Just like sony when they first greenlit the emoji movie because emojis are popular with the young kiddies nowadays.

I'm like, seriously... We go from Broadway to Tik Tok for musicals. Seems like the higher ups at Disney are in major desperate mode.

Yet some people will defend it and say "it reflects morals and values that could be found in the original movie"

When I read that description, every word filled me with dread. Are they going to have everyone act like they're in high school too? Now that I'm older I recognise that the original Disney film sanitized a lot of stuff and basically made Hercules a lot like Superman. But I still don't mind, because it was a great film. It was funny, with great action and characterization. It even had a message of 'A hero is defined by their heart, rather than their actions.'

So, people would be eating tide pods in the movie?

That’s because the originals are always good Edit: okay maybe one exception would be the Star Wars prequels but that’s a totally different story

Example = point break, remake was garbage!!

Hollywood: yea! We got fresh money from old movies.

Unfortunately some of those Disney live action remakes made a billion each

@@jaredsmith112 Some, like the first ones, but i believe i can say that's not the case with the newer ones.

An accurate film about.... Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs? Give me a break.

I think he means accurate to the German fable. I don't agree totally with that either. Just make a good film. Change it do whatever, just make it good and it's fine. But it seems clear there's no creativity going on. Like if Snow White was black and the movie was good then we wouldn't care. It's just when people start saying this movie is about diversity instead of saying this movie is good, then it's probably not gonna be good. Actually they lost an opportunity to do Snow Black. Directed by Spike Lee. That would be fun at least. Set in 80's Baltimore. "Mirror mirror on the wall who's the flyest of them all". The huntsman is Denzel. The Dwarves are a neighborhood basketball team. The Queen is that crazy super mayor. And the Prince is Prince Harry.@@jenniek8391

EXACTLY!

They're incapable of making anything new or unique that is actually good. Their "directives" kill all form of free and creative thinking. So they must attach to a beloved classic like a leech and subvert it to their ends to get people to look at it and be influenced by it....only for people to reject it anyway cause you can't change human nature, for better or for worse.

What does being Colombian have anything to do with this? You are just playing into the woke hand

Amen

That's simply because evil destroys everything. Corrupting an existing IP is just a subtle form of destruction.

Lay down the apocalyptic pipe, though.

Jesus joined the chat

Also changing character [se**al orientation]/[gender identity] from original in source to "modern audience standard"... Here, in Russia we call this "sjw agenda". Really feels like you see this one almost everywhere nowadays. And in addition most of times film itself is not interesting as well. Stopped watching newer movies and cartoons about 10 years ago.

Imagine knowingly ignoring today's definition of racism bc it doesn't fit your narrative. You can have prejudice against white ppl but you can't be really racist against them.

@@doosin8696 back then it was done out of necissity since they didn´t have many actors of clor in Hollywood.

@@doosin8696 Do you know what Jesus actually looked like? Can anyone be sure? If I had to guess, I'd say that you don't even have any idea of what the ethnic and cultural make up of the region where Jesus supposedly originates from was like, bearing in mind that Arabic people came to the region much later.

It's the "Triangle of Death" for movies nowadays

"re-imagining" is another red flag.

I don't mind some subverting of expectations. It just better be surprising, in a good, or clever, or entertaining way. The more frustrating, the more pointless, generally.

Only if you're a bigot.

It has gotten so bad that the only way to "subvert my expectations" would be for them to produce a good movie.

What a good dad you have for doing that, saving his kid from the woke terminal

Yeah that’s nonsense. If you start with a solid story with good characters first, your message will likely come out 20x more naturally than if you start with the m e s s a g e

As your thumbnail shows, you can evolve into many directions. I recommend the water pokey man, but the electrical one is probably the most successful. Read good writing. Gonna write scripts? Gotta read them so you know the template. Though you want your story to fit the frame, it also needs to grow organically from within you. Write your story for your Dad and not the world. Has a better chance of reaching the world that way. Good luck

Three loud cheers!!

Sure. When I was a teen I went down the right wing pipeline. Now that I‘m an adult I can see that pretty much anyone using the term woke is a moron who does not understand the proper context of things and would rather attack minorities than the capitalist corporations when they screw up

In retrospect those movies may very well be the end of an era

Me too. I love that trilogy.

Because the capitalist class lives in their own world

Because they don't care. They are staffed by the Twitter retards.

Hollywood lives on Twitter, to them Twitter represents the opinions of the masses.

It's a a part mass media complex spreading mental contagion by elevating one idea to gaslight people to think the thing they peddle is normal.

They understand it. This is called cultural subversion. Why do you think they're not worried about losing billion after billion?

Great shout with Planet of the Apes. Top 5 favorite movie of all time!

The only thing movies are good for nowadays is watching the drinker absolutely tear them apart for being so bad

Speaking of Interview with a vampire, have you seen AMC's version? it's awful.

Well there are some good movies after 2010, but I understand her 🙂

That's just good parenthood right there. Good job.

True that

Censoring of the past? Now you are probably mentally american, but uhh… the original Disney movies already heavily censored the source material.

@@MaticTheProto "Mentally American" sounds a lot more intelligent compared to the inanity you're spouting.

​@@MaticTheProtowrong

@@redsentry9785 bro I‘m German, every fairytale was censored by them

I mean… said minorities and left people exist. They just aren’t a target audience for garbage movies

"If you don't watch Black Panther, you ain't black"

thats what I always imagined you felt, it must be so incredibly patronising having woke white people tell you what blackness means

Say it louder for the ones in the back!

Thank you baphomet

Good to know more people believe the word “Woke” can be used in a different context than to just be progressive……………

All new movies do is push THE MESSAGE.

Fr. Thankfully you will found some gold.

No no. You got that wrong. They love to build a legacy full of passion and love.. Up your asshole whilst screaming at you for not doing and believing everything they tell you to. I mean it sure is captivating and worth telling stories about. 😆

This year we had 2 masterpieces, the batman and top gun. Prey was an amazing revival for a franchise as well. I'm thankful for these diamonds in the rough.

You're over complicating it. Everything woke turns to shit and its just that simple.

Yeah I don't get why any women like that because they seem like they'd be huge bitches to just about anyone.

And the grimm realistic of real life struggle

So succinct and perfectly stated.

None of the women have muscle either..

There are movies where the woman vs man fight is depicted in a way that women could win in real life too by using their agility and wits even without being bodybuilders, not every filmmaker has a competent enough crew to train actors to perform that though... That's why we see tiny girls pushing back much stronger men in a way that makes zero sense, it's not that women cannot win against much stronger men but that many filmmakers are incompetent enough to even see how silly their movies often look from point of anyone with close combat experience who got reasonable ideas about what can and what cannot be done against a much stronger opponent. The idea of putting a woman on an equal plane in movies is not bad in itself as old stories often depict the woman as inferior weak-minded beings by default from times when they were trading articles for property or even valuable animals, just the implementation is often silly, thus looking like a forced social engineering project where a woman is portraited in a way where it competes with a man physically in a manner that did not correspond with reality. Don't forget that even princess stories in decades-old movies were often already modified to be consumable by an audience of that time, we just remember the good examples that were not done by incompetent people, while today we see all that junk production despite the ratio between good and bad movies in AAA titles may not be significantly different, there is just far more of them per year around the world. Bad movies in old days had a far lower chance to lure audiences anyway as new production with good special effects and promotion campaign available these days make it possible for mediocre movies to be somewhat profitable today, so the main anger with new junk production is mainly in the fact that they still managing to make a lot of money despite even though they may deserve none, thus creating an incentive for more bad movies to be created. The fear of the success of low-quality products setting new standards we are unwilling to support is why people concerned with the quality of products watch reviews and actively fight against their proliferation in the first place. We just often want to see intention where is just sheer incompetence, there always were resorurce restrictions whatever in time or money, if anything, todays movies got budgets few decades ago could only dream about.

@@ShesNotAPeanut Or really any training. They just do a lot of cuts to make it seem like they can fight. Usually looks terrible.

Link to the Clip : reason why modern movie is bad kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o6mWjMxom5mYook.html

What do you expect from TikTok though? Isn't the average age about 15? This is all they know

Oh, and let's not forget, the fact that the Bad Boy tried to get the Nerd to help him rape the Princess... And the Basket Case girl was ONLY ATTRACTIVE after her makeover! The horror...

Seriously? I mean, I’m not gonna advocate for sexual stuff in entertainment simply because I don’t like it and have moral objections, but one teeny scene about young people doing dumb young people stuff is hardly enough to ruin a movie 💀

The woke-mob were calling A Christmas Story racist because of the Chinese restaurant scene. They're like terminators. They don't feel, they don't sleep, they just attack.

@Classic Tate I am so confused

@@ninjustice5574 That's a spam bot, man. Also, to answer the quoted question, "Because they CAN'T."

I don't think it is a matter of hating the source material. And I don't think "they" can't come up with new interesting stories. Personally I think the studios are the problem, studios want to exploit our nostalgia dollars and peak our interest with something from our past.

Something that didn't happen, okay.

They remake it because they hate it so much. It needs to be changed in their weird minds.

"We're oft to blame, tis too much proved. That with devotion's visage and pious actions, we do sugar o'er the devil himself."

"You will stay here for the rest of your lives. You will be happy. And controlled." I, Mudd, original Star Trek episode.

Leftism is a mental illness

Hehehe. Yeah. Because TCD isn't acting "virtuous" at all, right? I mean, he's only trying to SAVE movies. Hilarious.

I liked i love you daddy because it is different from the woke movies

For children yeah; Think about it, at least they could show a prince and not a meek and weak snowflake, or a stuck-up chic who believes she can do anything and better than a guy ya'know.

M O D E R N E S P U B L I K U M

More like they specifically wanted to make a film appropriate for all audiences and had to trim some darker aspects. Belle's nasty sisters aren't in beauty and the beast either. Nor is the father responsible for her being there.

Also older than the 19th c.

​@@poopsmith6853Bluth could have done it

​@breadandcircuses8127If I remember correctly, a lot of Japanese people find cowboys to be the American equivalent of samurai. Which is interesting considering that scholars see the roots of cowboy stories in European knights-errant stories which is kinda what a samurai is for the East. Everyone just likes stories about cool guys going on adventures.

Maybe she's called Snow White because she's a drug kingpin. That's the joke right?

Lmao

*snort*

Ikr if someone did that to Black Panther then they would be flippin their tables

I could deal with that, I can very often not tell Hispanics and white people apart, the problem really is that they changed the story

Let's see if others realise this when trying to analyse and replicate the success of Maverick. My bet is on them already churning bland sequels of similar franchise, but sticking to their losing formula.

while the movie was great and fun to watch, it still had a lot of PC stuff and "diverse people"

that might be true but I think its important to note that the female pilot for example didnt outshine her peers or the main protagonist. In a truly woke version of the movie the main protagonist would have been shown as a failing loser, no longer capable of fullfilling his task. He would have make place for the female pilot who would be better than him at anything.

@@lunisinko7498 exactly and it would've subverted your attention. The second it starts for me I know what kind of show or film I am watching

@@ViperGTS737 Probably to avoid the unfounded shitlib negative press publicity of ist and phobes accusations

And most of them don’t even like movies anyway.

i don't get why people need to relate to characters

I've got a few hours in my logbook but I never finished my private pilot's license - I still enjoyed Top Gun and Maverick. Relating to the characters does not mean I look like them, I am more than what I look like.

I don’t understand why characters have to be relatable. If a person is so egoistical and stuck up, they have the freedom to write whatever self insert fanfic they want to fantasize themselves in if that helps them cope or just watch media that is “relatable” to them. If a character is just a soulless and hollow entity only for self inserts then why is that even considered a character?? Instead of it being a discussion of character, it’s just people talking about how their egos are better…

​@@Nizhyii A relatable character isn't a self insert. If a character shares traits with your intended audience, that audience will like them more and care more about what happens to them. People empathize more with people who they have a lot in common with. It's not a good thing (it's believed to be the root cause of all racism) but it is the way humans think, and that's something we can take advantage of in our writing. The problem with self inserts is that they often *aren't* relatable: the author assumes the reader will just assume the character shares the reader's interests so they often forget to write a believable character with interests, flaws, and a personality. People have identities, so they won't think of someone with no personality as being like them at all.

Frightening that people can’t empathize with the universal human condition unless someone looks like them. As if everyone who looks like is a monolith.

I’ll follow up on that. “Modern audiences” seem to be allergic to appropriate arrangements and quid pro quos. Cooking and cleaning in exchange for safety, food, and being treated as part of the family is a perfectly good and healthy system. They just gotta have abuse or sex involved somehow. Probably means they think they were abused as children for being forced to clean their rooms.

@Bluespirit Listen okay, women aren't allowed to cook and clean. Those are a MAN'S domain. Leave such work to MEN, it's laughable to even consider a woman cooking and cleaning or other such housework. A women should know her place is in the mines digging up carts full of gemstones, not at home playing with woodland critters.

THIS!!!!!

Not in the eyes of the woke mob. Snow White is automatically entitled to room board, sustenance, and doesn't have to do anything because she's a strong independent Whahman that don't need no mian. Toxic Feminazism hard at not working.

@Bluespirit Not to even mention there was basically a bounty out on her. Laying low in a cabin in the woods seems like a good idea...

Just change Big Brother to Big Sister and you're all set

But it's fine because the left does it 🤡🤡🤡

And now You are in this little part of humans who knows that we are screwed

We've been living in a Kafkaesque amalgamation of 1984 and Brave New World for a few decades now. This is basically like adding Fahrenheit 451 into the pot.

Who gets their history from corporate movies

Yes! And yet those female characters still managed to be feminine and radiate kindness and gentleness to their friends and loved ones!

I'm working on a "fanfic" of Fallout 3/New Vegas, channeling heroines like Eowyn in my protagonist. She's brilliant, beautiful, determined and driven by forces like protection and love of family. I kinda wish we'd seen a little more badassery from Arwen, but I suppose Eowyn was meant to be her foil. Arwen had love for Aragorn, and Eowyn had her love for her uncle and brother.

Something else I noticed on rewatching a few years back, Snow White goes from being a helpless girl lost in the woods to a brave, strong, confident woman who decides to make the best of a bad situation. She doesn't beg the dwarves for mercy, she bargains with them as an equal. Her labor for food & shelter.

Exactly. Snow White was not only kind, but patient, brave, hard working, long suffering, and overall very inspiring. She didn’t let her fears overtake her and cause her to falter, she simply pushed through it. She was eventually rewarded with her own personal dream, which happened to be marrying her true love and living happily. She was a girl raised without the love of a mother, and barely knew the love of her father, and now she gets to have a wonderful family that she can raise herself. The only issue with snow whites character is her age, as she was only 14 and her prince was 30, which is highly inappropriate. But that did not factor into the original cartoon, it was simply the trappings of traditions kept centuries and centuries before, when many women died too young to wait to marry in their 30’s.

You’re assuming woke Hollywood writers understand things like subtlety and literary devices. They only understand things that are continuously whacked over their heads

They make movies to please their community of heterophobic, androphobic white-phobic weirdos. They please 1% of audience, basically. And piss off the other 99%. But they are so narcissist and delusional that they think their little community of weirdos represents a majority.

"Agreeability" is internalised Patriarchy. Sneering, snarling, snapping dagger-eared girlbosses are the true embodiment of the feminine ideal, and the only way for a woman to find true happiness. That, and box wine, and cats.

Nicely observed. 🙂

and it was not inteneded

damn, that's a good analogy. jack didn't understand what made people love christmas, so in trying to recreate it, he twisted it in his own image until he created something no one liked. damn

Neat analogy!! Very Good! Thanks.

Brilliant!

Well, can't speak for all Americans, especially since I'm not, I'm just in upside down land, although I can't say much for city folk, country folk are a different breed of human, and the only ones I have met with sense with what's actually decent and less sheep minded.

Sorry, but your rambling is horseshit. America never truly stood for freedom of speech. If you honestly think it did then only because you belonged to a group that was free to speak about their agenda. But I suppose when you grow up in America these details aren’t taught to you

Exactly. But no, let's bring these characters to 21st century sensibilities.

>>>They're a male escapist fantasy, not actual characters that need to be "updated". Producers: I see, so what you're saying is we should make a remake of these beloved characters that cater to female audiences?

ah, but, you see, me...excuse me! that should be: "cisheteronormative 46XY chromosome non-birthing persons" are not permitted to have fantasies, didn't'cha get the memo?

@@sifutophmasterofeyerolling2513 I know you're joking but that would actually be awesome. I'm a dude and would gladly watch a movie like that.

But you people have a meltdown when female fantasies exist.

We're still the same species

@@rog6725 except with a little dumber ideals nowadays which would mean most people (liberals) somehow devolved with time

Speaking of strong female characters....Antigone, anyone?

Hellenic tragedies were an evolution of religious sacrificial rites.

That's a great observation. How much did the ancient stories have to be adapted for modern audiences? I remember what they did to Beowulf in the 2000's and hated it. All I wanted was a screen version of the epic I read in high school. I understand cutting things to fit a run time but retooling the story is unacceptable.

You better run while you still can.

My gott man. Get out while you can. All the looks in the world will fade. All the women today written by women suck. Just ask her who wrote ripley or sarah connor or any of those other great female leads. Could she tell if a man wrote those? Those are some epic women. Not the crap fest we get today.

Don’t get married please it will be a mistake

Lol you're fucked if you wife her. Leave while you can and get a refund on that ring

I'm glad i have a partner who we would banter each other with sexist jokes and laugh about it. Growing up with 5 brothers gave me a sense of humor

It's the reaction of spoiled children who were never told "no," who never read, who got trophies for mediocrity, who were never challenged by difficult ideas in school or physical challenges on the playing field. People, in short, NOT to pay attention to.

That's the sad thing - that this is some form of revolutionary idea. It's common sense...or, was, when sense was actually somewhat common

Except @The Drinker, fkd up when he said @ 6:43, that LOTR was racially homogenous because it was based on Northern European Myth, but ... Wakanda shouldnt be, when its inside a racially homogenous Black Continent? lmao.

@@silentwitness536 watch it again, I think his point was that a racially homogenised wakanda is acceptable, but a racially homogenised middle earth or shire is not.

@@silentwitness536 deluded leftist can't even understand words😭

And “SJW Twitter users”

THAT'S ANTISEMITIC

"The world we live in today" means "downtown LA".

No, it means global audiences who watch films. Something you little conspiracy nuts have trouble wrapping your heads around.

Narrator: he's not.

That's pretty much what Top Gun Maverick is, and it made a heap of cash.

or playing a newer video game, as I have 0 interest in the witcher 1 remake `for modern audiences`, Dragon age 4 made `for modern audiences` or the race swap in God of war which will lead to the next one fighting a boss in a dress after you use the wrong pronoun. people ascept it and it grows, shame as i`s saved the money for it.

Instead of all this "Designed for ... Audience" how about designed to be good? Because I haven't seen one like that in a while

Or "actual" audiences.

@@aVerySillyBilly Wait...Witcher 1 is not just a graphical remake? They're updating its content too?

Its almost like he is a writer himself

@Chad 007 no

@@rhysprendergast5842 report the bots

@@ptptpt123 He fancies himself a writer

You are very easily impressed, I see.

Woke = bad, right? SO deep.

@@jenniek8391Would you like to talk about why people don't like woke policies? I'd be happy to.

@@jenniek8391Didn't think so.

They hope and try to brainwash everyone

Top Gun Maverick has made nearly 1.5 billion dollars because it did what other successful movies before it has done: Focus on things that are universally appreciated by people who watch it. 1. Internal consistency. 2. Likable characters. 3. Immersion, suspense and actual stakes. 4. Respecting it's audience.

Young people like traditional movie making too, they just are given the option anymore.

@@barongerhardt Like what, I didn't see anything you wouldn't have seen in a movie ten to 15 years ago

They WANT us to die off so badly that they keep thinking we have. Like a woman buying a dress three sizes too small and convincing herself she'll diet down before the wedding.

CGI is getting worse and worse every year that passes. Compare Star Wars, LOTR, Avatar etc. To any of the most recent Disney+ shows... The art doesn't matter one bit.

@@Blobbyo25 Yea, noticed that too. The CGI literally hurt my eyes and leaves me feeling sick

I miss hand-drawn animation so much

@@Blobbyo25 thats probably due to them not giving the actuall animators and effects people enough time, going with the "good enough" or "just enough spectacle for people to not notice much" types of production lines. in all honesty theres not much more we can advance in CGI, especially at this point in time. and jusing it as a crutch to compensate for other things is so not the way to go. honestly, i think the way to go is blend CGI with IRL visual effects. some movies still do this, but not enough, and when done well its pretty great. but again, it doesnt matter how good or powerful a tool is if you cant use it properly, CGI or IRL effects.

It's a sad world when Snow white and the huntsman is the best live version of snowwhite we'll get.

Sorry to bother, but did you read the books yourself? Cause if you did, you would be rather more humble and accurate when criticizing creators of modern Bond movies - as they finally did get 007 right as Fleming wanted him to be: empty-hearted, cold-minded killing machine in HM’s hands, a shipwreck of a person, the one fills his hollowness and grief with substances, but yet not a plain drunk. (And he was never actually attached to anyone, not just for some time). It was Connery and Moore - especially Moore - who got 007 wrong; easy-going, elegant, ever smiling English comedian is almost the exact opposite of Fleming’s original character. The hardest irony there is that it were Connery’s 007 who was adopted to ‘modern audience’ of that time - and the script differed much from the original books (sometimes almost completely, like in ‘you only live twice’). But you seem to have nothing against the ‘modern audience’, it seems, unless you’re not in it. Also the real reason that Lazenby left is because of his disdain with film crew and because his agent convinced him that 007 will become obsolete and forgotten quite soon. What they both did not consider that there are millions who will consume the same story over and over again - including the sorry author of this video. He himself is the part of ‘modern audience’, albeit of the 80s, and just has a problem with ‘modern audiences’ of these days. The most ironic of all is that he regards the art the very same way SJWs and Hollywood producers do - as a mere product - and when he’s not targeted, he plays the crybaby the same way SJWs do (which is, coincidentally, the content of this video) The only thing he got right is there are no ‘modern audiences’ - there are different stories without any audience targeted beforehand (so you either listen or stop whining about the story not being appropriate for you) And James Bond’s story is one of them and was in fact drastically different from Connery era movies. And Barbara Broccoli’s response is right if you look at it from another perspective: there is a whole load of action movie franchises like Bourne and more a more are spawn, how do you compete with them on their own field? You don’t. You have to come up with another story and another character. Luckily, there is a reliable source.

No, that's fine. I seem to recall having read two of the books but it's been decades. Since it's been two months since I replied to this video (I really don't want to watch it again), my recollection was simply that everyone seems to have their own impression of "Bond", and it's apparently quite easy to consume enough of it to either forget or omit the rest and still treat yourself as an authority. This doesn't actually bother me that much with a case like this, since there is so much material out there that I think it's understandable, but it felt like an important detail from earlier movies was being ignored. I'll take your word that the author never let him get attached to someone, as it doesn't change that it occurs in the movie.

I think you're talking about Chris Gore from Film Courage. His critique on modern movies is astute and on-point. He's sick of it just like the rest of us - an actual honest critic who *wants* to enjoy the films he watches.

Like what drinker said these people have been praised and not challenged almost their entire lives. It’s basically people who live in their ivory towers for so long they come off as nonsensical to regular folk when they leave said tower.

It's literally just the Js. It's really that simple.

@@mickeymickey9914 Kanye is right

Joss Whedon and his style has done such horrendous damage to writing as an art form and business

Mulan 1998 is a classic

Sarah Connor

Ripley

@Lachie well chinese audiences loved it so chill

Also, the original Lara Croft, Ripley from Alien, Sarah Conner from Terminator, ... - not one of which had the need to pussify the male characters in the process of their being a strong character

There's a great quote from Roman Orator Marcus Tullius Cicero: "To be unaware of what came before is to remain forever a child, for what value do our accomplishments hold if there is no history to weigh it against?"

You guys are blind if u believe Hollywood wasn't a degenerate propaganda factory from day 1, only difference is they used to be more subtle about it, which was actually worse.

Hollywood has always pushed poltical narratives and propaganda. The difference was that their propaganda and political narratives used to be entertaining.

Old hollywood cared about money, but let's not pretend they weren't pushing narratives or brainwashing the population from day one.

Make no mistake, Pedowood is all about profiting from their CCP master.

More like: "We want money and money and money and to huff our own farts."

Considering how physical media is slowly being phased out itd be nice if there was a larger trend among people buying more dvds and prioritizing classics over the box office.

THIS. I'd love if people just stopped giving this crap the attention. In a lot of cases, I don't even know if they "update" franchises to appeal to their idea of a modern audience or even themselves. They do it because they know it'll create controversy within the fanbase and controversy creates attention. Attention they otherwise wouldn't have because they lack the talent and imagination to create anything compelling. But get people angry? Yeah, that's a good way to get them talking about something.

Most, if not all, of the 'updated for modern audiences' things pretty much have proven to have zero staying power--so I really don't think we need to tell people to be indifferent past "Don't waste your money or time." But Western mass media's current management isn't going to grasp what they're doing wrong and why audiences are bouncing on them if they don't get told. They're just not really diverse, because on the inside they're all the same person...and that person is a high-SES from birth (culturally) White dude...who is outright baffled by the whole "Other people are other people" thing that most people figure out in preschool. That's probably the 'modern audiences' that they're talking about, and the surprising thing is that it isn't even tinier.

no, it doesn`t work this way. If one wants to stop this trend, he doesn`t stop hating it and starts taking it indifferently, he helps OTHERS IN MASS take it indifferently.

@@user-gj7yt1yn9b yes, but people like the drinker make these movies relevant, while being too polarizing, and subjective to convince the majority of the viewers of his opinions

This video heree is kinda countered by 'Popculture Detective' actually diving into 'whats wrong with the past'

I watch the twilight zone for October, man that show is so fucking good and that's for the 60s man.

Indeed

Imagine being given the fuckin opportunity to do so at all... but we both know that's not fuckin happening unless a white man that can give a shit about other cultures has his hands all over it.

There's a place for that. It's called Wattpad.

It would require imagination, that is way too risky come on!

*Can't wait for the SNOW **-WHITE-** TAN fairytale remake!*

@Hello I still do and go back to the ultimate classics regularly. It’s just, there are very few I haven’t watched. I’ve worked at a cinema and blockbuster stores back in the day. In years that followed, I used to go to the cinema at least once a week. I miss it. Modern movies just suck now 😞

Lol. That’s golden

Did everybody get refunds?

Too bad! They could have lingered over an extended dinner.

I’m trying to imagine an updated Seven Brides for Seven Brothers. That would be hilarious!

After…WARDS!

Not me. But then again, I guess I don't know what "real art" is.

Listen if im gonna be suffering from life Id wanna watch it in HD

Apparently we gotta buy the tickets, but not turn up, instead give them to a black family, for wakanda forever.. lol yea, sure, these people are insane.. clearly

As a brown person, the brown snow white is just straight stupid and anyone who says otherwise is just too stupid to realize they are bing used as a token.

Being* sorry was eating and texting lol

_Kingdom_ friggin' _rocks_

As a fan of anime myself, I completely agree with you. I mean hell, anime extends out of their culture and experiment with other cultures (i.e. African American culture inspired shows such as Afro Samurai and Samurai Champloo). It feels the teams made those 2 with passion instead of "diversity" and "made for modern audiences".

But this also means some of othose Westerners (i.e. the women and the men who simp for them) will end up being attracted to that media and try to change that Japanese media for when it gets ported over to the US/translated. You should see what we're having to deal with when it comes to English "localized" versions of Japanese video games. It's awful, tons of wokeists ruining them.

And mate the manga business is out selling comics

Of course there is still a lot of lazy bad anime made as a cheap cash grabs, but the medium as a whole is in a much healthier state than mainstream western media.

referencing ryan george is TIGHT

Preach. Thats ironically the one aspect I feel Disney will never actually bother exploring in the remake. Snow White is fairest in the land because she's a sincere hardworking selfless girl, not an overpowered beauty queen.

I fail to see the problem with "someday my prince will come". Almost ten years ago my princess showed up and I married her. Best thing ever. These modern filmmakers are lacking essential human features.

Also did the actress really say it's a story from the 30s?! This story is at least 300 years old or even older. Just make a new movie if you don't like the fucking story. Also snow-white is called that because she has skin that's white as snow. I don't think the actress will bleach her skin so this is just terrible casting on top

It depends how the song is interpreted. It seems like a "I want song" if you listen without context! But in the movie, Snow White has already met her prince and fallen in love with him, so she is asking not for "any random prince to be saved by him", but she's rather expressing her desire to find her one, true love again and be able to marry him at last. And honestly, in a time without phones, without SMS or any other chat possibilties, it's indeed not likely that the prince will likely find her easily. Yes, it's a passive part for the girl, but staying safe at the dwarves offers for her a better chance to survive than running around and searching for the prince (when she doesn't know where he is or where he is from), and so she decides to dream and hope instead, and what's wrong about that? (By the way, in the originak fairy tale, the prince hasn't met before Snow White and wants to have the beautiful girl in the coffin, and then they're marrying without any plot between, and would this the better solution??? (In most of Snow White movie adaptions, Snow White has already met the prince in the beginning or at least at the castle or it would be a scary fantasy or a parody...)-

Hollywood: "Best we can do is ruin your childhood memories"

I’d say that catering to “fan bases” is just as bad as catering to “modern audiences”. The Godfather did not cater to any fan base. Neither did Citizen Kane, Pulp Fiction, Shawshank Redemtion, or A Fistful of Dollars. They aspired to make a great movie, and only cater to the vision of the movie creator.

Like Star Wars. It’s a shame some fans left before Andor aired since it’s good

@@fr0ck360 I'm glad Mark Hamill stood up against it in interviews and said he doesn't believe the new movies are canon with how they ruined Luke. Harrison Ford just bounced and wanted nothing to do with it haha.

@@souldreamer9056 for original films you are correct. But for films set in already established worlds, like lotr, you do have to cater to the previous audience to some extent because they are the ones who are going to watch the new film or show.

Spot on

@@copysulting you articulated perfectly my thoughts on neilunknown's comment that addresses how the drinker articulated perfectly what millions of us think.

Trillions

He's the voice of the cinematically frustrated, hands down

Hear here!

Exactly..it’s the princess who is the “star of the show” Snow White, Cinderella, Rapunzell, Ariel etc…

@@GIBBO4182 its almost like its in THE GODDAMNED TITLE!

The Sleeping Beauty prince was the first. She slept through most of the movie while he did all the fighting.

you npc

@@ruthsaunders9507 He fight, but has nothing upstair. All I remember about him is that he's pretty & a good singer. This the reason it's my least favorite classic Disney movie: the princess is asleep most of the movie while the prince is as bland as the others

cry

@@contrapasso1539 that's antisemitic

because the modern audience doesn't exist

@@Slothi_Deathi no, they do sadly exist. I know some of them pesoonaly.

Like 99% of the world... they live in an echo chamber, thats why all the shit they push out ends up failing.

My man here being smart. I'm the same, I look for the buzzwords and swipe left.

same for video games.

I don’t understand why you want the remake to be a carbon copy of the old one? Just watch the old one. I don’t need all the wokeness in movies but I also don’t watch Disney Princess movies, nor do I care what ethnicity they are.

Box office revenues keep going downhill but somehow they still don't get it

What amazes me is that they keep making these declarations despite it being obvious they are instantly labeling their stuff as box office poison for majority of the population, even those they are arguably catering for. The costs of marketing are often almost as big if not bigger than the costs of production... and then they use it in a way that makes people less likely to see their content. Absolutely insane.

That's probably what modern movie-makers precisely cannot compute. For them, a character (especially of the "diverse" composition) just earn their likability by being sassy, egotistic, un-empathetic, and generally careless/bully-like on others. This is a big inconsistency since our general social experience (in real life) tells us that kind of behavior is precisely likely to make you unloved, un-trusted, and usually not wanted around.

@@herheartbeats5727 Modern Hollywood don’t grasp that since all of them from actor to producer to writer to director have gotten where they are by being un-empathetic and stepping on other people. Can’t expect people like that to tell a good story or create a relatable character that the audience can feel for.

Just to be clear, this is Disney's Snow White. You don't want to know what the Prince did to her in the German fairy tale

@@savioblanc The version i know the pale bearer stumbled and she was shaken awake, the true love kiss is disney invention (still works in how such tales where told though), but it is kinda an prince turned frog kissed back to prince theme.... so no issues there either.

@@Spinosaurus44 Well it probably has something to do with those traits, though they are probably shared far beyond Hollywood (and the general entertainement industry). . Also, reminding how often the majority of us "ordinary" people accept or cheer the promotion of such samples of humanity (while also often complaining with the consequences) is not hopeful.

That show really is a tipping point in everyone's patience for such problems in media

@@OmniversalInsect imagine how great that'll look on a resume in 10 years... unless we become so brainwashed that suddenly everyone will become a fan of the show, which hopefully won't happen

*Can't wait for the SNOW **-WHITE-** TAN fairytale remake!*

I know right.

They didn't make a series for "The Modern Audience." They made a series for Mindy Kaling.

We'll always have the first two movies

I think the biggest offender for me is the new Mulan film. They took a film about a woman pretending to be a man, who obviously can't keep up with the other men physically, so she constantly uses her brain and skills to find a way to win. And they turned it into a magical woman who wins fights with her own strength and power. A social commentary on female stereotypes and the hardships of living under a façade (e.g. Reflection), gets turned into a stale beat-em-up with zero moral worth. Oh, and they also managed to support genocide while filming it. Sheeeeeeesh Which is more empowering?

@@MikeInTheWoods Yep. T2 Sarah was a badass in every sense of the word.

Fortunately they've left Ellen Ripley alone... so far.

@@SolarisKane Don't jinx it my dude! 😳

Same here. I only watch old movies. I threw away my TV over 10 years ago.

But colbert wants you to mindlessly watch him spout propaganda into your head!

What is, tee vee? Yeah, I totally get that.

Back in the 80's and 90's, I would do my week's shopping, and then go watch a movie in the nearby cinema, before going home to my digs. That was 'every' week - there was something either well worth or reasonably worth watching. Last film I saw...The Darkest Hour. And now, sadly, we are suffering the film industry's own Darkest Hour. My local cinema shut down years ago, and then turned into a bingo hall (ffs). And there's no way that it'll be reopened as a screen again if we keep getting this endless, talentless crap from Hollywood. I am not in the least tempted to go and watch this new 'Snow White.' How the hell is the girl supposed to wake up from her poisoned sleep without love's true kiss? Omg...

Same here! When I was a kid in the 70’s and a teenager in the ‘80s, I used to go to the movies almost every weekend during the spring and summer months. Now? Why bother?! What’s wrong with making a good movie, Hollywood? If I want political propaganda, I’d watch Newsmax or the Huffington Post.

@Chad 007 no

Me and my fiancée are doing exactly the same thing! There are so many good films and series from the past, we don't even miss the modern cinema.

I almost exclusively watch movies from 1980’s to 2010.

I've been doing the same with just about every form of media that I engage with. Whether it be video games, books, music.

Same. I prefer to rewatch movies from the 70’s to the early 2010’s before 2015 happened. At least back then, movies went out of their way to entertain you and not preach to you. Even though there have been some hidden celluloid gems since 2015, they get lost amidst the endless MCU series/movies and modern remakes that end up flopping.

Watch Goodfellas or Pulp Fiction with a nephew who has never seen it, and their minds will be blown. Movies were good, and dangerous.

Please define "the past" when it comes to movies. For me when I was growing up, the "past" years were the 1920s, '30s, '40s, '50s, and '60s. Now, of course, the '70s and the '80s have joined them in my imagination.

and "values" is actually a very loose term for what those bozos think they have

They put too much political correctness and western value in the movie, which are not welcomed in other countries. Western value is not universal value. Universal value is peace, happiness and sparks of human decency….

@@keyboardmanyoutube3189 "western values" aren't held by all western people. Maybe they are just California values and have seeped into the west through the media

@@keyboardmanyoutube3189 ​ woke values are not western values…not all of us are like them. The west used to celebrate wholesome values

@@meat. Used to. Past time