Sounds like a typical woman. Clucking but saying nothing.

Woke* These Hollywood films aren’t liberal they are mostly left as they push far left talking points

Picking sides doesn’t solve the problem.

It would be stupid to say all movies on 1 side are bad and all movies on other are fantastic. Nobody wins if movie is bad no matter on which spectrum movie is leaning

you should take most opinions from centrists, just centrists nowadays can seem far more controversial because of how extreme both sides have become

Yes, Drinker is true to his core. I've got news for you... Drinker might not be a radical leftist but he is a leftist!

I really appreciated that. It shows Will is the real deal

Even if it is just a big F U to the other side that's funny enough for me.

​@HeluvaOfficialshoo spambot

Literally what's destroying other channels rn. Honesty isn't mean or an attack, especially if the person is a friend/ friendly giving another friend an honest critique of their creative endeavor. Steel sharpens steel.

Don’t compare South Park to whatever this is. South Park would win every time 😂 they’ve cemented themselves in comedy history. They’re on both sides because they’re reasonable they make a realistic trans character Garrison then make fun of an also realistic trans character the fricking bodybuilder that became trans to torment strong woman lol. They know the world isn’t black and white and that’s what this joke of a movie gets wrong.

South park did it way better

Because they understood that it's scummy to find loopholes in rules to succeed. Here? It's "TRANS ATHLETE BAD BECAUSE POWER OF THE PENIS GREATER THAN TRAINING!"

​@@TheForbiddenChode well I won't say that it is so much on the both sideism of SP that makes it good, but rather that they focus on making a great story rather than telling a message. Their writing idea is like: take recent events, and make a funny story out of it

the left wing is the master of brainwashing. To state the obvious

I think conservatives focus too much on getting back at the left that it ruins their projects. The comedies of the early 2000s were not trying to beat you over the head to get back at any particular group, they were just trying to make funny movies.

@@radicalcentrist1242 The left can do 100000x worse but we can't even make a truthful commedy lol. The left wing uses brainwashing, the topic of the movie is just one of too many to count.

Yep, he sure is. Just don't expect those butthurt woke motherfuckers to agree with that.

you would have to be very seriously lacking in integrity to pretend this product is good just to own the libs

Middle ground is the weakest joke of an opinion.

Nothing says fair and balanced like claiming a comedy didn't "explore the complexity of the issue." I'm normally in agreement with Drinker, but this wasn't a documentary, and there was no need to go middle ground on it. It was exclusive to DW. Did some jokes fall flat? Sure, just like every comedy. Ofc it will lean a certain way, and ofc it would be exaggerated. (although how exaggerated is certainly debatable)

@@squidikkano excuse for being just a bad comedy that wasn’t funny. And tons of comedies have tackled social issues with something meaningful to say while still being well written comedies. This was just lazy pandering.

“Objective” here means “biased in the way I like”.

@@CassieAngelicadid you watch the video?

@@CassieAngelica I don't know man, most people who are against constant political lectures / propaganda in the media would probably overpraise this movie, since it's a jab that comes from the other site. Meanwhile, people who support identity politics will mindlessly hate it. Drinker, however, criticized it and he did so without using the classic "transphobia" argument.

Not really though. Usually yes.

Didnt expect to see you here

Found the leftist

@@plasmaglobe2850 I’m a DW+ subscriber and huge fan girl. I was literally just saying that the movie came out on their streaming service (not in theaters) so they WERE making it for their subscribers (me) and so the fact that it was still pretty funny is a triumph. You are wrong about me: I drink Leftist Tears for breakfast.

google. Can find it free like everything else.

That movie in its entirely is highlarious. Tom Cruise as Les Grossman is one of his best roles

I have seen it over a dozen times. Robert Downey crush that role.

Yes

Wish I saw that instead of this tbh

"What do you mean... you people?!" 🤣🤣

Worse is an understatement. Hollywood would have churned out a pile of radioactive dog waste matter.

Really great point!!

there is literally no universe where this movie would be 100 million lmfao

@@Dr.Frogerston Disney universe, it would be 200 million

@@Dr.Frogerston Well, depending on actors hired, or if they'd animate it, the budget could balloon out of control.

I cant tell if this is sarcasm...

It was fun

“ neither politican nor conservative” is so funny and true

​@hm-sg9sm Um...Aren't conservatives politicians? It's not just liberals who are political.

It's not just reviewers who aren't touching this film, it seems almost nobody has even heard of it.

@@xuvial1391 true ! But if there were more people reviewing it , then there would be more awareness .

Seriously? I’ve seen multiple channels covering the movie. It’s red meat for magas.

the same reviewers who think cuties is a good movie about sexualizing children. Not like the 1st trans MMA fighter almost killed a women in IRL.

Uh, politics is the whole point of the film. If you separate the politics there isn't really anything left.

"Constructive criticism" which they can use to make their next film even better. I am SO looking forward to their version of "Snow White" (mostly to see Brett Cooper in the title role; it's so rare to see feminine women acting femininely in a feminine role these days.)

The Drinker has been on The Ben Shapiro show a couple of times. I hope he’d be able to help them improve.

Daily Wire doesn't listen to constructive criticism. Anyone who doesn't think their work is flawless is a "woke liberal anarchist" or something like that. They're morons.

Jeremy Boreing himself has said you learn by doing. That includes figuring out what worked, what didn't work, learning and doing it better next time. I doubt he expected a TCD review of a first-time effort to say "Everything was perfect. Go away now" So my guess is the DW is pleased they got a fair review, and it went as well as it did.

@@Anoneemus_Noenayme Old Dads also cost over 8x what Lady Ballers cost to produce (57M vs 7M) and, frankly, none of that extra money made it to the screen. The acting wasn't better and neither was the cinematography and it certainly wasn't funnier. Old Dads also took much longer to make. Lady Ballers went from idea to done in just a few short months. If the Daily Wire continues to improve and can continue punching above their weightclass on a shoestring budget then I can see them really becoming a force to be reckoned with.

He tried so hard to lighten the blow 🤣

giving a pass to transphobic propaganda from a white-supremacist organization is not the positive thing you think it is...

He was significantly kinder to this garbage film than any Disney movie that's come out. And those are objectively all way better than this crap, despite the political leanings. it is amateurish garbage.

@@0ldarwhat someone can accomplish as an amateur deserves more praise than what the greatest movie studio of all time can no longer do. If an amateur basketball player loses 12-21 against prime LeBron in 1v1, most basketball fans would probably give credit to the amateur. LeBron shouldn’t be letting a nobody score that much on him. The comparison being that we expect great things from Disney and they’ve been completely subpar lately if not outright bad. A new movie studio that just happens to be well funded doing something not only passable, but outright decent and watchable is something promising to withness

@@0ldar A 6/10 movie made by a bunch of amateurs with 0 experience and a decently high budget is a heck of a lot more impressive than the dozens of 6.5/10 movies made by a multi-billion dollar company with 100 years of pedigree behind them.

@@0ldar No, this film wasn't great, but it wasn't bad either, and that makes it better than all the garbage put out by Disney lately.

Yeah, the thought of possibly wrecking your career for the sake of a DW streaming production probably strikes even the few professional actors willing to work for them as too much risk and too little reward.

Please, if ISIS or Hamas made their own streaming services, these "writers" and "actors", would be calling their agents to get on-board.

@@dougcarey2233 I mean a counter point to this they should consider is pretty simple, Find someone talented who wants to make something, but is frustrated by Hollywood injection of diversity and wokeness into their projects, Offer to let them just made a good movie with DW with no injection of Conservative points and maybe just maybe we can get a good movie that doesnt preach at you, if DW is unwilling to do so then they are acting exactly like Hollywood no?

This seems right. It was a perfectly okay movie, but the comedy never really seemed to get beyond, “It’s men playing WOMEN’s basketball! Get it?”

Funny (heh) that some of the bad comedy movies I remember in the 2000's were made or star comedians.

I haven't seen it, but from watching the trailer and a number of online reviews about it, I'm confused about exactly what it's preaching. Most obviously, it tells the story from the point of view of the antagonists, who of course tend to be the villains in a conventional story. You can do that, but then you risk making evil characters look sympathetic. To be sure, the movie makes fun of them, but it also lets us understand their reasons for what they're doing. Even more confusing is the fact that the "heroic" female athletes are also the butt of jokes, getting humiliated in slapstick scenarios against the supposedly superior antagonists. You can have your protagonists suffer and even fail, but ultimately they need to prevail or the story is a tragedy. So, what exactly is the attitude of LADY BALLERS? Is it socially conservative because it's anti-trans people in women's sports and doesn't present women as sexual objects, or is it socially liberal in that it doesn't condescend to women by assuming they're too weak to suffer physical comedy and (again) doesn't present women as sexual objects? (Feminism goes in both directions, you know.) If this is supposed to be a "political" movie, it's a failure.

@@SeasideDetective2 I don't think we watched the same movie. Your questions feel like they came from someone's review of the movie instead of watching it. You really miss the mark on a lot of the concepts of the movie. My wife wanted to watch the movie twice. Since you don't seem to understand, the movie is a comedy about men pretending to be women in order to get an edge in sports, but in the end, the men willingly give in to allow the women to win. Some of the lines of the movie are literally things that could be said in this day and age and definitely said in the future if all of this continues to happen.

​@@SeasideDetective2you're probably having difficulty because you're trying to view it from the Left's propaganda lens that conservatives think "trans people are evil" - which isn't what's being said at all. The point is that trans women are NOT women, and that dishonesty is literally hurting women. The guys in the movie realize the error of their ways & course correct (fiction, obviously 😉)

​@SeasideDetective2 what about this movie in the slightest was confusing? It was pretty cut and dry.

​@SeasideDetective2 also I think it's funny you say socially conservative means to objectify women and liberals don't. That's ass backwards. I think I realize why you're confused now. You don't know anything that's going on haha

Most of the daily wire employees are actors.

@@maxwell8758 some, not most... But fair :) it deserves a like

Yeah it is because they couldn't get actors to be in the film. Almost none of them were meant to be actors.

The DW ceo talked about this in an interview. He said even cancelled actors were scared to touch this.

@@ar1sm70 I'm thinking this could be what the movie accomplishes. If everyone sees that the aftermath is anti-climactic, then perhaps that fear will be lessened. Essentially breaking the seal...

Have you seen the video? It's only 5:46 long, give it a go. The conclusion is, that it's not funny, but pandering to tiktok crybaby snowflakes (the ones on the right)

​@wowrada bro you missed the parts where drinker said it was funny. Triggered much? 😂

It's inspiring alot of soy boy lefties and women hating feminists lmao look at the comments

​@@wowradaI see. We found the gender ideology supporter

@@wowrada Isn't "snowflakes" reserved for the soy-filled leftists?

All hail the Drinker! The last bastion of integrity in a bleak and barren world (of entertainment)

Thats the example of woke people that dont care about movies or the movie quality at all, but they give it free pass, if it has woke bullshite in it with obnoxious arrogant unlikeable females as main charchters in the movie itself.

he could be vague as to not anger the leftists.

@@rockfish7777you are whats wrong with America

@@maxhuffman7033 you are not a very objective person. Somewhat emotional

why are you 'awaiting' movies from ppl who have don't know how to make movies and have no artistic motive or flair for doing so

@@helvete_ingres4717 That same question could currently be asked of Hollywood, and every other streaming service that exists. It's mostly garbage across the board now.

@@helvete_ingres4717 maybe he has hope they get better. The difference between DW and Disney is that Disney could make good movies if it wanted, but the message and blackcrock's money is too important to let go. DW is just learning and experimenting, and they might drop it a little in terms of politics.

​@@evage99it's all garbage now. As each year passes I've been seeing less movies and series each year. I used to have cable and Hulu and Netflix and Amazon and Apple TV. Now I just have TV and and use my brother's account since he's my roommate.

On top of what you said, by giving an honest review, he allows the Daily Wire to hear where they fell short and improve in their next movies. Getting a fair and constructive critique is the best way to improve at what you're doing.

That movies great

Apparently their own extras started protesting the movie. They sent the fake news crew to interview them 😂

Excellent review, and the criticism is well deserved. I did very much enjoy the film, and I think it is worth the watch, even though it is certainly longer than truly needed

Let's be honest, it's a step above indie films, but well below Hollywood production levels.

I'm on board with this explanation. This was obviously made quickly, with in-house actors, in-house writers, filmed in secret, and probably on a shoestring budget. And at the end of the day, this is essentially a made-for-TV movie. Even if it's just average, that's still a win.

wish the main trans lead was more talented and some direction choice.... meh. still works but some jokes are cringe not in a good way. borat was good cringe af

That's what I'm thinking. I didn't expect much on such a short time frame with a small budget, and they need to get their feet wet first to figure this stuff out. Props to the Drinker for giving a fair review. I'm sure they appreciate it...

Yeah, since Daily Wire is a much smaller operation, it's criticism won't have to go through endless channels for the right people to listen if they're harping on. At least, I hope so.

I would never put out any movie without at least running the script past The Drinker first, and would probably give him a shot at the rough cut as well.

Daily Wire knows how to take criticism. They look at everything from audience reviews to the views and money obtained, all useful signals to see if they are making a good product.

Daily Wire and comedy is a hilarious joke all on its own. When are you people going to realize that conservatives are absolute trash at comedy. Unless you consider someone like Greg Gutfeld funny. 😂😂

My family, who have no idea what DW+ is had fun and ample laughs.

Forsure, same

Matt Walsh killed me 😂😂😂 it was exactly what I expected 👍

I've watched it several times and, weirdly enough, I found it funnier the second time through. The first viewing matched Drinker's description precisely: hilarious physical comedy with long stretches of somewhat tortured character moments and one liners in between them. The second viewing improved on that impression, though. The narrative portions of the movie improved for me. Not even sure why, honestly.

My only problem is that every joke or gag in the movie is the same thing we've heard from conservatives for the last 3 years. If the movie came out sooner it would've been funnier.

People are praising this film?

​@UnifiedaxxS Yeah, honestly I don't care for it, it's meh. South Park managed to make something better out of this, and made it when it was somewhat more relevant than it is now.

“At least”? Are you suggesting he was supposed to do something else but you’ll settle for that?

He has developed a reputation as an anti woke movie critic. The commenter may have been genuinely surprised CD did not "blindly sing praise" because the movie is clearly a woke basher. Not every critic can seperate their bias from their review, the commenter seems to acknowledge and appreciate the fact that CD can. Don't let the language get you triggered.

@@mikegallina8389exactly

I think the main cause of his rise in popularity was the series "Why Modern Movies Suck".

Get your tongue out of his ass 😂

Whats frustrating is that if you actually understood the state of men dominating women in sports by claiming some delusion it wouldn't come off as parody. There aren't whole teams of men competing but every single character was a carbon copy of famous and recent men who dominated a woman's sport. It can't be satire if the satire is true.

Wasn't there a weight lifting coach with a full beard who entered a women's weight lifting competition in Canada to destroy the record a "trans" guy set? More men with beards need to do this....trample on the trans records.

@@allistertheeldritchmemegod3537 I watched the video were this poor girl got her teeth knocked out in field hockey. They don't wear the heavy padding and face shield like in male hockey because it's specifically designed for female strength level. It's also one of the sports that will give a girl a full scholarship to college.

@@kellharris2491 I've said this on other media, but will reiterate: The injuries that trans-females inflict are intentional, be it field hockey, volleyball or MMA. It, to my eyes, appears as a manifestation of self-loathing and the never-ending need for attention, no matter how negative.

​@kellharris2491 I have always been astounded by how much danger there is in field hockey relative to how little padding the players wear. For a sport that had a cool concept, I never wanted to play it because it just looked brutal. That injury attracted attention because the shot came from a guy, but any shot that hit someone right in the mouth would likely do damage. Maybe it would have had a lower mph coming from a girl but I dont think it would have mattered much in that case.

All "Christian conservative" films have been like this and have had the same problems for decades.

@@seriouscat2231 As someone who was partially raised on them, I agree. The problem with anti-hollywood movies in general is they suffer from: 1. Bad or overly preachy writing 2. Poor acting 3. Low production value 4. All of the above I am cautiously optimistic about the DW crew, but for the time being, anyone who wants to make it big in film has to go to Hollywood. Until that starts to change, we will be stuck where we are.

I don't appreciate it. As it feels like to me there was no effort put into this movie. It feels like they decided to make a movie about the first thing that popped into their head.

@@seriouscat2231 no DW is not your friend. They are a media company owned by ben shapiro, they have one goal to make money. They would sell you out in a heart beat

Being they just started up making movie's I'd say their doing ok so far.

Have you seen Godzilla Minus One?

Yeah, but the difference is Hollywood and Disney will put politics in movies where it isn’t appropriate, when putting politics in this movie was appropriate… considering it was a political satire.

@@ThisIsBoogieJar the movie only satires in one direction so its inappropriate. An appropriate satire takes the piss out of both sides because it isn't politically biased.

@@madpuppet666who made you the Satire Sargeant?

@@willow1698the guy I was responding to did

​@@ThisIsBoogieJar According to DailyWire it wasnt. It was intended as a comedy for the average viewer. Which it decidedly isnt.

Hear, hear.

I don't like majority of the DW cast and don't like the director either. But I can't lie, this movie was pretty good.

Their movie Run Hide Fight was absolutely amazing. If you have not seen this movie yet check it out. This was movie theater quality and a definite A+ in my book.

I don't know about that, I heard Run Hide Fight was pretty good.

They did hit it out of the park with, "What is a woman".

Yeah it feels like we've had way too many movies that just inject cheap gag comedy into otherwise serious situations thanks largely to Disney with initially the Pirates of the Carribbean movies which then became prominent in the Marvel movies and then leaked into even freaking Star Wars and a huge variety of movies over the 2010 and 2020's. Tropic Thunder and Dodgeball were like some of the absolute peak comedy films and it's sad that we've gone so long without anything challenging them.

​@@SorenthazThat's the good thing about the comedy movies back then. Even though they were mostly bad and outlandish they removed the need to insert comedy in regular movies that didn't need it and kept the two separate.

Comedy I thought it was a actual woke college future documentary . And why these leftists don't like it.

its definitely not a jim carrey movie. man that dude was hella funny. iirc liar liar sent my bro to hospital bcoz asthma

Did they, though? They decided to make a stridently political film and the comedy suffers as a result, just like comedy always suffers when it has to play second fiddle to politics.

He didn't explain much in his critique. He loves South Park episode about same topic, yet dislikes this films "one-sided" take. South Park episode was way more edgier and one-sided. He literally was concerned about why the daily wire didn't pander to more audiences 😂 almost like it was for the daily wire audiences on their website. He's contradicting his own statements. Bad review 😂

@@CarnageJesterXsound the meat riding alarm

Giving an opinion is something every person does on a daily basis

​@@CarnageJesterXimagine shilling a company that doesn't know who you are

You man, echo chambers like this channel? ;)

Is this movie not adding to the echo chamber on the right though?

​@@jfrankie3254"When your side does it it's divisive because we don't all agree; when our side does it you're being divisive for not agreeing"

@@jfrankie3254 Yeah, I guess this lone solitary movie from the right 'echo chamber' totally equals the literally hundreds of movie of the left 'echo chamber'.....

This movie is literally THE echo chamber.

No professional comedy actors? Have you watched Andrew Klavan's show? Matt Walsh's? Michael Knowles'? The guys are absolutely hilarious at times!

The movie is a lot better than this pseudo movie expert is trying to tell us. There are a lot of good moments to really laugh.

I watched it, it is really really funny.

You're the first comment here that isn't a fkn simp.

@@melquesedekcastro7480 You don't know how relieved I am that I'm not the only one that see how this wannabehollywooddirector changed his whole speech in last 6 or 7 months. He called this a "POLITICAL" issue? "Extreme" points? Have to come to the "common ground"? He is so sold and payed for it isn't even funny ow these simps in comments don't get it.

Yeah they said they were willing to put serious money into and get real actors but no one famous was willing to risk their career for the movie. Which is understandable

well for starters drinker puts out steady content YMS' lion king review was like 2 years late, and it still isn't finished. If i go to his page right now, he's only just got around to reviewing flash, and his general upload schedule has slowed to an average of like 3 videos a month. He also tends to want to pivot towards niche arthouse film and is pretty disdainful and dismissive of mainstream movies. Even when the MCU was good, he didn't like it. Meanwhile the drinker sticks to releases people are likely to be aware of, and reports on them in a timely manner, and only really goes off the beaten path when recommending something he actually likes, which is usually fairly safe, tom clancy-flavored Dad-bait. Factor in the folksy, working-class, vaguely plinkett-esque character he plays, and it's not surprising he's managed to be so successful.

This is why I don't believe a lot of stuff the Drinker says. Anybody with common sense would love this movie.

Internet culture gobblers that watch Drinker are not the general audience they think they are. If they we're they'd realise that his takes on so many things are contrived and tailored, and always contradictory. Things he complaints about in one movie he praises in the next. His reviews of Dungeons and Dragons, as well as Mario recently have shown his utter inconsistency. This movie will likely appeal to the average person, it reminds me of other comedies from the 2000s that appealed to common tropes, but this is just a 2023 trope.

Perhaps, but lots of movies that the Drinker mocks get similar reactions from lots of ordinary people.

I thought it was quite good, exactly what it was trying to be - nothing more, nothing less. One of the gags I loved was the news anchors getting forcibly dragged further and further into the world of DEI victimhood. Each time they appeared on screen the ante was upped. Drinker said the pacing was off, but I disagree that’s one of the things they actually got right. Also as far as the “echo chamber” criticism, I think that’s just silly. If the Daily Beast made a pro trans comedy, would there be any expectation that it would be fair and balanced? I mean the idea is just frigging absurd quite frankly.

I bought a subscription to the daily wire just to watch this movie. My husband and I were cry-laughing the whole time. It felt like watching a 2000s comedy again.

I wonder if they asked Rob Schneider. He basically owns this genre, and he is an outspoken conservative.

"Rob Schneider is a somewhat popular comedic actor! But now he's... a carrot."

I feel like Dave Chappelle, Jeff Dunham, Joe Rogan, Bill Burr, Bill Maher, Rob Schneider, and Adam Sandler should be a pretty easy list or to at least do a cameo.

Nobody seeking a career in Hollywood wouldn't come within a mile of any Dailywire movie. So they'll never have a first tier actor in it. That's OK, because it's a parody. I bet this is a lot of fun, albeit not perfect by any strech of imagination.

because the movie is a stinker!

I think he still treated this review with kid gloves. If a movie has a hamfisted left wing message in one scene it never gets a pass. But this two hour long strawmen of a movie gets some light criticism.

@@Dennis-ml9hv That's because the movie wasn't marketed as something else. Only a retard would go into a movie marketed as X and then complain about the movie being filled with X. That goes for anything.

​@@Dennis-ml9hvNo one knows what a strawman argument is apparently

I recall a comment from Chris Wallace, saying that being fair shouldn't be considered exceptional in journalism, it should just be standard. Drinker has his own reputation to uphold, and he at least had the sense to see that South Park criticized both left and right-wing narratives on the state of the US film industry.

@@takatamiyagawa5688 Critical Drinker is miles better than most of "ant-sjw youtubers". Which is why I can at least watch some of his videos. He doesnt use idiotic thumbnails and doesnt jump on any minor controversy like most of his contemperaries. But his bias really shines through here.

Can you really appreciate what they are trying to do? It’s quite obvious the movie is just a political stunt. It’s not like they are truly trying to create a movie that is to be taken seriously. There is absolutely no subtlety here and no real attempt at nuance. Lady ballers is just an absurd piece of political propaganda made by people that aren’t very talented and producing this type of media

So... What the left does with most of hollywood? Huh.

I thought caring about the message over art was bad?

yep... they're building a hollywood styled studio production company from the ground up and i bet every other studio production company is totally against them... i bet when they're able to actually able to start making a profit that they'll be sued and boycotted by all the hollywood unions, studios, and media

@@GOLDFISH817political satire

"Stupid, goofball comedies"? you obviously missed the entire message of the movie.

It’s a stupid goofball movie WITH a message, just as good humor should be. (Full disclosure I’ve not seen the movie, just clips. It seems funny but amateur. Which is what id expect given the cast)

No I think you missed the genre of the movie. It is emulating goofball comedy movies while delivering a very important message. It can do both. @@comar619

I was actually impressed. I had super low expectations and sure, I didn’t laugh near as much as something like anchorman, but I definitely had quite a few good belly laughs. It’s not for everyone and not every joke hits, but it’s entertaining and none of the acting was so bad it made me cringe.

Yeah it was decent!

@@adamweishaupt2846 You mean a lack of understanding of advanced biology?

100% agree

These type of movies are like Adam Sandler movies, they aren't great but will always sit down and watch if they're on

That's what I think as well. I'm glad it got made, and I'm willing to support it purely because Daily Wire is trying to create a more open entertainment market not dominated by a single political party, but I'm also aware that it's probably not very good.

If comedy is on life support and the doctor is a conservative comedian you better start digging.

I mean.. I'm not glad it got made because it looks like a giant pile of shit, and putting a bunch of people nobody cares about in a comedy movie with a Ted Cruz cameo will do nothing to bring back comedies, but they certainly are allowed to make this if they want to. It will have a tiny audience that will watch because they already subscribe to the stupid service, but nobody else will care.

Great Idea.

Great idea!

Given their openness to ideas I’m confident they would agree to your proposal.

This is a cool idea

Submit this idea to the editors.

On the one hand, I encourage anyone to make an alternative to the hollywood trash we have to put up with. That being said, the Daily Wire cvcks are not going to make anything truly helpful. They got themselves all excited over telling everyone that there are two genders, and the trans agenda has gotten ridiculous. But that's easy. Try to get them to address the institutional war against White people, then DW recoils. They'll just poop out yet another movie consisting of "jokes" such as jews praising black dicks, like in Lady Ballers. Daily Wire is toxic.

But just like the critical drinker says, if the movie only favors right leaning people and not average Joe, then it won't go far.

It’s a very easy topic to make fun of. The topic has been poked fun of so much that it feels as if the viewer had heard every joke before it’s delivered. It’s like making a movie that just makes fun of fat people or little people. Sure there’s jokes in it, but it’s nothing that the dimmest viewer at home couldn’t come up with themselves. This movie doesn’t say anything about what the daily wire can produce as a movie. I’ll wait to see if they manage to create anything where the jokes aren’t hand fed to them by such an easy target.

Yeah, an attempt was made, and South park plays it way to safe as always. It's more that movies don't have to be almost two hours, especially comedies...

​@@mildlycurious8333 so men participating in female sports , males entering female locker rooms etc isn't gonna effect regular people ?? Is it Only the "right wingers" who want women and the children to be safe ?? I don't believe in this "wing" nonsense but this film is for everyone to see, realise and fight against the insanity as humans regardless of your political views

You should check out the South Park episode "Board Girlz" then. The Drinker nailed it when he said they discussed this issue in so much more depth in only twenty minutes, almost ten years ago.... (Matt and Trey are prophets lol)

What debate? It was just a giant fuck you to the other side of the issue. There was no attempt at all to see both sides.

@@optimusprime6202lmao what? It’s literally a view of both sides, you should just stay off the internet bc you can’t seem to use any logical reasoning you immediately jump to the bs.

​@optimusprime6202 nor should it... especially when 1 side thinks they have moral superiority and don't have to support their ideology. It's just "if you don't agree with us you're a (adhomonym here)." The best part of the film is that much like Babylon Bee, it didn't really have to be extreme to point our the lunacy of the left, they have become the parody at this point 😂

@@psylintzu6036 technically the other side would be showing a trans woman who finds it degrading to force her to compete against men. I don't agree with her point of view but technically that would be showing both sides, which this movie did not do.

They paid for the movie themselves. There was literally nothing stopping them from making this movie. What achievement?

Lmao, FBI literally arrested one of the main actors in the day of the premiere dude and it was a black imigrant muslim dude. They took him for some fake 3yo charges of basically doing nothing bad and just being in the gathering of protesting people on January 6th, which now is broadly know as NOT being an xDDD insurection xDDDD After 3 years. This is an intimidation tactics from Soviet Union. You all in the west really does not get it and will never get it because unlike me and the whole central, eastern and southern Europe, you were not under the communism for 40 years. If you did, you wouldn't want to bring it back xD@@benjaminhoyt1421

Achievement? Are you kidding? You don’t clearly know film history or the history of theater and art. This is old news (500 years old) done badly with malicious intent. How is that an achievement?

@@VetsrisAugusteAchievements are more than the gold you get on your reddit posts. Maybe you should go back there.

They had no malicious intend. Lefty troll. Quite the contrary. It's a counter culture done by the good side against people expoliting women, children and denying science takin over politics, media and enterntaiment. There is nothing "malicious" here. It's spreading the Truth in a funny way. Please, just stop trollin here. Also it's done by people who really know literature and history or the history of theater and art. Shapiro would never co-produce and cameo in something that wouldn't be based 100% in it. From my side I can tell you I've graduated somethint thatg combines theater, literature, linguistic and psychology of the "word" in my country which name youy wouldn't even understand, so I'm vastly better equiped than you in that topic, sweethart :) @@VetsrisAuguste

Daily Wire is Trash like Disney. Enjoy being a little paypiggy for shapiro

Summarised my thoughts well.

Yup, a new studio finding it's legs. Hopefully they will learn and adapt to better movie standards.

Agreed. Not good enough I’d pay to see in theaters but good enough for me to spend the time with it at home. I definitely think Jeremy wanted to see how far he can go and trim it down on his next project.

When you think of what certain other Hollywood studios have done over recent years. Doubling down, attacking the audience, consistently finding a new low, when people were sure things couldn't get any worse. It will be good to see DW grow and improve.

I think the taser scene was poorly acted but to each their own

@@arfhat89 Wrong. His physical comedy in that scene was hilarious.

I stared blank at the screen when the taser scene happened but laughed at other parts. To each their own

Adam Carolla cartoon!? I'm in!!

@@allistertheeldritchmemegod3537 "I am dead inside" is what I read.

Hopefully the actors will have a chance to learn and improve

If they can replicate that turnaround time and make at least competent movies, they'll be short-circuiting Hollywood in a very relevant way.

@@jorgamund07 no

@@SubZero-hs9xcI’d say yes

Accurate comment, except it was about 6 months concept to final product, vs 7 weeks

Do not watch Daily Wire it is trash too, shapiros just wants money

First real comment I've read

Of course you did you're just as much of a joke as the average modern day star wars fan that finds any reason under the sun to like something that's on the same side

Definitely feels like some old fart made it… that’s why it feels 20 years old

Funny enough into the spiderverse a movie made by a leftist was funnier then this movie

​@@redninja3056Because Into the Spiderverse is comparable to Ladyballers in budget, advertising, acting pool, etc....🙄

@@snuke37 yet it was more funny then a movie that was a comedy it's almost like conservatives aren't funny or something

@redninja3056 Or, a bigger budget with access to studio resources and every comedic writer and actor in Hollywood helped maybe a little? It's stupid to compare the two as one is an indie film with a 7 million dollar budget, while the other is a major studio release animated feature with a 90 million dollar budget ("Across the Spiderverse" was $150m). Plus, don't act like liberal Hollywood doesn't release trash with poor comedy...the same studio as Spiderman releases The Marvels which was painfully unfunny...

A big reason for that was due to zero mildly conservative actors having the balls to take any of the parts so they used the DW+ staff.

he said "rough gem"

That is because you aren't an actual discerning or intelligent viewer. You just want to be pandered to, just like the other side. Think about that; maybe grow.

​@@austintyler7901 some douchebag like you pretending you intimately know the psyche of some random guy in the comments section on KZfaq will never stop being funny to me. 😂 something he said clearly triggered you. Sounds awfully liberal of you.

​@@austintyler7901take a look at your previous comments and tell me how intellectual you seem to be....my god the self awareness trait is always missing w you people.

​@@austintyler7901your replies are always the same. You remind me of this kid in school who thought of himself as a genius and would carry a notebook for his "thoughts." Carry on Gregory.

@@austintyler7901What’s wrong with you?

Daily wire is trash do not support them

This isn't the last temptation of christ. This is a small budget movie that is more of a publicity stunt. And all the right wing ppl are frothing over how stunning and brave they were to make it. (Just look at the comments here. Ffs)

@@morganseppy5180someone’s angry

No one would make a comedy on this topic except South Park. Like 4 years ago.

@@JoelPerry1 you are dumb if you think this is a new topic. Some of the oldest comedies out there address men in womens clothing and women in mens clothing, it is a commom trope for evil doers

You won't find that here, Airplane and Police Academy had class and were movies anyone could enjoy, but as the Drinker pointed out in this video, this movie panders hard to their conservative viewers while not really offering much for anyone else.

David Zucker released a movie in 2008 that was supposed to lampoon the libs. I bought it because of all the hate reviews. Then I watched it and it was just a shameless character assassination of Michael Moore. They might as well have called the movie "Michael Moore is a doo-doo head". I don't even care for Michael Moore but it wasn't funny at all. First movie I actually threw in the trash.

It's nothing like that, more like a lame boner comedy, but focused on politics

@@milantarbuk1039 To me, anything that actively parodies the current lunacy is welcome to be honest

​@@christanner8765Thanks for not fighting movies just because one of them wasn't lefty. I probably won't even watch this movie, but the amount of lefty people here trying to "push" against this movie for being conservative-ish is pretty telling. As if 98% of films aren't pretty one sided

The Drinker's reviews are always objective. Did you just get here?

Woke hating? Touch grass buddy

i am not frequent and lately there were mostly bad movies, so doing fair review on them might look like person is not objective@@musicfoundation3300

But don't you know Drinker is at minimum alt right? Because it's apparently impossible to not be especially right or not be especially conservative to hate woke, or that is what I've been told (not that I believe). Personally I say every somewhat balanced and smart person dislikes it.

I actually like that aspect of his content. He's isn't woke, but also isn't a political pawn. He's an actual movie critic who clearly shows passion for story telling and art, something that separates him from the usual bottom feeder garbage doing the same jokes about feminists and gay people over and over. As a result he gives things done well credit regardless if "the message" is in it or not

Despite not being a big "hahahaha" movie it was certainly a very enjoyable thing to watch.

*10/10

Are they're even comedy movies these days? I can't even think of any

"...today's comedy." ? Which one? I cannot honestly remember being aware of a new comedy movie in a while. Not trying to be a diq, genuinely asking.

@@chainsawsubtlety9828 good question, certainly nothing worth watching