Supreme Court hears arguments in abortion pill case

Supreme Court hears arguments in abortion pill case | full audio

Рет қаралды 14,051

2 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case involving mifepristone, a commonly used abortion pill, and the Food and Drug Administration's actions in recent years to make the medication more accessible. The high court is reviewing a federal appeals court's ruling that said the FDA's actions were unlawful.
#news #supremecourt #politics
CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
Subscribe to the CBS News KZfaq channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

Пікірлер: 55

@rico5393 2 ай бұрын

Ah yes the party that claims to want to limit government overreach wants to tell people how to live their lives

@paulkrasner 2 ай бұрын

The attorney for the gov is brilliant

@tanyabailey7651 2 ай бұрын

Exactly what I thought.

@Pants3 2 ай бұрын

She is great!

@tanyabailey7651 2 ай бұрын

The Solicitor General (government’s lawyer) was absolutely brilliant. She’s incredibly intelligent and extremely effective.

@ageb9811 2 ай бұрын

Why does the Supreme Court keep taking cases where there are no damages? How does it make sense legislating based on hypothetical plaintiffs?

@jeffbanken689 2 ай бұрын

No damages? Hypothetical plaintiffs, definitely a candidate for dumbest comment in social media history.

@jamestaylor1088 2 ай бұрын

@@jeffbanken689 concrete and particularized injury, where?

@ageb9811 Ай бұрын

@@jeffbanken689 Go ahead, explain it. What were the damages? Please explain how the plaintiffs were wronged in such a way that they are entitled to a legal remedy which strips everybody else’s right to take mifepristone. Let’s hear it genius

@willpenn2797 2 ай бұрын

I want to see if SCOTUS doesn’t want the FDA to decide which drugs should be dispensed. If the FDA can’t allow drugs to be dispensed, the Supreme Court shouldn’t make laws.

@walnutclose5210 2 ай бұрын

Elizabeth Prelogar is just, absolutely, awesome. Complete command of the case. Complete command of the relevant law. Never speaks in anything but complete sentences strung together as complete paragraph and thoughts. Never a pause or nonsense word. Impressive in every respect.

@kimscott8176 2 ай бұрын

This must be pure sarcasm.

@willpenn2797 2 ай бұрын

I have not heard of anyone complaining about the birth control pill. What is the problem?

@tammythomas8167 2 ай бұрын

Birth control causes weight gain, hair loss, depression, suicidal ideation and many more health issues for women

@Gfy69ytb 2 ай бұрын

See my response about DNCs on the comments page. I could have DIED.

@thankfuljosh Ай бұрын

It kills unborn humans.

@jthakurdin 2 ай бұрын

Thank you for recording and posting!

@willpenn2797 2 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court knows law the FDA knows food and drugs. Stay in your lane, Supreme Court.

@51disco 2 ай бұрын

Thomas and Alito are owned by fascists

@rickylopez2420 2 ай бұрын

Wow Jackson saved for last. Her questioned:/ agreeableness with the government I think shows her view on the outcome of this case.

@mdl8210 Ай бұрын

Weird how Senator Hawley’s wife is arguing a case in front of the Supreme Court that normally would never have standing.

@paperomo 2 ай бұрын

jesus DOES IT MATTER THE SPECIFIC PERSON ISNT ALLOWED TO SUE?

@user-ue1lv3mr5h 2 ай бұрын

What person?

@pcon77 2 ай бұрын

This is so freaking surreal. The drug is designed to cause an adverse event and the core argument is that studies show no adverse events. If that was true the drug would not be working.😂😂😂

@huffhouse2 Ай бұрын

“An adverse event is any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient.” The drug does what people want it to do. It works. The abortion is not an adverse event; it means the drug works safely the way it is supposed to.

@pcon77 Ай бұрын

@@huffhouse2 Hahaha. I am pretty sure the fetus is experiencing a pretty "adverse" freaking event. Also abortion is so much of an adverse event that the classic Hippocratic Oath includes the following promise, "I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child."

@pcon77 Ай бұрын

@@huffhouse2 Sorry but the fetus is experiencing a pretty "adverse event". The event is so adverse, that the original Hippocratic Oath (5th century BC to 1964AD) had doctors make the following promise "I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child."

@1969billy1970 Ай бұрын

More than just Abortion: States Rights: healthcare rules on “involuntary and or Right(s) of Consent” treatments on out of state/country patients. Ie Vacationers? Travelers? Or Patients “transferred From one state/nation to another by another state/nation??!!

@1969billy1970 Ай бұрын

Ie Private Hospital/Provider That Transfers a Patient for philosophical and or moral reasons because they conflict with state/nations rights.(Where does the patient’s rights stand in that situation).

@1969billy1970 Ай бұрын

Medical Malpractice: What Constitutes It??? Damages Physical, Psychological, and or Both?!!

@1969billy1970 Ай бұрын

IE : Both Psychological And Physical Damages!! “You Performed an Abortion” vs “You didn’t perform and abortion” Out of State Rights!!

@marybuford9591 11 сағат бұрын

The argument it's my body I'll do what I want means---> I had unprotected intimacy for the purpose of getting an abortion. You do realize that, right? Let's say your body is a car and you demand to drive recklessly, without a license and insurance. There's a car accident. No one has any responsibility to bail you out. There is no moral responsibility to do so and btw your reckless driving crashed right into some ER doctors. The most absurd questions came from jackson, kagan and sotomayor. The water bottle question was beyond inane. 1 million women are driving without insurance. Get some or don't drive. It is an expectation of the public that justices do some homework before showing up. A paragraph won't do for excommunication. It's beyond understanding. An alternative exists and a responsible alternative. See a doctor, and do an in-person follow up. There'll be some stragglers. About the same number as adverse reactions to the mail. It could just get lost in the mail.

@billstevens9190 Ай бұрын

God gave all women life.

@alanbrito706 Ай бұрын

Who is the real rapist here? the attacker that raped the woman or the Supreme Court that wants to rip her rights off?

@marybuford9591 7 сағат бұрын

Move it to OTC it's so safe. Its really like being surrounded by nags 24/7/365 . I must have this and then that and more more more. They nag and win because you just want peace from their damn needs, right?

@user-rw1pm1is9o 2 ай бұрын

If gynocologists cant do the job they took an oath to do, they should practice other medicine.

@CraftAddictedWendy Ай бұрын

Especially perplexing since members of the plaintiff organization include dentists. How many women run to their dentist for help when they learn that they’re pregnant? 🤷‍♀️

@marlowemayhem3230 2 ай бұрын

#fightthepatriarchy #abortthecourt

@billstevens9190 Ай бұрын

Satan. Out smarting women. Have answers to God.

@kimscott8176 2 ай бұрын

The USA and this dumb abortion issue. I am male- had a vasectomy 30 years ago. So I am old. I am not from USA. I am of the opinion that all American males should have a vasectomy. That would solve this issue once and for all- and I wouldn’t have to listen to the mindless rants from all sides. Also the prophecy of the movie - Idiocracy could be reversed as currently it is spot on.

@51disco 2 ай бұрын

What stupid, bigoted questions by some judges.

@jeffbanken689 2 ай бұрын

It doesn’t matter how the crime is committed.

@markpkessinger 2 ай бұрын

What "crime?"

@AmberTurdsShittyBedsheet Ай бұрын

Calm down, Sparky, a woman taking a morning after pill isn't anywhere near an abortion, lol. If you backwoods folks spent less time chopping wood and whittling sticks and more time reading books and listening to experts maybe you'd have known that before the age of 45.