You mean every fucking body they passed

Yeah, and driving the wrong side of the road 😉

😅😅😅😅

Pickering village I had no clue

I work at a heritage railway and there's a steam train that visits about once a year. The line also crosses a dual carriageway with plenty of traffic and I just love thinking about how they must feel watching a little tank engine roll across at no more than 10 miles per hour

it was much better than horses

@@yn1578 not if you died in half the time using this machine then a horse. only the horses died from overworking not the humans from inhaling these fumes

@@hotbowlofstu9228 "half the time" is a bit of a stretch most people probably died from road accidents at speed, which was probably not much more than horse related accidents, fume inhalation health issue's would only really occur in later life and would include the majority of people in civilised countries including people who used horse's primarily, which is why most people used to die in their sixties and fifties.

@@Aman-fv5if its faster thats why .nothing about being safer it's all about making it happen faster

@@Aman-fv5if I didn't realise horses could blow up and kill( horses killed people but not nearly as often as the conditions int he industrial age or burn a person's skin off most of there bodies. people today still use horses but they don't use steam engines I wonder why

With double acting steam engines. Every stroke is a power stroke.

It would be if they could transfer the power better

Только паровая машина предназначалась не для современного климата (если вода замёрзнет, то котёл лопнет). Это означает, что в то время не было зимы! Only the steam engine was not intended for the modern climate (if the water freezes, the boiler will burst). This means that there was no winter at that time!

@@constructor910 there was winter in those days but they just kept the boiler hot at all times.

@@constructor910 Russia had lots of steam trains, you know. That is the exact same thing

or whether you want to get steamrolled. Once in a lifetime experience.

Don't imagine too many cars would attempt a bluff at a roundabout.

احسنت

Ya know when they slow down it heats up. Lol.. not just shear weight but slow them down when hot? Nope !

In alaskA they say that the biggest rig has the right of way.

8 tons!?

drove one round a rally field when i was about 13

Tom big m

He’s a big boy

Everything comes from organized chaos 😉💯

...and you can cook during the travel lol

Plenty people have tried

What the hell is a roundabout? Just kidding. I have seen Benny Hill. I know all about you Brits.

@@BobMarley-bp6sh are you poking fun at roundabouts cause they are 10 times smarter then a stop sign America has finally started using them on outskirts of city's where they are expanding

Now that is a vehicle that commands respect. What a beast.

@@doubleboost Yes and failed, this old girl would make licence plates out of cars. Much respect from Australia.

а щас что, фальшивые? 😂🤭

@@alexshrek6144 про всех не скажу, но народ сильно обмелчал.

❤

I'd guess fast enough for most city traffic these days and you got a steam fire-extingiusher🧯

EPA will shut it down because 'feelz'.

Сам ты дизель это паровой движ

Indeed. This thing probably puts out enough torque to twist a modern Case-IH Magnum like a pretzel.

hehehehe,

Он сказал нахуй дизиль.дрова лучше

@Delon Duvenage With all the pollution It's rather horses that we will see again.

@@cultofpersonalit1888 no people will just destroy the ozone before they stop then everything on the planet will die

@@hotbowlofstu9228 I gurantee all our great great x10 grandkids will be dead and gone so calm down Greta

@@ricochetey they will be dead with no ozone nimrod

@@hotbowlofstu9228 take a chill pill

Dude, he could smoke a whole goddam calf on that thing!

That's the fireman/co-driver's job -- shovel coal and brew the tea.

What about a digiorno frozen pizza.

Nah He can Make Smoked beef in his exhaust too😂

I believe they have!

No, a steam engine.

@@truecamvidea5881 I have got that, but there were steam turbines, and still are. I was, still am, curious, as to why the engines, in these trucks, turned at much higher rpm than steam locomotives and tractors.

@@wmden1mechanics, physics, a larger mass spins slower, these trucks had smaller components and less mass hence higher Rpm to make power

British-mechanic ,go to Yorkshire and ride the steam bus

Steam is always cool but it would be more convenient if the boiler was converted to burn kerosene. Coal is dirty and you have to keep shoveling it in.

Kerosene burns too hot for steam usage. It would destroy the temper on the boiler plates! That said, I am curious if any of these had been converted to be oil-fired.

@@Novusod Nah coal is fine and cooler. Don't be a brainwashed pansy.

@@tanall5959 About that, there have been several kerosene burning steam cars.

ro eng it be cheaper to make one as to buy one would be an artifact and would be extremely expensive

ro eng me too

ro eng same sir same

Beautynice.steam.truck

I will convert mine to burn fuel oil for the boiler so I will not have to shovel a lot and I can go out by myself, without anybody else. I will have a steamy good time! I am looking for a 1935 S-Type with the four cylinder engine. It ran so very smooth and did not have all the unneeded, "refinements," of later steam lorries. Everyone knows when something is advertised with added, "refinements," it just means those worthless gizmos will break sooner than later. It also means less heavy duty parts that will break easier.

Da

No

VW till take care of that...

sure

Yes

only in England. Can you imagine sitting on that boiler in Phoenix ?

@@slowpokebr549 You'd have to carry an extra ten gallons of water just just replenish what you sweat out.

Can't imagine during the summer...🔥

Some English steam locomotives have a little shelf on the front of the boiler for a tea kettle.

@Stimpy&Ren and make a fryup aswell!

😂😂😂😂

Virgin Diesel Vapours vs Chad Coal Soot Fumes

a cancer man

@@atruebrit6452 ?

@@atruebrit6452 do you mean it will give you cancer?

@@cyborglion4179 what do you think all that soot is doing to your lungs?

@@atruebrit6452 well, that is true.

😁🤣🤣🤣🤣

That would’ve been scary af

@@thegeforce6625 They were getting rare by that time so I was pleased to have seen them doing what they were designed to do. Most big ships in Southampton at that time were also steamers. Grand day out which included a trip on the ferry to the Isle of Wight. What stayed in my mind was an amazingly ramshackle steam dredger with a very low freeboard and a load of complication on deck. I was lucky to see SS United States, SS Canberra, RMS Queen Elizabeth, RMS Queen Mary, LaFrance, Fairland, Fairwind, SS Neu Amsterdam, RMS Queen Elizabeth 2, SS Capetown Castle and many big crude carriers. To be honest I can't remember which were SS and which were RMS, but anyway they all looked fantastic! Of them all, the QE2 looked the best to my eye, though of course that one came later. For some reason I don't understand, the 'Zing' brand of fizzy pop has stuck in the memory too. Oh yes... steam locos ruled the LSWR mainline expresses and semis too :-)

😂

Ну да у нас бы давно в металлолом сдали и деньги пропили это же так скрепно

👍

Kenneth Dunn And how many Miles Per Gallon of water?

Buddy Clem coal lump was better.

Sandra Weindel You're not aware how much of an issue was replenishing the water supply on steam locomotives? Range was mostly limited by water before coal. Presumably it would be a similar story with a road-going vehicle.

Unsafe Velocities I think she meant that her miles per coal lump was funnier. It was funny enough for me to reply. Old steam engines did need lots of coaling stations and water towers to keep running. I remember an experimental Buick (GM) that ran on powdered coal, but it kept on fouling out the spark plugs.

Buddy Clem Oh, yeah, I realised what was meant. I just thought the significance of what you said had been missed. Because a mainline express locomotive usually has between 8 and 10 tons of coal (some more, some less) in the tender. That was, I believe, enough make long distance runs between stopping stations. However, in Britain such a locomotive would have around 5000 gallons of water. In Australia you can roughly double that figure, sometimes nearly triple, but for the same about of coal. Line-side water tanks must have been further apart, and that was the problem. Probably took on coal at more stops in Australia than Britain anyway, but the ratio is the key. I think I remember reading about that Buick too.

Yeah scalding hot water and embers to compliment the crash.

I doubt anything would happen to this looking at how solid it is built. On the other hand whatever it hits probably won't be recognisable

Будущее России, когда цена бензина станет как в Европе.

Да и уголь уже не дешевый

@@user-lc3kd4pu7x Зато можно валежник собирать! Он, конечно, такой жар, как уголь, не даст, но хоть что-то ))

Не будет она наших внуков радовать, она будет их внуков радовать.

sKAVURSKA

They should have converted them to oil or gas fired. So many technical innovations missed cuz stubbornness with gas and diesel engines.

Чтобы бы у вас раковых заболеваний лёгких не было ,астма , хронический бронхит, хрупкие кости и.т.д🇷🇺 И чтобы природа раньше времени от рук человека не погибла

K

This truck was made at least 60 years after diesel trucks and petrol cars

коробки передач там точно нет. Главная передача + промежуточный редуктор. Скорость регулируется оборотами паровой машины.

вообще ничего не показали по сути) Можно было бы какой-то обзор основных характеристик сделать, с разных ракурсов показать агрегат...