Serie A domination 🔥💪🏻

@@Libzalii Mh ok. Try to put Pelè in this league, at this era. You cannot compare the numbers of a brazilian league of the 60s with the numbers of the golden age of world football of the 80-90s! PS. Napoli won european cup the year before

@@CDFiOS yes and he is probably counting the regionals leagues that have a lot of bad teams now ( imagine in that age )

@@danteadolfobalbi3279 😂😂😂 yes, that's the ridiculous thing about these pseudo-statistics

Only 3 foreigners allowed in each team, the best league there will ever be and the other teams around Europe could still compete at this time, football is f****d now, only teams from the big leagues can win and all the top talent is so condensed into a handful of teams

@@Libzalii I find it very weird that you decided to do all this research and write a comment that is this detailed , whitout actually answering a question, argument or statement that is relevant to your answer. I do presumsjon that you have saved this answer and is just copying and pasting it in Wheeler you want, but still.

@@benardboateng1501 C'mon...@hussein made several mistakes using statistics without to know the matter.

@@Libzalii pele played against plumbers maradona played against footballers

@@ericbrono1751 you don’t have to disrespect the man to elevate the the one you are fun of. Compare what Maradona did in the biggest stages and what Pele did, and is very clear that Pele was better by a bit. I wonder if you were one of the plumbers that Pele played against? If you are, then you have a point.

Those training drills at start of this video gives me chills🤔💪💯🙌💥🔥👊

1980-2000

@@nonamer0o016 if it was a 20 year period.. then I agree with you 100%

@@fredthegoat908 serie a was already going down the drain in 2000s.

1980-2000

1984-2003

I think the spanish league was way more better in the 90's there are some teams that competing with Barcelona and Real Madrid La Coruna have a great team Betis was too good Sevilla that Maradona played too Valencia with Romario Ortega and other players Atletico Madrid with Vieri Simeone Stochkov Koeman in Barcelona Laudrup in Madrid Redondo Celta de Vigo was a great team back then Alaves that won against Liverpool of Owen in 2000 the best Yugoslavian players was playing in the Spanish league of 90's Bilbao was decent comparing the 90's Spanish League to the 2010's it's totally wrong was good only because of Cristiano and Messi and Barcelona and Real Madrid dinasty these days

@@ryol5587 Well, you think absolutely wrong my friend. The quality of football, strength of the teams is totally on Italian side. Their clubs were winning titles in almost all eruopean competitions, played so many european tournament's finals. Barcelona was also humiliated by Milan in 1994. Spanish league was good, but not as much as last two decades. Because in the last two decades you had Real, Barca, Atletico, Sevilla(winning Europe league every year, Valencia(2000's), Villarreal, Bilbao(also winning some titles). Spanish league was maybe very good before, but Italian was scientifically proven as the best. All the best players were coming there and the quality and beauty of football was happening exactly there.

@@peacefulwarrior7954 I didn't say that was better than the Italy i wrote that was better of the today's spanish league there's no doubt italian League was the best in 90's

@@ryol5587 oooh, all right. If we talk about that, I am sure that Barcelona was not so good as with Pep Guardiola, the same as Real like with Zidane. It was maybe more romantic football, but Spanish clubs have totally dominated european football last 2 decades as I wrote in the previous comment.

@@ryol5587 that’s why the channel posted also many nice conclusions from the least favorite teams...we all now the ratio off legends was way higher in the Italian league..many teams had incredible trios even if 5th or 6th in the league and these legacy almost resisted until 2010 starting far back...in the early 20es/30es an average Italian player was payed 5 times a English league one... player price records from the 20es to 2010 were most likely made in Italy...yes it’s also because of the money from the mafia but 🤷‍♂️ the Spanish impact on football is great but serie a wrote some rules

Or hell

@@brianlaudrupchannel why hell?

@@NoName-hg6cc hell to play there for alot of people. Bergkamp found it too tough to play there for example

@@brianlaudrupchannel well, if you play with the best you know it will be though

the English league was suspended until 92 due to the heysel tragedy and there it was renamed PL

@@Libzalii who even asked you to compare pele and Maradona.

@@Libzalii You would be a good math teacher for an elementary school, but football is clearly NOT your field of expertise. Comparing 2 all time greats is a big mistake on its own, and the only thing you provide is just numbers of superficial stats, without any insight or context.

How did serie a sink so low?

@@dmw798 because of calciopoli, see a vid bro. Anyway if you saw serie a this year it was completely different and very competitive

Ok!

Very true my friend which many people don't mention, all in all I feel like the Bosman rule brought more negatives than positives in hindsight. If forced clubs to only recruit 3 foreign players so you had to make them count, but also it forced teams to focus a lot more on their academies and bringing up homegrown players, which is something that's dying overall in football.

Well said.

@@Libzalii without Spain🙄

Y sin Uruguay, ni la mística, ni la historia, ni los huevos, ni hazañas.

@@royreny4199without Spain it will still be the same, Spain not impactful except for Real Madrid and Barcelona and majority are foreign players

Football without Brazil, Italy Germany Argentina and Uruguay will not be Football

​@@royreny4199pass mercahnt system😂😂😂😂😂

@@Libzalii Brasil without pele 1962 won the world cup. He only played the group stage

Now football is a dead sports.

'70, '80 e '90, non solo '80 ;)

@@marcofuina9736 not 70s

@@dmw798 anche '70, fratello.

e quando in Italia giocava Sivori, Piola, Meazza, Valentino Mazzola, Facchetti nel resto del mondo, tolto il Real di Di Stefano, c'era poca roba.

Considering that most of the italian national team who won the euros plays or played in Italy until the end of the transfer window, Serie A doesn’t look that bad. I’d rather just say football as a whole has changed for the worse, with the game being played without sweepers, liberos, creative play being made obsolete by overwhelming pressing and ball retention has become what manager want from the players rather than individual brilliance. This is why modern football stars aren’t comparable to the legends, back then you had to fish out individual plays on a consistent basis, day by day, while now you can go through the motions as it’s more of an athletic contest. It’s the americanisation of football, stats, athletic ability (defenders having to be taller than 6’2 lol cannavaro and baresi beg to differ) team cohesion and tactical philosophy is more important than FUN.

Arguably the 4th best number 9 of Brasil, after R9, Baixinho, Leonidas

He was convinced by Maradona to go to Napoli he personally called him and begged to come Care a said I couldn’t refuse Diego plead

E la serie B e la serie C anche erano difficilissime e durissime

Il Bari, tanto per fare un esempio, ha avuto Jarni Platt e Boban

@@francesco4302 Oddio, è vero! Ricordo Jarni, ma lo sai che invece avevo completamente rimosso Boban al Bari?

@@TShelby eh si, un giovanissimo Zvonimir

Se facciamo un salto di qualche anno ricordiamo il Foggia con Bryan Roy

Yes Battistuta ( who played with Fiorentina in serie B) said Italian serie B was like any top league in the world then

And he would get the living crap kicked out of him in every game.

@@Libzalii Damn... you're quite annoying with the same dumb comment over and over.

Most of these "footballers" didn't grow up playing in the streets. So you can tell from the jump that they aren't all that

diver haha kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j55lpZiU0bXQc6c.html

¡Si!

@@Libzalii And this kids, is why football is not maths nor statistics... btw, Argetina won a worldcup 100% because of Maradona and reached a final with his left ankle like a baloon, and regardless, the allpowerful germany had to be granted a doubtful penalty to beat the ever critic of FIFA, Maradona Napoli never won a scudetto prior to Maradona, and never after, the same with a UEFA cup where he would defeat Bayern Munchen and Juventus among other... What Maradona did with anything round, a tangerine, a tennis ball, a golf ball, whatever, is not described by numbers. It was art, poetry, and on top of that, always fought for his fellow teammates and football players (like defending Suarez when he was expelled from even the hotel and his teammates in Southafrica because of the biting while Pele and Platini were in favor of the sanction), against the mafia of FIFA, against the will of the tv (creating the footballers union, of which he was the first president because,among other things, the TV making them play midday in summer time in Mexico 86 for Europe's viewers, for ex). Pele was never the most important player of Brazil when they won the worldcup. Regardless of his fantastic goal being 17 at the final, he was a substitue in previous matches, or his famous header in 1970, he was old for football standards and Brazil would have been champion with or without him that year. Sadly, in his best years (1962 and 1966) he was fouled out, and nevertheless Brazil became champions without him in 1962 with Garrincha and Didi... So, the statictics don't show the real story. The reality is that when most matter, that is playing for your country and in a worldcup. Pele was never the most important player for Brazil, becoming champions even without him. Of course he had tremendous matches and scored fantastic goals, such as the one at the final in 1958. Maradona, on the other hand, SINGLE HANDEDLY won Mexico 1986. I'm old enough to have watched many worldcups (1986 entirely), but anyway, now I guess you can find them here in youtube, and his utter dominance has never been matched in a worldcup. He did everything. And then, with another below average squad, made magic when most mattered (that is, dribbled half od Brazil's team to assist Caniggia) leading Argentia to another final, against all odds, against the home/local country Italy, and losing with a debatable penalty. almost 4 years later, in 1993, whenArgentina almost couldn't qualify and had to play vs Australia to get its word cup ticket, who was called? Yes, Maradona. After drug positive tests and out of shape years at Sevilla and few matches in Newels, he went to a famr and got in shape by his own, like Rocky in RockyIV. He again reached in peak form to the world cup and was kicked out when ARgentina was a clear favorite, after his and the teams level showed in the first two matches, testing positive for drinking an energy drink with levels that today would not be considered positive. How did Argentina after Diego was DQ? Lost both matches. Mafia at its best. While one declared how dirty the FIFA was, and later found to be true, the other was the poster boy. The antihero vs the role model. The one that the people voted as the best of the century vs the one that had to win because FIFA had to invent another poll so Maradona would not be the sole player of the century. You can create as much statistics as you want, but you cearly know nothing abouth football. Ask people in Naples about Maradona and ask in Santos about Pele, ask in Argentina and in Brazil. In Brazil they even like more Garrincha, or Ronaldinho or Ronaldo, and in Santos Neymar, where as in Argentina or Naples, everybody loves Diego, because when it mattered the most (beating Juve/Inter/Milan in the best calcio era, and leading Argentina to one WC and another final) he was there, leading. All his teammates and contemporaries (Gullit, Matheus, Baggio, Zola, etc) adore Maradona, unlike Pele. Brazil was exceptional with or without Pele, they won the worldcup without him and was never the best player nor the one who played the most in ANY of squads of Brazil's 3 WC in Pele's era. Keep up the numbers, luckily, football is an art, is not beisball, is not math. Bye

@@Libzalii Using numbers to explain football players is such a disrespectful thing for such a passionate driven Game!! If u talk numbers, u don't know shit about football!

@@Libzalii Such a masterful feat. Right or wrong (I definitely agree that Pelé is SLIGHTLY better than Maradona) you made a great job!!

Currently no lol,in the past yes.

He actually was a hell of a player