yup

Even I've challenged Magnus many times but he was afraid to accept the challenge.

@@leenkotob6144 same bro

neither me bro

You forgot to mention even polgar hasn't defeated you

Wait how is this even possible?

@@theanonymouslegion4811 didnt have 3 gm norms

@@theanonymouslegion4811 no gm norms

@@theanonymouslegion4811 Sometimes weird things happen because of the rules. GM Wang Hao was never an IM, despite being top 10 at one point.

@@theanonymouslegion4811 It also depends on time period, Nowadays 12 year olds are getting GM norms, Many prodigies are coming up and reaching 2500-2600 in just 17-18 years so Earlier there were definitely not many strong players except 10 -20 whom we know,So its possible.

No way are you the real rhythm 🥁 no kappa ur brain is dating me

It's great to see you here! Your videos are such a treat!

Your videos are great. Have you stopped or are you going to continue doing it?

We need some more visual essays from you bro!! Some of the best content on KZfaq

41:42

Seriously. I don't understand why one needs separate tournaments for men and women in a game of memory, imagination and intellect.

@@anbee8127 as a female chess player, I really agree. There is no difference in the talent of women in chess, it’s just misogyny that has made girls less likely to be pushed in the game. Stereotypes of men being more intelligent and logical mean talented women are less likely to be coached to their full potential. + if you just take a look at how many women are treated online in the chess world, it’s truly despicable.

@@esme6069 I’m going to agree, But this mysoginy also led to less girls to enjoy chess and since polgar there hasn’t anyone that great to compete with the top GMs. It’s truly sad but hopefully the future changes this cause Judit Polgar clearly showed that women can be just as good as men, if not better than most.

@@diyanshu5573 exactly , I completely agree. Young girls are much less likely to want to go into chess/continue because of the misogyny. I remember watching a Carlsen vs Nakamura match with a female host, and many in the comments section kept critiquing her judgement solely because she was a ‘dumb woman’.

@@esme6069 I agree to the fact but what the "men" is an open tournament and women can join if they wish to , ik this is misogyny but it's due to late appraisal in women chess in comparison to the men. It's sadly a vicious cycle where sponsors don't give to women players, due to which lack of funding is caused, causing not so good level practice by players

Porus the UNDEFEATED

@UCyCmBIFgh7iWrDtUVR9LLWg It's difficult to count up all the things that are wrong with this horribly misinformed comment, but suffice it to say you aren't making a great case for that IQ claim.

@@cybrancommander5993 imagine shaming someone because they admire a professional chess player, she's way above average, also imagine using nerd or simp as pejorative terms to shame people

@@cybrancommander5993 you seem more than a bit slow.

@@cybrancommander5993 Wow! Very edgy!

Lol

😂😂

It would be cool for the female chessworld, if Carlsen or Hikaru would become transgender women.

@@knuthansen8524 what even...

@@knuthansen8524 Just like it would be great for female sports if some male athletes came out as trans and then... oh wait...

Wartimes suck

Pia cramling was also a very talented chessplayer

yee they really drop the ball on that one, it's not like judith's games are someone's copyright I don't think chess works like that

@@rastrisfrustreslosgomez544 the Queens gambit is based on a book with the same title, they simply followed the source material. (It's loosely based on the life of bobby fisher in case you didn't know)

@@hommelwijf so what? displaying Judith's games on screen is independant from following the source material since knowing which move got played is irrelevant to the narrative, instead it would be a great source of fan-service and a much appreciated tribute to the real life Queen

Best of luck Alene, I'm just getting back into chess having not played since 2004. Back then I played at a club for a while and my greatest achievement was a win against a female player who was about 60. I found an early endgame combination she overlooked, and to be honest, I'm not sure I could have even beat her with the extra piece but she graciously gave me the game as a reward. I was thrilled for that win because she always just crushed me positionally every time I played her! She was a B-class player iirc, and one of the top 100 women in the US at that time. She was a lovely, sweet woman, 100% grandma vibe, but would just tie you up on the board until you only had bad moves left!

That's awesome! You're living proof that chess is for everyone and that you're never too late to learn the game!

Wow!! U have started following chess as hobby/passion at like 60s??? That's when people want to retire and have fun! Cool!! U r a legend!! Thanks alot mam cuz now i feel insanely motivated by figures like you

Never to late. Are you on TindeR???

Good last thoughts Gotham 400%

it was Sack of Rome She had 8.5/9 points and had a 2879 performance whoch was stunning when she was 14

Maybe she had a computer in her lipstick D:

Would love to see this as well

@@AthosJosue is that you random player who accused Anna?

yes

why

it will be featured in guess the elo episodes 😀

I'm willing to bet that he hasn't even played 11 World Champions.

No. How fish defeated me?

@light man Its a joke ,I guess he played only 2 Champions till now.

JP played other women, she just never played in the" women's world championship."

It does set the bar lower but there's a reason for that. Never in the history of humanity were women endorsed nor encouraged to play chess. Quite the opposite. So it makes sense how systematically they'd try to start less and by giving them a separate category the chess federation is trying to encourage more women to join and better themselves at this male dominated sport. Someday when the discrimination on the basis of gender will be ancient history then the segragations will be also long forgotten, for now they're trying to 'even the field'

​@@warrendsmith6832 or in any women-only events. She was Hungary's olympiad board one...in the open section!

Because women are quite far behind men in chess. Why? I don't really know. It could be because women in general don't like this game as much as men do (although I don't know if that really is the case). But Judit is the only woman to pass a 2700 rating in her career if I'm not mistaken. There are many male players that have surpassed not only 2700, but also 2800. It doesn't make much sense to put a woman who is around 2650 with male players who are 2750-2850.

@@flavio7180 i have given the reason for why above

Each champions immortal botez gambit

bxh2 lol

@@m_uz1244 NOOO HE WILL G3

There is "guess the elo" and "top GM blunders" series

@@akramansari885 why did you comment twice? And also don't be genralistic she's not in my all time favourite players list 🤷‍♂️

@@Zenith9132 I only did it once 🤔 I think it's a glitch I'll delete one

@@akramansari885 no she’s not she’s hatefull and cringe

@@wasp7969 Sikes 😬

As a part of the other side, I wish for at least 50%.

@@ZerrorRx agreed

I hope one day too that there are more female chess player’s

We need this!!!

@@ZerrorRx Y'all must teach your sisters how to play chess then lol

The "was" is correct here in the sense of him talking about his chess past, seeing as he is a different man today

@@Zozakaoo7 yeah... but does the sentence have something to do with his chess carreer? Lone sentence. You would have to answer the question til his chess career be praised. So the sentence is technically asking about the man's life as a whole.

Have you noticed the difference between her and Anish Giri comentating on the WCC? Giri is always like "oh, this pawn here closes the diagonal, white goes here and equalizes and the game is 0+" while Judit just dont give a f***k for the engines and is always like "but what If you trade here and after king moves, now i can infiltrate with my f******g badass rook"

@@arthurbarbosadelira7505 Loved their dynamic in the world championship. Hope they bring them back for the next one

Hasnt Hou Yvan 2700+? I need to check it up again

@@frickseerose6146 google says peak rating 2686

@@frickseerose6146 She was close, but she's around 2650. She did take a short break (I think it was for her studies), but I bet that she will break 2700.

@@munchkinmatt1670 she has the ability but i think she retired from serious competitive classical chess

They know how strong she is, when you are 2700+, you can beat anyone above you

ooc ðat looks weird hahahahahhahahahhahahah

Venonat Kirby is a nightmare

I was trying to make it venonat kirby but not a nightmare

Rick and Morty refference 😂

There is always a funny moment during guess the elo videos where it’s either a super gm or a

Yup weak players play exceptional moves without knowing why. On the other hand strong players do know why. Everyone else just floating in the middle 😂

Good one

lol

*super grandmaster

I just didnt like it.

how is that now? I also live in Hungary and i do play chess

@@JeeBand Well I gave up on learning a long time ago, but I've found things that fit me better. I hope you succeed though, good luck with learning chess!

Magnus did it too. “Hotel mini bar game”

Or Magnus recent sans shirt appearance lol.

There will always be naysayers whatever your gender or activity just ignore them sis!

@@johnballard6725 thanks!!

Stop acting like a victim and get better

how about men stfu for once@@guyslifehacks5179

Gracias

She didn't even got much recognised when she was at her prime ....you can't expect her to be famous now when she is retired 😐.

@@Thorfinn517 sadge

She does

She gets plenty of recognition. Definitely deserves it

Men dominate chess mainly because they are more likely to pour themselves into something obsessively.

Dont you have the previous quotes about women in chess by kasparov? I mean to put the whole thing in perspective

@@steelmongoose4956 Lmao no.

Yeahhh I mean.... not quite a myth is it, when you look at the standings and records. Don't tell me women are still being shut down in 2021 and are afraid lol. All doors are open now.

@@lucasng4712 what they said is absolutely true. Obsessively spending years and every waking moment pushing wooden pieces around a board, with absolutely no guarantee of financial compensation as a result of it, is objectively a complete waste of time. Men are really weird and get hugely obsessive about minutiae, be it in sport or anything else. *This is in no way saying women cannot do x or y*. They absolutely can and are frequently better at it. Though generally speaking, dudes are wired differently. There are biological differences that can't be ignored. This DOES NOT mean men are automatically better at things because they are men. This is simply a broad explanation for why you see more men in STEM fields (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and also in sports like Snooker and Chess. We should be able to have a reasonable debate about this sort of thing without fear of being branded sexist, or getting your comments batted away with a dismissive "lmao no".

Garry or Magnus Polgar confirmed??

@@tarunv24 calm yourself

I would have love if he would added the story of the Polgar´s family, how her parent had a theory from before they born, that anyone could become top in something just practicing from little (as all champions does), and he did this experiment with her daughters, which he totally success to prove his point without the advantage of numbers or innate talent. Even taking into account that it would be always a culture bias and pressure that plays against women, because their own friends and social circle push them to "boyfriends, kids, etc" from early age, when for men there is no hurry or distractions and they even get encourage to be 100% committed. So I guess that is the biggest gap that society should start to close.

@@angellestat2730 It's really not though. The biggest factor when it comes to the gender gap in chess is biology. Men and women have different characteristics. Which, to be fair, is an even greater endorsement of her father's theory. By the way, you forgot to mention the fact that her father actually put out an ad in an attempt to find a woman who would agree to participate in his experiment, which is how her parents got married in the first place.

@@angellestat2730 imo the biggest difference is men and women themselves and mental characteristics. Men innately want to he leaders the same isnt true for women. A woman is just as likely as a man to get bullied for playing chess at school the difference is how important this is to either one and in my experience women always bail out first men are simply more likely to take risks. Whether this is because men are stronger mentally or dont feel the same pain or rejection from being ridiculed I will never know though I tend to lean to the latter. Obviously in the past this simply doesnt apply women were second class citizen which while his did have advantages the disadvantages massively outweigh it and one of them was a lack of education but in modern society there is no reason women shouldnt be just as good at chess as men exept for interests. You see the same thing in Esports why arent women as good at games as men? Well the size of your hands makes a small difference but its just participation because either board games video games and such just arent as riveting to women in general or mabye as singular entities they are less likely to stray from a group mentality to play what is seen as "nerdy" or "geeky" to create new parts of modern culture such as gaming such as chess such as comics and movies like marvel such as anime. The majority of these "nerdy" things are dominated by male fans and imo Is the reason women suck at games and chess in comparison to men imo.

well said brother. cold hard facts right there.

What theory? It's not even his fathers theory that's what every chess players does

​@@lynxsss5403 one thing is to know that with practice you could improve (everyone knew that), another thing was to believe that that even without an innate talent (just from adn) someone can reach the top, proving that "genius are made, not born" (I Still think adn also help but he made his case). This is the story: medium.com/the-reflectionist/creating-a-genius-the-3-stage-journey-to-creative-excellence-7ac02dab9e9 And this was even a higher proof because he had daughters, which is harded from a social enviroment point, because these girls does not have any previous role model to follow or feel inspired (other women good at chess), which they may believe that is not possible, that they may be inferior, they also may have the influence of friends or society telling them that is not normal a girl playing chess, that they should do another thing).

@@angellestat2730 what initiate talent? You told geniuses are made not born Right? And that's not surprising

@@angellestat2730 One doesn't need any women or men inspiration at all just like I like sabine hossenfender she is a physicist and she inspired me to do physics I don't see any reason why she should be men so that I can take any inspiration

My favourite chess players are attackers like Alekhine,Tal,Stein and Kasparov but I shall have to look into Judit's games as well now!

@@johnballard6725 absolutely! Tal and Nez for the win brother! 🏆

Yeah I know

Isn't the touch move rule not that big of a deal?

? Explain Better

@@abdullahg4919 it is a big deal, happened with hikaru too, he lost in a drawn position

@@abdullahg4919 Garry made the move and then quickly changed it. See agadmator video

Imagine beating ELEVEN world champions

I would have love if he would added the story of the Polgar´s family, how her parent had a theory from before they born, that anyone could become top in something just practicing from little (as all champions does), and he did this experiment with her daughters, which he totally success to prove his point without the advantage of innate talent that you can from just form numbers (no every man who practice from little become a top player). Even taking into account that it would be always a culture bias and pressure that plays against women, because their own friends and social circle push them to "boyfriends, kids, etc" from early age, when for men there is no hurry or distractions and they even get encourage to be 100% committed. So I guess that is the biggest gap that society should start to close.

@@angellestat2730Please dont spam this

How did she came out on top if she was at her peak number 8 in the world?

@@joshualogan6655 In the specific games shown, she did.

Why did you feel the need to tell everyone you are a straight white male? Did you want woke points? It doesn't add anything to your reasonable analysis.

@@TheLincolnrailsplitt They never said they were white.

@@HaileyTheThird yea he assumed it😂, that happens when you expect it to be there

@@TheLincolnrailsplitt why did you guess they were white? And mentioning it makes the point that he's saying that not to benefit himself, but for greater fairness and justice. Do you hate the idea of a level playing field?

@@verybarebones talk to him bro !!!