Rashid Khalidi - The Hundred Year War in Palestine, SOAS University of London

Рет қаралды 72,803

8 жыл бұрын

www.soas.ac.uk/lmei-cps
This lecture titled "The Hundred Year War in Palestine" was given by Rashid Khalidi (Columbia University) at the Centre for Palestine Studies at SOAS University of London on 11 March 2016.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 launched what amounts to a hundred years of war against the Palestinians. This war had a unique nature - it was formally sanctioned and authorized by the great powers of the day at different times during this century, and via different fora, such as the League of Nations and the United Nations, but it was mainly waged by other actors. A much distorted and maligned feature of this long war has been the Palestinians’ continuing resistance, against heavy odds, to what amounts to one of the last ongoing attempts at colonial subjugation in the modern world.
Rashid Khalidi is Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies and Chairman of the Department of History at Columbia University.
You can find out more about this event at goo.gl/dBewLm

Пікірлер: 12

@lalira53 8 жыл бұрын

I'm glad someone says it the way I see it: we are living the horror of colonialism, just as it was in the 15th and 16th century in America!! hasta cuándo? are we that powerless that such injustice can keep going on? we must stop supporting a colonial state. Period.

@madams6796 8 жыл бұрын

Deep rich 100 year history presented by Prof Khalidi....followed by Q&A...should be mandatory to view/listen for all North Americans.

@Elizadoolittle1948 7 жыл бұрын

One of the best explained histories of the Israeli Palestinian conflict I've seen - and I've seen them all.

@sransmeier 7 жыл бұрын

wow

@rachel36ify 7 жыл бұрын

Phooo !

@aidenconlinkaatabi9504 7 жыл бұрын

During the Arab Revolt in the 1930's Britain acknowledged the Palestinian people. I find Khalidi is really pushing the victimization of the Palestinians by the 'whole world' to a non-existing degree. I find his presentation of history too skewered and biased. I would not read his books on this account. An historian should not have such a flagrant bias...