Sigma EF-M 16mm F1.4 Vs Canon 22mm F2.0

No video

Sigma EF-M 16mm F1.4 Vs Canon 22mm F2.0 | Which Wide Angle Wins?

Рет қаралды 86,555

Күн бұрын

16mm on Amazon: amzn.to/2RyHTno
or on B&H: bhpho.to/2DUTvJk
22mm on Amazon: amzn.to/2Vv3QDg
or on b&h: bhpho.to/2CO1irm
Much requested prime lens comparison between the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 EF-M and the Canon 22mm f/2.0 EF-M lens. When it comes to wide angle everyone needs at least one lens option in their camera bag, but which one is right for you?
Timestamps:
0:28 Lens specs
2:34 Autofocus ring sensitivity
4:50 Gimbal vlog
6:03 Selfie vlog
7:35 Low light vlog
8:58 IQ comparison
16:26 Low light IQ
19:10 Landscape IQ
22:45 Chromatic aberration
26:10 Lens flaring
26:36 Final thoughts
M Y G E A R
Cameras:
📷 FAVORITE CAMERA: amzn.to/31XtOVI
📷 BACKUP CAMERA: amzn.to/2RiNdLS
Lenses:
🔥 MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: amzn.to/2SCESD6
🔥 MY FAVORITE PORTRAIT LENS: amzn.to/2MWP30m
🔥 MY FAVORITE WALK AROUND LENS: amzn.to/2Vv3QDg
🔥 MY FAVORITE WIDE ANGLE LENS: amzn.to/2RyHTno
🔥 MY FAVORITE CHEAP LENS: amzn.to/2M7huIt + amzn.to/2CedW6h
🔥 MY FAVORITE IS LENS: amzn.to/2W3y9RQ
Accessories:
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES M50: amzn.to/2CEOTqX
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES M6 MK ii: amzn.to/2AKpKNk
🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: amzn.to/2zLeM9W
🎤 LAV MIC: amzn.to/2fiAMM9
⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: amzn.to/2gzWVIy
⚙️ GIMBAL: amzn.to/2iITr3N
⚙️ SD CARD: amzn.to/3fESWnT
⚙️ HEADPHONES: amzn.to/2YNOKLL
🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? Use this link to support the channel for FREE: amzn.to/2N7Rtdi
TWITTER: / 7drivebyreviews
#Sigma16mm #Canon22mm #CanonM50 #m6markii

Пікірлер: 149

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

16mm on Amazon: amzn.to/2RyHTno or on B&H: bhpho.to/2DUTvJk 22mm on Amazon: amzn.to/2Vv3QDg or on b&h: bhpho.to/2CO1irm David or Goliath; which wide was your winner? 0:28 Lens specs 2:34 Autofocus ring sensitivity 4:50 Gimbal vlog 6:03 Selfie vlog 7:35 Low light vlog 8:58 IQ comparison 16:26 Low light IQ 19:10 Landscape IQ 22:45 Chromatic aberration 26:10 Lens flaring 26:36 Final thoughts

@andy-mm2no 2 жыл бұрын

Canon 22mm for me - I owned both and used them for a year and ended up selling the Sigma - I prefer the images from the canon, and the size and weight difference is a big bonus (that 16mm on the M50 feels too big and heavy) , and for me, the extra aperture is negligible - f/2 is more than enough for a wide angle lens. I still have the Sigma 30mm and 56mm - they’re awesome lenses and Canon haven’t got anything available that touches them.

@ruthieisabellejules174 2 жыл бұрын

I guess you haven’t tried the canon efm 32 mm. The sharpest efm lens you ll ever try.

@jacobleetech 3 жыл бұрын

This is EXACTLY what I was looking for. I got the sigma 30mm and 56mm but I knew the 22mm and 16mm would be pretty close. the 30mm and 56mm were easy choices given their alternatives, but the 16mm and 22mm were tough since the 22mm is a lot less expensive, and smaller. Is it just me or is crazy the canon can do better in sharpness with such a tiny front element, especially compared with the size of the sigma?

@lillyknight525 4 жыл бұрын

Great comparison! I had the 22mm for a while but I just prefer the field of view and speed of the sigma 16. I'd love to see a comparison between the sigma 16 and the 11-22 - a wide angle showdown!

@TimKeh 3 жыл бұрын

Great review of the video quality and characteristics of both lenses. Thank you!

@RealCopsReelLife 3 жыл бұрын

Great video!! Love the detailed comparison, along with the "real life" shots. Well done.

@noraj.7383 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the comparison. I loved 16mm wide angle shots and clarity quality of the shapes and colors, if only it not a bit heavier. Yet 22mm did a great job in comparison and its compact shape gives it an advantage to carry around more will travelling. Im going with the 22mm but would still love to have the 16mm with me as an option for certain projects :)

@KLimitless 4 жыл бұрын

Perfect video! Definitely happy with the sigma 16mm f1.4 it's such a good lens

@atommixz 4 жыл бұрын

Very nice review! Thank you very much!

@GarrettXPrime 3 жыл бұрын

just an excellent video man great job

@DmitriyTor 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent review. Thank you!

@RyanshawMe 3 жыл бұрын

I got both but for different reasons. For the vlog video shots, I need that wide field of view for sure with the F1.4, makes it good.

@Shiva_Racing 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you. I have M50 and 22 lens. Thinking about 16mm Sigma, so you gave me lot of info about this !

@JulieSchiro 3 жыл бұрын

Great comparison, thanks @Drive By Reviews!

@JenniferWasylenko 3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely super review! Very helpful!

@user-gd5gn6mb2f 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your review!

@dedyhuang5384 4 жыл бұрын

i have both of these, and 22mm is really thin, and feel happy with this lens, just take the evening walk and take some shoot with the boys. but Sigma clarity is wow, quality of the lens and speed is different. for traveling i will choose 22mm,

@nicolepengson-eugenio9899 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent review! 💯 Hope you can compare Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 stm VS Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 stm lens

@mhsvz6735 4 жыл бұрын

Canon 22mm for my money. Thank you for another excellent review!

@aggasht104 4 жыл бұрын

You did really good review ❤ make more

@sean9820 3 жыл бұрын

Just got the 16mm, thank you for this wonderful video. And to all those wondering, this is absolutely no contest. The sigma feels like a 3k piece of glass.

@mattdelcomyn8012 Жыл бұрын

Great review! Thank you!!

@chrisoglevoiceover 3 жыл бұрын

Great review!

@UldisZalcmanis 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this great comparison - saved me a significant amount of money. I've got 22mm and been using it for a while, very happy with it - tiny and bright lens... So portable with my M50. I'm not a pro, so I don't really carry tons of lenses around but I was kind of looking at Sigma, thinking to maybe save up and buy it one day. Nope. The difference is so insignificant that for my type of use (if I leave the house, I'll probably never have it with me anyway - too bulky), I'll just stick to my 22mm.

@JenniferWasylenko 3 жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing for myself! I have the 22mm and don't feel there is enough of a difference to warrant getting the 16mm Sigma. For the money, I think another action cam might be better!

@pedrosoares7273 3 жыл бұрын

I have the canon 22mm and i love it. I wish the aperture was slightly faster for more boken, although it is good enough. Everything else about this lens is fantastic. It competes with my Sigma 17 to 50 mm 2.8 for sharpness despite the sigma costing twice as much and weighs as much or more than any APSC camera out there...

@namedkenn 4 жыл бұрын

Ah yeah here we go! The most awaited video of all time 😆 Just wanted to add something: The Sigma 16mm may look huge here but in real life it’s just the Canon 22mm that’s REALLY small. Compared to full frame lenses, the Sigma is still okay in my opinion ✌🏻

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

hah true, although for someone used to the native ef-m lenses the size might be somewhat of a shock 🤠

@yudaadhiguna4577 2 жыл бұрын

Hi man, after searching awhile finally found your video that answer my confusion whether I should buy sigma 16mm or canon efm 22mm. It is such a great review man! My confusion is, I am a travel and landscape photographer as well as videographer. But the thing is I am using zhiyun crane m3 for my canon eos m50. As for the weight I have no doubt when using efm 22mm, but for this small and compact gimbal, do you think sigma 16mm + canon eos m50 will hold in various angles? Would like to hear your opinion on this one, thank you before!

@Apologia5 3 жыл бұрын

What lens between the two is most flattering for faces? Or in general when it comes to lenses is there something to look for that is best for slimming the face? I think I read that 70-100mm lenses are best, yet these ones are 16 and 22mm!??

@RADERFPV 3 жыл бұрын

This was an incredible comparison, thanms for putting this together. Sadly, Im still lost as to which one I should get. Sounds like we can't go wrong either way. New supporter, +1👍

@guardianobserver6593 3 жыл бұрын

With the eos-M system, lost is the only feeling!

@GymPerformance 2 жыл бұрын

Which one do you recommend to have as webcam right behind the notebook? About 0.5-1m in distance

@barkan86 2 жыл бұрын

The 22 is awesome for candid street photography, with the M6ii. The detail level is awesome and no one even understand that I photograph. The electronic silent shutter is used, of course.

@DanielTuriman 3 жыл бұрын

Clear review and best comparison

@Bookib 3 жыл бұрын

Extremely helpful !!

@SuperAwesomeReviews-lw6ry 2 ай бұрын

Great video. I have the 22mm f2 and looking at getting a Canon 11-22mm next or a Sigma 16mm. I kinda like the canon 11-22mm better as a wide angle lens, but the Sigma has the f1.4 so definitely better in low light.

@gingerelectrician 3 жыл бұрын

With the Sigma at f1.4 and the Canon at 2.0, what minimum and maximum distance would you say you are still in focus on those night videos (at around 8m 30s on your video)? In other words, when you say you can move in and out more on the Sigma, how much more? What is the closest and furthest distance (cm or inches) in each case? Thanks, Simon P.S. I'm mostly going to be doing indoor Vlogging for a membership site. But i've got 360 videos to do so want to achieve Bokeh in a closer distance. My background is around 1.5m - 2m wide (yes, I know, tight!) and I sit approx 1-2m out from that background. Camera can go between 2-3m from that background wall (Again limited space!). Would either of these lenses work in this case? I'm currently stuck with the kit lens 15-45 with very limited Bokeh other than cheating and opening up to 45. So this is why I am looking at better options from something more dedicated. I'm not too fussed about low light as I do also have studio lights (but no room for a large background filler light due to the dimensions mentioned above)

@mattcero1 3 жыл бұрын

Total thumbs up guy, thank you! I'm torn between the M6 mk II and the Fujifilm X-S10. Do you have any experience with the Fuji? The side flipping screen and the 240 fps slow motion appeals to me but the very expensive lenses turn me off. Knowing that, the M6 has the 22 mm pancake lens you evaluated and that combo is perfect for my motorcycle trips. Thanks man.

@DriveByReviews 3 жыл бұрын

I've been very happy with the M6mkii but I know exactly where you are. I was salivating over the 240 fps options a few years back when I went with the m50. The usual 120 fps has done a good enough job but I would have been using 240 if it was available. But as you probably know once you get a few lenses you will want to keep at least 3 or more at a time. So cost is a heavy factor, but I never did try out a fuji. For now I couldn't live without at least 5 different lenses, hah!

@GraceVeldhuizen 2 жыл бұрын

Just gotta say, that outdoor driveway shot on the Sigma is crazy stunning!!! No wonder you used it for your thumbnail! 😜

@DriveByReviews 2 жыл бұрын

absolutely, that driveway view often has me pause for a second to take in the view, great colors throughout the day

@peterball8241 3 жыл бұрын

Happy with 22mm on the M3, small and light. Anything else I'll take a bigger camera with better glass. Photos only, use Panasonic camcorder for video.

@JulianGuevaraphoto Жыл бұрын

I have the 16mm for vlogging but kind of want the 22 for snap shots and travel for my walk around photo lens

@orpheneus77 3 жыл бұрын

Great comparison! Was leaning towards Sigma16 initially, but i think I'm gonna have 22mm instead for my next prime lens.

@CarlG-lz3hs 3 жыл бұрын

Nice video bro!

@dadstoysnthings 2 жыл бұрын

Couldn't decide, I just bought both lenses. 😁

@FrankieTheOne 4 жыл бұрын

I think i will get the canon since it is sharper and i want to shoot sharp landscapes. Low light will just need to go higher on my ISO

@danimaldonadofut Жыл бұрын

im thinking for buy one of this two to make photos on group, in events and i have the m50 mark 2

@disneyanddaysout Жыл бұрын

I have both lenses and on the M6 MKii the Sigma 16mm is for my requirements a much better buy. So much sharper and works a lot better with the higher megapixel sensor. Better colour reproduction too.

@noth606 11 ай бұрын

"better buy"? Eh, who the heck are you to make that call? The sigma seems to be the size of a portable telescope, bigger than my largest optic atm. With the 22mm on, people don't even seem to notice or mind my camera, which they will immediately if I have anything bigger than it.

@disneyanddaysout 11 ай бұрын

@@noth606 it was the better buy for me and my requirements. It is a sharper lens with better colour reproduction. Of course if yours is about discreetness then the 22mm suits that purpose better. All lens purchases will come down to your own personal preference, requirements and budget. But this is a comment on a video comparing the two, so I was providing my own experience.

@noth606 11 ай бұрын

@@disneyanddaysout The way you put it came across as a sort of absolutism, hence the way I commented. For me the 22mm works great because of how stealthy it is, it makes the setup look like a compact camera and gets no attention. At times I use a Viltrox EF adapter with a 35-80mm EF on it and often immediately get very hostile comments as soon as I take it out, people seem to think I'm out to take pics of them or am media/news whatever. I don't take pics of people without asking their permission first, and most of the time when these things happen my purpose isn't to take pics of people at all, but a "scene" of how the lights and shadows play on a street or in a park and such.

@disneyanddaysout 11 ай бұрын

@@noth606 I’ve adjusted my comment so it reads better :) Yes, your use case for street photography makes sense to use the 22mm.

@andrewcrossley2448 3 ай бұрын

For travel I use the 22 and the excellent 11-22mm Canon zoom. I notice that the zoom is sharper at the edges with IS off. Given the two Canons are about the same size as the large Sigma, and offer far more versatility, for me I’m sticking with that combo.

@babigirl3206 Жыл бұрын

Cool video .maybe this is the Difference of opinions but every time you said it’s neck and neck I noticed the canon look incredibly better or overall I’m no professional I guess this is what’s make it hard choosing a lens both the 16 and 22 is great I just can’t figur it out😅

@avikmajumdar1791 4 жыл бұрын

Hi. I find your reviews very informative and extremely easy to follow. Quick question i have the efm 22 already, will i be adding value to my kit if i buy the Sigma 16? I also have the 15-45 kit lens. Should i go for the Sigma 56 instead so that i have a dedicated portrait lens?

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

I was going to post my 56mm review friday but I'll do it tomorrow just for you ;) The answer depends on your needs. If you need a wider angle lens the 16mm is amazing, especially great with vlogging. The 56mm is a stellar lens, its immediately become my go to for portraits.

@avikmajumdar1791 4 жыл бұрын

Drive By Reviews Thank you so much 😊, i am extremely eager to see your review on the Sigma 56. To answer your question, i currently use the EFM- 22 for street photography and travel photography since its compact and works decently well in low light. I use the 15-45 kit lens for landscapes when there is sufficient light. My dilemma is that, should i buy a lens which is predominantly a portrait lens or should i buy a lens which gives me flexibility and a really low aperture at the same time like the Sigma 16.

@sanjtiwari5364 3 жыл бұрын

@@avikmajumdar1791 hey man, hopin you're based in india only. Where r u getting the sigma lenses here!

@avikmajumdar1791 3 жыл бұрын

@@sanjtiwari5364 I am based out my America my friend!!!

@J.KingVlogs 3 жыл бұрын

Awesome Video! The low light shots you did are amazing. Question: how did you set up the low light shots starting 7:40 Was there a light source underneath and did you do color grading in post?

@DriveByReviews 3 жыл бұрын

That's straight out of the camera without any color grading. Loved the look of the 16mm with canon colors. Light source was above from my house lights which gave it the warm look

@J.KingVlogs 3 жыл бұрын

Wow! Thanks for the update

@Andrewmusic100 Жыл бұрын

The perfect review

@majoorF 2 жыл бұрын

wauw, just the fact that I even want to watch a vid with "16mm f1.4 vs Canon 22mm F2.0" in it's title!

@KimEngvoldsen 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the nice video. but when it comes to comparing sharpness of a 16mm and a 22mm you can not do this. It will be totally wrong because there is a big difference between 22 and 16 mm it will be like combining 70 and 100 mm due to how much wider the lens is . You can pair a 16 and 18 but a 16m will never be a razor sharp lens. a 16 mm will go into infinite focus of 1.5 meters while a 22 will clear and focus at 3 to 4 meters.I do not own any of the lenses and do not care about the mark on the lens, but nice with a video to find out if you want a 16 mm or 22 but to compete between the two is wrong

@jessicamessier9339 Жыл бұрын

this video was so amazing but i'm still stuck on what to buy!! I feel the sigma 16mm is way too heavy/bulky for traveling, but the 22mm canon isn't as wide of a shot that I'm looking for. thoughts? are there other options out there?

@mikkz9 Жыл бұрын

Canon EFM 11-22mm is another alternative. It is definitely wider :)

@user-cb7vs2iw3n 3 жыл бұрын

please tell me how to display the sound control

@ethanperez4774 4 жыл бұрын

Legit might get both 🤣 I want the 22mm for light hiking and family pictures on the trail but the sigma for vlogging 🤷‍♂️

@khobautista456 3 жыл бұрын

Hello! Great review, I just bought Canon M50 and planning to get the Canon 22mm f2 since it is only $200 right now on Amazon & Best Buy but I’m planning to get the Sigma 30mm f1.4 as well in the future. I’m doing photography and filming will I benefit from Sigma 30mm?

@noblegendforever2052 3 жыл бұрын

all you need are kit lens, 22mm f2 and sigma 30mm f1.4.. these three lens have been my go to. daylight use kitlen for video and low light 22mm f2 can do good. when photo use the 30mm f1.4 .. i realize that f2 and f1.8 or even 1.4 are very different in lowlight but just a tiny bit . you can consider spending 400$ to get the 16mm or buy used 22mm f2 for ard 160$

@vvlad78 3 жыл бұрын

But what about autofocus motor noise in video, comparing these two lenses? Recording with internal mic of course. It could be very useful for people, who choosing lenses for video. Good work, as always. Thank you!

@SICKYPOPP 3 жыл бұрын

Both make no noises which you could find disturbing

@pcanarsky 4 жыл бұрын

have both. bought the sigma after your review. NO regrets. love both

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

👊

@sparklingstar5479 3 жыл бұрын

Which one is best for you?

@pcanarsky 3 жыл бұрын

@@sparklingstar5479 I haven't used the 22mm since :) Don't plan on getting rid of it. But the 16mm is perfect for the particular shots I do. Here is my channel if you want to see how it looks. kzfaq.info The camera is at arms length.

@DawnofCooking Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the awesome video! I like to do food photography and cooking videos and have the Canon M50. I own the kit lens and the Sigma 30mm. Could you please help me what a good lens would be for plates of food etc??

@DriveByReviews Жыл бұрын

Hey! Thanks so much for the kind comment. Food photography often requires close proximity; generally a wide prime lens is best. The Sigma 30mm and the Canon 32mm would look great, for example, but leaves little choice to how far you have to stand to take a good composition of food. Sigma 16mm is a good option for low light situation and the wider field of view. Sadly we're limited on wide lens options (canon 11-22mm is an option but not great in low light). I am currently looking at the Laowa 9mm which is the widest option yet and MAY be a decent option for food if the distortion isn't too much. You can check out my sigma 16mm review and comparison to the 22mm on the channel!

@DawnofCooking Жыл бұрын

@@DriveByReviews Yes that is the problem I am having with the Sigma 30mm for food getting the perfect distance without distortion. Thank you I will keep checking your videos:)

@shaqebk2222 2 жыл бұрын

Which would you recommend for vlog style public interview? And beginner photography

@DriveByReviews 2 жыл бұрын

22mm is classic FOV for video production, but I love the wider look of the 16mm myself. Beginner photographer would benefit from the 22 for sure

@yitpengong8194 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you. Brilliant comparison. I shall keep my pancake.

@MinimalWave1982 4 жыл бұрын

The Pancake is just the best!

@Yosser70 2 жыл бұрын

Sigma looks way sharper than the Canon! Got to remember it’s a lot wider so there’s fewer pixels covering the subject, so it may seem softer but the fact it’s so close, shows how sharp the Sigma is. The test’s in the video are a bit pointless as this sort of thing only works with lenses of the same focal length.

@andymmorledge4063 2 жыл бұрын

thank you

@BurningParisMusic 4 жыл бұрын

Literally have been debating these two for weeks. I need better low light for my videos.

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

don't we all 👍

@abrworld 3 жыл бұрын

Sigma goes out of focus quickly cause of fast 1.4f, put that to f2 same as the canon and it would be same.

@georgesmith3022 3 жыл бұрын

you nailed it

@FRUITSWITHROOTS 4 жыл бұрын

Have both of these lenses. The cannon is razor in comparison. A great little lens

@amounifnd 3 жыл бұрын

The 22mm is what made me get the M Mount. It is deadly sharp

@authenticbusinessentertain153 3 жыл бұрын

Hi question. Can I use this lens to shoot live food shows? Or a wider angle would be better?

@DriveByReviews 3 жыл бұрын

would work great for that 👍 wider only necessary if you're including a large part of the room like in real estate photos

@authenticbusinessentertain153 3 жыл бұрын

@@DriveByReviews which zoom lens would you recommend for low light on M50?

@ubellubo 2 жыл бұрын

I was planning on getting the 22 mm but I already have the 16mm. I am thinking now the 22 mm is almost superfluous as it looks like the 16 mm can do everything the 22 mm can do but a bit better. On the other hand the small size of the 22 mm really appeals plus it is not that expensive. But I don't want to buy it if I will always end up using the 16 mm instead. Decisions

@DriveByReviews 2 жыл бұрын

Also, if you want the equivalent "cinematic" 35mm full frame FOV the 22mm is much closer to that than any other lens (besides the alt 22mm out there now)

@zekirami 4 жыл бұрын

Good vedio I use to have that 22mm now I use 32mm .Can you do vedio Ziess 32mm for fuji vs fuji 35mm 1.4 .thanks

@SAMPRODESIGN 3 жыл бұрын

The Canon 22mm F2.0 works nice for real estate photos or should I buy another wider lens ?

@okaro6595 3 жыл бұрын

You should consider the 11-22 mm.

@dansklrvids7303 4 жыл бұрын

Well done

@brionsantiagoflowyo 4 жыл бұрын

@f8 and f16 on the Sigma’s clouds?? Incredible. I have all Canon glass 🥴

@SICKYPOPP 3 жыл бұрын

The fun thing about the signs lens... When you want to change to let's say Sony, Sigma can change the Bajonette for you

@MuhammadMundir 4 жыл бұрын

I want sigma 16mm f1.4 for my eos m50. I think this can help to get better low light shoot.. hehe

@weidonglan3663 4 жыл бұрын

16mm and 22mm is different view,so if you complete shaper,it's not best results. like talking 50mm 1.4 and 22mm 2.0,take some photos at same place. just my idea

@hapowoverhere7951 3 жыл бұрын

Is the 16mm 1.4 EF-M lens compatible with Canon 5d Mark IV?

@SICKYPOPP 3 жыл бұрын

Not without an adapter

@StefanBoeykens Жыл бұрын

@@SICKYPOPP you cannot adapt ef-m lenses to an EF or EF-s or EF-R body

@IvarsDayLab 2 жыл бұрын

Canon lenses are nice, but that manual focus sucks especially for video because if you shoot hand held you can change focus with a touch of a finger like on Sigma lenses. From other point of view I love that pancake but of course image quality is much better with Sigma ;)

@guanyu210379 2 жыл бұрын

As a 22mm f2 user...that Sigma thing is huuuuge ^o^

@JayArCezar 3 жыл бұрын

SUPERB!!!

@salsabilarahmawati4269 3 жыл бұрын

Best comparation so far

@Jor_Dan01 3 жыл бұрын

haii..malaysia ke...

@salsabilarahmawati4269 3 жыл бұрын

@@Jor_Dan01 no. Indonesia. 😉

@Jor_Dan01 3 жыл бұрын

@@salsabilarahmawati4269 baik👍👍

@watchsomemorevids 4 жыл бұрын

Do I need the viltron speed booster for the sigma 16mm

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

nope sigma released an EF-M mount version

@kevindiossi 4 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, Sigma removed the weather sealing when they changed to the EF-M mount...and proceeded to charge more versus the Sony Mount.

@circuslife888 Жыл бұрын

Interesting. If you look at the video comparison in low light at the widest aperture of both lenses, you won't really see much of a difference in terms of brightness and bokeh. Personally, I think that the value of a wide aperture diminishes as the lens' field of view goes wider. Parang... the opening of a wide-angle lens is too small anyway to deliver the great benefits of a wide-open aperture. But that's just my opinion. I'm sure the hardcore photographers here can explain this better. Cheers!

@mbismbismb 26 күн бұрын

the colours are also better on the canon lens, i guess maybe because of the lens coating

@tipidkamera1346 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the review. I'm gonna pick up a 22mm soon for my M50. The differences are very manageable. The Canon wins for me because of the portability. Sigma is too big and heavy for vlogging and street photography.

@MichaelSiroshtan 2 жыл бұрын

From your review, both lenses are OK, but a biggest conclusion is that you need new pair of eyes with a way wider aperture!

@BIGBAKEONTHEMOVE 3 жыл бұрын

Wish you would have turned the sigma lense to 22mm @2.0 and compared them then.

@jaceanthony7272 3 жыл бұрын

16mm is a prime lens. You can’t make it 22mm

@atommixz 4 жыл бұрын

I'm not understand english by ears, but I think sigma 16mm f/1.4 better for night video, but canon 22mm f/2 little bit better in photo and as main tourist lens

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

you got it!

@Agcz1213 2 жыл бұрын

Which lens is better 22mm or 16mm?

@Violllllllllllla 3 жыл бұрын

😍😍😍handsome

@DriveByReviews 3 жыл бұрын

😘

@amounifnd 3 жыл бұрын

If its purely IQ, put the 22m next to the 32mm and then you will wonder why you paid 3 x the price considering they sometimes give the 22m away for free.

@pro100_koliostro_tula 2 жыл бұрын

Эх. Хочу себе SIGMA 16mm. Видос хороший, информативный 👍👍👍👍👍

@wildfoodhub Жыл бұрын

Jaby 😱😱😱😱

@abhirawat300 2 жыл бұрын

We hve a clear winner (price) native 22 unless you r a professional looking for that 1.4f .. nd 16mm. But than u won't be be using a crop sensor.😂.. so let's end this debate .. have money buy that 1.4 16mm for wide angle view

@DriveByReviews 2 жыл бұрын

I'll be honest, since having the 16mm I use it mostly. 22 is only if I'm trying to video a FF 35mm equivalent shot. And that is rare.

@DavidBeechfieldBrownArt 4 жыл бұрын

Which one is better an apple or a pear? 😂

@DriveByReviews 4 жыл бұрын

Depends, you want low glycemic performance or better dynamic flavor

@lerlo 3 жыл бұрын

Why is the lens on the 22mm so small.. It looks like a disposable camera.. Lol

@a_js 2 жыл бұрын

Sigma autofocus looks more responsive

@ubellubo Жыл бұрын

I have both, and I prefer the 16mm, partly, for its noticeably faster autofocus. That said I love the small size of the 22mm so if I go out and about using a small sling camera bag I take the 22mm.