But we also acting like we are planning to buy one every year 😀

Im buying a80l 83“. I got a heatsink and is glossy.

I've been watching for years and I've never bought a TV in my life.

@@ActuallyJamesS 😳😳😳

Excellent Fomo

+1, Vincent GOAT 🐐

Andrew robinson is also one to trust

​@@nickthompson7369🥱🥱🥱 Like the saying goes: "Second place is the first loser."

fact

He is the Tv God

You will probably be the first to get them!

Thanks for dropping your advertising in his video. Real classy move.

Are you still happy with your Sony tv? Im thinking about a new Sony

@@sj460162 It's the best purchase I've ever made, it didn't kill my budget and it has everything it needs to run my PS5 optimally. Budget friendly with amazing picture and the newer models are better then the one i currently have in that series, but it still kicks ass

sometimes i have to go back from the start bc i feel i missed an intro.. I get used to watch all youtubers loong intro sequence..

Which will come out at this same time next year so it’s still over a year away. Might as well wait til 2030 lol

@@IntotheFurther. *2024 S95D will match or exceed the performance of the A95L and will be lower priced and launch in February. Maybe A95L's successor will launch much earlier as well like in March.*

@@bushgreen260 But then you have to buy a Samsung TV.

The Sony A95L preorders go up on August 21st 2023 and it releases on August 28th 2023

Well it seems it is 200% more than an A95K. Isn't A95K below 1000 nits. So in the vivid mode preset it's almost double.

@@loki76You would be wrong. Vincent said the A95L measured 1349 Nits on a 10% window in its most accurate mode. My A95K measures 1000 Nits in that same window, and all panels vary, but nowhere near 200% more brightness, and that’s why they revised that statement. The S95C uses the exact same panel, and it just barely gets brighter than the S95B…

The panel isn’t everything though. Sony has much better processing and heat control than Samsung. I am curious how this model works on pc though, that’s what I’m interested in. It’s this one vs the lg g3.

Yea but don't forget, he is so precise, that if he finds something wrong with the tvs, he waits till the quick fix patch is released, and only then posts the final review. Happened before.

It's out in August

You're or you are. NOT your.

Sweden should just switch to the Euro already

You are quite right !

Thank so much.

Doubt they’ll ever dim the tv again after such backlash last year! Also Sammy gives you access to the service menu. Couple adjustments to Ana peak and boom you have the brightest oled to date!

with the S95C - Keep it offline and use AV Forum BT2020 settings - it looks great and you don't need to switch to P3 ever. Save some money, but it isn't as pretty with the UI or finish and a touch short on motion. That is the choice haha.

I went with the s95b as my first OLED and the firmware makes me regret my buy. Horrible navigation, remote, menus, source changes etc. picture quality is really nice but I’ll never go Samsung again. Operating system feels like a cheap knockoff

@@KopfdesRiesen Exactly. Big difference to Sony. Samsung is like plastic fake tv. But Sony is bad for gaming.

@@KopfdesRiesen That was Exactly how I felt with the Samsung 90T and 90A (95a, here in the States in 2021 without the 1 connect box). I went with the Song 77 a80j and I was "Home" again. Full size remote that year, no retarded menus/interface/os ect... Better picture and processing than both LG and Samsung, and motion too, imo. Btw the 77in a80 was a badass that year, nearly the a90j, with the EV0 panel and Gloss finish instead of matte, also Sony's surface audio sounds better to me as well.

To wind down at the end of the day I’ll take the gin ,you keep the tonic 🫷😬

Has A95L released in the market yet?

It's called turn on Notifications.

​@@manoharreddy8613Did you even watch the video?? 😂😂😂

@@PSYCHOV3N0Myou’re asking wayyyy too much of some of these lazy people…..

not surprised to see you here. lol. us Singularity guys really do think the same lol

@@TechDoneRight1 😆

It better be "TV of the year" given it costs more than its competitors, at least here in North America.

Get a 4k tv, 8k is not worth it and there is no content out there that will be native 8k.

I guess there is no real need for high refreshrate Dolby vision gaming because of the lack of support titles but I get it

@@KopfdesRiesenSo far, the Sony PlayStation 5 does not support Dolby Vision gaming at high frame rates. That appears to be exclusive to the Xbox Series X and/or Series S. Second, this is the first time that Sony made a TV that is capable of Dolby Vision at high frame rates, so Sony might need to develop the firmware required for its own Cognitive Processor XR video coprocessor to properly handle Dolby Vision gaming at high frame rates.

This isn't a release version so it's possible the TVs will have it by then, but it's a legit reason to not preorder (among other reasons) if that's important to you.

Well it comes down in sales and Australia is a rip off.

@RobertK1993 How are they supposed to sell at those prices? G3 and S95C, if you wait for sales, you can buy at almost 40%-50% less money, and G3 looks way better on the wall than Sony. Picture alone won't sell.

Sony has always been the premium brand, they dominated last year with the A95k, Samsungs S95B was subpar in comparison, if people cant afford the A95L, they can always buy Sony's "lower end" OLEDs that feature the same XR processor - which in itself is leaps ahead of any other TVs cinematic processing. A95L is an enthusiast level TV, it isnt for your average joe who watches Married at first sight. I wouldn't even classify a G3 or S95C enthusiast grade, its more like high end. Its like buying an RTX 4090 vs a 4080, or a Lamborghini Aventador vs Lamborghini Hurucan. Also I agree with your Aussie comment, eveything in Australia thats bleeding edge is always a ripoff.

Doesn't help the Aussie dollar keeps dropping against the usd. Costs are insane.

@@BNR_248 I disagree with you, there is no substantial difference between A95K and S95B. You can fine tune S95B to look just as good as A95K. It is not always about the processor, other things matter, for example anti-reflective attributes, the thickness of the the TV, stand and wall brackets etc. Sony Does not tick all the boxes. Lower end Sony OLEDs are like shiny mirror surfaces, unless you watch in total darkness, unwatchable during day time with a bit of natural light. Sony are way overpriced in Australia, if the prices were the same as the USA market, they would have been worth considering. There is only a price difference of about $200 in USA whereas in Australia it is priced thousands more than a Samung or LG. They are not in a different league to LG or Samsung as you make it, they are not enthusiast grade, that is a lot of B.S.

Why not just buy a AVR that handles DV, and plug all into that?

Yes exactly what I was thinking 😂🤦

Mediatek have been a disappointment Given that Sony after a few bios updates will have it going well - and Panasonic will have it mastered by next year to squeeze the most out - They won't use the 2000 - too expensive - and will think they will want to master the 1000 well across their range - being snappier is great - Panasonic when they use it should get better graduation , and control. Thankfully receivers now can do full bandwidth passthrough - shame Sony is so expensive in my country - but if they do a 83" QD-OLED next year - may bite the bullet - 1500nits is enough - 90% BT2020 is enough as little content beyond that - and colours still look great anyway on a Panasonic or G3 MLA - and unless sets side by side - you wouldn't know what you are missing and in 95% plus content -SDR and HDR - will look pretty much the same no matter MLA or QD-OLED

Shouldn't Sony have used that in 2023 4K Bravia TVs

I have concerns about the Pentonic 2000 SoCs. First, the marketing material shows that the Pentonic 2000 is aimed at 8K at 120 Hz displays, and does not mention the ability to drive 4K displays. Can it even drive 4K displays, and if it can, is it limited to 4K at 120 Hz instead of 4K at 144 Hz which the Pentonic 1000 can do? Second, are all 4 HDMI 2.1 ports mentioned in the Pentonic 2000’s marketing material full speed or not? The Pentonic 1000’s marketing material including its web page previously advertised “HDMI 2.1 x4” just like the Pentonic 2000’s marketing material including its web page is still doing. This is technically true since all 4 ports comply with the HDMI 2.1 standard, but that standard does not require that full HDMI 2.1 speed be implemented in order to be seen as compliant. However, this could be seen as a lie by omission by leaving out the fact that full 48 Gbps speed is not implemented. The Pentonic 1000’s website was revised to remove the “x4” to obscure the lie by omission once Vincent Teoh exposed the lie by omission in another video. MediaTek also complained that implementing 4 full speed HDMI 2.1 ports is impossible without a second chip. So does the Pentonic 2000 SoC implement 4 full speed HDMI 2.1 ports due to having enough room due to using TSMC’s smaller N7 process that promises smaller transistors that could possibly allow all HDMI inputs to implement all current HDMI 2.1 speeds, or are 2 HDMI inputs limited to HDMI 2.0 speeds?

@@jnvivian Considering Pentonic 2000 uses Cortex A76 and G57 compared to Cortex A73 and G52 in the Pentonic 1000 I'm sure it will support full 4x HDMI 2.1

LG G2 97" or LG M3 97"

@@rcclenni7843i think he’s talking about QD OLEDS 🤣

@@justchilling4491 I agree we really need a 97" Panasonic QD OLED.

is the a90j 83” still a good buy? I don’t think I could afford the A95L on it’s full retail price on it’s debut..

@@jBstfu Yes, the 83" A90J is still a good buy. Or Samsung S95C (only 77“) LG G3 (available in 83“ but no MLA OLED)

TCL’s China Star Optoelectronics Technology (CSOT) Co. is developing inkjet printed OLED technology that it licensed from JOLED before JOLED filed for bankruptcy, hoping to make its own inkjet-printed OLED panels. CSOT bought all of Samsung Display’s LCD patents when Samsung Display decided to quit the LCD business and manufacture OLEDs exclusively when LCD prices became so low that Samsung Display lost money on every LCD panel that it sold. Samsung Electronics now buys LCD panels from companies other than Samsung Display including CSOT. Hisense does not own its own display panel manufacturer, opting to buy all of its panels from other companies.

Warranty is your friend , stop being paranoid

@@tears2040 you totally misread what I wrote

Not much i bet

In my region too mate....last year no A95k only models available are the s95b and s95c with all lgs premium oleds. Sony really think they will hide behind that preserving creator's intent, processing and sony brand name to boost their sales. Not this time Sony.

Lol really? Nearly 200 nit lost with those "superb" Sony Algos? 😂 I'm so proud that i didn't spend the extra bucks for Sony TVs 😂

pixels degradation of oleds over time are unavoidable, that's way i try to go back to mini leds.

@@ejdhdjejejebdnem Same story for Mini LED (20% in first year) but no way on OLED in first 12 month! It has to be a "software-feature" like on last years Samsung OLEDs😁

I doubt you lost that much brightness. I think you had a bad measurement or something else has changed. No tv loses that much in 9 months.

Don't update fools, who knows how they be nerfing with their updates!

T-Con limitation on the QD-OLED panel supplied by Samsung Display.

This is the standard in other brands (typically referenced as blur and judder). Sony has not implemented it until now on this model. So it is not dependent on the MediaTek chipset.

of course at some point it will... but it is not distracting, because in real scenes you won´t see a scene for that long often.

4K120hz with Dolby Vision will work as intended and be a blurry mess due to chipset limitations.

U mean this Sony chip set has limitations to produce 4k120hz? If so that’s a bummer cuz it’s a lauded chip set in it? What about the same scenarios in LG G3 Is the G3 chipset also limited in a similar way?

@@leperlord7078 No, it’s a joke about how Sony TV’s have handled gaming features in the past. The X900H was promised with VRR at launch, and didn’t get an update till two years after the fact. Sony even at one point tried to cancel it entirely and only feature it on their newest models, but caved due to backlash. The other comment was again a joke about how Sony TV’s like the X900H had a bug (that was never fixed) that resulted in the 4K 120hz mode only rendering half the resolution and resulted in the 4K 120hz mode being a blurry mess. I still don’t think these latest Sony TV’s support Freesync/Gsync either, so they are still far behind in terms of gaming features when compared to LG or Samsung.

Of course, it does. It's a Sony TV

I was wondering this too. Did the A95K?

@@Kung_Fu_Kenny the a95k had aggressive ASBL in SDR, especially in game mode. There was a little bit of ASBL in hdr gaming but was hardly noticeable

@@jackdubs25 yeah I knew sdr gaming was an issue, as it is for most OLEDs. I’m wondering about HDR/DV scenes like the notorious house of the dragon scene Vincent showed.

No 3D is gone

I am also curious if that means it supports 3D I hope we get an answer

Needs the 2.1 bandwidth. They should be adding more hdmi 2.1 ports. Even the middle level samsung TVs have all had hdmi 2.1 for a few years now.