I never trust when a KZfaqr says "affordable". Most KZfaqrs are so out of touch with reality.
@zachdavis72342 ай бұрын
He mean affordable in comparison to the other 6k cameras
@imagistatheimagista18702 ай бұрын
Agreed. Definitely not “affordable”. Plenty of way cheaper options. However, it does look like a great option for a full featured lighter weight and smaller in size “all rounder” A better video title might have been “Powerful Small All-Rounder Camera”.
@zulfahmi6332 ай бұрын
Agreed
@nope86372 ай бұрын
The title should be switched to cheaper, or more budget friendly. A budget friendly plane may be 200k, but that isnt the same as affordable even though planes are millions normally
@attraxia2 ай бұрын
Considering a lot of cameras are around the 3k-5k price range I think this is decent
@szczecin_2 ай бұрын
1500$ What a world we live in where it's considered affordable
@hermanzhang64942 ай бұрын
Already very cheap compared to other full frame cameras
@rephaelreyes85522 ай бұрын
@@hermanzhang6494 just buy yourself a 10 year old full frame DSLR. Cameras aren't like smart phones. The technological advancements of cameras aren't that fast
@cmog60362 ай бұрын
This is very cheap compare to sony
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
Everything is relative. Is $1500 at lot of money? Absolutely! But is $1500 a lot of money for a full-frame camera? Absolutely not!
@HellooDoggy2 ай бұрын
@@TomCalton Yeah, but where's the affordability part?
@irychioperez82722 ай бұрын
Sir this cost $1,700 nothing cheap here
@heymynameangelАй бұрын
For a 6K camera, 1700 is ridiculously cheap compared to other 6K cameras, if you really want a bang for ur buck though I’d recommend a lumix g7, resells around 400, shoots in 4K, does the job
@lucadipaolo1997Ай бұрын
@@heymynameangel well, the X-S20 is 1500 and does 6K open gate as well and has a viewfinder, mechanical shutter, with the only "disadvantage" being it's APS-C. If this thing had a viewfinder I think it would be more appealing.
@heymynameangelАй бұрын
@@lucadipaolo1997 true that, thats also a very good alternative! forgot all about that camera lol
@Lowns_300Ай бұрын
Cheap af for a full frame
@iaintamishАй бұрын
bruh who are these people why dont you buy me a 1cm choclate for 1k
@djlapio93litlebro2 ай бұрын
I will buy it used, from people that bought on credit but never end up using the camera, so to recoup loss they listed it on eBay.
@jaysonva4256Ай бұрын
This, best way to buy gear shit is too expensive these days and why pay the depreciation tax
@nickbarrow2805Ай бұрын
Great idea. I’ve bought all my instruments used, except for one of my saxes. You can get absolute steals if you’re willing to make a 3-hour drive or pay for shipping.
@thomasmacdonough288Ай бұрын
Used gear is awesome. Like you say, many people buy these things and just let them collect dust. Unless you're buying retired gear from professional photographers, every used lens and body I've purchased has been practically unused.
@jaysonva4256Ай бұрын
@@thomasmacdonough288 Not to mention manufacturer refurbished gear! I got a refurbished canon rp for 600$ from canon with a warranty when I got it, it was like new
@miklosnemeth856620 күн бұрын
The guys who buys S9 know perfectly why they buy it. This is the camera I have been waiting for 10 years, so I bought it immediately when it was available in my city. Definitely, I will not sell it any soon, it is fantastic camera with the Sigma compact prime lenses.
@Zainphotography2 ай бұрын
This guy is determined to make his YT channel grow big and it doesn't matter where, when and how the viewer wastes their money.
@CallMeRabbitzUSVI2 ай бұрын
BINGO! You finally got it, now multiple that by 1000 and you have Camera/Video KZfaq
@420gl72 ай бұрын
Affordable? Since when is £1.799,99 affordable??
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
For a full frame camera, it's a good price. They're usually around $3-5k
@ziks41032 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain thats complete bs. They are by far not in the 3-5k. Its 2-3k and under 2k if you get a good deal or cash back. Smth sony and fuji do a lot
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@@ziks4103 so it's still cheaper than that. Nikon Z9 is $6k, Nikon Z7 is $2.5k, Cannon R5 is $2.9k.... so the $1.7k is affordable in it's class
@icedcocoa012 ай бұрын
I'm seeing so many comments justifying the price tag for this camera, and while I think it is a powerful camera I cannot agree with the affordable part. I think the title was originally "An Affordable full-frame camera" for this short, which is now changed to "Affordable 6k video camera" to make it more sense (though I could be wrong, so sorry if my memory is incorrect Tom). But as there's already an actual affordable (and newly made) full-frame camera - Nikon Z5 - I still can't agree with "one of the most affordable full-frame camera" part. currently $821.99 on amazon for body-only, and Nikon made it much more content camera after years-long software updates. It does suck at video part, but 1080p wise it's still decent. For video part, other than I don't get the obsession with 'full-frame' tag, I don't think it's even a good budget video camera when there's severe recording limits (6k 10min, 4k 15min, fhd 20min??), no viewfinder, no hotshoe, no anti-flickering, suffering from rolling shutter. I would go with new APS-C (super 35mm) cameras which are a lot more affordable than the full-frame (and more variety as well), Panasonic S5 which is full-frame currently under $1200 (body) with lot more features. And then there's a wide world of well-used cameras. But what do I know? According to many comments in this section I'm hopelessly broke when I don't find this camera attractive for it's price tag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@icedcocoa01 that is because you don't know the difference between a full-frame camera and an iphone. For a semi-professional camera, $1.7k is amazing pricing.
@andrewyarcew85422 ай бұрын
No hot shoe, no viewfinder, 6.2k for ten minutes, 4k for 20 minutes, poor controls, no audio out, pancake lens only with manual focus and aperture of F8. 1500 for a body only Good luck with that 😂
@ademdingin2 ай бұрын
No mechanical shutter for photo😅😅
@brugj032 ай бұрын
Yeah, all those youtubers are bought and sold. They`re making commercials. That lens is really worthless.
@Zack-xz1phАй бұрын
if it was 300 or less it would be worth it just to have a travel full frame camera
@brugj03Ай бұрын
@@Zack-xz1ph For 300 i would buy it right now. I do like the looks.
@PixelMoverVPАй бұрын
Sheesh f8 is rough. It’s also 30fps
@vaskoobscura_2 ай бұрын
This camera is $1500 USD it's not affordable when you consider how little you get for your money. You can get a used EOS R5 or R6mkII for around $2000 and get way more value for your money.
@turo99920002 ай бұрын
1500 is less than 2000. It's more affordable
@replaygoplay79192 ай бұрын
or a sigma fp for the same price, or a nikon z5 for 700$ , or a sony a7ii for 1000$
@jaysonva4256Ай бұрын
Canon R7 or Sony FX30 would be wayyyyy better especially if you want to shoot video lot more support and lenses better af just as many codec options more flexibility or if you want full frame there’s the R8 and these are all the brand new options maybe if it was priced more accordingly like say 1k maybe 1,100$ but for 1500-1700$ it just doesn’t make any sense imo
@Kevin-mx4vmАй бұрын
Used vs new
@JJARCHIE8 күн бұрын
I can get the s9 used at 1k , its almost a thousans buxks cheaper
@reapanomin8992 ай бұрын
I'd probably let it age for 2-3 years and then purchase it when the price can be anywhere between 15-30% less by then (used condi of course).
@sangwonpark896718 сағат бұрын
Yeah I'll remember this and pick it off a pawn shop at 50~70% off 5 years in the future
@titomiguelmarques55122 ай бұрын
A second hand a7r ii is more affordable still, yet has twice the resolution, 4k, pdaf, ibis... All of that in 2015, currently for half the price on ebay. A steal.
@colbyfinnigsmier9332 ай бұрын
Funny that you say that because I literally just bought an a7rii. Great camera!
@Ridge_does_tech2 ай бұрын
@@colbyfinnigsmier933 same I just bought my a7rii it’s a lovely camera!
@ilfaraone582 ай бұрын
Wait,the s9 is not stabilized?
@JJARCHIEАй бұрын
Apsc battery, 4k30 at 100mbps 8bit, no open gate,no 4k60, 4k is also from a lineskip variant,blurry fhd, pre a7iii/a6400 colors, ibis issues ( like the a7ii ), bad low light performance ( 1-1,5 stop worse )
@saturnmedia1Ай бұрын
@@JJARCHIE Will you elaborate a bit on that please?
@theinternetkid2 ай бұрын
😂 everything is affordable, depending on whom you ask.
@Jeremy.Jerelle2 ай бұрын
Canon RP is full frame at half the price...
@bryan3am2 ай бұрын
I think the selling point to this camera is mostly the size. An alternative to Leica's Q line or Fuji's X100 line.
@fotografalexandernikolis2 ай бұрын
@@bryan3am With a rolling shutter sensor and no mechanical shutter, it's not going to compete with any of those either. X100 has an F2 lens whereas this camera has no lens that small and bright. Bruh you just looked at the physical dimensions and thought "oh a competitor!" without taking ANY other factors into account? 💀
@michelecintramika84822 ай бұрын
Nikon Z5 > Canon RP
@rayms6823Ай бұрын
@@bryan3am if you want to compete with fujifilm and leica, missing an EVF is a big discouragement for photographers. With this price I would at least want a EVF. All I can say is that’s a Ricoh with video features and bigger sensor… lol such a stupid decision for Panasonic
@jaysonva4256Ай бұрын
@@fotografalexandernikolistbf this seems to be exactly what Panasonic did when maki g this thing
@vaskoobscura_2 ай бұрын
This camera is trash. You have 10 min record limit that's pretty much useless. You're better off making videos with your phone and saving up your money for a real camera. For Photography we'll see how the AF works when the non-sponsored reviewers get to test it.
@jaysonva4256Ай бұрын
Has no mechanical shutter so I doubt photography will be better
@kylejenkins5050Ай бұрын
@@jaysonva4256 I tried it the other day and it’s not good for anything you’d get paid for. It’s good for street stuff with a 24 or 35 mil but other than that, the AF doesn’t track well, I get banding under LED lightings, and the readout is slow so when taking pictures of folks playing soccer or volleyball, the ball or arms will warp. The cam isn’t good enough for its specs. Also, why is there no grip??? It’s like a phone with a lens mount
@Drawperfectcircles2 ай бұрын
It’s over a thousand dollars, bro, that ain’t affordable
@neyfarias232 ай бұрын
You might as well just buy a second hand sony a7 III and a lens for the same price 🤣
@astralgod64482 ай бұрын
@@neyfarias23 the sony a7 III is over 2k euros where i live
@heymynameangelАй бұрын
dawg its a quality camera, other 6k cameras sell for 3k+ , it damn near cut the traditional price in half which makes it more affordable .. wat
@JJARCHIE8 күн бұрын
@@neyfarias23i dont see an a73 with 4k60 nor 10bit with the lumix ibis it has
@trulsdirio2 ай бұрын
Yeah. Nah. Crippled a bit too much to achieve the size. Also isn't the Z5 cheaper? And soooo much better?
@laurenthenry2 ай бұрын
Buyest review. 15 minutes max recording in 4K LMAO, are we back 10 years ago Pana ?
@gwenlop9512Ай бұрын
Panasonic actually still thinks they’re in 2008. You’ll actually need uber-proprietary software in order to even read and export the files, you will have to jump through hoops since the software only works for Windows 8 32-bit and it’s also only available as a Metro app that only works on a Let’s Note CF-XZRF7VS, otherwise it will outright crash the whole in classic, convoluted Panasonic style.
@manavmanav314 күн бұрын
just FYI i think you meant *biased not buyest
@Xottapchenko2 ай бұрын
Panasonic forgot the hotshoe :(
@tonkatsu99072 ай бұрын
the hot shoe is right there?
@sauzefilms2 ай бұрын
@@tonkatsu9907 the S9 has a cold shoe.
@kylejenkins50502 ай бұрын
@@tonkatsu9907 there’s no electronics that allow anything you may place in the slot to communicate with the camera, thus by definition makes it a “cold shoe”
@Xottapchenko2 ай бұрын
@@tonkatsu9907 no, it’s a cold shoe
@gwenlop9512Ай бұрын
How does Panasonic go from inventing the first camcorder with image stabilization to forgetting about adding contacts to a 1,000$+ camera’s shoe so you can use Speedlites? At least, they could’ve put an additional connection in the shoe so you could use some accessories they made like a viewfinder or a microphone, like the Sony Multi Interface Shoe
@darkpheonix690082 ай бұрын
Cropping doesn't make the shot anamorphic. Still looks like a nice small camera
@escapemetracks2 ай бұрын
lol this camera is not affordable. Is almost about 2000€
@phin18712 ай бұрын
Affordable FULL FRAME camera.
@hexium_2 ай бұрын
@@phin1871there are many cheaper full frame cameras buddy
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k
@fotografalexandernikolis2 ай бұрын
@@phin1871 Still a waste of money. It's bad for video because it's got a 15min recording limit, and it's bad for stills because it doesn't even have a mechanical shutter despite using a slow sensor. You'll get rolling shutter on anything that moves.
@aaronDyates2 ай бұрын
The most affordable mirror less full frame would be a canon RP.
@michelecintramika84822 ай бұрын
Nop! Nikon Z5 > Canon RP
@CallMeRabbitzUSVI2 ай бұрын
@@michelecintramika8482 Canon RP usually sells for $600 refurbed from Canon
@leoslash2 ай бұрын
$2000 isn’t affordable.
@maximedelpech72172 ай бұрын
Of course it is a substantial amount of money, but there are very few cameras with this kind of specs. Not every camera has open gate at 6.2k on a full frame sensor. There are other options, and the one that seems the most comparable is the sigma fp.
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
Yes it is. Full-frame cameras are usually $3-5k. It's very cheap within the category. It's like saying a $30k sports car. Can you find cheaper cars? Yes, but it's an affordable car in it's category
@maximedelpech72172 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain totally, I think "value" would be a more adequate word than cheap 🤝
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@@maximedelpech7217 he says "affordable". The definition of "affordable" is literally "reasonably price"
@stefanvasilev93182 ай бұрын
Someone at Panasonic HQ saw the Nikon Zf with the color leather and boxy design and was like "We need that as well" 😅
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
Ngl, I got Zf vibes when they announced the colourways too
@stefanvasilev93182 ай бұрын
@@TomCalton Just no EVF, so you're stuck with the toirist-taking photos-with-phone stance 😂
@Wildridefilms2 ай бұрын
Panasonic did multiple colour options for the GM1 and GM5 about a decade ago.
@free_re_fells2 ай бұрын
No hot-shoe, no deal.
@user-uv1ux2sm2s2 ай бұрын
It’s cool but no EVF is a dealbreaker for me and I’m assuming most others in the market for a FF camera body.
@Girtthquake2 ай бұрын
Affordable? Just looked it up, its $1700
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k
@kylejenkins50502 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain this is like the 5th time you ever copy pasted this comment with wrong information. Full frame cameras (brand new) start at 1200 bucks. If we’re talking used in new condition with less than 4 hours of use time, they start at around 800 bucks
@CallMeRabbitzUSVI2 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgainYou can grab a Nikon Z5 right now for $860 new, please stop spamming this comment
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@kylejenkins5050 Don't compare used cameras to new ones. Fujifilm's GFX50S is $3k, Sony A7 iv is $2.2k, Nikon's Z 8 is $3.5k, and Cannon's R5 is $3k. A $1,700 camera is extremely affordable in it's category
@bedenegative64502 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain Right but those cameras blow this out the water they aren't in the same bracket. This costs the same as an s5ii in some regions. It's a fine camera but it's style over substance. It's for people that want a cool camera not for budget minded people.
@shApYT2 ай бұрын
Isn't it the z5 that's the cheapest new?
@DarthJarJar6Ай бұрын
My cousin made night vision out of these. Surprisingly good
@TheRoboRyan2 ай бұрын
3:2/3:3 aspect ratio, my beloved
@soprolakido2 ай бұрын
affordable is used a7 with 11k shutter for 450 eur
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
Yeah, where are you finding that price? Because New, the A7 costs nearly the same price
@soprolakido2 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain you cant buy new a7, they are discontinued
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@@soprolakido Then it's a false equivalence. $1400 is an affordable price, for a new full frame camera. That's like someone going "this brand new sports car is affordable" and you go "No, because if you buy a used 2008 car its cheaper"
@soprolakido2 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain but you can buy a7iii new for 1500 eur or a7c
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
@@soprolakido $1.4k is still cheaper
@ChasedRabbitАй бұрын
Really interesting point with the aspect ratio, that’s pretty cool. Not something I’d have thought of as a plus, but actually very useful in a time where content has to be posted in different aspect ratios for various platforms/content types.
@Hiah.l2 ай бұрын
What were Panasonic executives thinking when they implemented a cold shoe for this
@gwenlop9512Ай бұрын
Panasonic executives were WAY too high to think. They didn’t even think about normal camera things or stuff that would be a great compelling reason why to buy an S9 over other cameras.
@mewli74022 ай бұрын
affordable? I don't think so
@VideoGameBoxReviews2 ай бұрын
what's wrong with you?
@mewli74022 ай бұрын
@@VideoGameBoxReviews Hey bro, I mean this new camera w/o mechanic shutter, no hot shoes, no EVF, no small & compact lens to choose from (that MF 26mm F8 is a joke), recording limit (even in FHD), plastic body (no weather sealing) and it charged for 1500$
@tuvirat2382 ай бұрын
I think it’s versatile than Leica Q Series.
@yorgenibnstrangle30722 ай бұрын
I was exited to see affordable. Then I googled it and its $1,799.99 as of mid 2024. You gotta be kidding.
@olivertrees2 ай бұрын
It’s just 6k, not 6.2
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
What an idiot- you're absolutely right, my apologies! Not sure where I got the extra .2k from!? Thank you for correcting me!
@osepvelasquez2 ай бұрын
@@TomCalton hahaha rofl
@reaxxion2 ай бұрын
1,500 affordable? LOL
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
In the world of full frame, this (unfortunately) is considered affordable 😅
@reaxxion2 ай бұрын
@@TomCalton darn it! I guess I’m stuck w my lumix gx85 for now 😅
@willywonka30502 ай бұрын
$1500 for a full frame is a steal dude
@kylejenkins50502 ай бұрын
@@willywonka3050 Canon R8, RP, A6700 with a speed booster all beat this lumix. This LUMIX has cool features to keep up with the pack, but not any real hardware to stand out. I’d buy a used one for an actual deal and use it for everyday carry but not for paid gigs
@sauzefilms2 ай бұрын
@@reaxxion bruh dont listen to them. a brand new Nikon Z5, Canon RP, Sony A7c/A7iii body are much cheaper.
@yoshy26282 ай бұрын
That's 1.7K... affordable?
@VideoGameBoxReviews2 ай бұрын
For a full frame camera, yes it's affordable.
@kaihughes18572 ай бұрын
CAD $2000.00 affordable to whom?
@lauverry2 ай бұрын
affordable for what it can do lol, nothing is “affordable” when talking about cameras
@miklosnemeth856620 күн бұрын
I bought this camera, the Panasonic S9, as the first customer in my city, immediately when it was available. In my decision almost none of the features mentioned here played any major role. My preferences were totally different, this was the camera I had been waiting for 10 years.
@guillermo7168Ай бұрын
Full frame and all that in such a small camera? OMFG! 🤯 I used to be really interested in cameras some years ago but left that hobbie around 2019, technology has come so far
@liamleech47482 ай бұрын
where is the grip
@astrogalaxytravelerАй бұрын
Waiting for iPhone fan boys to say that they still prefer the iPhone as their primary camera.
@eggyvictory2217Ай бұрын
If you don’t eat a Big Mac everyday for 284 days you will be able to afford this
@itsfikree2 ай бұрын
Great camera 😮
@ecchstore293911 күн бұрын
A 36x24mm 6K resolution is perfect for 4K resolution at 22x18 mm original cinemascope projection area. With a classic standard 1,33 or 1,66x anamorph lens it can priducttiom a 4096x1640 px sized 2,38:1 perfect output. As we seen with S5II.
@AKB47ANCEАй бұрын
I agree not cheap , i don’t know what other brand or models run for that probably support what this does as well . If I had to guess it’s touristy cheaper than the alternatives
@datcheesecakeboi674521 күн бұрын
It's the cheapest new full frame
@h.b646319 күн бұрын
people are compaining that he called it “affordable” when he in fact called it “one of the most affordable full-frame cameras”. just because it looks similar it cannot be compared to your mother’s point-and-shoot from 2006. it has a full-frame sensor and his statement is just comparing it to others like it
@techpassion4126Ай бұрын
The KZfaq algorithm is the devil because now I'm curious to buy this lol, those samples look stunning! Never seen your videos before or any camera-related vids in general, just gonna have a quick look around the channel!
@BoomixDeАй бұрын
Full frame, 10bit, Open gate is actually impressive compared to more expensive cameras
@aidenle6522 ай бұрын
Lol people keep crying about one word the guy said. For over 90% of us, this (photography/videography with a camera) is a luxury, not a necessity, so being affordable should be put in context when compared with other recent full frame cameras that offer similar features out there. It will not be affordable when the buyers can’t even consider other options.
@kulupal4 күн бұрын
Beware. This camera has only an electronic shutter. This has some consequences on shooting in rooms with artificial light. You can get some banding. Too bad that they did not build in a mechanical shutter
@liamcroy24942 ай бұрын
Yes its expensive for a camera, but it's already been pointed out by many people that it is considered affordable COMPARED to other cameras of its type. And, for the people its i.e. content creators, its great. Film in the average 16:9 aspect ratio, then crop to whatever you need for shortform content, or 9:16. It also debuts a few new streamlined editing features. What im getting at is that its cheap AND competitive for the people shopping for this kind of camera
@Concept_8042 ай бұрын
I see people saying numbers that get close to 2000 here, but to Brazil... It's R$16k (Help me)
@eggydrums2 ай бұрын
Considered getting rid of my X100V for this but the lack of mechanical shutter is making me doubt.
@tolgaygulec2 ай бұрын
The v is better
@michelecintramika84822 ай бұрын
@@tolgaygulec Nop!
@michaelbmw19313 күн бұрын
I love Panasonic. My number 1. Always.
@maneesh2oo7Ай бұрын
All my hopes burnt to ashes after opening comment section 🙂 you guys saved my time
@pawelmod32922 ай бұрын
In 2019 I have bought Sony A7iii for 1450€ Even today a7iii would be a better choice for photos. I am not so sure for video…
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
You can find this camera for 1661€, it's not that much of a difference
@pawelmod32922 ай бұрын
@@jjOnceAgain used a7iii these days is 800-900€, still better (and cheaper) for photos
@brugj032 ай бұрын
The a7III is a much better tool, maybe not on paper but when you`re working with it, it`s no comparison.
@dfotosАй бұрын
The S5 II doesn't cost that much more either. I don't understand the hype from many KZfaqrs about the S9. 15 or 10 minutes shooting limit, no viewfinder and an F8 pancake without autofocus. I don't understand Panasonic. A Gx9 II would have made much more sense. But the photography world is simply clamouring for the so-called full-frame format, which in reality is a 35 mm format.
@DinoBoy238Ай бұрын
Does it overheat?
@ze3bar2 ай бұрын
2000 is "affordable"
@jjOnceAgain2 ай бұрын
For a full frame camera, it is. If you want to take regular pictures, use an iphone. Full frame cameras are usually +$3k
@createdbycreatortocreateАй бұрын
I feel like people saying $1500 is unaffordable when Canons newest video camera goes for $6000+. Ill definitely be buying this camera especially with best buys 12 month 0 interest financing
@simonanthonytrudeau78982 ай бұрын
No EVF, no mechanical shutter, 6k Open Gate in 4:2:0 chroma subsampling… CAD$2000… Just no.
@futoenjoyer2 ай бұрын
to be fair s5ii and s5iix also only supports 10bit 4:2:0 on 6k open gate
@GeorgeDaPro3847Ай бұрын
Bro took never judge a book by its cover to a whole new level 💀
@thesinysterstyle21 күн бұрын
It's not about megapixels, it's about the physical size of the sensor.
@tolgaygulec2 ай бұрын
A hybrid viewfinder would make this camera very popular but without, a forgotten piece of tech in 5 years. Sorry panasonic but you don't understand the game.
@johnclarke13192 ай бұрын
if you call $1500 affordable! you still need the good lenses or your wasting the money, so add at least $1000 more
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
You're right, the world of full frame can be a pretty expensive place, but this is one of the cheapest options.
@ecumenicalhereticАй бұрын
Removing the mechanical shutter was mistake. Jello video is either passable or not even an issue for most people, but jello photos are unusable
@Chow00122 ай бұрын
15 min 4k record limit, 4k60p 1.5x crop and a 26mm f/8 manual focus lens which cannot use nd filters stop the cap - terrible camera
@emiliomarcano12 ай бұрын
Everyone complaining about the price. You obviously don’t run a photography business. Anything sub $2000 is CHEAP!
@WNKYFCEАй бұрын
Frame of reference for Photography KZfaqrs. Anything over $600 is not considered "affordable" by anyone making under $200,000 a year, which is 99% of people.
@taz9311Ай бұрын
I hate this shit. CHOOSE your words carefully. I watched this and was like "damn, if it's affordable maybe I'll check it out, I've been looking for a good video camera and this looks great"....I checked the comments and this is mad expensive. There's nothing affordable about it at all, how out of touch with reality and the economy are these people???
@cosmic3829Ай бұрын
It’s the most affordable full frame on the market.
@taz9311Ай бұрын
@@cosmic3829 not all of us are camera enthusiasts or people with that money laying around. Algorithm found the wrong people for his content.
@CrowFlips2 ай бұрын
I feel like I’m not trusting a lot of new companies except Sony canon or Nikon. I think that one of them with a good lens is basically all you need instead of a bunch of small artisan cameras. It does look quite nice though.
@pinkgiraffe8084 күн бұрын
Why anybody would choose this over an OG S5 or S5II is beyond me. Its rehashed parts to make a profit.
@AyFantasmaАй бұрын
Reminds me of the Sony a7c I feel as if cameras are going for smaller bodies on purpose
@lalasusu12 күн бұрын
Affordable. It means, in full frame plus compact camera comparisons. Its definitely not for ALL of you. Compares to its rival sony a7c2, he is definitely more affordable.
@Aeonikst85 күн бұрын
I was really hoping this camera would have been better, but the pancake lens is not good , no ibis , no evf and electric shutter put me off. I'm sure it fits other peoples needs though.
@geassmanleonАй бұрын
Just once I'd love if a youtuber showed me something "affordable" that is not the same price as my rent
@kylejenkins50502 ай бұрын
The cripple hammer hit harder than cannon this time
@bromoboy15 күн бұрын
people in comments seem forgetting their brains to understand his point, this is the cheapest full frame compared to other brands.....and also the chepest full frame with 6k 10 bit video.....we don't speak about full hdmi port, raw, or viewfinder here.....
@manuelaj3z11610 күн бұрын
SERIUS QUESTION, what is the advantage to have a full frame camera?
@coolduder100114 күн бұрын
U said that, I immediately looked it up and would have spat out my drink if I had one. Can buy a used a7 for less than $800
@fayed.untitled22 күн бұрын
What's the video recording limit of this camera again? :D
@asdcomasdcom2 ай бұрын
Can you make a full video for this S9? I’m very interested in.
@TomCalton2 ай бұрын
Already live my friend: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qcWeiKumt9W3aWw.html
@encloud19Ай бұрын
In Malaysia, it is sold at around RM7,400 - RM7,900 @ around USD1,614. Not really affordable for commoners.
@bapt_andthebasses2 ай бұрын
LUT ? As in Teal & Orange filter... Like no other colours exist?
@kris46372 ай бұрын
Lut doesn't mean teal and orange filter.
@bapt_andthebasses2 ай бұрын
@@kris4637 You missed my point: all the LUT he showed on this video looked very teal&orange. All of them... so, honestly people are abusing that kind of filtering.
@markshirley012 ай бұрын
How do you move from C1 in video to C1 in photo
@bradl26362 ай бұрын
Basically a Cripple Cam 😂
@Recycler-tq1cl28 күн бұрын
It should have been built as a photography centric camera, a pancake kit lens, with minimal video capability but priced much lower.
@brandonlong27963 күн бұрын
“Most affordable full frame cameras”
@josephromano61684 күн бұрын
I'd rather stick with the 40MP Fuji for the same price
@powderiders6054Ай бұрын
for that price I can get a go pro, iPhone SE , and a cheap Panasonic superzoom.
@datcheesecakeboi674521 күн бұрын
It's not a full frame camera tho
@johanolca277219 күн бұрын
I hear ‘affordable’, I watch a part of the video, I search the actual price, I realise I lost precious time of my life 😩
@Voltarion_WWaАй бұрын
It's more expensive than many full frame canon mirrorless cameras
@Pickle_PantherАй бұрын
My new favorite trend is when out of touch film-tubers show off some affordable camera for the low low price of $1500+….
@miki97xyАй бұрын
3:2 it’s the most used aspect on cinema cameras sensors …
@JJARCHIE8 күн бұрын
But the target audience isnt cinema users , so explaining has to be done
@ThisCantBeRealTV6 күн бұрын
Movies are shot on $1000 iPhones but $1500 for a camera that’s … well, just a camera doesn’t make any sense as affordable.
@jamescaldwell52 ай бұрын
One of the most? Is there a more affordable Full Frame interchangeable lens camera?
@Wisconsin.pikachu12 ай бұрын
Yea lots and lots, canon 5d mk2 is a little old but still great camera. Can be found easily $300 sometimes less
@tezkyflex73042 ай бұрын
@@Wisconsin.pikachu1 you also forgot the difference that 5d is a old bulky dslr, while s9 is a new compact mirrorless
@Wisconsin.pikachu12 ай бұрын
@@tezkyflex7304 ooo nooo I must have the newest thing to get good photos and pictures 🤣🤣🙃, it's still a full frame sensor is 1/5 of the cost and would give you the huge selection of canon lenses. Also 5dmk2 is weather sealed 👌
@jamescaldwell52 ай бұрын
@@Wisconsin.pikachu1 when you’re discussing a brand new camera and what else is available, you can’t compare it with used gear that’s a different category.
@Wisconsin.pikachu12 ай бұрын
@@jamescaldwell5 well when the guy making the video says it's one of the most affordable full frame cameras you can get, it's a lie. Maybe the most affordable NEW MODERN mirrorless full frame camera. But he did not say new, modern when he said it is the most affordable. Sure if you for some reason want "need" 6k video and like 25fps photography mode then yea get a new camera. But if you don't feel like you need these modern amenities then the older cameras work fine. Me personally think these high frame rate cameras are just overkill. If you feel like you need to shoot photos at 25fps then just record a video and pause a frame and print it 🤣....again that's my feelings.
@singularity564Ай бұрын
i thought it was gonna be like 50 before i clicked on the video
@yadalin91721 күн бұрын
Maybe the context of "affordable" in this case is compared to those professional camera that is same class as this lumix. Cmiiw
@miramaldito2 ай бұрын
"MOST AFFORDABLE" GOOD SIRE I BEG YOU TO RESEARCH ON WHAT 'AFFORDABLE' MEANS Awesome camera btw