1600 usd for a sdr display at 60 hz. no from me

iMac 🖥

Will be getting the Studio Display, as soon as it is available in stores without 8-10w wait time… 2200€ here in Austria, hoping for a discount to 2000€ or less.

I dont trust MKBHD

Studio display for me sitting on my desk - so close to worth it for me, should’ve been same price as the LG 5k (and that one discontinued), and webcam really should’ve been better. Of course pro motion / mini led would’ve been great but probably then it’s a 2500 monitor.

So Apple priced the XDR based on what they planned to price a product that came out years later? Doubt it. The XDR actually isnt outrageously priced, it competes with reference class monitors that are 20-30K and even exceeds them. And there's nothing really out there you can compare the price of the Studio Display to.

@@Slurpy2k8 Didn’t say the XDR was a bad monitor for the money But it’s still crazy expensive. And yup - it’s pretty much the standard playbook to structure pricing in this way. Apple wins both ways - they get to sell some expensive monitors to true professionals but ultimately and more importantly leverage it to make a $1600 60Hz IPS display seem like it’s not overpriced. And that will help them sell a lot of those, probably at much higher margin.

@@Scootir185 Very true. I have the LG Ultrafine 5k and was curious about the Studio display. It wasn't enough of an improvement for me to go out and purchase it. Have to say I was disappointed. The XDR should be seen in person. Aside from its ridiculous price, it has an amazing picture on it.

@@speedzero7478 For the same price you can buy a Eizo Coloredge. Way better than any Apple display.

@@Slurpy2k8 true ! And don't forget that the XDR is the only 32'' 6K monitor on the market. That doesn't explain the price (this you did well) but it's a fact : if you want a 32'' "retina" (220 ppp / smoothing @2x), no other monitor can do that today Monitor manufacturers (LG, Samsung, etc) could easily propose a 32'' 6K thunderbolt monitor with just an IPS LED panel (but a good one), this would be a far less expensive model while allowing them comfortable benefits, but they prefer to fight on the field of cheap 27'' 4K ... if someone understand why .... ?

👆👆👆👆 thanks for watching and commenting 😊😊 congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁.

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

That is a good value buy considering you also get a keyboard and mouse with the iMac

Thanks! Hope it helps you make up your mind

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

seriously wait for the wwdc event on 6th of june!!!i'm also confused... .

Who needs iMac Pro? iMac Pro was released because of bad thermals and design mistakes of trashcan Mac Pro. Now, Mac Studio is perfectly fine and there's no need to integrate it in the display.

It's a reasonable guess, considering that this display has so many bugs. They're just not sure about it.

Because its overpriced. Oh and you can't use he iMac as an external display, so say you have a MacBook / Mac Studio / Mac Mini and need a display, you cant use it - also you dont get Center Stage? Idk. Also its 5K instead of 4.5K so...

27 5k lg monitor also this price

@@rogersam8554 nop, 27" LG Ultrafine is cheaper than an iMac..

5k lg is a little bit cheaper and much worse build quality and worse panel, iMac is also running on cheap m1 cpu with smaller, cheaper display

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

Fair, sometimes I find it a bit too large for my timeline but 27-32 is about right

@@KarlConrad I use two 32" monitors, a third 32" monitor rotated portrait and a 34". This is productivity and photo editing. Like I said, everyone is different and I don't judge. None of them are the XDR monitors. I Wish! LOL

I would love to see a 49-inch 3:2 8K option from Apple. It would be lovely in a studio setup behind a huge mixer or a DAW controller.

27 inch is very small. It is definitely not “sweet spot for 95% of people”. I use a 40 inch tv for my coding and most coder I know prefer bigger screen. As far as content consumption goes, you don’t get much visible screen because of the aspect ratio of the Studio Display and the 27 inch size. Those are the two use cases I use an external display for and they both better with a bigger screen.

It works perfectly with my iPad and Windows laptop with thunderbolt

I agree, Tino. It's the elephant in the room and quite a deliberate omission by Apple to push much more expensive products to customers who just wanted a newer version of the 27" iMac.

@@candleby It's incredible to say it in this day and age but the 24" imac with 16GB RAM is actually still currently an incredible piece of tech. Throw in a £100 usb hub and all in all for £1700 (education store) it's an incredible deal for a desktop. I don't see them updating the 24" until 2024 with M3 and the 27" days seem to be long gone. Shame they couldn't dilute how many options there are for consumers that they seem to be doing with the laptops currently.

@@daggar98 Got the 16gb model iMac used for around 1100 :D

they want exactly this, that you can't wait to buy one the day he takes out the 27 in.

Apple doesn't respect its customers. What else is new

👆👆👆👆Thanks for watching and commenting, congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁...

What did you choose ?? I am confused too

@@meghanak8854 I went with a studio display and run it from my 2016 MacBook Pro. I love the display. Although my MacBook seems to be under powered to run the display and it’s self. Looks like I am now getting a newer more powerful MacBook.

@@Paulies_House thank you

@@Paulies_House There's no right or wrong option. It is most definitely the far more expensive option but welcome to apple! Brilliant display, value is always going to drop the higher quality you strive for with apple!

Update: My 2016 Macbook pro was not powerful enough to run the Studio Display. Also, Apple will not allow the 2016 Macbook pro to update to Ventura OS. I replaced the 2016 Macbook pro with a new 2022 14" Macbook pro upgraded with 32 GB memory and now I cruising with all the power I need!

👆👆👆👆Thanks for watching and commenting, congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁...

Not officially. Apple took away target display mode a few macOS releases ago.

You could set up universal controls for the seperate monitor effect!

100p the best value!

@@KarlConrad what do you mean by "100p"?

👆👆👆👆 thanks for watching and commenting 😊😊 congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

I use a 32 inch monitor and it doesn't even feel that big to me

👆👆👆👆Thanks for watching and commenting, congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁...

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

Yes, I would look at it this way. If you want a stand alone desktop start with the M1 "mac mini" with 16GB and only if, it did not meet your needs would, I upgrade to the base model of the new "Mac Studio". However, if you prefer using an All-in-One computer the colorful 24-inch iMac is 100 percent the way to go. Also, if ordering an iMac please get the top of the line version with its matching mouse, track-pad, and full sized (with number pad) keyboard at about $2,000 (US). Trust me, with a computer from Apple there is nothing like buying a full and complete system to meet all your needs, both now and for many years into the future (smile...smile).

@@transitengineer Thanks so much for taking the time to share your insights. I wanted to buy the full suite of iMac accessories, so you’ve definitely affirmed what I was hoping to do!

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

👆👆👆👆 thanks for watching and commenting 😊😊 congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁

What do you mean hows the workflow, its just a second monitor lol. You can choose which camera to use and which speakers to use

@@danieldev514 do you have the set up? Is it possible to use both screens speakers at the same time or only one at a time? Workflow - I mean is it fluid to navigate from one screen to the other one? The quality of image and color sense is equal or do we need to readjust and calibrate? These things are important to me and to the quality of my work so yeah my questions shouldn’t be judge or seen as a joke.

@@davidsalgado5279 Yes I've tried it with my iMac before selling it for a MacBook. They are detected by macOS as just regular speakers so if you can two speakers at the same time in macOS then you can use studio display's and iMac's too although i didn't try it The main difference is the brightness and contrast and it is visible under certain viewing conditions but colors overall are great on both and I don't think you will have to readjust (you can always lower the brightness on the studio if you need).

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

Define incredible.

Congrats!

eBay?

@@rustybucket5465 Local classified ads. Got it for the equivalent of US$ 2,300 with the stand.

What they should have done was sell the display with the stand included for $6000 but allow customers to knock the price down to $5000 by not getting the stand. 😉

@@gregorymoore2877 😝

👆👆👆👆Thanks for watching and commenting, congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁.....

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

I reckon he will have to replace the whole display. It is an eye sore now.

👆👆👆👆 thanks for watching and commenting 😊😊 congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

Nope

Yes We can

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

That's next I think. 24 inch, 4.5K monitor. Then they will discontinue the iMac line entirely. You heard it here first!

The bezels on the ultra fine are bad too 😢

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

def just buy imac. The studio display is honestly almost scam level. imac gets you pretty much same screen plus keyboard+mouse AND it's a whole computer. Anyone who buys the studio display just loves throwing away money

It’s almost like they did this before…in 2010! Target display mode was the bomb.

👆👆👆👆 thanks for watching and commenting 😊😊 congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁

Text🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙🆙 Right now i have a surprise for you.

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

From what Apple Insider says, it does support HDR, but doesn’t get any brighter than its normal 600 nits. They showed a KZfaq video playing side by side with a Studio Display and the LG equivalent and the KZfaq video showed the same video playing on the Studio Display in HDR while oddly it was not in HDR on the LG.

It supports HDR but they cannot legally claim it because it doesn’t have the full brightness to qualify for that label. So you would not get the full blacks or whites of a tv or display with the full “hdr” label, but for all intents and purposes it is fully capable of viewing HDR content (although with a reduced white and black range).

@@ghost-user559 Isn't there an HDR400 certification? Granted, most people consider that fake HDR, but it's still a certification standard. Most real HDR requires 800-1000 nits but I've seen some monitors with HDR400 certification.

@@techinrl9869 Well that’s kind of what I mean, it doesn’t pass certification because of the brightness limitations, but it CAN technically play HDR content in a less dynamic range. That’s the strange thing about all these silly LCD lobby and USBC and Thunderbolt and HDMI standards is they are all so specific, yet the manufacturers are all so different in the quality of cables and ports and components vary so drastically. So for HDR content this screen would function within its range of brightness to view HDR, but on a technicality it doesn’t have the contrast or brightness ratio to qualify for the official standards, which is actually why Apple doesn’t advertise it as HDR, but that’s interesting because they still gave the customer the ability to utilize HDR content. So it’s very interesting to include functionality you can’t advertise just for the benefit of the viewer. That’s a rare thing for corporations, so I can’t help but think they had supply chain issues that prevented full HDR implementation on these devices, and so they essentially “binned” the Display brightness capacity at the last minute until the mini led models.

Thanks for watching and congratulations 🎊 you’ve been selected amongst our top 10 winners. DM☝️☝️☝️☝️

Karl 😂

@@KarlConrad konrad

👆👆👆👆Thanks for watching and commenting, congratulations you just won a gift 🎁🎁🎁🎁...