quantumania there's no reason we haven't seen them work with it even more. The fact that the book _publicizes_ this is even worse. One of the many insane implications of doing that is the goverment knows all about it now, and there's no way they haven't intervened and aren't abusing it right now. And then there's the whole question of the public's reaction to this information. If they don't meaningfully address this stuff later, it's a really bad plot hole. 22:03 It's much more charitable to the MCU to assume Scott is just a bad explainer and it seems consistent with him saying he couldn't exactly explain it, so I'd rather go with that. It's not like he's an experienced author/storyteller. On more positive notes, I really like how Scott writes about Nat and Tony's deaths. It's neat that they actually made this book a real thing. Also, is the "Hulk's baby" line quoted from the book in Quantumania actually in the real thing?

I think Scott is just explaining branching timelines but with words that general audiences understand. And he's not really wrong. In the moment you arrive in "your own" past it becomes an alternate timeline.

I ordered the book myself and I have to say that it was great. Admittedly, I was most interested in what Scott would write about the time travel. But I was really blown away by his advice, attitude to life and what he had to go through in his life. I've always loved it when characters can be shown more about their personalities in this way and hope that the MCU might be able to do something similar like this with other characters in the future.

This has quickly become my favorite MCU channel.

Interesting! I love the dedication put into the book, even if it didn't answer that many questions or gaps. To me, my favorite tidbit was for sure the fact that Hawkeye and Hulk were the ones who asked Scott to write the book. This with Clint's perseverance for people to hear about Nat is just awesome. Also, good to see that Peyton Reed wasn't drunk, he just didn't watch his own movie :/

Honestly I love that they did this and made an actual production of Rogers: The Musical, really hope the MCU continues these types of things

always love when you upload right before i eat food, now i have a great video to watch when eating my sandwich 😂

I think a scene in Endgame dedicated to the immortality machine, as well as being intentionally vague about the fate and whereabouts of Steve Rogers, were deliberate choices by Marvel Studios to keep the door open for any future writers/directors to bring back a young Steve Rogers for a special if brief occasion. I think the book must have come out at least after TFatWS, since the Smithsonian exhibit keeps the Avengers' "final mission" vague enough such that there is no mention of a time heist, nor that the Thanos they fight is different from the one in Infinity War. It may not have been public information at the time. Additionally, I don't think Yelena thinking Clint killed Nat necessarily bars the book from releasing before Hawkeye, which helps with the Strange endorsement. Many people rightfully doubt the authenticity of publicly released information. Val, in her position of power, could have simply convinced Yelena that there is more to the story than meets the eye. When Clint tells her that Nat sacrificed herself *for* him, Yelena did not question the context in which she could have possibly needed to do this to save the world; instead, her main concern is *why* Nat would possibly do that for him. Yelena then went on to say that if she was there, she "could have stopped it" and "could have changed it." To me, this quote, as well as Yelena not questioning the details of the situation, only makes sense if Yelena knew why Nat allegedly had to sacrifice herself.

Great catch basing timing of the book on Bruce before the inhibiter. Your attention to detail is amazing. I think one of the most clever aspects of this book, is because it is from Scott's perspective and Scott is not one of the brighter superheroes (his strengths are very specialized), Marvel is hedged because if a detail gets messed up they can say "well Scott got it wrong". Keep in mind this is the guy who was visibly upset because he found out that 'back to the future was bullshit'. If it had been written by Tony or Bruce or in the third person like the encyclopedia timeline book that's coming out they are more on the hook for whatever is stated. It's kind of like that book myths of Luke Skywalker, where stories are told from the perspective of sometimes unreliable narrators. So definitely a fun exercise but I think it probably lose his reliability the more detail you get into. With the exception of personal details. This is exactly the right source to find out how old Cassie is etc.

I feel like with a lot of people talking about how the MCU is falling apart with connectivity things like this remind me how much they really care. Writing a whole book from the perspective of an in universe character with so many Easter eggs and new notes. Absolutely amazing!

For the “time travel” thing I’m almost positive they were accessing the multiverse but because HWR allowed it, it has to end up with tony dead which in turn prohibits anyone smart enough to figure it out again due to it being a dangerous thing to have on standby. I strongly believe that theres only one multiverse but like you said in your Kang video, I think HWR is just hiding from the branches that connect the multiverse to wherever the kang counsel is. Idk I’m making sense it’s kinda confusing lol

I can’t express how much I love in-universe MCU things (such as WHIH and this book).

Great video as always! I think it'd be great if tons of different characters got these kinds of novels before their movies so you can catch up on their story as well as read about a lot of stuff that Marvel wouldn't (and shouldn't) necessarily bother putting on-screen, in movie or even show form. I imagine the books could contain lots of minor Z-list villains that Feige would be 100% sure that they'd never use, just to make the universe even more realistic. They can't only have villains during the runtime of a movie, there should be smaller ones we just don't get to see for the sake of brevity, right?

If it wasn’t clear, I think the way he described time traveling to an ALTERNATE timeline would imply that there is in fact a difference between universes and timeline. Universes can have their own multiple sets of timelines. Because if the mcu is 616, alternate Lokis TVA file ended in 616 yet he is an alternate Loki not just a past Loki. Super interesting. So variants can’t mean a different version of an individual in a timeline and universe sense. I’d like to think all of the what if time lines obviously diverge from the sacred timeline. Where as something like the raimi films are a completely different universe. Super interesting

Oh DUDE!!! Thanks for this! I wanted to get the book but I’m broke right now so this video is exactly what I needed! I also hate reading LMAO

Thanks for breaking down the book. I’m thinking of getting that one and the MCU timeline book.

I would love more books just like this one to give us information about the MCU

Love these timeline breakdowns. I'm actually working on my own release order timeline for everything that ties into the Marvel Cinematic Multiverse. All movies, games, and even the TV shows ordered by the episode's air dates. It's gonna be a long journey.

18:00 - It just proves my point that everything that's been seen has not been alternate universes but alternate timelines in which they are still taking place within the MCU.

Thank you for making this video!

Awesome video, this was a lot more interesting than I thought it would be!

My Theory on the time heist and how they went to other timelines is... Kang is a future dependent of Stark in the MCU not Richard's. (I know it will upset some ppl) but... it's because Tony figured out time travel that eventually his great great great grandson (KANG) to find some old notes and re-discover it... So the events of end game had to happen for the sacred timeline to exist. (Also in loki season 1, a team agent said they had to do that) After our Kang (he who remains) finished the war he just isolated our timeline (sacred timeline) and patrolled all time past and future so that no one leads it to another multiverse war or another Kang finding us... Of corse after he dies Stuff goes crazy and we finally branch into the multiverse

Okay, here's my attempt at explaining the time heist. Be ready for another long comment of mine haha! Let's start from the line by Hulk: "If you travel to the past, that past becomes your future. And your former present becomes the past. Which can't now be changed by your new future". Weirdly enough, I have never though of this line as "confusing". It somehow clicked for me after the first couple of times that I heard it. To understand what this means, I believe, you have to look at it not from a general timeline perspective, but from the individual perspective of a single person who is time traveling. It's teally simple, if you think about it, but they intentionally made it confusing by mixing up the words past, present and future. I'll try my best to explain it. So, imagine Ant-Man. The time heist started in 2023. "If you travel to the past" (say, you go back to 2012, for the sake of argument), "that past becomes your future". This simply means that, now that Ant-Man is in 2012, that is now the future from his point of view, because he's experiencing it in first person, and things that haven't happened yet after the point he came in are still "in the future" for him. Then, after he has time traveled from 2023 to 2012, "your former present becomes the past", which is also true, in the sense that, again from his *individual* point of view, he has already experienced everything in 2023. So, *FOR HIM*, his former present (2023) is now the past, even though he now happens to be in 2012 because of the time travel. Consequently, if 2023 is now his past, it has already happened and, as Hulk says, it "can't be changed by your new future". What does this all mean? It clearly describes the branching of the timelines: if you start from 2023 and travel back to 2012, everything that you're about to experience after the time travel (2012 and beyond) is now "your future", meaning that it's uncertain and depending on your actions can be shaped in any way you want. But at the same time, everything that you left behind (the 2023 that you started from) is now "your past", meaning that it's locked and it cannot be influenced by what you do while time traveling. The only way these two things can happen simultaneously is if every time you time travel you create a new branch in the timeline and follow that, while your original timeline remains unchanged. That's what Scott probably means when he talks about "alternate timelines". That said, though, I don't think that people who say that time travel brings you to your own past are entirely wrong either. Because if you think of a new branch in the timeline, that branch must have stemmed from somewhere, right? Because it is a branch, it must be somehow related to your original timeline. It cannot be an entirely "alternate" timeline, in the sense that runs parallel to your original one, otherwise it wouldn't be a branch! What I believe happens during the time heist is that time travel moves you back along your *OWN* timeline, until you reach your destination. At that point, it creates a branch and places you on it. Think of it as a cart on rails: you put your cart in reverse and bring it back along the track, and then as soon as you come across the junction that you need, you switch tracks and start following the new one. That's what happened during the time heist in Endgame: the Avengers started in 2023, identified the most likely points in time in which they could find the Infinity Stones (I believe what Scott meant in the book is that they simply did a brainstorming: there's a montage in Endgame that shows exactly that, with all the Avengers in a room discussing where they could find each Stone based on their shared experiences with them), then split themselves in smaller groups and each group boarded a different cart that brought them to different points in the past. Then, after each group reached its destination, the cart "switched tracks" and started following the new branch. Each group then is now in a different branch, they find the respective Infinity Stones (which in the case of Steve and Tony requires one additional trip back to the 40s), and once they have them, they board the "cart" again, go back along the branch to that *SAME* junction and "switch back" to their original track and bring the Stones back home. Then, after the Battle of Earth, Steve takes all the Stones, boards the cart once more and revisits all the junctions one at a time to put the Stones back where they came from, thus deleting that branch from existence, as if nothing ever happened. Then, seeing that they had finally won, he decided to go back once more and live his life with Peggy. But (and here's the big question) did this happen on a different timeline or on the main one? I don't think we have enough information to answer this question, at least until the timeline book comes out, but we can speculate. Option 1 is that, after he finished replacing the Stones, he took one last trip back in time and thus created one final branch where he lived his life happily with Peggy and then simply traveled back once more as an old man to give the shield to Sam. I guess one possible way to check would be to count how many Pym Particle charges he had on himself when he left and trace all the trips back and forth, to see if he had enough to make that additional trip, but I don't think the movie ever tells us exactly how many he had when he left (we should check). Option 2, on the other hand would be that, while he was on the very last branch, after he replaced the last stone in the 40s, he boarded in his little cart and, instead of going back to the main timeline at the junction and proceeding forward to go back to 2023, he simply stopped right there at the junction and kept reliving the main timeline from there. This would create some kind of closed time loop, kinda like in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, where Harry and Hermione go back in time only to realize that they had always been there, meaning that at any point during the story there were always two Harry and two Hermione running around. In this case, during the whole Phases 1 to 3 of the MCU we should have two Steve Rogers simultaneously alive on the same timeline: one is the one that we follow during the movies that eventually goes back in time in the time heist and defeats Thanos, and the other is the "old" Steve who has already lived through all that and only shows up at the very end to give the shield to Sam. Some could say that it would be weird for "old" Steve to let all the MCU play out and allow all those tragedies to happen while he already knew how it would play out, but this could simply be explained with the fact that if he had intervened in any way the "young" Steve could not have taken the trip back in time, thus breaking the loop. Another possible counterargument to both options would be Steve's age: considering that his ageing is significantly slowed down by the Super Soldier Serum, in order to grow to that old age that we see at the end of Endgame, he should have lived many, many years, and Peggy would have most likely died before him. But this is probably irrelevant, because in both cases he lives the entire MCU timeline twice: once with all the Avengers as we see in the movies, and then a second time with Peggy (either in a new branch or in the background of the main timeline). In any case, he lives twice as much and has enough time to grow old with Peggy, without introducing any plotholes. Personally, I think that both these options are equally likely, so at this point only the timeline book can explain us what truly happened. Sorry again for the very long comment, but this is a complex issue that requires a bit of time and care to explain properly, especially the analogy with the cart and the tracks (and it might not even be correct haha!)

finally it’s out!! glad to see you picked it up. thank you for this haha

I guess by "Alternate Timeline", we should take into account that any change made during time travel can generate a variation. If it's not a big change (talking to Ancient One or Frigga, for example), that variantion still exist, as part of the main flow. I mean, the Timeline was always shown as a rope since Endgame, with a baseline (the MCU we know) at the center, and the little strands on the side, which of course can (and generally does) lead to Branches.

I’m very excited go read this someday, but not nearly as excited as I am to pour over the timeline book!

about the immortality thing, this wouldn't be the first time the Avengers had access to space-age technology and kept it from the public. that's basically been the MCU's whole deal since 2008 if you think about it. like, despite arc reactors being this big thing in the iron man trilogy, i don't think we've ever seen them actually used anywhere normal people live. it's actually one of my biggest issues with the MCU

I'm glad you made a video about this as I would have never bought it personally. Some nice little gleams either way. I wonder if the "you try entertaining a 10 year old" was meant more as a general statement regarding young kids and not specifically identifying Cassie's age but it is really dumb. And while it states they chose alternate timelines for the infinity stones it doesn't dismiss the idea of Steve being in the main timeline but I guess if he went to an alternate 1940s then it would make sense to not be the main timeline but still very confusing. We need a Steve Rogers autobiography, because it's never explained why Steve didn't return back to the present like Hulk expected him to. But also some parts of this sound wild and kind of amazing.

I wanna point out that the October phone also said it was a Friday- not a school night…. Another thing is that we know she was six, setting her birthday as early fall 2009. So if she’s 18 in Quantumania, it would take place in 2027 or even 2028. And while Disney + isn’t very reliable, it has Quantumania before the GOTG3 but after the Holiday Special. We know the Special is in late 2025, and judging Groot’s growth Guardians 3 would be sometime in 2026- maybe spring. Which would fit the existing theory of it being in 25-6 ish (I’m gonna watch your Quantumania timeline video after this which might explain)

That "Empire Strikes back Move" is from The Brave Little Tailor from the Brothers Grimm fairytale. Triggers me everytime I watch CW. But of on the other hand Spidy is just a kid probably doesn't know that.

Great video once again. This should tie me over till I get the book myself.

notification squad assemble!

cant wait to check out the book, im 100% checking out the timeline book first but this will also a fun read

I was half expecting this book to be full of stupid jokes, just like the quotes heard in quantumania, but it seems to be actually be pretty good and a fun tie in to the mcu. I've not bought or read it myself but I enjoyed hearing parts of it in this video. It even includes information we never knew, such as Scott being conscious in his different age bodies

Great video, this book was a fun insight on Scott view of many things. One character I hope we get introduced to especially in the multiverse sage is Captain Britain and the Captain Britain corp.

This is going to be interesting!

Love your channel man! Hi from Brazil

I'm pretty sure Clint was A-OK with Scott revealing his identity. 1. I'm not sure it was ever secret, but 2. People know who Clint is in the Hawkeye show, and if he wasn't okay with it, he probably would've said something before the book was released.

Haven’t got it yet but can’t wait to read it

I think it pretty cool if in thunderbolts yelena out of curiosity buys this book reads it and cries when she gets to Natasha’s death. Narratively it wouldn’t be needed(she already forgave Clint in the Hawkeye show) but it be a nice callback

Very in depth 😅 love it

I love watching your videos, keep it up

Great video, it adds some really interesting stuff to the mcu, I want to get this book and read it for myself after hearing all this. Now that this book is out I’m curious would you consider doing videos on The Wakanda Files and The Book of The Vishanti (not sure if the latter one is canon though) I’ve always been interested to know more about those because as far as I know they’re the only other two in universe books for the mcu. Also really underrated that they’re continuing to keep WHIH newsfront canon. I’ve had a lot of discussions lately with the new timeline book about how it supposedly confirms all the pre Disney plus shows aren’t canon because it says “everything” is in this book. WHIH is one of the leading factors I have to dismiss those claims, it’s on Disney plus, it’s said to be canon over and over again with little to no contradictions but yet it’s seemingly not in the timeline book (though it’s not released yet so I could be wrong). Frankly I think that “everything” line was just for marketing purposes and can’t possibly be accurate

When I first heard, that there would be a reallive version of Scott Langs book, I thought " What a cash grab" but I seems cooler now, thx

As someone who goes with the October phone date (for now, I’m open to changing it depending on the book). Cassie’s birthday would fall on September 25th. Carson tells Cross he’ll be back in 2 weeks and the phone date says October 9th when he returns. The problem is this is a Friday, so doesn’t work with the school night line. It looks like whether you go with August or October, there’s an issue. It’ll be interesting to see what the book settles with. I always went with the phone date since it felt deliberate given it shows Friday October 9th which is after the movie’s release and not just a production date that made it through. Plus I felt certain scenes had more of a Fall feel. Like after Casie’s party the color in the leaves on the tree are changing and there’s dropped leaves around Scott’s van.

It's always interesting when they do stuff like this. The Jurassic World franchise did something similar with a book describing Claire's past before the events of JW1. My favourite part is quotes on the back of the book. There is even Christine Everhart in there, which I think is a nod to WHIH Newsfront since they only interacted there and she was quite aggressive towards him at the time which makes her quote funnier 😂 I hope Marvel will put all WHIH Newsfront episodes on D+ in a dedicated section soon. EDIT: I just realized that in the same back cover they address Sam as Captain America, so the book must have came out after FaWS in universe.

I think they should do more in-universe book like this. Imagine a Star-Lord book

I think that MCU book that is about the history of the MCU will mention the original plan for the MCU back in 2004 before they got The Rights back to Iron Man in November 2005 The original plan was going to consist of 10 movies released from 2008 with some releasing 2 a year The original lineup of movies was going to conclude with an Avengers movie which is going to consist of the following in the order with some of these characters being in the order that their films would’ve been released other to clarify we only know that the first character who I’m about to mention movie would’ve originally been the first MCU movie but the original lineup for The Avengers would’ve consisted of Captain America, Nick Fury, Hawkeye, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Ant-Man, Shang-Chi, Cloak & Dagger & Power Pack

Damn, what a cool book, thanks for the breakdown

It would be nice to see marvel do more like this. Instead of so many shows and movies, I'd love in-universe books or podcasts or even the in-universe avengers comics retelling the story of phase one

I really wish we got to see Clint and Bruce taking Scott out to lunch lol

I really thought you were making out that like Yelena had no clue about Natasha‘s death until the book but then I realized oh yeah, I remember the fact that she had no clue Clint didn’t kill her, but she sacrificed herself

I like to think that Scott _purposely_ made his explaination of the Time Heist confusing in his book just in case someone with the wrong idea would recreate the Time Machine from Avengers Endgame and create a whole mess of chaos. As he said in a Q&A in the book; "Q: Can you explain how the Time Heist worked?" "A: No, I cannot."

Great breakdown

17:50 And that's exactly how they could bring back Steve anytime they want.

This sounds really interesting! Would love to win the contest and get it

Something that I only just thought off about the blip while watching this video is that, if a zoo or farm of animals like ostriches were to shut down during the blip because of the poor economy, once the animals came back there would have been too much to deal with before they begin breeding, causing massive invasive populations in quickly-breeding animals throughout the world.

At the beginning of endgame you can hear the birds slowly disappearing in the background during the scene with Hawkeye

This was a good video. I will wait personally to read this until it comes to librarys in Finland.

I'm ready for this video

The MCU time travel has always been a ridiculous mess, but I think your understanding of it is the most accurate.

you ever heard about the wakanda files? just like LOFTLG, it's a book that's in-universe. although this one is written by shuri. the book is a technological exploration of the avengers and beyond. some editions even have special pages that can only be read under blacklight! would love a vid on it if possible.

I’m just assuming “alternate timeline” means they are traveling there, and thus creating a TVA-approved branch (no dangerous versions of Kang/HWR/Loki SHOULD pop up or something like that idk). Because yes, a multiverse exists on the sacred timeline, but these were SO CLOSE to the sacred timeline, I think the alternate timelines were created by them being there if that works/makes sense.

Now that we have the book, I want the Ant-Man podcast that was referenced in Ms. Marvel, just put Paul Rudd into a recording studio and let him run wild as Scott!

It's so weird that the first piece of canon that acknowledges Sam Wilson as Captain America post-TFATWS it's this book about another character published more than two years after the series. Meanwhile no hint in the actual content of the movies and shows that Wilson is actively doing anything Captain America related.

Great video as always! I really enjoyed the breakdown! So, after doing some math, I believe the book to have been published in late-March 2025. If Clint and Bruce asked Scott to write in maybe late-November-early-December 2023, he'd begin writing right away and maybe be done by May-June 2024? Google says it's at minimum 9 months from the moment a book it's finished until its publication, so that would make sense. Then the book tour would start in mid-March 2025 and by early-May, where we see the book tour is "continuing"! Also, I do hope Ant-Man is set in October 2015...

I dont know how to fully reconcile everything we have heard about time travel in the MCU. So much is conflicting 😢. Best i understand(read:head canon until i hear more definitively): Each timeline can branch smaller timelines (a lá Superior Strange's timeline manipulation in What If) where there are certain immutable events pivotal to that timeline(s). If a branch becomes different enough and robust enough to start branching out more timelines then that branch becomes a Major Timeline. Possibly the with the Major Change that originally created that branch becoming immutable for that branch (because smaller branches depend on the major branch). So Superior Strange kept creating minor Branches and since none of them became a Major Branch they were all still mostly connected (enough for the Ancient One to utilize) and all dependant on the Lynchpin for that Major Branch: Christine's Death. So thats my theory: Until a branch is importantant enough to become a Major Branch, theyre still largely connected so the timelines the Avengers went to are likely new minor branches of 616 (maybe 616-a, 616-b, etc). And thats why multiverse hopping is so dangerous, each Major Branch has different Lynchpins. Anyway, thats how im interpreting it all untill we get more. Hopefully from Loki2.

Wouldn't the book had to have been released prior to Hawkeye so that the general public would be aware of his presence at the Alt-2012 Battle of New York? Thus allowing the writer to add him in.

Steve went to the alternate timelines, put the stones back and then when to his own timeline to peggy instead of returning in 5 seconds , he had always had returned but in 1945.

I have a theory that when ‘time was pulled through Scott’ in endgame he was actually returned to the body of a younger version of himself. This is the only explanation for how Paul Rudd still looks so young 😁

27:19 that part is actually so sad 😭

Since you can't reach the same timeline twice, how do you return the stones if you can't go back to the place you stole them from. Wouldn't you just be creating a new timeline where you returned the stones, leaving the timelines you took them from screwed? I honestly thought Tony's time/space GPS is what gave the Avengers the ability to slide across (616 or 19999) whatever. Ya know, just the one timeline. Lol I love that movie.

I'm so close to getting this book it's a slow process I'm so busy 😂

I will not rest until we get a Paul Rudd audiobook

I'm kinda surprised he didn't give any perspective from the people who got dusted, would of been interesting

I hope there is an audiobook version

Both the MCU lore and Scott Lang's self help sounds interesting

This makes me think that Ant-Man and the Wasp Quantumania takes place in October 2026, so that means Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 which is during August 2026 happens before!

Hope they make agent of shield canon

pre video watching comment: I'm not sure which I'm more stoked for..… more paul rudd brilliance, more scott lang brilliance, or both tbh 😁🤣#defwannaread

I still think things like social media would have still been up and running during the 5 year blip. So the Endgame battle could still have been witnessed by civilians and their accounts spread online. Leading to people like Kamala becoming fangirls/boys of some of the heroes.

I wonder if in the timeline book will they mention when Scott was asked to write the book and when he wrote it

I think you can jump into your own time, thats what kang does , goes back in time not jump to other timelines. Tony didnt want to change things because of morgan. It would change like days of future past. Suddenly they would have returned to 2023 where there might be 2023 versions of them that never went back in time to save time. And everyone else wouldnt have blipped for 5 years. They wouldnt be able to go back to their past 2023. The past becomes present and the future becomes past.

35:02 I wonder how would your channel look like in the MCU. Do you post videos like: "When does The Battle of Earth happen in the Real Life Timeline?"?

Does Scott say anything about the Guardians in this book? I’d imagine he’d comment on Nebula calling him an idiot in the landing zone and Rocket asking if he wants to go to space!

If there’s not a mention of his podcast or an interview from that podcast in the book that’s a real shame.

Somethings going to happen to big green soon about his monster self from the Pass coming back

Maybe Dr. Strange skimmed the book while astral-projecting himself in his sleep.

do we know what exact day endgame takes place? Because we're coming up to that date soon

heard decent things about this book

22:24 I dont mean to overstep, I love your work, but I think that is what he meant. I got the book but haven't read it yet. I made a video on tiktok about Tony's bday discrepancy, that's what's missing from your timeline. You thought it was an error in your other video, but it wasn't . This explains his confusion in Endgame with his mom's pregnancy.

Kate knows who Hawkeye is in Hawkeye so I think it’s out there now just not the location of his home and stuff like that

But wouldn't the avengers going back in time and "branching" their own timelines by being there just create an alternate timeline in that point forward? In that way both the Russos and the writers would be correct. So Scott and the gang would go back to their own timeline which would become paralel to their original timeline at the point they arrived.

The ants took it 😂😂 the picture

If the book is published in early 2025, does that mean the podcast mentioned in Ms Marvel came after? It would make sense.

Are you gonna breakdown the art book for spider verse

But technically, also, the Avengers knew she died after Clint came back alone

So I believe that they asked Scott to write it in November 2023