Nice! That’ll definitely do it. Just run the dc currents straight into a dc motor to spin it. Probably gets a great efficiency.

Can't you buy these and you connect it to your water boiler? Or did it never come out?

@@v4skunk739 not made like this you can’t 😜 but yeah I think there’s one or two places that make them. But again why would you buy one when you can just make one this easily now?

I thought cavitation gives of radiation....

@@tophat2002 - obviously there is some IF radiation, as you are converting energy to heat... but I highly doubt any significant EMF would be present, unless the water source was contaminated with some reactive substance. Because there is no direct electrical transmission in the reaction volume, even that risk is all but negligible. There is a company currently developing a cavitation steam generator using modified electronic diesel injectors, which has the capability to subject the cavitation volume to electrical current. They were playing around one day with salt water and nearly destroyed their device with the outcome (browns gas + sodium + ignition point = big boom and noxious gasses).

Aw shucks! Thanks for the kind words! 💚💜💙 I hope to soon have one built! My plan is to put one on the same shaft with the Tesla turbines that I’m building!

Hey Clifton, not sure if you’ve gotten a chance to see my latest tesla turbine updates but check them out! Graphs, charts and all! Just running on compressed air so far while I still work on the larger vacuum chamber system for the turbine. Peak 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque 4150rpm with 150psi room temp compressed air with 1/2in supply lines. And the second video is the latest 1200watt electrical load tests using 170gal of 150psi compressed air dumped to 65psi, both room temp and then 70-80°c heated compressed air. And saw the continuous 1200watt output all the way down to 65psi. Should have this thing ready for a vacuum chamber here real soon! kzfaq.infoyXQy844URMA?feature=share kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2gi7Wr1-DKZJs.html

Thank you Top Hat! I should have a test version of it here in the near future now that I’m making good headway with all my Tesla Turbine R&D.

hey thanks robert! yeah im really excited! i already can easily make a whole aluminum one like this right now. im working on getting the feeds and speeds nailed down to be able to cut thin stainless steel sheets on my 6040 router so as soon as i have that ill be able to really make a quality one. as you mentioned jeremiah in the live chat, im also very excited to test this in a low pressure system as the cavitation should happen much much more vigorously and at lower rpms if in a vat of "cold" water thats at very low pressure. My Thought is that the lower the pressure the less centripetal force that will be required to get the cavitation action in the cavities.

Robert me too

@@postualin6551 oh it’ll happen sooner or later that’s for sure.

@@CharlieSolis im waiting

My new stainless steel capable cnc router arrived last week!! Can’t wait to put one of these into action!

Thanks for watching! 🙏❤️🤓 Hopefully I’ll have a prototype made here soon!

Hey thanks Johnathon!

Hey Thanks Arif!

I can't Wait To build a Prototype!

Actual progress!! 🤓😎

Yeah buddy! Lol this was that easy manufacture design idea I had that was I telling you about a while ago! Lol I legit made this video just to show you!

As I’m pretty sure you can already tell exactly how it’s designed just from the thumbnail picture and from us talking before 😂

Thoughts?

Yesss love the hex shaft im still working bug out on furnace for casting got the cnc talking just gotta learn the software now and need more ridgid stand

@@bestowicprimer8835 yeah I’m excited for you to get that thing up and running. Lol I actually thought this cavitation heater might be one of the first things you made with it. I haven’t figured out a good set of feeds and speeds for the stainless steel though. I’ve been watching a few videos though so I’ve got a good place to start. Going to be giving a couple cuts a try tonight.

Thanks Dave! Hope it helps. Please share your tests if you end up making one!

Hey thanks cerebral! Let me know if you have any questions about this or all the Tesla turbine R&D I’ve been doing!

Soon! I’ve got to get the Tesla Turbine Working first! Make sure to check out the latest updates on the combustion + steam Tesla turbine builds! But didn’t @The Action Lab say that the Tesla Turbine Doesn’t Work? - DIY Tesla Turbojet R&D kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gZ2hjdmilqmxdps.html +5 Horsepower Tesla Turbine Dyno Jet Turbo Power & Torque Curve 375 mph @ 125 00 rpm HIGH SCORE! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m952aLWfkrKcl6c.html Solis Talks Tesla Turbines - Nikola Tesla’s Electrical Power Systems Patent GB 186,083 Walk Through kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a79jd5Rkr9PYk3U.html Tesla Turbine Jet Engine - gasoline fuel burner atomizer flame tube test 186,083 propane burner kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbihftKozs3SkZc.html

Hey thanks!

🤓 Cheers mate!

Just released the latest update! Tesla Turbine 250 watt to 2.65 kW Power and Efficiency Test kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jrecZKeCzL66m4U.html

Lol pretty much yeah, it definitely played a large factor in it.

@@CharlieSolis I don't know a lot about cavitation effect, but if you dare to build this design it will be interesting a comparation of cavitation obtained with square holes (like this design) and with round holes "classic design", and the effects of erosion.

Yes, Definitely! That’s why I designed the round hole version of this at the end too to be able to do the comparison. Just have to use a ball nose tool and it would make the rounded holes. So much experimentation to be done!

Only thing is the material… it would have to be stainless or aluminum….

Definitely something to test for sure.

It will vibrate more and could achieve stronger resonance

I’m sure it would certainly work for a while. Def with a spin up to see.

Hey thanks for messaging. I’m still working on all my Tesla turbine R&D at the moment so this idea is still on the shelf at the moment. I will be making a version soon though!

Just released the latest update! Tesla Turbine 250 watt to 2.65 kW Power and Efficiency Test kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jrecZKeCzL66m4U.html

Hey Giorgio! Thanks for commenting back it really helps my video! I’m currently still completely immersed in the Tesla turbine electric generators that I’m building and testing. The cavitation heater will be next because I want the turbine to drive the cavitation rotor. Check out my latest updates. Here’s my latest 10in diameter, 75disc aluminum and plastic prototype drive turbine dyno, 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque to the shaft at only 4150rpm with a 150psi room temp comp air supply from a regular piston compressor for now. I’m gearing it UP AT 1:3.6 to dual BLDC gens with a Kv rating of 2200rpm/volt. So for every 611 RPMs on the turbine the generators output 1volt. Tesla Turbine Generators With Usable Power and Torque kzfaq.info/sun/PL4XBGjR8Gu-Emu1QRPIwATKFuCZabqOh1 1200watt continuous electrical load output with room temp compressed air all the way down to 65 psi too and with the turbine only at about 6700rpm. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7ejg6Rl2MWqgn0.html Thermal addition tests of the 1200 watt load on compressed air. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eK6AdLR3nbeynqs.html 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque at only 4150rpm on only 150psi room temp compressed air. kzfaq.infoZxy8mIVG6as?feature=share This is a look through of the 10in disc stack of 75 discs, +10,000in^2 kzfaq.infoFU2LMZQ2_yA?feature=share These are the latest liquid fuel burner tests for the replication of GB 186,083. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbihftKozs3SkZc.html These are the latest propane burner tests. Tesla Turbine Jet Engine Combustion System GB 186,083 Superheated Steam kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gamprMx806_Fopc.html I haven’t gotten to my Tesla disc compressor tests finalized just yet but I have the setup to do them already just gotta do some upgrades to my bearing and gear hubs for the generators. 10in Tesla Compressor & Turbine w/ Built In Balancing Apparatus RC Car Dual 6s 3kW 2200kv BLDC Motor kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nKmBoZqCldjWn30.html

Just released the latest update! Tesla Turbine 250 watt to 2.65 kW Power and Efficiency Test kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jrecZKeCzL66m4U.html

Hey Orgone Warrior, Thanks for commenting! I have put some thought into using the casing for more cavitation “ports” but their effectiveness would be based a lot more on their geometry to create low pressure Eddie’s for cavitation than the radial holes that utilize the centrifugal force/pressure. That’s a good idea to make the generated steam work as a reaction turbine as it leaves the rotor. This design of mine would make testing geometries to make that happen very easy to do!

@@CharlieSolis thanks for the reply, the casing could "accentuate" the cavities in the rotor, as to get a pulsed cavitation. Not be cavitation holes themselves. As for the rotor, you can "easily" test a whole array, indeed a nice design. Maybe you are familiar with the works of Viktor Schauberger? On the odd chance you aren't, well worth the rainy sunday afternoon.

Oh yeah I really like schauberger’s work!!

Hey Raj! Yeah they are pretty interesting little devises. There’s a lot of claims that it produces more heat than it takes electricity to run, but I don’t know about all that. I do know COP greater than 1 are achievable with refrigeration cycles but I’m not aware how this might be doing that. My main goal with this is to test it with the Tesla turbine in a low pressure cryophorus system. It’s my belief that if used in a low pressure but “cold” tank of water the cavitation action will happen much much more vigorously as in the low pressure it should require less centrifugal forces to cause the low pressure boiling and cavitation within the cavities. 🤷‍♂️ who knows though at this point lol I’m going to eventually make one and find out though. I just need to get the feeds and speeds nailed down for cutting thin stainless steel on my machine and then I can really give it a try as I have a feeling aluminum won’t withstand the heat it can build up.

Hey there Raj, could you please link me to the video you looked at? I’m pretty curious too haha.

@@andrewselberg649 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rad4gdN0yq3RdKs.html

@@RajGiandeep thank you man!

Nice thanks raj! I’m going to put this link in the description!

Hey Pony_ Player! Thanks for messaging. Currently I don’t have anything available in the way of selling or files even. It’s a pretty basic build. This is a whole venture I’m going to begin doing R&D for here soon as I have my Tesla Turbines all wrapped up and going out the door. But I can only do so much so this whole cavitation heater construction design has just kind of been on the shelf for me. Which means I don’t have any of it optimized in any capacity. A lot needs to be done to study it to find the best design still. However I’m sure with a little bit of research in what others have built a basic starter one could be extrapolated or deduced. Send me an email at TesTurEnergy@Gmail.com and we can talk more.

Hey yes. Personally I haven’t used tinker cad. But I love fusion 360!

🔥🔥🔥

Hey thanks RusticRaver! That sounds like a really cool build! Are you making any videos of your progress? And I’m sorry I don’t have anything specific in the form of available files. It’s really easy to reproduce though. I will be dabbling with this design in the near future. Currently I’m wrangling with my 10in Tesla turbine and Tesla’s DC current generator PN 406,968. Currently getting a 2-2.5 horsepower continuous output capable on the Tesla turbine with a peak output of 3.2hp and 5ft-lbs of torque at 4500rpm. So I am just trying to get these two bad boys properly coupled together for a quality Turbine generator. Then I can take the side step onto cavitation research, and the myriad of other things I’ve just been waiting to get my hands dirty in.

@@CharlieSolis Sorry for late reply - that tesla turbine sounds like a great concept. So steam generated by cavitation will power the turbine which will be coupled to a generator? Should net you about 2.5-3 Kw output + you can loop the output from the turbine around to heat exchange to heat your home, have that controlled by a solenoid valve with a thermal cut off switch.

Actually I missed the part about the Electric Dynamo Machine - that's awesome, I can't wait to see the video 👍 I'm moving away from cavitation now and looking at magnetic inductance - I have a single to 3 phase variable frequency speed contoller/invertor and I will be modifying the output frequencies and looping copper tubing through each of the 3 phases to generate eddy current to heat the water. In theory it could create on-demand steam. I'll definitely be filming it and will tag you in it when I upload them.

Awesome! I can’t wait to see it! How long until you think you’ll have something built?

how are you going with this?

@@thumperhunts6250 i never heard back. ill likely try to go ahead eeith this once my machine shop extension is finished

Hey Paul Butcher, thanks for commenting! Oh yeah that would also totally work. Oh boy what I could do with a quality metal 3D printer 😈😈🤓🤓 that would be game changer for my ability to prototype. One day though, one day.

Hey Paul, not sure if you’ve gotten a chance to see my latest tesla turbine updates but check them out! Just running on compressed air so far while I still work on the larger vacuum chamber system for the turbine. Peak 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque 4150rpm with 150psi room temp compressed air with 1/2in supply lines. And the second video is the latest 1200watt electrical load tests using 170gal of 150psi compressed air dumped to 65psi, both room temp and then 70-80°c heated compressed air. And saw the continuous 1200watt output all the way down to 65psi. Should have this thing ready for a vacuum chamber here real soon! kzfaq.infoyXQy844URMA?feature=share kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2gi7Wr1-DKZJs.html

Because it’s a one for one power in to heat out, which electric heaters already do that with a lot less moving parts. Even if you have mechanical input from like say a water wheel and a stream you can just put magnets rotating around a metal case and it will heat via induction at a 1 to one. The real conspiracy theory is why mini split and heat pumps are just now being offered on the market when we’ve had this technology for heating at vastly higher efficiency for over 100 years. Heat pumps have coefficients of performance between 3-7 for low end models (meaning for every 1kW of electrical power put in it moves 3-7kW of thermal energy from one environment to another.) This is how mini split AC/heaters work. I know it sound ludicrous but I promise you the thermodynamics works out. I rectify it in my head by remembering that heat pumps can quickly move heat from a system without any power put in. They are just made more and more efficient the more energy you put in to compression for increasing the efficiency of heat exchange via transport within latent heat of vaporization and condensation. So for the same amount of electrical or mechanical energy put in heat pumps will deliver 3-7 times as much thermal energy as any plain old electrical heater. Not to mention all the electrical power put in to run the compressor just gets turned into heat of compression and gets fully utilized with the heat transported. At least it’s one of my own personal conspiracy theories that appliance companies have been refusing to sell AC/Heat pumps for heating because they know they can sell more furnaces and help sell wayyyy more energy to heat everything if didn’t offer them. But now if you go to Lowe’s or Home Depot you can find these “Hybrid electric and air to water heat pump water heaters” that they put messily heat pumps in to bring up their appliance efficiency just the little notch they needed to meet epa standards. and then charge 2-3 times as much for that model. But anyways I could go on and on about heat pumps and reversing valves being kept from the people by appliance corporations for monetary gains but I’ll leave it there and let you ask questions if you’re actually even interested in listening to me rant 😂

I do know there are the claims of more heat out than energy needed to be put in to rotate it but I have yet to see them actually verified. Something I wanted to either prove or disprove with this improved construction method. One of these days, once I’m finished with the Tesla Turbine R&D that I’m doing right now, I’ll get around to doing it. So sooner or later. Lol

@@CharlieSolis Thanks for this, a very detailed, and impressive response

@@terrytytula 🙏🙏🙏💜💙💚 let me know if you have any more questions I can answer about the improved cavitation heater design or the Tesla turbines I’m working on! Cheers!

Hey Terry! Not sure if you’ve gotten a chance to see my latest tesla turbine updates but check them out! Just running on compressed air so far while I still work on the larger vacuum chamber system for the turbine. Peak 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque 4150rpm with 150psi room temp compressed air with 1/2in supply lines. And the second video is the latest 1200watt electrical load tests using 170gal of 150psi compressed air dumped to 65psi, both room temp and then 70-80°c heated compressed air. And saw the continuous 1200watt output all the way down to 65psi. Should have this thing ready for a vacuum chamber here real soon! kzfaq.infoyXQy844URMA?feature=share kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2gi7Wr1-DKZJs.html

Not yet. Still elbows deep on this Tesla turbine R&D. I’ll be making a prototype here soon!

Hey jason thanks for commenting! So simply put, i didn't want to complicate the video passed the scope of the simple cavitation heater construction. i already have MANY ideas of how to use this with the tesla turbine and other systems too. i will be releasing more as soon as i can get it out of my head and into CAD. lol ive been sitting on this idea for about a year now but finally today i decided to sit down and build it in CAD to then make this video to show people. i currently don't have the time to build this as i'm so busy with the tesla turbines i've been commissioned to build for multiple customers now so my hope was that this would inspire someone any one to start trying to do the tests. i figured if i showed people an easy way to finally make one maybe they would start doing the experiments testing the cavity geometries to propel this technology forward. if i'm too busy to build it myself it does no good for the world just sitting in my brain lol

@@CharlieSolis Love your work and inspired curiosity - especially evidenced by the altruistic ripple effect inherent in doling out such inspired head-start ideas/data/methods to the creative souls out there... Ah, a delicious taste of that good, pure purity - of some delectable inquiry or another... I savor these moments' feelings! 👍 More power to you, Charlie, I've quickly become a fan/student. 👍

@@justinklenk 💚💜💙🙏🙏🙏 omg thank you so much for the kind words! Knowledge/information is one of the few things we can give without having to give something up to give it. Love is another. Thank you for your love and support!

@@CharlieSolis Aye, brother! A chain reaction of a conceptual nature, good stuff. 👍

I gotta pay it forward somehow, right?

Hey thanks for commenting! Yup! You’ve got it right! That’s what I meant by “machined” I was including stamping processes. It’s the exact same way I will be making my Tesla turbine discs here in the near future. No need for surfacing either. At least not at this point. Tesla talks about using a stamping process in his improved construction patent for the turbine runner. This is also how I am doing the spacing in the periphery of the discs, with the pressed in dimples. Right now I don’t have the stamp for the turbine disc yet though because I don’t want to make one until I know I’m satisfied with the design to fully scale er’ up! One of my donors helped me get a new cnc machine that can cut steels and hard metals so as soon as I’m satisfied with this design I’m building now ill machine out the stamp die. Much R&D needs to be done first though. If you haven’t had a chance to read this one check it out! NIKOLA TESLA BRITISH PATENT 186,082 - IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF STEAM AND GAS TURBINES "In the new design I employ two heavier end-plates which are machined tapering toward the periphery for the purpose of reducing the maximum centrifugal stress as much as practicable. The inside discs, of relatively thin material, are rolled, forged or ground tapering in like manner and with the same object in view, but this may not always be necessary and plates, made of sheet metal of substantially uniform thickness as furnished by the mills, can be employed. Each of the thick as well as thin plates is provided with exhaust openings, leaving a solid central portion like the hub and spokes of a wheel. Star-washers of similar configuration serve the purpose of keeping the discs apart in the center and for the peripheral spacing the thin plates have small holes drilled in them on a circle, or circles, of suitable diameter, and in these are driven tight-fitting studs which are upset at both ends by a special tool so that they will project beyond the metal on each side a trifle more than the thickness of the star-washers. When the plates are put together the separating studs do not come in line but are straddled in order to give opportunity for slight yielding, thereby eliminating constructional difficulties which might be caused by unevenness or other mechanical imperfections. Thus the rotor can be finished closely to predetermined overall dimensions and will run true on the outside even if the thin inside plates should vary a little in thickness or be slightly warped. To simplify this arrangement I provide only every second plate with studs, using plain ones between. Furthermore, with the object of cheapening the manufacture I dispense altogether with the former, accomplishing the spacing by means of small bosses or protuberances which are raised in the plates by blows or pressure and provide a die, practically reducing all the machine work on a thin plate to a single operation in a stamping press. The star-washers, while preferable, are not indispensable and may be replaced by round separating washers of a diameter about equal to that of the hub part of the discs" -NIKOLA TESLA "This construction permits free expansion and contraction of each plate individually under the varying influence of heat and centrifugal force and possesses a number of other advantages which are of considerable practical moment. A larger active plate area and consequently more power is obtained for a given width, this improving efficiency. Warping is virtually eliminated and smaller side clearances may be used which results in diminished leakage and friction losses. The rotor is better adapted for dynamic balancing and through rubbing friction resists disturbing influences thereby insuring quieter running. For this reason and also because the discs are not rigidly joined it is safer against damage which might otherwise be caused by vibration or excessive speed" -NIKOLA TESLA Read full version: teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/british-patent-186082-improvements-construction-steam-and-gas-turbines

@@CharlieSolis Check your E-mail. I sent you something you may be interested in. Lets talk.

I will do that! Thanks for reaching out! I’m excited to see what you sent.

@@CharlieSolis When you get a chance let me know what your initial thoughts are.

Hey sorry I was up all night working in the garage organizing to get back up and running again. I promise I’ll get to reading your email some time today! Just been crazy busy at the moment. Just wanted to make sure you know I wasn’t ignoring ya!

Hey sylent Xtinction! Thanks for messaging. I have not made a prototype yet but I will be soon. Currently I’m elbows deep in my Tesla Turbine R&D. But I will be making one to go direct on shaft with my Tesla turbine in the very near future. There’s SOOO much left to tested with this cavitation heater. The possibility for new and improved resonant chambers inside the hole pockets really has the opportunity to change the game. I’m not sure if you’ve gotten a chance to see my latest tesla turbine updates but check them out! Just running on compressed air so far while I still work on the larger vacuum chamber steam system for the turbine. Peak 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque 4150rpm with 150psi room temp compressed air with 1/2in supply lines. And the second video is the latest 1200watt electrical load tests using 170gal of 150psi compressed air dumped to 65psi, both room temp and then 70-80°c heated compressed air. And saw the continuous 1200watt output all the way down to 65psi. Should have this thing ready for a vacuum chamber here real soon! kzfaq.infoyXQy844URMA?feature=share kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2gi7Wr1-DKZJs.html

@@CharlieSolis - nice work... but would be much better if you had a consumption meter for the load AND the inverter. I'm working on a design for a cavitation heater myself... but it focuses more maximizing the cavitation volume than anything. I'm not sure how effective it will be. Industrial supplier's "secret sauce" is frequency (number of orifices), depth, angle, diameter. The best designs also have a profile at the perimeter, which appears like a trailing edge into one side of the orifice. I'm almost certain they discovered this design implementation after some designs reportedly worked better after many hours of use. I would assume the erosion effects of collapsing cavitation bubbles that traveled to the top of the orifices before collapsing, degraded the leading edges. My main interest in the boilers, is the overwhelming reduction in descaling that is required of other methods. My locale is lime heavy... and eliminating the need for water softening, distilling, or descaling is a huge contributing factor to reducing operating costs.

Hmm interesting. I have not heard of the rescaling capability. Could you elaborate a bit more on that?

Oh yeah if I did the meter before the inverter it would be showing even more power out that I’m claiming too. 😂 I’ve got two meters but they aren’t the best at measuring over small periods of time. More adequate for hours rather than 30-45 second. And I’m basically hitting the bottom of my funds to complete this vacuum chamber system I’m making at the moment. It’s going to be so fancy lol but I’m the hopes of saving time I kinda just started throwing money at it to eliminate from having to compete ground up design for making my own cost and material effective custom components. I absolutely cannot wait to show what this system can do. 😈🔥😈🔥😈

Hey thanks for the critiques. What kind of music would you like to hear?

@@CharlieSolis you know what? I'm glad you replied because there is no perfect answer but maybe something not so jarring or way out there or maybe put no music at all?

The second song in the video I actually really liked. It's smooth, relaxing and fits the theme and style of video which is also very smooth and relaxing, as it always is. ;)

All good points; nothing jarring, more focusing. 👍

Just changed it to another copyright free song from KZfaq. I’m just going with what they’ve made available for free which isn’t a lot that doesn’t sound like it’s from the 90’s lol I definitely don’t have the budget to be paying royalty fees for better music right now though. 😂 It might take a little while to update the audio track but hopefully that’s a little better.

Can you elaborate more on that?

@@CharlieSolis Water enters the blind hole to react and then release energy, the response speed is slow. We can communicate together.

@@nekochen4580 hmmm yeah I’m sorry. I’m still having trouble understanding what you mean by that. Or how that means the efficiency is low, and for that matter compared to what?

@@nekochen4580 check out this video. The cavitation is happening at very high rates of repetition. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i6ioo9Fn1MrYk3U.html

@@CharlieSolis The design of the blind hole has a slow response speed, and it takes too long for water to react when entering the blind hole and then coming out of the blind hole.

Really?!? Dang it lmao that’s really frustrating actually. It’s relatively easy to change the music within KZfaq because they give you the option to just overlay music over a videos audio. Unfortunately I won’t be able to fix the construction spelling without deleting the video and reuploading it. You win some, you loose some I guess. Thanks for pointing it out though! I appreciate the help making the videos nicer and better quality!

@@CharlieSolis my pleasure, your the best .

@@Name-js5uq glad I could be of service!

Hey Justin, not sure if you’ve gotten a chance to see my latest tesla turbine updates but check them out! Graphs, charts and all! Just running on compressed air so far while I still work on the larger vacuum chamber system for the turbine. Peak 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque 4150rpm with 150psi room temp compressed air with 1/2in supply lines. And the second video is the latest 1200watt electrical load tests using 170gal of 150psi compressed air dumped to 65psi, both room temp and then 70-80°c heated compressed air. And saw the continuous 1200watt output all the way down to 65psi. Should have this thing ready for a vacuum chamber here real soon! kzfaq.infoyXQy844URMA?feature=share kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2gi7Wr1-DKZJs.html

hey thanks for commenting but this not a primary project of mine. i put this up on here so that if there were other people who wanted to take the idea and run with it they could. currently our time is focused on our Tesla Turbine R&D Make sure to check out the latest updates on the combustion + steam Tesla turbine builds! Tesla Turbine 250 watt to 2650watt Power and Efficiency Test kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gZ2hjdmilqmxdps.html DIY Turbo Generator for Off-Grid Electricity: 250 watt Load kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bJZ_pNBzsrS6XYU.html and our Tesla Turbine Collab Video With @Integza kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ituqm5yerdzem58.html as well my most recent video and research into tesla's actual wireless transmission system. 🛜 Neil Degrasse Tyson, WRONG about Tesla?!? 🛜 ​⁠@joerogan (30min) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qsufrKSVupOVg2Q.html let me know if you have any questions. cheers

@@CharlieSolis - if you happen to hear of anyone "running with it", let me know. I've been looking for a reasonably priced cavitation boiler for years... but the only U.S. manufacturer/supplier has no interest in any consumer-grade examples. Their excuse is inefficiency compared to fuel-fired boilers... but I honestly don't care about the efficiency. I need a device to produce steam on-demand, without combustion, and without the wait time of electric elements. I've looked into direct resistance electric boilers ("ohmic boilers", "stingers", etc.)... but they're simply too inefficient. The output is nearly instant... but the power consumption is exorbitant, to say the least. I wish you all the best with your research of the Nikola's bladeless turbine. In certain applications, they have their merits... but the profits generated from an affordable cavitation boiler could possibly provide enough funding to advance your turbine research significantly.