Yes! No yelling, no referring to yourself in the third person, just what we came here to see. Thank you!

I like him because he doesn’t have a goofy laugh like Scotty Kilmer.

Totally the opposite of Doug DeMuro, where it's all about him.

Exactly right! There`s Music in almost every video now and i skip Intros as fast as i can.

@@danielknepper6884 Doug is a clown and these new so-call car guys really just want to be entertained.

Lmao

He does look a lot like Adam Sandler now that you mention it! Lol

@@lynndonovan4941 Sounds like him too.

Omfggggg

dude, cold blooded accurate but coooooold blooded

I very rarely comment, but as soon as I heard that phrase, I had to check. Sure enough, it’s the very first comment! I love subtle stuff like this worked into videos.

Or if she's ugly it's better that way too.

It's even a reference to the mercedes video he did before this, where he made a "back to front" comment.

My chuckle was "There's a little white on the tip"

It normally would have made me laugh, but I was in the middle of eating my breakfast! 🤢. I had to take a moment before I could continue eating my eggs!😂

Except for the center crank journal...! I've broken many rods in the 80s to early 90s 4.3s, always the center journal from oil starvation, but my s10 blazers were work trucks... One of them had 800k on the chassis, 5 700r4's, and 4 4.3's went into that one...!!! We traveled all over the southeast pulling small 10' enclosed trailers full of tools...! We were high rise/ condo builders, actually we were the finishers, the buildings themselves were already built...! Thanks

These are pretty good and they actually made power and were efficient.

Second this

It is called the "Atlas" motor. There was a 4, 5 and 6 cyl. The inline 6 was in the trailblazer. Great motor.

I drove one of the trucks those engines came in - there was a whole family, a 4, 5, and 6 cylinder. I had the 2.9 liter four banger, and it was a good running engine, but if anything went wrong, whatever it was would be almost impossible to reach under the hood. I, too, would like to see one of the GM Atlas engines torn down.

@@Oddman1980 The 3.5 5 cyl had a lot of timing chain issues. I think that got fixed with the 3.7 5 cyl.

@@guardrail2897 the 2.8 and 3.5 engines had timing chain and valve problems, and yup the 2.9 and 3.7 engines were the fix.

3k change intervals on a 2010 engine when my 1985 engine is fine to 5k+ according to Blackstone Labs oil examination?! Wow what a piece of shit engine. Good on your wife for looking after her car though.

Did she come with a Boat and motor ?

Just be sure to keep an eye on the water pump(internally chain driven on the V6 models) and the power transfer unit(transfer case on AWD V6 models) as they are highly prone to overheating their "lifetime fill" of oil and subsequently having a shorter lifetime then anything else in the drivetrain.

Does your wife's parents own a brewery?

I have seen plenty of Edges with way over 200k miles that run like new, and a couple around 300k

overall these engines are virtually bulletproof over any ford , and took a ton of abuse/ neglect to get to this tear down stand , most will never see this type of abuse ~Very rare

Over 260k and 10k hours and it's still going. About to do a oil pan reseal and replace the original vacuum pump and belts.

Might explain the new plug and lead as well, fitted in an attempt to get that dead cylinder working again.

It could also explain the bearings, I'd bet it was causing a rich misfire (plug change to try fixing), and most of the fuel was washing down the cylinder. All that fuel in the oil makes for bad times for the bearings. The thing about failed lifters is it doesn't get that bad overnight. People brush it off and then it cascades into this. That cam lobe ware thru 1/2" of the lifter's body!

If there is no fresh air, there also is no fresh fuel. THINK.

@@jimdavis6833 It's direct injected. That means the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder like a diesel, rather than into the intake port. So yes, on this engine there is fuel without clean air.

@@jaredkennedy6576 My mistake. I'm not up to date, because I gave up working on engines when they started needing $20,000 worth of equipment to troubleshoot and repair. I'm from the days when a timing light and compression tester plus dwell meter was pretty much all you needed, except for hand tools.

i think i'd prefer the slow old 4.3 a little more than the soot direct injection here - even if it is faster

You're absolutely correct people also bash on the 3.6 V6 engines to and it's literally because people do not keep the oil changed and full on these motors. People simply do not understand what preventive maintenance is. GM makes very solid engines, it's people's poor habits that give their products bad names. I will say this I do not believe in going over 4,000 miles on an oil change I think that's a lot of the problem on these newer engines as people go 5,6, even up to 10,000 miles on not changing oil and I think that's the Killer.

@@kskip4242 I agree a lot of issues with the modern engines are due to bad maintenance habits. I own a 3.6 with 260000km myself and it has never been apart at all and runs perfect. I do change the oil every 5000km with synthetic though. The early direct injected ones in 2009 or so were pretty bad but the later ones are solid as long as people change the oil regularly. Pretty much the only common thing on 2012+ ones is the front cover leaking and the water pumps leaking.

@@nickbrooks3253 Yeah I have the lfx 3.6 in my 2012 impala and ive beat the snot out of it and with regular service it still runs strong at just over 200 thousand. Question, I just changed the water pump on it because the gasket, not the seep hole was leaking, so after I get the new one on with new metal gasket, that sucker was still leaking! I went ahead and drove it ( leaking) up to operational temp and 99% of the leak stopped, but still has a slight leak! What gives?

@@kskip4242 I've got the exact same car as you then. Did you use new bolts? They're supposed to be one time use. I find with those metal gaskets the surface has to be super clean or else it will leak. If there is pitting or anything on the sealing surfaces you can use a little rtv as well when installing the pump and it shouldn't leak again.

@@nickbrooks3253 yes I used the bolts that were brand-new that came with the pump. I'm guessing there might have been something on the surface that I didn't get off or maybe a little bit of pitting in the aluminum or something it's not leaking anymore.Thanks for replying back.I went back over the bolts with just a bit more torque is how I got it to stop seeping.

Don't forget that Governments around the world are putting huge amounts of pressure on manufacturers concerning emissions and buyers are the same about fuel economy and it all costs in the end.

Indeed. Simple and robust. Rugged. Easy to work on.

@@TestECull Yep you got it brother and they'll definitely outlast just about any EcoBoost engine out there.

@BL Dontmatter Yep you got it brother.

@BL Dontmatter They're known to fail at 90-110k in the F-series. Just simply asking too much of too little. Ford should have just put a more modern EFI on the 87-96 spec 4.9 I6 and pressed it back into service woulda sold so so so so so many trucks with engines that'll never die.

@BL Dontmatter f150 is the best selling truck in America cause you gotta buy a new one every year

Mercruiser put a lot of those old 4.3 engines in boats under 30 feet. They ran pretty well and had enough torque to power a smaller boat.

Yeah, couldn’t see why he unloaded on the 4.3 vortec. Tbi, sure, rag on the power but reliability, checks out.

Used a lot of them in hyster tow motors/fork lifts

Those intake gaskets though! Arghh!

@@rexmedina4561 Giving it a turbo and a special port-injection system, and AWD, allows it to compete with Ferraris ala what the Syclone bragged about when it was in production being able to beat a Ferrari at the time IIRC.

A little tlc and they'll run forever.

Richard Tracy - They're just fine if you don't expect too much. Great in the S-10 stuff. Not so great in Silverados. Like Eric said......"the power of a 4 cylinder, with the fuel economy of a V8".

Literally everything on them and bolted onto them fails prematurely. I've never come across one that wasn't an absolutely hunk of garbage and having an owner swearing to never buy any GM product again.

Mines in a 96 c1500 w/t , just did the spiders once, and a fuel pump. Guess I got real lucky.

Well, if all you want is a longblock that never wears out, you're in the money. But if you want an engine that's got the power of an 8 with the economy of a 6 you'll want a Ford 4.9, not a GM 4.3.

I have been hounding him to find a flathead car engine for the channel but an old flatty Briggs might be the closest we get. And hell that's one he could start up on the teardown table before he tears it down!

You need to check out Mustie1 on YT.

Would be awesome to see each of the 4-5-6cyl variants in a series torn down to see the differences of changes over the years, thats a lot of engines and time though. I love that Calvin has found the breaking point of 800+ whp from a stock bottom end/head 4200, shows they are tough and people are the biggest issue with their failures

@BL Dontmatter 100% I always believed that oil changes should be based on the amount of hours the engine is run, not mileage.

@@Resurrection9 also how the engine is ran during those hours. Oil in an engine in a track car has a much shorter service interval than oil in a normal car because of the sustained high rpm high heat environment

@BL Dontmatter dang I can change mine at 5000 miles and it’s still clear

@@Resurrection9 that’s why I like the way bmw does there oil change system. It’s Calculated by fuel burned.

@@Resurrection9 I believe fuel burn is the best method of determining oil life. Idle hours count, but an engine being run hard will need more frequent oil changes. Either way this engine was neglected.

In the 90's my dad used a couple of Astro/Safaris to pull travel trailers...200/260 were pretty darn good numbers for a v6.

@@elmarko9051 yes my 03 astro has a built 4l60e and chirps in second torque for the win

I owned several Vortec 4.3 and actually driving one currently and yes they are good. However that Ford 4.0 was rated at 160hp and was most certainly under-rated. It really put out more than that, easily as much as the Chevy. They were badass engines.

Same here 2000 Chevy 4.3 250,000 and I'm going to replace the intake gasket this weekend, very small coolant leak. I get over 20 mph n highway. Not bad for a 23 year old truck. Heck I just bought a new car in September and it's been back to the shop last month because of coolant leak. So I can't say one thing bad about the old 4.3.

That's exactly right. More so depending which valve cover has the oil fill I would think. I have 2 older gen 4.3L. One in a 2002 s-10 the other in a 2005 astro van. PCV is identical on both with the exception that the astro PCV valve is part of the cover and non-serviceable. The astro (with 509,000km) looks to be relatively clean evenly on both heads under the covers and it has the oil fill on the left cover which has the PCV valve. On the s-10 (with 401,000km) the right head is considerably cleaner than the left head under the covers and the oil fill is on the right cover which is where the PCV fresh air inlet is. Both vehicles get the same oil around every 5000km for the past 10ish years that I have been servicing them.

The OLM is only a reasonable calculator of need if you're using a high quality oil that meets the performance characteristics the PCM is using for its calculations. Put in the cheapest barf-mart garbage you can find and its calculations will be hopelessly optimistic.

I had this engine in one of my work trucks, a 16' extended cab. I liked it because it was lighter and more nimble than the 5.3 which is a bonus for all the off-road driving I did with it.

My dad has an early 2000s Silverado 2 wheel drive truck with a 4.3. I drive a 4 wheel drive one with a 5.3. He went with me to trailer a car back through a bunch of hills in Arkansas. More than once he told me “man I wish I’d bought a V8 truck”. Every time I take him to lunch he says the same thing. You’re wrong. I’ve owned one 4.3 V6 that was in a Blazer & I’d never do it again. Gutless engine with horrible gas mileage. Like mentioned by others, it never could compare to the Ford 300. Chevy should’ve done I6s if they wanted a 6 cyl in a truck or SUV.

In my experience the Gen V V6 that replaced the L20 4.8 as the base engine is more reliable. I owned 2 4.8. 1 blew a spark plug thru the valve cover and needed a new head. Both required new ignition coils on #7 cylinder every 100,000 miles. The V6 has more oil consumption but no extra maintenance costs like the V8.

@@joshuahedrick I had a GMC Acadia 3.6 bought new that was bulletproof, and the 4.8 in my 2009 Silverado as well. Great service from both.

Looks like it was a construction truck and had an oil change once a year 😬😬

"a good engine" Yea, until your lifters fail. GM started their decline in 2007 and never recovered. They have no interest in making things right. Meanwhile, Toyota pays out billions to replace rusty frames on trucks 10+ years old with a ton of miles on them.

Alot of lifter failure us due to the thinner oils (5w20) in a hydraulically actuated system. And extended oil change intervals or neglect. Surprisingly this is the first LV3 I've heard have a lifter failure, and they're the only one of the 3 ecotec3 family that runs 5w30 and not 5w20. So maybe that's a factor. However that engine wasn't maintained...

@@matt9c1 I've seen plenty of those frame-swap trucks on CSW!, but it's a little sad how rusty _they've_ gotten, and the condition of the rest of the undercarriage? Ugh. Toyota needs to learn that rust coating doesn't mean coating their parts in rust....

Change your oil at least every 5k miles. That's the key. AFM systems rely on tiny oil passages and small screens that act as filters. The biggest reason AFM lifters fail is because the owner pushed oil change intervals out too long and those tiny oil passages became clogged with sludge deposits. The idiotic assumption that if you use a fancy expensive full synthetic engine oil, you can go 7500 to 15000 miles between oil changes is the number one killer of AFM systems. Just because a used oil test says you have plenty of TBN left at 10k miles or you simply believe the oil jug's claims doesn't mean that the engine oil is loaded with carbon soot and unburned gasoline (particularly in engines with direct injection) that go right through the oil filter and caused accelerated wear/sludge in the AFM solenoids, manifold, and tiny lifter mechanisms in AFM lifters. Excessive idling is also terrible for roller lifters, particularly when combined with bad engine oil maintenance.

They move a 5800 lb van pretty good and reliably

Little engine? Compared to what?

@@nexushexus4365 350 gas (5.7), 4.8, 5.3, 6.0, 6.2......lots of other options for GM trucks over the years.

Probably failed at 50k miles not 250

@@sef2273 253k to be exact.

Jason of Engineering Explained has a great episode all about this issue.

Yup. But again it comes down to maintenance. "Oil is cheaper and easier to change than the engine!"

Change the oil every three to four thousand miles solve the problem. These long extended oil change intervals are a joke.

The ports n intake valves look heavily carboned up ..Ford fixed this on the 5.0 by adding another set of port injectors that run part- time..

@@aaronhumphrey2009 I own two of the direct-injected 3.6 LFX V6 engines and supposedly they do the same thing but I keep my oil change with full synthetic every three to four thousand miles and use premium gas and don't have any of that problem. I think a lot of the valve cocaine comes from using the wrong oil not keeping it full and letting it go really long in between services.

Agree. The 3.6 that the Colorado/Canyon uses is a revvy sporty engine that makes good high RPM power. The 3.6 has proven to be very reliable too, but the 4.3 here is a proper truck engine with more power at lower RPM where trucks need it; the 4.3 would have been a better choice for GM's mid size trucks. I hear for 2023 GM is going with the 2.7 4 cylinder turbo engine for the Colorado/Canyon, and the 2.8 diesel and 3.6 V6 are going away. The engine in the video looks like a company fleet situation. Tons of miles, minimal care. That thing was nasty inside. There have been problems with AFM/DOD. Apparently current engines don't have it due to the chip shortage, a silver lining perhaps.

@@Duken4evr29 They have the AFM lifters, the ECU is just missing the chips to control them

Shouldn’t be too hard to find a scrap Northstar, afterall…

Why you wanna torture the poor man like that? :D

I bet the starter will still be in place 🤣

@@acemobile9806 and yet… it only takes 60-90 mins to change and isn’t plastered in road crud. Also not many people seem to complain about that on 2UZ Toyotas!

great engine,i PURPOSLY bought a 03 1500 BECAUSE it had the 4.3,some guys need a power trip to compinsate for tiny "equipment"lol

What more could you ask for? A new distributor, I guess.

If only the average owner had that kind of common sense. An AFM lifter doesn't guarantee a destroyed engine unless you ignore the obvious knocking noise and keep driving it anyways. It takes a long time to grind down a lifter like the one in this engine. Changing the oil frequently and never going beyond 5k miles makes far more of a difference than running any overpriced boutique full-syn engine oil. Just because the TBN of the oil suggests that it has thousands of miles left in its usable life doesn't mean that it isn't loaded with abrasive carbon soot and other combustion byproducts that the oil filter will never capture. The most common way to cause an AFM lifter issue is dirty oil. Sludge and abrasive carbon are are the single biggest cause of AFM lifters problems. Sludge and carbon accumulation are terrible for just about any complex modern engine, which is why so many engines with complex variable valve timing/lift systems have major issues or even die an early death -- VVT solenoid failures, timing chain tensioner failures, cam phaser failures, stretched timing chains, etc.

3500 is a good interval but 5-6k intervals are a bit too much.

Do you know how many lifters of each it uses? Thanks.

Probably best practice to change oil way before the computer says it's time on those DOD engines. Still seems like a lame idea to me.

Clearly not enough oil changes and probably running it well past 0% oil life a few times to build up that much varnish.

@@I_know_what_im_talking_about And probably running the cheapest oil he could get, just to make sure he'd have a problem.

overall these engines are virtually bulletproof over any ford , and took a ton of abuse/ neglect to get to this tear down stand , most will never see this type of abuse ~Very rare

Ditto ... loved my '98 Chevy 4.3 V6 ... never a moment's issue with it ... regular oil changes and put good Gas in her. And plenty of pep for a vehicle weighing 2 tons !!! Only engine I've had better in my 2.4L Toyota HiLux Turbo Diesel ... not available back home in USA but WOW ... indestructible (see UK Top Gear where they tried to destroy one ... hilarious !!!).

Do you have any experiance with this engine? ive had both versions and can say that GM did not screw up, this is a great engine and will last if maintained.

Same at least according to my uncle. He had a '96 & drove that thing until the body ceased to exist around the engine, I reckon it had at least 400K. He swears the old 4.3 is the best engine GM made.

It’s a supplier issue using bad alloy mixes. It’s been fixed now.

But you wouldn't be all that surprised once you got over the shock and annoyance of having to find a 9/16 inch spanner to remove the valve cover.

micheal baker - Since Eric is in the business of selling parts.....i'd say you're barking up the wrong tree. It would be cool, but he's getting some actual work done with these teardowns.

@@christopherweise438 yeah, when you put it like that, it would seem counterintuitive to "build" an engine solely for the sake of making a video

@@michaelbaker9347 - I'm just happy he takes us along AND explains everything as he's doing it. I've learned so much from Eric's videos, and i even grew up with a grandfather that owned a repair shop that i used to hang out at.

I had a 1989 S10 Blazer with an earlier version of this engine (RPO LB4), and later a 2001 Astro (RPO L35). Both had decent power and got decent mileage. Kept them both for 10+ years with no serious issues, although I had to replace some of the cheap plastic vacuum lines in the Astro (major PITA). Good engines IMHO.

power of a broken 305 with the gas usage of a 350. lol

@@throttlebottle5906 Well it was literally a 305 minus 2 cylinders, so not sure how your expectation's of high output is supposed to trump basic knowledge of physics. A completely stock '92 S10 with the 4.3L and 700R4 sure had me surprised, thing had way more power than any 4 cylinder (contrary to this breakdown queen's experiences) of it's time especially torque where it mattered down low for a truck. Even as a flying brick with a whopping 150hp it would smoke any stock all motor 4 cylinder hatchback off the line of it's day and many years after considering I had it around 2003 to 2007ish with over 250k miles before giving it to my X (what a waste that was). I had two problems with that truck, the cheap radiator and the heater core leaked and had to be replaced, I believe that was around the 210k mark, not a big deal considering it spent those last few years in Phoenix. Dry heat is good against rust but it's harsh on all the cheap plastics in cars. My 1976 Blazer faired better than newer cars for the 15 years I lived there

Recent cars, pcm shuts off the injector after a certain missfire counts.

Dang. I never got over 21 on highway in my 03 Chevy 1500 4.3 the 7 years I've owned it.

warren,homie u damn right! 1986-2013 4.3 was a bad mofo! got one in a s-10...fk'n thing flys 92 tbi

No you didn’t. Not even my manual S-10 broke 21mpg on the highway, completely empty. Updated spider injector got it up a little, but I have a very hard time believing a 4.3 got better MPG in a larger, heavier vehicle.

They weren't overly fuel efficienct... But they were reliable. Not too often I've ever heard them fail.

Don’t believe the on board computer. They lie.

3800 s are not related to the small block chev. the 4.3 is totally different. other than they both have 6 cylinders from a 8 cylinder block. the 3800 has a very interesting history. makes great reading. my buick 3800 has almost no parts in it. therefore less to go wrong.

@@cocodog85 you're thinking of the Buick (231) 3.8. It just so happened, that Chevrolet produced its own v6 with a similar displacement from 1980-1984. It was second in the line of "small block" v6s, between the 200 (3.3L), and the most known of the family, the 262 (4.3) V6, which had a production run lasting over 20 years

110hp has no midrange pull. 0-60 takes nearly 20 seconds

The block can be easily cleaned up. Need to hone the cylinder and lifter bores. Replacement bearings, pistons, cam, lifters, etc would probably make it not cost effective.

The lifters don't tolerate neglect. The average car buyer today won't even check the oil level between changes... which they think they can go 10k miles between changes... even if they let the vehicle idle for a half hour every morning before driving 2 miles to work. That kind of habit leads to excessive carbon soot (abrasive) and sludge deposits in the tiny passages that feed the AFM control system. The lifters activate and deactivate based on oil pressure, which is turned on and off by oil solenoids. Clog those channels up and the lifters don't lock and unlock like they should. Run dirty oil filled with abrasive carbon soot (coming from combustion byproducts, particularly with direct injection which tends to be more "sooty") through those lifters and they increase the chances of an issue with the pin that has to move freely to "collapse" the lifter and deactivate the cylinder. Excessive idling in the winter and not getting the vehicle up to temp will cause the engine oil to become diluted with fuel. Gasoline is a terrible lubricant and if you accumulate a lot of it in the engine oil, tiny mechanisms such as the ones found in AFM lifters will further increase the likelihood of a problem. There's also the issue of human perception vs statistics. GM builds and sells well over a million V6 and V8 engines with AFM lifters every year. When you have tens of millions of trucks, SUV's, and sports cars with AFM lifters, even a lifter failure rate of 1% means tens of thousands of vehicles that need to be repaired. If the owner is smart and stops driving the vehicle as soon as they hear the lifter tick, there usually isn't any serious damage and the lifters get replaced. But if you neglect basic maintenance and have bad driving habits, you end up with a lifter like the one that came out of this engine. They had to have driven hundreds if not thousands of miles with a LOUD lifter tick. Judging by the sludge, the owner of the vehicle this engine came from barely met the minimum maintenance requirements. In all likelihood it was a company truck and the company changed the oil sparingly and the employees drove the truck into the ground. The same kind of neglect that frequently kills AFM lifters is the same kind of neglect that causes the common issues in engines from all manufacturers -- VVT solenoid failures, cam phaser issues, timing chain tensioner issues, timing chain stretch, etc.

@@karlschauff7989 You'll love this story I got from one of the owners who also works the counter at my local parts haunt. Some old guy comes in with one of these DOD engines and it's got a lifter tick. It isn't very old. He wants sea foam to put in the oil to clean the lifters. Parts guy asks what oil he's using. 10w40, the only thing you should ever put in a Chevy. Parts guy politely informs him that the designs on these engines has changed a great deal in the last 30 years, and he really should use the oil specified on the cap, I think it was 5w20 5w30 DexOS. The old guy is belligerent, 10w40 is the only thing you should ever put in a Chevy, give me my sea foam and don't argue with me. Parts guy knows the guys at the dealership in town, and wouldn't you know, a few weeks later this same old guy's motor was junk with less than 20,000 miles because he refused to give it what it needed. Of course, that's not neglect, that's outright abuse for stubbornness' sake. I just thought you would find the story interesting.

I think he did. Subarus are flat engines

I think it does have DOD, did you see the DOD lifters?

@@Discretesignals oh if that's the case then it's a waste of aluminum

what does "permanent" deactivation refer to because I can control will the throttle pretty easily to switch between 4 to 6.

@@Discretesignals So what does that mean? Thanks

@@schoolmaster8038 It's a joke people talk about with GM engines. The cylinder deactivation caused the deactivated cylinders to be starved of oil which caused premature wear which lead to that cylinder being "permanently deactivated" because the engine just grenaded. According to GM this problem has be fixed, but I've seen as new as 2020s still have the same problem in the 5.3L

Ford switched to dual injection in 2017 as well to avoid similar issues plaguing the Ecoboost.

GM vehicles are junk dude

Can of CRC or seafoam induction cleaner periodically and an aftermarket oil catch can will solve the carbon issue.

long stretch to get a Euro engine on his table that isn't Merc or BMW given how rare they are in the US. *Maybe* able to get that engine if it ended up in the 500 but that's still a long shot.

@@TestECull thé came in the 500 Abarth and 5 dr Fiat 500L

@@JohnnyAFG81 Then there's a few of them putting along American roads, but again, it's still a bit of a long shot for one to cross Eric's teardown table. There'd have to be a market for the parts and enough cars on the road that there's a steady supply of cores to strip and sell. The other way would be for a viewer to donate one specifically for him to make a video with, as we saw with the smallblock Chevy he did two weeks ago. I don't see that many Fiat 500s. I see a couple, but for every 500 I see I'll see 10 vehicles that have an LS-based V8 in them.

@@TestECull i figured it’s a stretch to find one, was curious to see the multiair setup. I’d settle for 2.4 multiair that came in Chrysler products.

Didn't the 1.4t also come in the dodge dart?

Good choice. 2uzfe from toyota is the best normal engine ever made. Good choice...