🤣

Haha quality

😭😭😭😭😭

Chelsea are just daddy’s wallet team. Not a real team.

Tbf that’s me. Great shout whenever the boss makes a mistake as well.

The type of guy to say 'Ooh dont mind if I do' when someone brings donuts into work

This isn't an insult to Rory, it's an insult to the ESTABLISHMENT

This is a JAFFN listener

I don't get it

He definitely safely disconnects his USB before removing it.

at least u tried

😂

Who doesn't?

anyone who doesn't is living in the past. All fours is max efficiency. I'm gliding up stairs

@@tomhartland818yeah but are you on all fours going down

He wanted to join utd before brighton 😂... valencia was his hero😂

I mean he's young so what's your point?

So what? I'm from South Africa and I wanted a Chelsea shirt since primary school but I could not afford it.

@@KreepKidtheir point is that Caicedo was wearing a 20/21 season chelsea shirt in his ‘childhood’ photo and he was born in 2001

@@Renoir. I mean no one even knew him at that time.

Kinda sad what happened to him especially with how well he was doing in Brighton

Here come the sheep with the 👍

Ong

Only second to Robbie

​@@waseem_tajrobby's sometimes could be a bit annoying

@@waseem_tajrobbie is too bias

Not deliberated though

hes so funny man, its how he says his things with such conviction

Why u getting ripped this much in the comments mate🤣

not watched kick off in months saw it last week. u fully off it?

City are nowhere near the likes of United, liverpool, Arsenal and chelsea in terms of club size 👍🏻

@@jonlamb6980 they're pretty close to Chelsea tbf, nowhere near Arsenal, and Liverpool and United are in a league of their own

@@matthewbanton7077 maybe you’re right. I’m an arsenal fan but Chelsea success in Europe sometimes makes me believe they are touch and go with arsenal. No idea how a neutral would see it

Roman would've signed Mbappe , Haaland with that Money 😂😂

@@elypsemusic8042 easily! Worst case scenario would've been Osimhen, which I would happily settle for 😂

Except that was never the actual intention. They signed a bunch of young high ceiling prospects on long term deals with the intent of not just being a one and done team, but one that could compete year after year. But that won't be for another year or two which was expected.

@@thetimeisrite football isn't as forgiving as American sports. We have relegation, and it's not beyond the realm of possibility that a squad full of inexperienced (albeit talented) kids could be fighting relegation. You can't just wing it, especially in the PL. The way I see it, Chelsea are failing to score goals. You could have the best defense in the league but that means nothing when you can't make basic attacking moves.

@@MrPwrt I wouldn't say they are winging it, and when you have the likes of Luton, Everton, and Burnley in the league, I think you wouldn't have to worry about Chelsea being relegated.

Rory’s hit and miss but really balanced here

The most logical lot? Now I want to hear the others. On one question, they say Chelsea is more attractive than Liverpool because the current generation players grew up watching Chelsea win more silverwares than Liverpool. Then on the very next question, they say Chelsea is bigger than City because City was playing Gillingham in the 90s??

I hope you're being sarcastic...

Yeah guys. I’m not being sarcastic. But the others are so much worse 😂😂 it’s funny how most get to speak for Sky Sports haha

He said within that argument that liverpool, utd and arsenal are all in a league of their own as the biggest clubs in england above both chelsea and city so what are you on about?

the difference is size of club and attractiveness. I'm sure if they were asked as to whether man city or Chelsea are the more attractive club for a player to join, everyone would say city. That isn't the same as the size of a club.

Don't think he hates Chelsea but he's sat next to Rory who says outrageous comments to get a reaction.

@acer908 yeah rory tends to rub people the wrong way 😅 , but you can see the genuine disgust when they asked him to comment on chelsea , he HATES us.

Loserpool

I agree.

Absolutely correct. Arsenal, Liverpool and Man United are global clubs with global fanbases. They are up there with the Milans, Juventus, Real Madrid and Barcelona. Chelsea is popular with the players but not the fans so much. And City is a rung below them.

Liverpool and United do have lots of glory hunting fans, correct.

no one cares about either the london plastics or the manchester plastics, you both tinpot clubs funded by sugardaddies to have relevance. i cant comment on who is more tinpot, its a draw

When you typed this out did you genuinely think anyone would care?

I care. I rather appreciate the astutely detailed history lesson my man gave us for free. Big Up yourself man 🙌🏾

@@Miketrill_ng thanks for your positive feedback sir. I'm glad you could take something out of it!

Spot on lad 👍

Youth is not a guarantee for success, otherwise we would have millions of deserving ballon d'or

Lmao. Both of yous a joke. But looking strictly at trophies, man city are better than chelsea.

Prior to both sides being taken over, Chelsea had won only 11 trophies to Manchester City's 15. Manchester City had also won the FA Cup in 1904, this was before Chelsea had even been created. Just for context, Chelsea didn't win their first trophy until 1955, some 51 years after Manchester City had won their first trophy, and by that time, Manchester City had won 4. Chelsea have spent 89 years as a club in the English top flight, in comparison to Manchester City's 95. But by focusing on just a few of Manchester City's worst years of their over 130 year history, which as stated earlier was a trophy winning club before Chelsea were even created, is a failed attempt at trying to denigrate the club. Whilst City were busy playing in the FA Cup final in 1981 against Tottenham, Chelsea were scrapping it out in the 2nd tier finishing 12th. A position that would later become familiar with the club, this despite spending close to 1 billion pounds in one season. So as you can see, there is always a way to create and spin certain narratives in order to denigrate a club when certain facts are picked and chosen and other facts hidden, in order to fit a certain agenda.

There is no debate - Man. City are bigger. Hardly any history, yet still more than Chavski, and will pass your total honours count in December with a Club World Cup victory. It's not looking good...

@@Mikejames1080 you said everything I was about to say. By every metric City are historically a more significant side than Chelsea. Chelsea is the definition of a modern-day significant club - they were pretty good before Roman and have been mega since 2004. When you combine that with the fact they're based in the richest part of London and had tons of players from very passionate parts of the world like West Africa, their growth was turbo-charged. But pre-1990s, this wasn't even a debate

@@africancoastchelsea are massive

You’re forgetting something: if they didn’t want to be smelly scousers they wouldn’t have chosen Liverpool

​@@AndyBlue297Proud to be smelly! 😁

😂

Blokes a spac

@@Mikejames1080 u chat a lot of waffle

I don't even really have City stuff in my office I make videos in so that doesnt hold out lol - its not my fault City are better than everyone right now!

Good

City are already bigger

City have already won more PL titles than Chelsea, and have been way more consistent that Chelsea. Keep in mind even with all the billions Chelsea had season under Mourinho etc where they finished in the 2nd half of the table, not to mention last season. They also finished outside of the top 4 various times since having all that money in the last few years, whilst City havent in many years

@@footballhipstertv Chelsea have been the most successful English club as far as trophies in that time period so what’s the point and I hate them it’s just a fact city will be bigger than them in a few years and never be bigger than the other 3 regardless of what they win it’s as simple as that the prem teams are lucky arsenal united and Liverpool exist that’s why they get all this money for the rights

@@MKillip1994 Your time's up, old man. There's a new sheriff in town.

In England, currently Manchester City won’t be as big as those other English clubs because obviously parents want you to grow up supporting the club they grew up supporting but outside of Europe now that other countries have access to things like Peacock, online livestreaming, cable TV, etc. to watch EPL football they are growing up to be Manchester City fans because of how beautiful it is to watch their style of football. When Manchester City came to Houston to play a friendly against Club America the stadium was almost full and it was way more blue than yellow which I found surprising because Club America is a Mexican league team and Houston is a city full of Mexican people.

“Barely”nah mate Chelsea is significantly a bigger club it’s not only about trophy,the size of Chelsea is much more global and bigger than city ,city was a relegation club before 2009 I ain’t saying Chelsea’s comparable and they are leagues above like united ,Liverpool or arsenal but they are a lot bigger I mean city just won a treble and there’s really no fuss about that anymore

You’re agreeing with Stephen. Rory is acting like there’s a huge gap when it’s actually just a one trophy gap and City will likely even pass them this season.

@@TP-pq9xx one trophy?😂 How?

@@justjerryblaq5173 Because City have one less trophy than Chelsea. It’s not complicated.

@@TP-pq9xx ok

Fake Liverpool fan lol not from Liverpool and probably not gone to a game before.

She was just staying in the fence mate, she said nothing special. The opinions were kind of a bunch of nothing that can’t really be disagreed nor agreed with

have you never seen ty?

@@azcukfan8068 I mean does it matter? Ian Rush, a Liverpool legend, is not from Liverpool. He must be devasted and crying in a corner after seeing your comment right now.

​@azcukfan8068 lol! You are clueless! She is part of The Anfield Wrap. She has access to pretty much most things at the club.

But you can fault him for paying so much for players who haven’t proven themselves at all

Young, sure, but quality? Maybe if you mean poor quality. Sure, they have time to improve, but how many of them shown a single sign of that potential?

If Chelsea want to have a couple of good players in every position, then how do you explain the players they've been buying over the last year?

​​@@man4437most. That's why the people who are paid to scout players advised the club to sign these guys. Unless you mean that we're supposed to judge these 21 year olds after 4 games...

You kinda can fault him for the ambition he is showing though because if he spent nothing and kept the same squad you'd be better off 😂

Yes. It does.

In that case Chelsea was founded in 2003. City had more league titles and FA Cups than Chelsea before Abramoivch's takeover. Like mentioned in the video neither are Liverpool, Man United, or Arsenal in terms of stature but that's not to say that either can't catch them becasue all it takes is time with sustained success

​@@matthewriley2178so wrong city before oil money nobody's not even making champions league city with oil money when sheik mansour took over won trophy's and improved. Arsenal under Wenger 2000s- around 2017 he got a invincible season with a prime team of Henry, veira, David seamen, dennis berkamp, Ashley Cole, willam galas. Manchester United under sir Alex 1990s-2013 less budget but kept getting better and better the season after under David moise with sir Alex squad flopped and finished 7th. Chelsea with roman abramovich built a squad that lasted a long time look at the 2012/13 Chelsea squad you had cech in goal, Ashley Cole LB, ivanovic RB, Terry and cahill CB midfield of lampard, jaun Mata, moses, malouda, obi mikel ect and attack of Fernando torres, Eden hazard, demba ba

The stupidity expressed online just gets worse and worse.

​@@declangaming24learn English and eat vitamin. You've no idea what you barking

@@matthewriley2178 city doesn't have more overall trophies Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea combined have more trophies

first things he’s said with truth. city will never be a big club and could never been compared to united arsenal and liverpool.

@@oliver_burch11 you become a big club with time, trophies and consistency. It's inevitable. Already there imo. Your feelings as a rival don't mean anything in this discussion. It's gonna happen if City carry on being successful

Question was who is the biggest club . In the present moment ? City . In overall history of football ? Chelsea .

@@EsteemedKompanythey’re a big club only in england tbh

​@@EsteemedKompanyit's going to.... Not that it is right now that was the question so behave.

The fact is though, that if you're spending £110 million on Caicedo, you want him to perform straightaway. That is A LOT of money to invest in a player who'll only come good in a year's time.

@@youngdolo8he has played 100min🤣 chill, give him atleast 3 full games too settle in the squad and play style, then start asking questions

4 weeks? Chelsea spent the bulk of the money last season

I think that looking at this team It will take about three seasons to grow into a title challenging team. It's certainly possible but not at the moment

@@Alex-di9kr tbh I don't see any team catching Man City anytime soon.

Well into their second decade of being at the very top of english football. If you're writing a book and you're half way through, do you tell someone 'I've just started writing it'

No you dont say ive just started writing it, but you also don't say that you're bigger than the club that has already written their books. Chelsea being a bigger club than City currently doesn't mean City is small, it quite literally just means one is bigger than the other@@neilgannon205

Man city have a much more established history than Chelsea, that's a fact

Yeah I absolutely agree with that… If they are on these long term contracts then give it a bit more time to judge rather than 5-6 weeks into a new season

We’ve squandered millions mate there’s no denying it

No long term plan there ,ye signed them on long contracts cuzco that's the only way ye could cheat the system

@@stevenosullivan187 how’s it cheating the system? Any team can do it…