Sony a7 IV vs Canon R6 Hands On Camera Comparison
Рет қаралды 207,626
Күн бұрынHow do the Sony a7 IV and the Canon R6 compare? I think they're head-to-head in the marketplace. 20 megapixels or 33 megapixels, that doesn't tell the whole story. Let's take a look at these two cameras: picture quality, dynamic range, ISO and auto focus for stills and video. Let's see what they have. We used the new Sony 50mm G-master f/1.2 and the Canon f/1.2 50mm. So these are very good lenses for both these cameras. Take a look and let us know which camera would be your choice. #SonyA74 #CanonR6 #CameraComparison
Sony a7 IV:
B&H - bhpho.to/3mwDxw2
Amazon - amzn.to/3021yCv
Canon R6:
B&H - bhpho.to/3pIHMDF
Amazon - amzn.to/3wvwBCD
Sony 50mm G-master f/1.2 Lens:
B&H - bhpho.to/3n3PqIh
Amazon - amzn.to/3H02ecv
Canon 50mm f/1.2 Lens:
B&H - bhpho.to/3H4RI3N
Amazon - amzn.to/3ki5eHi
SHOW US SOME LOVE! SUBSCRIBE!
Subscribe to The Slanted Lens and get new videos every week
bit.ly/1RgdYoM
Support The Slanted Lens by shopping our affiliate links:
B&H: Weekly Photography Deals & More: bhpho.to/2AxlpH2
Amazon: amzn.to/1T7Z20D
Follow The Slanted Lens-
Facebook: / theslantedlens
Twitter: / theslantedlens
Instagram: / theslantedlens
Visit the webpage: theslantedlens.com
Visit our SPONSORS
Tamron Lenses: bit.ly/2mZgkoz
SKB: www.skbcases.com/
Platypod: www.platypod.com/
Westcott: www.fjwestcott.com/?sca_ref=2...
Datacolor: www.datacolor.com/
Triple Scoop Music: www.triplescoopmusic.com
TSL Store: theslantedlens.com/tsl-store/
---
GEAR USED:
Canon C200
B&H: bhpho.to/2FJaH8d
Amazon: amzn.to/34aYAbJ
Canon 24-70 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2OCKjgl
Amazon: amzn.to/2O871PH
Sony A7 RIII
B&H: bhpho.to/2DZYHut
Amazon: amzn.to/2QFH0Zu
Canon EOS R
B&H: bhpho.to/2roExVE
Amazon: amzn.to/2QEnk8s
Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 G2
B&H: bhpho.to/2J2wp4j
Amazon: amzn.to/2KCVw0v
Tamron 28-75 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2FsWNno
Amazon: amzn.to/2KJ3rcD
Tamron 17-28 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2ItePur
Amazon: amzn.to/37qnWVh
Platypod
B&H: bhpho.to/30rqHlp
Amazon: amzn.to/2X7BnGD
Spyder Color Checker
B&H: bhpho.to/2JgfPCz
Amazon: amzn.to/3eofTeb
Sennheiser G4 Wireless Lav
B&H: bhpho.to/2BrOeei
Amazon: amzn.to/2Mreesc
Discounts:
15% off Lens Pro To Go
www.lensprotogo.com
Use Discount Code: SLANTEDLENS15
$10 off Luminar by Skylum
macphun.evyy.net/c/2073517/64...
Use Discount Code: LuminarTSL10
__
Jay P. Morgan has been working as a Commercial Photographer and Film Director in the Los Angeles area for more than 20 years developing an impressive list of clients from Paramount to McDonald's. Jay P.'s experience with elaborate set design and extensive lighting are key to the success of his illustrative work.
@77dris 2 жыл бұрын
Why would you compare a brand new Sony native mirrorless lens to an ancient, subpar adapted lens on the Canon. The new RF 50 is soooo much sharper.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We will have to test it out.
@RockyMaiviaMiami 2 жыл бұрын
I can’t believe I’m agreeing with @77dris.
@jasperramos7657 2 жыл бұрын
its true why the ef 50 1.2? lol
@stevesvanderpool8653 2 жыл бұрын
I'm in the Sony system and I definitely agree.
@miles5790 2 жыл бұрын
yup i agree
@leerothman7570 2 жыл бұрын
Come on dude get real. You needed to use the RF 50mm f1.2L NOT that older EF lens. What are you trying to pull? You proved absolutely NOTHING!
@francoisequentin1647 2 жыл бұрын
Agree. So much work for nothing, the EF is old and not sharp.
@leerothman7570 2 жыл бұрын
@@Sidowse you better believe it. 25 years of professional photography and having been a Sony owner that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
And yet both cameras performed quite well.
@axelfiraxa 2 жыл бұрын
@@Sidowse the EF canon 1.2 is less sharp and slower than the EF 1.4 . The RF version is on a whole other level in both speed and resolving power.
@weigertj 2 жыл бұрын
The EF Canon 50mm f/1.2 is a 14+ year-old adapted lens, which is known that not very sharp below f 2.2. This is not a fair review.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
If you watch the whole thing you will see that the Canon did quite well!
@pabloguillen605 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens Maybe, but this is not a fair comparison.
@brthiebauth 2 жыл бұрын
Would have liked to see you use the native RF 50mm 1.2 from Canon. Not that it is going to make the 20MP higher resolution, but it has been shown the RF is sharper than the EF version. Autofocus is also much better on the RF version. You really should have worked to compare the newest Canon lens and the newest Sony lens to make this more apples-to-apples, or used an older Sony.
@wellwhatthen10101 2 жыл бұрын
Looks as if Sony is paying his wages.
@richardcollinsphotography1288 2 жыл бұрын
Good point it would habe been a much better and accurate comparison. It's just content as is.
@sebasr1 2 жыл бұрын
The RF would have much better coating so it would probably handle flare and ca better as well. I have the EF 50 1.2L and I’d say it’s probably the softest L series lens in Canons line up.
@marccav7910 2 жыл бұрын
Instantly thought the same thing.
@drobinv 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the work but don't understand the comparison when the selected Canon lens was released in 2006...
@stevewestonphotography 2 жыл бұрын
No point in watching this comparison as you are using the newest and greatest Sony lens against an adapted old Canon lens which was known for being soft and mushy! what's the point. Not bothering to watch any further, Bye.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Too bad. We found some great results with both cameras. And our conclusion...stay with where you have invested in glass!
@lumenspaul 2 жыл бұрын
is there much difference at f5.6
@SMoeun-zs9ji 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens done well
@Libinkttm 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens why didn't you use old 50 1.8 for sony and RF 50 1.2 for canon ?
@KikujiroChan 2 жыл бұрын
They don't care about that stuff. Look at the description and all the affiliate links. They made a horrible bad comparison only to use the title to attract people. For the 15 years old lens, that just the lens they had lying around.
@jeffreyhill4705 2 жыл бұрын
Sharpness and autofocus is always the camera and the lens working together. The sharpness test would have been better with a Sigma 50 art adapted to each camera and the autofocus with a native RF L lens. I do not believe that old 50 L is fast focusing at all, Older canon primes tend to be sharp in the center only, even when stopped down.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Some good things to consider. Thanks for sharing!
@axelfiraxa 2 жыл бұрын
the EF 50 1.2 is less sharp and slower to focus than the RF version. it is actually less sharp than the EF 1.4 which is a 20 year old design compared to the current generation canon and sony
@kerwindesilva2087 2 жыл бұрын
Cmon, everyone knows that you used the wrong canon 50 1.2
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Next time. Thanks for watching!
@bert671 2 жыл бұрын
That was the idea lol
@MarkoNara 2 жыл бұрын
That its the trashier 50mm 1.2... nullifies this review from the start. Sorry.
@sidknee4975 2 жыл бұрын
Sony commercial is why.
@BassDad 3 ай бұрын
Seems like you might have a bias for Sony
@ExploringWorldYouTube 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, congratulations for the very interesting video. I'd like to ask you a question. For me the stabilization of a camera is very important because I make all my 4K documentaries around the world freehand, without tripods and without stadyshot. I DON'T take stills. If I had to buy the Sony A7 IV and the Sony FE 24-105mm f / 4 G OSS, could the two stabilizations, both of the camera and that of the lens, work together and in synergy? Do you think the Sony A7 IV with Sony FE 24-105mm f / 4 G OSS might be the right camera for me or is it better that I look to another camera with better stabilization? Thank you very much
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
If you are doing strictly video you might be happier with the Sony a7S III: bhpho.to/3ExLfN1 And the Sony FE 24-105 F/4 should work great with that. I do however love shallower depth of field so you might want to consider the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8 although it is heavier and larger.
@bpunching 2 жыл бұрын
Canon RF 50/1.2 is much better in terms of focusing speed and sharpness. EF 50/1.2 is a great lens and probably my favorite one, but it's pretty old and cannot compete against modern glass in technical tests.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good point. Thanks for sharing.
@frostybe3r 2 жыл бұрын
6 FPS in RAW just isn't acceptable, also comparing the new G Master 50 1.2 to an OLD EF mount isn't a good comparison, get an RF 50 1.2. Biased. Infact I'm completely disregarding your entire review. Lenses also render colours differently. What a joke man. What a joke.
@arniesegovia2809 2 жыл бұрын
Totally agree
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
There is a lot in the video to consider and worth watching.
@frostybe3r 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens There really isn't.
@taylorhickman84 2 жыл бұрын
Canon fan big mad
@frostybe3r 2 жыл бұрын
@kulmmii Know what I can g free lol a difference in? 20 fps and 10.
@syrcular 2 жыл бұрын
I really like your channel and videos, but I have to admit, I was disappointed you did not test the RF 50mm f1.2. It would provide a more relevant comparison, I would have loved to have watched. Hopefully you will consider doing another video comparing the 50 GM and 50 RF.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
If you watch the whole thing you will see that the EF was not a hindrance to the Canon.
@syrcular 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens I’ve tested both those lenses on R5 and R6’s and respectfully disagree. The motors in the RF lens line and the overall lens “intelligence” is designed to be efficient in autofocus when it comes to interfacing with the camera. That’s why you had a few misses on the EF and it slightly scored less than your GM comparison. Although I can agree that EF lenses do work well with R bodies for sure, and maybe even better than on DSLr’s, it’s not appropriate to do a comparison of an adapted lens against a native lens from another camera system. On top of that, although there are aesthetic qualities between the EF and RF, that you could argue about since that’s purely subjective the technical optics of the RF are also superior to the EF version. You would have been better off comparing the EF to the RF lens within the system which would be an extremely valuable comparison but comparing the old 50 EF 1.2 adapted to a Sony 50mm f1.2 G master on an stove body is not a fair comparison and just doesn’t make sense. And I’m actually a predominantly Sony user myself but also use Canon from time to time for my shoots. So I’ve had experience with both systems.
@brankokosteski 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens you're a hindrance to the canon
@jigjitsu5599 2 жыл бұрын
They always do this. It has to be fair RF vs GM 1.2
@ExploringWorldYouTube 2 жыл бұрын
Sorry if I also ask you another question because I have great trust you and your professionalism. What variable ND filter would you put on the Sony SEL 24-105mm f / 4 G OSS 77mm zoom lens? I would like one that decreases the definition of the clip as little as possible. I'd like to know the brand and dimension of the VND filter. My budget is max 150 euros. THANKS
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
I think in that price range Tiffen makes a good variable ND filter. You might want to check out our video about ND filters. I just picked up a Nisi filter that I will be testing soon. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jramnayKseC7ZJc.html
@rovleculina8237 2 жыл бұрын
I usually like your stuff but I don't understand why would you use Canon's EF 50 f/1.2 instead of RF version. EF version is quite soft and at it's best resolves 15 megapixels on a 20 megapixel sensor, it's sharpness is 15 P-Mpix for a 20 megapixel sensor, there is a big difference in resolving power between EF and RF versions. Also, on the first comparison photo it looks to me that foreground (grass) on the Canon side was much sharper which indicates that focus on this comparison image was on two different focal points, background on the Sony and closer to foreground on the Canon. Regardless of this review flaws, Sony seems like a great deal. Thank you for putting in the effort and providing the content for us!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
The Sony is a good deal. And the Canon is a great camera as well.
@KikujiroChan 2 жыл бұрын
They don't care about that stuff. Look at the description and all the affiliate links. They made a horrible bad comparison only to use the title to attract people. For the 15 years old lens, that just the lens they had lying around.
@EhtashamAnwar 2 жыл бұрын
Why not using RF glass on R6 RF mount. Please don't do these comparison unless you know how to use gear to its maximum potential.
@TonyDae 2 жыл бұрын
Huge problem that renders the comparison very suspect... Needed to have native lenses of comparable quality.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Our experience is that the Canon lens is a superior lens!
@brthiebauth 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens They were asking to have you use the RF mount 1.2 versus the EF 1.2, both Canon lenses. Putting a 15-year-old design lens against the latest and greatest Sony seems a bit odd.
@TonyDae 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens This doesn't really solve the problem here. Your comparisons are naturally going to favor the better corrected and more modern Sony over the older EF 50 f1.2 due to better AF technology and lens correction. The comparison really needed to feature the top end native mount 50s against each other to be a more fair comparison if you were going to feature the Sony 1.2. Both the RF and FE 50 f1.2's are much, much better corrected and faster/more accurate than the old EF design. This is objective and a fair criticism of the video.
@tarjei99 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens Lots of people love the EF 50 F/1.2 with warts an all. But it is not a technically good lens.
@mish19811 2 жыл бұрын
Great video ! What is you’re focal length when you filming in the studio it looks perfect 👍🏼
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Focal length is 50mm. Thanks for watching!
@amandaparotte 3 ай бұрын
I am having a hard time debating whether or not to get the canon R6 Mark II or to get the Sony A7CII. I shoot some portrait photography but lately I have been shooting photo and video of my 12 year olds basketball team. which one would you say is better for this? I currently have a Canon 5D Mark III. I can't really find any review videos comparing the two cameras. Thank you for your help.
@NarutoUzumaki10.10 2 жыл бұрын
It almost feels like you're trying to make up for your A1 vs R5 comparison by using a less ideal lens for Canon this time. I guess we can call it even now and hope that in your next comparison you'll match the lenses more wisely...
@town3 2 жыл бұрын
😳😳😳😭😭😭 lol
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We had no preconceived thoughts on this. Thanks for watching!
@viperstinger77 2 жыл бұрын
So true this guy used to be a canon shooter now a sony advocate sold his soul to sony lol
@DayHunch 2 жыл бұрын
For the ISO test the Canon definitely did better than the A7 & I'm a Sony user
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the Sony looses the color in the higher ISO.
@zodyking4595 2 жыл бұрын
Agreed, but your also smart for being on Sony to begin with, i just bought the R6 yesterday and considering a switch lol.
@longjohn2404 2 жыл бұрын
@@zodyking4595 how come? I love my R6
@smashedlegends 2 жыл бұрын
What video did you see? You´re crazy!
@luisvalenzuelateran 2 жыл бұрын
That's obvious because of the Megapixels difference
@JohnAmaro_Official 2 жыл бұрын
Hi i was wondering where did you set the brightness in imac? How many squares from left to right? Struggling to set it right . Ps nice job with those videos
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Every monitor and computer is a little different. It is best to get calibration software to calibrate your monitor. Datacolor has some great options.
@ExploringWorldYouTube 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, I am considering buying the Sony A7 IV and I would like to ask you a question. If I activate all the stabilizations possible in the camera during the shooting phase (even in the zoom lens ), will the video I get slightly decrease in quality? I mean its definition, etc. Thank you.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
I don't believe it will decrease the quality or definition.
@omandaub 2 жыл бұрын
Why did you use an OLD 50mm lens for the Canon? Isn't that unfair? In terms of testing sharpness+
@austinrichards5643 2 жыл бұрын
Also this lens is notoriously soft, and a slower focuser compared to any modern lens.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We were actually impressed that it did quite well!
@RuhulAmin-qf9ud 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens you are a sony guy
@rudyreimer302 2 жыл бұрын
An old 50mm l lens and not the new RF glass? and a new Sony lenses hmmmm not an equal comparison.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
That is a great lens! We have shot with it many times and it performs great!
@deputydd4364 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens I have a 2006 Ferrari. That’s great as well. Not as great as the 2021 version though!!!!
@arniesegovia2809 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens it sure looks like you purposely made the Canon look bad, each side by side you obviously cropped in more on the Canon than the Sony to make the Sony look better. Sure reminds me of all those old magazine before and after pics lmao. Lost quiet a bit of respect for you on this video. What does Jarred Polin call it? Oh the Sony money truck just pulled up lol. Totally un equal and trick photography comparison, whatever gets views I guess.
@VelaDomLifeTravels 2 жыл бұрын
Im struggling to choose 😅 which one do you recommend that is very good to use for both videos and photo please? 🙂
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
They are both great. That larger megapixel is better for stills if you are making large prints from your images.
@jer3006 2 жыл бұрын
Jay P, Thanks for sharing this helpful video. I'm ready to go mirrorless and non-professional video-ing with the about-to-be-bought Sony a7 IV (no existing investment in lens worth worrying about). Please suggest the Tamron lens I will want for Vlogging and indoor video green screen use. Maybe the 24-70 you list below?? I have no video experience yet but I hear wide-angle is best?? I like zooms for flexibility. My home studio is about 12x12'. Do you still like this from your list: Sennheiser G4 Wireless Lav? Your experience is helpful and appreciated!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
The best lens for that camera for your purpose is the Tamron 28-75mm G2. Yes Sennheiser G4 is still a great option.
@jer3006 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens Appreciate the response, both are on my list to purchase now. Thanks. PS- Found your Basic Videography for Photographers to be very helpful, learned a lot, and enjoyed it!
@alandyer910 2 жыл бұрын
The R6 will go to ISO 204,000 in video mode. I use it all the time at that speed for low-light framing of dark nightscapes. You didn’t take the time to learn to use its menus to make the proper adjustments for the comparison, which makes the video comparison suspect, if not the other tests.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We can't do everything in these reviews. Not enough time. Thanks for watching!
@Abdi_Mohamed_ 2 жыл бұрын
As per 90% of the comments down below its a shame the RF 50 was not used BUT both these camera are fantastic in their own right as a Canon R6 owner I absolutely love it loads of videos I made on my channel using different lenses. But I would be equally happy if I had the Sony A7 iv with Sony lenses. What a time to be alive to have all these amazing cameras at a relatively affordable prices!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Great point. We have so many great options!
@jchambo86 2 жыл бұрын
Great video Jay P!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Appreciate your support!
@chrismartirosian Жыл бұрын
Great review, amazing, thanks much!
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
My pleasure! Thanks for watching!
@sols9449 2 жыл бұрын
You need to do this test with Rf 50 1.2 way sharper and will resolve more pixels. The gmaster is sharper than the ef plus more megapixels. Prob not super accurate and could get more clarity out of the canon.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good things to consider. Thanks for sharing!
@alvinblackwell268 2 жыл бұрын
Dude 🤔 right out of the gate you bias the tests to favor Sony, i.e., new G master lens vs an adapted Old EF lens. EVERYBODY knows the RF 50mm 1.2 blows the EF version away.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. He couldn't be more obvious. Completely ridiculous
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
So then why did the Canon perform so well?
@TheEmperor2029 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for very interesting, informative and for useful video review.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful and useful for you!
@genkinosomi1912 Жыл бұрын
Hello from Mexico!! A very good comparison that clears up many doubts. You have done a good job. There's just one thing I don't quite understand. There in your dynamic range comparison, there is an aperture of f5.6 in both cameras, the sony looks clearer, when you lower the shutter speed to 1/320s, the same, sony looks better. I ask you, in those cases, WHICH IS BETTER? Put a more open aperture like 2.8 to help the dynamic range? Or does the dynamic range benefit more with slower shutter speeds? You are the expert, we await your answer
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
I think you are confusing the dynamic range with the exposure. The shutter doesn't affect the dynamic range and the aperture shouldn't affect the dynamic range. But it will give you the impression that it affects the dynamic range because it affects the exposure and depth of field. You will be super happy with the a7 IV or the R6 II.
@seanedwards94 2 жыл бұрын
I think it's fair to say you should attempt another go at this with the RF 50, as well testing how their DR impacts editing.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a good plan. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@skepsys 2 жыл бұрын
i see people are commenting that the canon was put in a disadvantage because of the lens, but looking at colors in video, canon (at least according to this video) looks much better at all iso's..
@nyobunknown6983 2 жыл бұрын
Look the same to me.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Very true. Thanks for watching!
@Oscariver 2 жыл бұрын
I have a Canon r5. Would you recommend me to try an A7 iv for second body on video? or is it very difficult to match canon and sony colors?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
A better choice for you would be the R6.
@pepetrueno8722 2 жыл бұрын
Solid review. Subscribed!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Great to have you join us!
@ElBoyoElectronico 2 жыл бұрын
Why on earth would you not use the RF 50 1.2 on the R6? This serioulsy makes the whole comparison pretty questionable. I normally enjoy your comparisons though...
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
It is a top quality f/1.2 $2300 lens!
@johnnywash12 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens the g master is $2000, seems like a perfect comparison.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens Are you serious??? Have you seen how much better the RF is on IQ and much faster and accurate focusing? The fact that you area trying to defend this shows a clear intentional bias
@exogendesign4582 2 жыл бұрын
@11:24 you can see that a7iv lose the ISO battle, the a7iv became full resolution @100% while the canon is still at 250%, not to mention the 50mm 1.2 classic and it still beat the a7iv in all margin. Also being 1year advance with 60p @4k Canon is dominating now.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
They are each great cameras.
@AMS82005 2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks so much.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for watching!
@RetroBusker Жыл бұрын
Can the Sony a75 film 4:3 4k for long periods of time... I currently have the GH5, might upgrade to the sony next year... gh5 good although would prefair 4:3 on 4k 30/25fp3 for ticktok 9:16 & youtube 16:9, Awesome video :)
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
We did not test the length of time. I have not heard that it is an issue.
@andis9030 2 жыл бұрын
Really unfair comparison. The RF 50mm 1.2 blows the EF version SO far out of the Water in EVERY aspect its not even funny. So quite fishy move to use the ef... but ok, in that way Sony can win more easily...
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
There was nothing fishy about it. We are not paid by either company and we love the EF lens.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens lol... Sure sure
@b2unoo7 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens you may love it but you're selling Sony this way :D
@crispycaptures 2 жыл бұрын
The sharpness would have been a much closer comparison with the newer RF 50 glass. For a 20 megapixel camera it is pretty good I gotta say!
@nyobunknown6983 2 жыл бұрын
The sharpness difference is due to JPEG sharpening, not the lens.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Totally agree. Thanks for your comment!
@crispycaptures 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens Thanks for the review though! Good take 👍
@worldpassport4759 2 жыл бұрын
i need your help !! i am planning to shoot more active wear brands photos and videos ! will be my first camera .. and i was thinking to get the sony a7iv + tamron 28-75mm 2.8f g2 or the canon r6 but i have no idea about which all around lens can i get for the canon r6 ?? i would love to know your opinion !! what do you think what will be better to get the sony or the canon ??// thank you
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
I think for cost factor that you are better off with the Sony and Tamron combo. You will be very happy with it.
@DjPaNik 2 жыл бұрын
Would you recommend the Sony A7IV or the Canon R6 for Astrophotography (and low-light shooting in general)? I read that the lower MP Canon R6 (20MP) is better for low light and astro shooting because it has fewer and bigger pixels, therefore producing less noise, compared to the 33MP Sony A7IV. Then again, I read that the A7IV is advantageous in low-light as it has a back-illuminated sensor, whereas the R6 doesn't. Which would you recommend?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
I would definitely take the Sony A7 IV. Take a look again at the ISO test in this video again. That tells the whole story.
@MichaelAres 2 жыл бұрын
Once they showed the Canon EF version I already knew the Sony would be rated as “sharper” and better colors which isn’t fair to the R6….and this coming from a Nikon Z6ii user.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
True the RF lens is better. Yet the EF performed quite well.
@IslandFilmMaker 2 жыл бұрын
I would like to see the Panasonic S5 compared here! It's seems to almost always Nikon & Sony? There are others that could be compared in this range! The S5 is as good or better other than AF only in Video mode, and doesn't shoot 4K 120fps. Otherwise, feature for feature, the Panasonic blows both these cameras away including low-light. I think the S5 is a superior Hybrid camera for about 5600 less that the A7 IV body! You can buy the Panasonic S5 in a kit with the S 20-60mm f/4 for the near the same price.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good to know. Thanks for sharing.
@exogendesign4582 2 жыл бұрын
Nikon isn't really good in the Video world, Their Dynamic range is lousy in lowlight and the Autofocus is crap not mention the N-Log is not that good. Canon & Sony is what dominates the Video world, Panasonic is really good too but I don't know why they won't improve their AF System, if they do I am switching to Panasonic directly. Good Color Science, Decent Lowlight Performance, cheaper, the IBIS is great, ALL-I Format, 10bit capabilities, no overheating, unlimited recording time, basically a very well rounded camera, if AF is as fast as the R6, Panasonic would blow Canon and Sony out of the abyss in the video world if such improve AF Systems happens.
@omranmohammed8134 Жыл бұрын
Hello sir thanks for this video❤️❤️❤️❤️ I do have an r6 should i switch to a74 or its almost the same? I shoot video mostly not long videos maximum 5 min 😊
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
They are very similar. And if you already have Canon lenses it might not be worth it to switch. It really is a personal decision. Try renting the a7 IV and see how you like it.
@eguillen1386 Жыл бұрын
What picture profile were you using on the sony, when comparing it to the canon?
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
We used a standard profile on both of them.
@NazmulIslam-tp1qs 2 жыл бұрын
I like your reviews but as soon as you mentioned you are using the EF 50 1.2 against a brand new camera and lens set up I stopped watching as it’s not even a fair comparison lol
@richardcollinsphotography1288 2 жыл бұрын
Same
@pematamang9268 2 жыл бұрын
I think using old canon EF lens 50mm f1.2 on R6 and compare to native Sony 50mm f1.2 GM lens on Sony a7iv is utterly insulting and arrogant to Canon. It is absolutely No Common sense it get different auto focus result not using native lens. Use old Sony lens then compare. Canon does have native RF lens 50mm f1.2.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Too bad you didn't watch the rest because you would agree with our final conclusions!
@gmee123 Жыл бұрын
The color differences between the two are noticeable . The canon is more vibrant to my eye
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your point of view!
@anorveaa 2 жыл бұрын
Hello The Slanted Lens. Thanks for your video. A lot of people have seen your video and some are already "complaining" that the jpeg colors from the Sony are terrible. May I ask what is your opinion on that and did you or did you not set up or adjust any of the jpeg settings from the Sony? Or is the Sony jpeg output really that bad? Could it be the lenses you had on?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
The Sony color lost it in the high ISO images. We didn't adjust anything.
@RionPhotography Жыл бұрын
The dynamic range in those backlit images is fantastic on the Sony. I've always been a Canon person, but I haven't bought a Canon since I stopped doing weddings - the overly-red images made too many headaches for me. Haven't been able to pull the trigger on Sony yet, but those backlit images were extremely impressive on the Sony!
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
It is a hard decision between the two. Wishing you luck with your purchase!
@michaelescalera9909 Жыл бұрын
I seen a lot of reviews on a lot of different things but man is this one of the top ones. So much depth into each test … I love how it’s a very fair comparison and I appreciate the amount of time that it took to do all of these test
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
I appreciate that! Glad you appreciated the details!
@ivideocouk 2 жыл бұрын
Just sold my a7IV, as for photos the older A7r3 was so much cleaner at higher iso, I was seeing terrible noise at iso 1250..
@by.wakhidd 2 жыл бұрын
Realy? For color science which one is better?
@ivideocouk 2 жыл бұрын
@@by.wakhidd canon, nikon or fuji are better colour science..
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, that is interesting. Thanks for sharing!
@creatorsjourney6286 2 жыл бұрын
So, I noticed the EF lens and not the RF 50mm but, from that aside, I will tell you that I am not very happy with the R6 so far, I was very optimistic but…. The dynamic range is lacking a bit, specially for landscapes (not a landscape camera for me so far) the R5 has more pixels but, to my eyes, I don’t see much difference in quality unless it’s used with different lens. I will have to make a new video to update my findings on the R6. Your videos are always well made and love your explanations.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Great to hear. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@stuARTvideoproductions 2 жыл бұрын
Great review. My experience as a videographer is that the A74 will overheat in some circumstances. I use a couple of A7s3 as my main cameras, and had an A73 as a 3rd back up option. I bought the A74 to replace my A73 - unfortunately we've had this camera overheat whilst shooting video during weddings, something we've never experienced with the A73 or of course the A7s3. So we sold the A74 and held onto the A73 as our 3rd camera as its never over heated. If video is your main thing, just spend the extra money and get the A7s3.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
That is great advice! Thanks for sharing your experience!
@86london Жыл бұрын
I am eyeing the A7s3 but would rely semi-heavily on it for photography as much as videography. Do you have a personal opinion on using a 12mp camera as a primary for stills?
@punjabmovies4320 5 ай бұрын
Use any file or just heat at 4k.
@stuARTvideoproductions 5 ай бұрын
I was shooting 10bit in 4K - so the camera was running at full capacity. @@punjabmovies4320
@stuARTvideoproductions 5 ай бұрын
I specialise in video, so I'm probably not the best person to ask regarding stills. Once upon a time 12mp was plenty big for photos, but these days it seems rather small doesn't it. I would imagine that for most applications 12mb is fine, but if you're doing corporate work that requires heavy cropping or the requirement for very large photos, then I'd stick with the A74 instead of the A7s3. - having said that, you can get amazing photos on the A7s3, and in low light you'll even get a cleaner photo thatn the A74.@@86london
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
Using an old lens that was never sharp to begin with and on top of that doing that on the lower res camera. Renders all this pointless
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
It is interesting to see how they compare when choosing the same price point.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens absurd excuse. Own your mistake and save your reputation
@mrdazzmon 2 жыл бұрын
Using old adapted EF lens vs a new G mount lens it's not a fair comparison.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
And yet, the EF performed very well!
@soularproject Жыл бұрын
Very good review. Thank you. However, it would have helped me when you were describing ISO stills differences that you use the camera name when describing your opinion. I didn't know if you were talking about the Sony or the Canon.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Good point! Thanks for your feedback!
@davidalanphotography1 2 жыл бұрын
here is a though even though it is subjective, What camera was more fun to shoot? and what camera would be better in the hand after holding it for hours? Having a few people chime in on these questions would give a real world feel to the review. That said, great job on all of this!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
They were both fun to shoot and they both felt great to hold. Which one do you have lenses for.
@letsfindout6587 2 жыл бұрын
Try the RF 50mm and be amazed how much better the R6 is.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
That is something we would like to do.
@frankfeng2701 2 жыл бұрын
A7M4 advantages: image quality, native lens selection, 4k30 (and below), longform recording R6 advantages: burst rate, 4k60, LCD, IBIS
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good points! Thanks for sharing!
@Mr_DOHC 2 жыл бұрын
Are these pictures jpg or RAW? Because ath the time of shooting thins video, no image editing software supported Sony's ARW files...
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
You are correct. The images are jpegs because the plug-in wasn't out yet.
@levieilours8119 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! Thanks for watching!
@hotshotbv 2 жыл бұрын
DUde,come up with a new video comparing the R6 with the RF version and then will be a fair comparison
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Watch the full thing and you will think it is fair. Both cameras are great.
@hotshotbv 2 жыл бұрын
Cameras are great but you compare a 2006 lens with Sony's brand new 1.2 technology.......
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
He won't... he is making so sorts of excuses to justify this obvious biased "test"
@henewview7441 2 жыл бұрын
Nikon Z9 has already confirmed that he has a sensor from Sony in his camera!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Not sure what that has to do with this comparison.
@Benjamin_Jehne 2 жыл бұрын
Like for the last 10 years or more?!
@sosomelodies659 2 жыл бұрын
Someone is gonna have to do a tear down to reveal the IMX sensor in Z9. Just like they did with D850.
@jankarlsson5358 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens No ... Not at all ... But it is well in class with what you just showed here. Very bad of you not to use RF lenses ... Because you are not a beginner after all? So you must have done this consciously. Which just looks super ugly and colored. And why did you not set them up and film with both at the same time. .. you have managed to get everything sloppy ... redo and do the right thing. Or do you want to make another weird video? Then you can get an adapter for Sony and use Canon EF lenses on it as well.
@SBdetail 2 жыл бұрын
Great content. New sub from me ! Keep it coming.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the sub! Glad to have you join us!
@JanSur 2 жыл бұрын
Nice review, please make video comparison A7IV Vs S1H
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
I have added that to our list!
@jankarlsson5358 2 жыл бұрын
I really expected Sony to look like a winner but not by cheating ... You're probably the most fake tester I've seen in a long time. Not even using RF lenses is just a big mistake .... Throw this and do it again, do it right.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
And yet the Canon performed quite well.
@LuisPerez-fy6up 2 жыл бұрын
The old EF lens is not Sharp at all. Unfair comparison
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
That was not the conclusion we drew. It is a great lens.
@LuisPerez-fy6up 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens check out Christopher Frost he compared the EF to the RF and the RF lens is way sharper. He is a professional lens tester should subscribe
@dovklein7721 Жыл бұрын
What about 29:59 video limitetion on the R6? what about dual iso base on the IV?
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Great points. We did not test those things. Thanks for watching!
@d.adcock2282 2 жыл бұрын
Which apple computer are you using?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We use iMac and MacBook Pro.
@TomasRamoska 2 жыл бұрын
EF 50mm f1.2 soft lens even stopped down to f4
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Are you talking about the video part?
@TomasRamoska 2 жыл бұрын
@The Slanted Lens No resolution (landscape) test.
@gonzaloleviatanh 2 жыл бұрын
This Sony fanboy says both of them look great 😊
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
They are both great cameras!
@kennethhart4859 Жыл бұрын
Hi. I have watched this video several times. It’s very informative. I own two Sony A9’s. Would you trade one for the Sony A7IV?. Thank you.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
If your primary goal is video then the a7IV is great for video and you get a larger megapixel image. The a9 is great for sports. So trading one in might be a good idea.
@nickmangiardi8787 2 жыл бұрын
Any testing information on using Canon L series lenses on the Sony a7iv?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We haven't check into that. Thanks for watching!
@gregdavidson9631 2 жыл бұрын
Great video. As an R6 owner I genuinely preferred the R6's colours over the Sony even after they have 'warmed' their colours up more. And I guess this is subjective. I also felt the R6 did better in the photo ISO section. With sharpness, I'd have expected the Sony to blast past the R6 as it has 65% more pixels than the R6. But it didn't look 65% sharper! Subjective, I know..... DR has always been a Sony/Nikon strength but some of the photos I take of morning shots of the countryside are very good and do not disappoint. AF? Using a non RF lens? The RF 50mm f1.2 uses dual nano usm focussing motors. My 24/105mm stm focuses faster than the EF used here! In fact the R6 surprises me most days when it focuses so quickly using a 'slow' lens. and ergos, the R6 feels better than even the Nikon D780. It is so easy to use and the up to 8 stops of IS......
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good to hear your experience! Thanks for sharing!
@nrlondon7959 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Greg. Do you find the 20 meg on the R6 to be limiting? Thanks.
@gregdavidson9631 2 жыл бұрын
@@nrlondon7959 hi. Tbh I’m not sure. I do know that for a 20mp camera, the photos it takes are way too sharp for the sensor. I mean for sharpness it walks all over the D7500 and D780. I only crop photos if I have the level wrong so I never lose too much of the photo. I have only cropped for faces and birds. It’s fine for faces but not so much for birds.
@nrlondon7959 2 жыл бұрын
@@gregdavidson9631 Thank you.
@joe2snj 2 жыл бұрын
I’m a Sony shooter but I have to say you should have used the RF 50mm f1.2 for a fair comparison.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
That would have been a good choice. Thanks for watching!
@dailydrivenH2 2 жыл бұрын
made it as far as when you mentioned the old canon lens . buy since I understand that can hurt retention rate I let it play till half the video .
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
The old Canon lens still holds up.
@MarianMoisii 2 жыл бұрын
Only one big issues: In raw files you'll have just 6 fps in uncompressed file which it's not good at all . Is it possible to have update firmware update for fix this issues and as well to fix overhead issues?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
It may be possible but who knows if it will happen.
@UlricWolf 2 жыл бұрын
This test is so unfair - testing AF with terrible old Canon EF lens and dynamic range with jpegs… whaaat??? As unfair as it can get.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
If you watch the whole thing you wouldn't say unfair.
@ahmonon4352 2 жыл бұрын
hate the back lcd on sony
@mbismbismb 2 жыл бұрын
It's rubbish lol
@pematamang9268 2 жыл бұрын
Sony LCD display absolutely Terrible and No way to use in sunny days even harder in cloudy days.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
It would be nice if it had higher resolution!
@zodyking4595 2 жыл бұрын
A lot of us started out on Canon cameras, for me, it was the Canon SL3, about a year later I moved to the Canon 90D and yesterday I upgraded to mirrorless with the Canon R6. The salesmen in B&H ask me why would you even buy a Canon camera and I could not respond. The truth is, it's just unintentional brand loyalty. I, am starting to lean towards Sony, and I have until February 1st to make the switch entirely free. Great Video! Positive for Canon R6: Comes with 24-105mm lens (Super Versatile) Positive For Sony: Everything else.
@WOLFTICKVIDEOS 2 жыл бұрын
I hate to tell you, but there is way more positives to Canon than a kit lens that comes with the R6. If you want the Sony, why not just buy the Sony? I personally can't stand the menus and ergonomics of any Sony I have ever used. Good luck🤷♂️.
@missionhunt 2 жыл бұрын
Stick with Canon. I am like you..a loyal Canon user. This comparison is good but doesn'tdo the R6 much favor. You got to keep in mind that the a7iv is a newer camera..let's say for argument sake, Canon released a R6 mkii or an R6c the same time the a7iv came out...most of us would agree Canon would be pulling ahead in this comparison easily.
@zodyking4595 2 жыл бұрын
@wolftickvideos i believe it, i’ve ran through 3 different canon cameras only using kit lenses because i wasn’t going to invest much into a non mirrorless platform in this day and age moving away from the mirror realm. Now im on full frame mirrorless i dont mind spending on lenses now. Can you believe most photography apprenticeships in New York wont hire you without full frame or mirrorless now.
@WOLFTICKVIDEOS 2 жыл бұрын
@@zodyking4595 That's crazy considering if the photographer is any good you couldn't tell what they shot with. I have about 8 different bodies and I feel good about producing great results with all 8. On the flip side, I have also failed to get the results I was looking for on all of them before. It is all about knowing your equipment and lighting really. How is that R6 working out for you?
@zodyking4595 2 жыл бұрын
@@WOLFTICKVIDEOS its a much better camera than what i had previously, performing better in lowlight, less noise overall. I do video and photo so I really needed a well versed camera. The EOS 90D did well on the photography side of things but if you want to know what noise is flip it to video lol.
@tomirwinphoto 2 жыл бұрын
Most useful comparison I've seen between the R6 and a7IV.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good to hear. Thank you for watching!
@tragicevans4157 2 жыл бұрын
If he redo the review with native RF lens i think Sony A7 IV still wins overall. Dynamic Range and Resolution. Similar price ill go with Sony this time and there's some great third party value lenses.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent points. Thanks for sharing your opinion!
@-123 2 жыл бұрын
This test is Ahahaaaa ))) You need to test R5 + 50 1.2 RF vs SONY A 7 IV )))
@mbismbismb 2 жыл бұрын
The A1 cant even beat the R5 😒
@EhtashamAnwar 2 жыл бұрын
Even R6 with RF 1.2 will beat sony A iv hands down
@kennethwilliamsinc 2 жыл бұрын
@@mbismbismb You sound like you just read specs and have never used either one. The R5 is clearly inferior to the A1 as a pro camera and that’s not saying the R5 is not good. Just say you don’t like Sony cameras in general.
@pematamang9268 2 жыл бұрын
I think using old canon EF lens 50mm f1.2 on R6 and compare to native Sony 50mm f1.2 GM lens on Sony a7iv is utterly insulting and arrogant to Canon. It is absolutely Common sense it get different auto focus result not using native lens. Use old Sony lens then compare.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Think about how these two are equivalent in price so it is interesting to see what you get for the same price.
@gbwalther3198 2 жыл бұрын
How about test shots of the Sony a7iv 4k crop 60fps with Sony 16-55 f2.8 lens? The new Tamron aps-c Zoom lenses and the Sigma new aps-c Zoom lenses. Also, do several similar tests with Fuji aps-c prime lenses for Sony e-mount: Fuji 16mm f1.4; Sigma 19mm f/2.8; Sigma 30mm f/1.4; Sigma 56mm f/1.4.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Some good suggestions. Thanks for the ideas.
@caalinAbyan 2 жыл бұрын
I am going to start vloging + . And confused which camera is better ? I tried to buy canan 80d ! They told me its not good ? Then 90d they told me there is better . Sony also zv 2 -10 ? Which one is better recoding vidoes and pic ? Thank you
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Right now I am a huge fan of the a7 IV. If you prefer Canon then go with the R6.
@caalinAbyan 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens thank you
@cammackey 2 жыл бұрын
This was a pretty bias comparison and a little suspicious.. since Sony has been buying out so many KZfaqrs lol. You compared a Sony mirrorless lens to an old canon DSLR EF lens……. And everyone know canon has better shadow recovery than Sony while Sony has more dynamic range in the higher end…. Yet you just compared unedited images…. But obviously Sony crushes it with ISO comparisons. But the rest.. lost some trust.
@EhtashamAnwar 2 жыл бұрын
Agreed 👍
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
We are not sponsored by Canon or Sony. If you watch to the end you will see that we are not biased.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens not biased yet you used a super old lens that is also known to be very soft. Your actions speak way louder than your words
@victorjones2681 2 жыл бұрын
lousy thoughtless comparison
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
If you watch to the end you would agree with my conclusions.
@johnraj786 2 жыл бұрын
Which mirrorless is better in mid range
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
The a7 IV has a better dynamic range.
@cannottrickme7239 2 жыл бұрын
So what is the speed of sony mechanical shutter?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
On B&H it says 1/8000 to 30 Seconds: bhpho.to/3KJEYQY
@kraft1954 2 жыл бұрын
Great review! Sony is on top!
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
They are producing some great products! Thanks for watching!
@saintmovies7735 2 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely not a great review… if you’re going to compare competing products at least try to understand the latest technologies available for both products. Using a 30+ year old lens when there is a newer version for that Mount is mindless
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
On top vs a super old lens. Hurray...
@debangarajchoudhury1409 2 жыл бұрын
Waste of a comparison
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
So think about the fact that you can see how they compare and in actuality they are both great so stay with your investment in lenses!
@poldeleon4551 2 жыл бұрын
Why shooting with the ef 50mm????
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Good question. You might like our follow up video about that: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rdV6pcuZ1LGUf6s.html
@jeniferclark8814 Жыл бұрын
well very best wild videography mirrorless camera....? canon r6 or Sony a74
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
If you mean wildlife the a74 has a larger megapixel and you can crop in more
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
I did this test vs the A9 having the subject running towards the camera and the R6 was just a good. The difference? I didn't crippled the R6 with a super old lens. Shame on this channel
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
It is good to see that the Canon performed well even with an "older" lens.
@shaolin95 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens lol there is zero valid reason to crippled the Canon. Own your mistake, man
@marccav7910 2 жыл бұрын
Poor show. How can you even think to compare those two lenses?? A dated 50mm canon through an RF mount?!?! Turned off, thumbs down. Crook.
@pematamang9268 2 жыл бұрын
I think using old canon EF lens 50mm f1.2 on R6 and compare to native Sony 50mm f1.2 GM lens on Sony a7iv is utterly insulting and arrogant to Canon. It is absolutely Common sense it get different auto focus result not using native lens. Use old Sony lens then compare.
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
You may think that, but the Canon lens is an excellent lens!
@blackmike79 2 жыл бұрын
Compare against RF glass or why do it?
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Coming soon. Thanks for watching!
@blackmike79 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens I watch because you guys always put out great content. But I am bias as well bcuz I love Canon!
@hardiaziz9015 2 жыл бұрын
thank you very much it was great
@TheSlantedLens 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! Thanks!
SELVA RIDER 92
Рет қаралды 26
TerryWarfield
Рет қаралды 108 М.
Jared Polin
Рет қаралды 187 М.