Fantastic info about nested keywords. I think this is one of the most fantastic keyword-courses that is posted on KZfaq. This is just what I needed from biology where one specific bird species are nested into birds that are vertebrates that are animals. But I did not know about this "will export"-function. Thank you, thank you. Maybe you should drop place/region/country as an examlpe, since there is specific metadata-fields for this type of information.
@tasercs Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this Wayne. Keywords in Lightroom are simple once you know about them but it is very difficult to find out what effect some of those checkboxes might have! When you have tens of thousands of pics, a misunderstanding could lead to a lot of heartache. This is the best explanation I have seen so far.
@lenorro4 жыл бұрын
Dear Wayne, thank you for doing this tutorial. I am just a weekend warrior trying to organize my family photos and your video was simple, clear, and easy to understand. Will save me lots of time and frustration! Thank you.
@cwaynefox4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@StephenJStephen_Photography Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this informative video. I will be moving my massive keyword list into a much better and shorter hierarchal grouping to improve my organization.
@arunasrimkus19223 жыл бұрын
I was scrolling through the youtube search looking for a tutorial on how to do the keywording, skipping the first 4 minutes I found the information I was looking for, thank you.
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@gregperks3 жыл бұрын
Extremely good and clearly explained Wayne. Thanks.
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@abhijit-sarkarАй бұрын
I'm creating a keywords list based on the 'Lightroom Keyword List Project'. I have a couple of questions that I hope you can help me with: 1. How would you categorize "things" that fall somewhat between "WHAT" and "WHERE"? For example, mountains and lakes. A mountain may be present in two photos taken from completely different locations, which seems redundant to label in each instance (and leads to my next question). Categorizing them as "WHAT" creates confusion for smaller items, such as a hot spring or geyser. These items can't be present in photos shot from elsewhere, but technically, you're not at a geyser, you're seeing one. 2. Can the same keyword exist in two different hierarchies?
@bigtredunzo3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video on setting up a keyword hierarchy. I never learned how to keyword properly on my old computer and my photos are a mess. I have a new computer now so I will take my time as I add my photos to the LR catalog. Thanks very much.
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@cee26154 жыл бұрын
Excellent, thank you, you have been a great help
@jacobthomson93695 ай бұрын
Excellent.Thank you.
@cwaynefox5 ай бұрын
Thx.
@buntjohn Жыл бұрын
Very helpful.
@nevergoinghomepodcast4 жыл бұрын
The best video for this specific purpose I've found. Thanks for making it ! : )
@cwaynefox4 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@dandonovan12 жыл бұрын
This is amazing keyword information. Thank you so much!!!
@cwaynefox2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I appreciate the kind words. Sry it took so long to reply.
@MannyG329683 жыл бұрын
Excellent and well-described video.
@JimmyRooney3 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks for making this! Headed to watch part 2 now .
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
Hope you enjoy it!
@sjsphotog11 ай бұрын
Good stuff. thanks
@audunskrindo58773 жыл бұрын
I agree that taming your keyword list is essential, and what I looked for. I wonder why so many videoes of keywords still put location information in keywords. It is meant to be placed in other places of metadata (city, sublocation, country), and "aspect ratio" you will get from EXIF. But as I said, it is still more than enough keywords left to grow that list way too long. My problem is related to adding systematic hierachy to animals, birds, plants etc. so it was still good help
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
you can't build a location hierarchy using the location field of the metadata. Also some places strip most of the metadata, but they usually leave keywords alone. Also finding things via keywords for me is easier. So I stick to using keywords.
@audunskrindo58773 жыл бұрын
@@cwaynefox I agree about that LR do not understand location hierarchy. I included in my argument for using these metadata for location that the user remember the hierarchy herself/himself, or watch it as it appear in the metadata, since it will show the overall location/state/region/country for any sublocation I have added.
@pamelataylorcather26714 жыл бұрын
Some great concepts.
@cwaynefox4 жыл бұрын
thanks
@juliemorency92543 жыл бұрын
This was very helpful. I wonder how you would recommend organizing other "types" of words beyond places, things and people. Example - mood, or specific picture themes for abstract pics as an example.
@cwaynefox3 жыл бұрын
I have a top level category in my things labeled mood, and several keywords in that I attach to some images based on the mood. As far as abstract, I do have a single keyword in things called abstract which some images are attached to (don't do a lot of abstract work). You could certainly add more descriptive names to types of abstract under that.
@juliemorency92543 жыл бұрын
@@cwaynefox Thank you Wayne. I've rewatched your video a few times now. I'm realizing it will take some thought to figure out the proper hierarchy. The "Thing" one is the most complicated one I find as it is so wide.