Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 VXD (A056) Review | 4K
Рет қаралды 25,399
4 жыл бұрынPhotographer Dustin Abbott reviews the highly anticipated Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 VXD (A056) large aperture telephoto zoom. | Read the Text Review: bit.ly/A056Review | Visit the Image Gallery: bit.ly/A056Images | Purchase the Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 VXD @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2RsBIQV | Amazon amzn.to/2VlpeLQ | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2Rqy2PH | Amazon UK amzn.to/2Xm2pug | Amazon Germany amzn.to/3ebdX9N | Ebay bit.ly/F056VXD
Sony a9 Camera @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2HyWIyt | Amazon amzn.to/2B4NAjh | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2peQkbn | Amazon UK amzn.to/2M7XPcY | Amazon Germany amzn.to/2VHbDOP | Ebay bit.ly/Sonyalpha9
Purchase the Sony a7RIV @ B&H Photo bhpho.to/2nUgnno | Amazon amzn.to/2oGpVD1 | Amazon Canada amzn.to/2mY8UDW | Amazon UK amzn.to/2n9GWF3 | Amazon Germany amzn.to/2nXhene | Ebay bit.ly/a7RIVda
Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at:
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/1TA0Xge
Ebay: bit.ly/DustineBay
Make a donation via Paypal: paypal.me/dustinTWI
Get a discount off all Skylum Editing Software (Luminar, Aurora HDR, AirMagic) by using code DUSTINHDR at checkout: bit.ly/LuminarDLA
Become a Patron: / dustinabbott | Check me out on: Personal Website: dustinabbott.net/ | Sign up for my Newsletter: bit.ly/1RHvUNp | Instagram: bit.ly/DLAinsta | Google+: bit.ly/24PjMzv | Facebook: on. 1nuUUeH | Twitter: bit.ly/1RyYxIH | Flickr: bit.ly/1UcnC0B | 500px: bit.ly/1Sy2Ngu
My filming setup: Sony a7R III: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2D6ibNO or Amazon: amzn.to/2CNxOvH | or | Sony a9 @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2HyWIyt or Amazon: amzn.to/2s1vYE0
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 RXD @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2FA00la or Amazon amzn.to/2G2kaEr
Lights: Rotolight AEOS @B&H Photo bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Genaray Contender @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/33HbGNM | and Aputure AL-MW: bhpho.to/2N3MtZV
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Keywords: Sony, Tamron, withmytamron, A056, Tamron 70-180, Tamron 70-180mm, VXD, F2.8, 70-180, 70-180mm, 28-75mm, 17-28mm, Di III, Sony FE, Tamron 70-180mm Review, Tamron 70-180 Review, 70-180mm F2.8, Dustin Abbott, Autofocus, Sample Images, Video, Video Test, review, Video review, Real World, Wide Angle, Sony a7RIII, Sony a7RIV, Portrait, Sharpness, Resolution, Bokeh, 70-200mm, GM, G2
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I have been able to confirm that a Sony SEL14TC will NOT fit, unfortunately. The rear opening on the A056 is not wide enough for the protruding section to enter.
@catchlite5196 4 жыл бұрын
Dustin Abbott thank you for a great review ones again. I have come to learn and appreciate them more and more. As an additional comment to the wish for a converter, if it ever comes out it will most likely make it even more clear that you are missing out on stabilization in the lens..
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
There's some truth to that.
@OccultDemonCassette 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Have you heard any word about Tampon producing their own TC for this lens?
@OccultDemonCassette 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI lol, I meant to type Tamron.
@xWood4000 Жыл бұрын
@@OccultDemonCassetteI feel like Sony probably want to create incentives to buy the first party lenses and have forbidden third parties from making teleconverters. Tamron has a very good relationship with Sony, Sony owns shares in Tamron. Teleconverters are also really difficult and expensive to make well
@ArchWayE 4 жыл бұрын
You give the best lens reviews as always accompanied by fantastic images from the lens. Thank you.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much.
@atomikmaster1 4 жыл бұрын
This review deserves more views. Thanks for your work Dustin 👍
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
It's actually not even public yet. The views are only from those that link in from the text review (and from my Patrons before that). It goes live to the public tomorrow.
@catchlite5196 4 жыл бұрын
Give it some time... “they will come”. 😁
@adidasaddict 4 жыл бұрын
Great review @Dustin Abbott , as always.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@1j007zm 4 жыл бұрын
great review!, I have the 28-75mm f/2.8, and I'm working on the 17-28mm, this lens will complete the trinity for my a7III. photography is a hobby of mine since the 70's early 80's ( Pentax k1000 ) there was no image stabilization back then, so it doesn't bother me that the lens doesn't have any, the a7III IBIS is enough for me. I'm not into all the little details high end expensive lenses produce. Sharpness! is what I like, and on that Tamron always delivers. I like how Tamron's made decent photography affordable for us monetarily challenged photo fans
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's such a valid point. With these Tamron lenses , you are compromising a bit on the features (and, to a lesser extent, the build), but you are no scrimping on the performance from autofocus to image quality.
@Mejtub 4 жыл бұрын
You make great reviews. Thank you.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@rolandrickphotography 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dustin. Love your reviews. Can’t wait for your Tamron 28-200 2.8-5.6 review
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
You and me both!
@maxipadthai 4 жыл бұрын
Another great review. Thank you!
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@jen43072 4 жыл бұрын
I love the idea of this lens being less weight, smaller and fairly equal performance, and with the a7riv, I can use a custom button for crop mode, still get 20mp from the image and not need anything extra like a teleconverter. I will be watching my shutter speed carefully, so thank you for that caveat, Dustin. Great review! Edited to add- I have and love the 28-75mm version and really enjoy it!
@luckgod1857 4 жыл бұрын
Jen Scott still you get 26mp😉
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's right...even better!
@mystikmeg 2 жыл бұрын
It says something about the lens when I can’t believe how good this video looks. Tack sharp and dreamy background.
@DustinAbbottTWI 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@robertbarel896 4 жыл бұрын
like always - best review on the internet -
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much.
@MJAdams-js7np 3 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 100k!!!! Big achievement!!!
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😀
@N4865G 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your review Dustin. One area I am missing in regards to this very promising new lens is its close focusing distance of just 27cm combined with maximum magnification factor of 0.5. On paper it looks like very capable quasi-macro lens. Did you get a chance to see it in action up close? Thanks
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That is covered in both the text and video reviews. I demonstrate both the pros and cons.
@WeddingDocumentary 4 жыл бұрын
Great review! Glad I have one in the mail as we speak! Just sold my g master for a good price
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Hope you enjoy it!
@rickymcc9072 4 жыл бұрын
As always, an excellent concise review. You remain, along with just a couple of others, one of my main 'go-to' reviewers for lenses and kit in general. I have now ordered one and eagerly await delivery. I will do my own detailed evaluation of this lens. I expect shortly to be selling my 70-200 f4 G OSS equiv, based on anticipated faster better performance with a pretty useful close focus ability. My intended application is mainly ad-hoc day to day and travel use. If it's as good as reviewed then I may also explore the other sister lenses 17-28 and 28-75mm but I suspect that the relative use case those optics is less, relatively, compelling. Currently I'm shooting a broad range of primes (24, 35, 55 and 85mm with a view to also buying a 20mm) when I have a specific assignment in mind - all good for small size, high IQ, speed and bokeh. On zooms I shoot a 16-35 f4 G (I rarely need faster on wider glass, except for astro) but might eventually go for the highly regarded GM equiv. For single lens use (very light day use/travel) then Sony's 24-105mm f4 G OSS has a performance better than I dared hope for and was my low heft choice vs the possibly flawed GM 24-70. As observed when the light drops or I need more bokeh it's easy to pack a single prime to supplement
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I think you'll like it. It's a superior lens.
@jorgemartinez123 4 жыл бұрын
Great review!
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@apmor3738 4 жыл бұрын
Great review Dustin. I just got this lens and I'm loving it so far. Wanted to ask you a question since you seem to be very familiar with this lens. Is it normal for it to click when you invert it? My copy seems to click louder than usual, at least louder than my other zooms. I'm assuming it's the new VXD motor since the clicking stops once I mount it to my camera body and turn it on. Haven't had any issues with the actual lens thus far but just wanted to know if it's a bad copy that may have issues in the future due to the louder than usual clicking.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, I didn't really hear much autofocus noise from my review copy at all.
@RensKapoor 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation... Is it better to go for this or an 85mm 1.8 prime? I already have tamron 28-75 2.8... Which one should i go for next out of those 2...
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
I would choose the zoom. A great supplement to the 28-75
@robustsong 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Dustin, thank you for the awesome review which convinced me to purchase one. The lens I got has a moving part inside. If camera is off, I can easily hear the moving part when flipping up and down. If camera is on, the moving part seems locked and won’t move. I wonder if this is normal?
@DustinAbbottTWI 2 жыл бұрын
That's due to a floating element design (helps with better up close performance). You won't hear that "rattle" when the lens is powered on for that reason (the element is engaged)
@elvispresley2542 4 жыл бұрын
Great review.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@krulmi 4 жыл бұрын
Hello! I would like to know your opinion, which lens will be the best for real estate - Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS or SAMYANG 14MM F2.8 AF for a7iii side, thanks!
@ArrakisDunedt 4 жыл бұрын
Well.. the Sony is for aps c and I own the 14.. there is a lot of mustache type distortion and bad quality copies of the 14mm. For a autofocus I would go with the sigma 14 mm to 24 I think it is or the manual lenses like the laowa, rectilinear based construction. Another option is tilt shift adapted..
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Bruno's advice is pretty good.
@ArrakisDunedt 4 жыл бұрын
Ohh and he does have reviews on all of them if not mistaken even the 10mm laowa ;)
@tampabayaudio 4 жыл бұрын
How would this compare to using a Sony 70-200 f4 on an A7r4? I understand the f stop difference but the in lens stabilization and other features on the Sony F4 make it a viable contender?
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
The Tamron is better optically, but the in-lens SteadyShot will be better.
@TheDhauladhar 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Dustin, can you help? Am on a budget and torn between Tamron 70-180 and Sigma 100-400. Can't buy both. Which one would you choose if you had to between them? I know it depends on the subject, but can you give an opinion if you had to choose one?
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
That really isn't a question I can answer for you, as I view these lenses as being suited for two different purposes. Do you need more reach for wildlife, or do need a faster maximum aperture lens for events, weddings, portraits, etc... 180mm isn't a lot of reach for wildlife or birding.
@TechandFood 4 жыл бұрын
@dustinabbott I got my 70-180, Is it normal to hear a slight clunking sound when tipping the lens forward and backward? When I put it on the camera and turn it on, the sound goes away. Tamron said it’s normal but I see no one mentioning it
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Often people are hypersensitive when they get a new bit of equipment that they've spent a lot of money on. What you are most likely hearing is a "floating element" that is part of the design to allow excellent performance up close (and why Tamron says it is normal). I hear this concern often from people that have bought a lens with floating elements and aren't familiar with them. It's nothing to be concerned about if that is all that it is. Just monitor it, and if it gets worse or operation of the lens seems impaired, that's when to contact Tamron.
@fraensemeier-fotografie 4 жыл бұрын
I cannot believe that you have an old "10 Deutschmark " bill on your testchart (at 08:08), that is sooo cool :). Haven't seen one since ages. Greetings from Germany.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I get that pretty often. People love seeing it. It's a beautiful bill.
@KevinJamesVideo 4 жыл бұрын
Got mine pre-ordered!
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
And I hope you get it sooner rather than later. I'm in the same boat, though Tamron will probably make sure I get one sooner rather than later (I typically buy right from the distributor when I buy gear).
@blupinto1629 3 жыл бұрын
great job Dustin! when i want to get info on my daydreams, i always turn to your channel. thanks
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
I'm an expensive watch!
@phoenix1202 4 жыл бұрын
Is it worth paying the extra $200-300 to get this one as opposed to the Tamron SP AF 70-200mm 2.8 Di VC USD G2 (A025?) I'm looking for a 70-200mm type lens for my Sony E-mount but I don't want to spend TOO much if it's not worth it.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
The short answer is yes. You'll have infinitely better focus using the native lens over using the G2 adapted.
@charruaporelmundo 4 жыл бұрын
Do you know if Tamron is thinking on come out with some kind of mount ring that can be purchased separately? Thanks.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I have not seen any reference to that, and I don't know that I see any provision for that in the design. In this case, however, it isn't really necessary. The lens is light and compact enough that it balances fine on a tripod.
@charruaporelmundo 4 жыл бұрын
Dustin Abbott Thank you Sir, I’m buying in a couple of month a few lenses and mostly made my mind for this already, need to decide among 28-75 or 25-105 👌🏻📸
@AwesomelyAwesomeO 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Dustin. Great review as always! Anyway just wondering how would you compare this to Sony 70-300? Thanks!
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I haven't reviewed the Sony 70-300 yet, so I don't have an opinion.
@simonp8088 3 жыл бұрын
There's def an aperture difference. F2.8 is very fast for this focal range.
@nikkorojo 3 жыл бұрын
How is the weather sealing holding up so far? Any dust or sand in the lens? Did it manage to resist rain/drizzle or snow? Cheers mate!
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
I've not had problems, though I haven't beaten the lens up at all.
@nikkorojo 3 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI cheers!
@nerdybunch636 4 жыл бұрын
I fell in love with the A9
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I love it, too.
@vognarov 4 жыл бұрын
Dustin I must say that I watched most if not all of popular lens reviewers and you are definetely among the best, thank you for your work. Would also like to ask - what is the actual lens you filmed this with? It looks really great, perfectly fits my taste when it comes to look.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I filmed this episode on the 70-180 (and an a9)
@kl33tus 3 жыл бұрын
I don’t buy lenses if Dustin doesn’t review them. You’re the man!
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@rajatcoool 3 жыл бұрын
You talked about the motion blur at 180mm if the shutter speed is too low; because this lens doesn't have an inbuilt Image stabilization. What would you say, if I am using a tripod for the shots. My Sony A7r3's IBIS should be good enough to cancel out the wind effect if I am on a tripod at a low shutter speed with this lens? My use is: I want to use it for Landscape Photography. And I am always at 100 ISO and on tripod.
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Tripod work is a whole different story.
@rajatcoool 3 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Does that mean there are other issues when using a tripod? Or does it mean this lens gives good/great results on a Tripod. Asking because I need to make a decision this week, whether to go for this lens or not.
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
I mean that image stabilization becomes a moot point when you use a tripod. You actually should turn it off when working from a tripod.
@rajatcoool 3 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you for responding, I honestly appreciate it. I Always buy lenses after watching your lens reviews. Very comprehensive coverage.
@deanlewis2215 3 жыл бұрын
Hi, I'm more interested in this lens on a tripod for sunset and sunrise landscape photography. Using it stopped down and probably between 135 and 180mm mostly and longer exposures. Can anyone with experience with this lens give views on if it is a good choice? Thanks
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
hi Dean, this is a great lens, period, but if you are primarily stopping it down and using it off of a tripod, you might want to consider something like the Tamron 28-200mm RXD. It's got very good image quality and will give you more zoom range. The 70-180 is really a better buy if you want to shoot at a constant F2.8.
@deanlewis2215 3 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you very much for getting back Dustin. It will be used on a tripod mostly. Will the 28 200 match the 70 180 stopped down to f5.6/f8/f11 on a tripod for landscape in pure image quality do you think? Thanks dean
@8XHuXBgkok 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review again! I have both A036 and A046, but this is still a tough choice. I'm glad you acknowledge the limitation of A056 relying on IBIS only. Many Sony believers kid themselves that IBIS is good enough on its own even at a telephoto range. IBIS produces acceptable results at 75mm, but I seriously doubt its efficacy at 180mm. Another possible deal breaker is that the lens doesn't have any tele-converter option, at least for now... I guess I'll hold on to my Sony 70-300mm for a while.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I'm estimating that IBIS provides about 2.5 stops, or about half what good in-lens stabilizers are providing these days.
@8XHuXBgkok 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you Dustin!
@Itdoesntmakesense2me 4 жыл бұрын
God of Tech Reviewers 🙏🙏🙏
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I don't think I aspire quite that high ;)
@ahmonon4352 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Dustin, I'm really hesitated about purchasing this lens. From 17-28 & 28-75 what I can say is that this series of Tamron lenses are really sharp, but I what bugs me a lot is that the bokeh rendering of these lenses are really not as smooth as some other competitor leases . I would love to see some side by side comparison with 70-200 f/2.8 L or GM leases, thank you
@gurudeclan 4 жыл бұрын
I have the 28-75mm and I agree, bokeh could be better. I would say they're more "workhorse" lenses than artistic lenses only the build quality is only OK. They're high quality, budget lenses, but not without compromises.
@gurudeclan 4 жыл бұрын
By the way, I use a Sigma 135 instead of 70-200 on my A7R3 (including for event work) and couldn't be happier. Not as versatile as a tele zoom but when you combine other factors like sharpness, size etc, and pair it with a very high resolution sensor, it's an option worth considering.
@kingweddingmedia 4 жыл бұрын
Is agree with the other reply, for me, if you want good bokeh use a prime lens - these zooms are “get the job done” lenses more aimed at being able to get the composition right in camera. If bokeh is your number one priority, go for the 85mm or 135mm prime, I’ve had both and they are both excellent. I have also preordered this tamron as I am so impressed by the sharpness of the other two, but I’m not chasing bokeh from this, it’ll predominantly be used for wedding ceremonies and speeches, landscape fun and sports photography. For portraits I’d be reaching for my 135.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure I agree here. I think the bokeh is actually quite good from the lens for a zoom lens. Any further comparisons may or may not happen. I don't have either lens on hand, so it would require a set of circumstances where I could have both lenses at the same time.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's fair, @gurudeclan.
@StanleyKowalski. 4 жыл бұрын
7:44 without IS, pics would look crappy at zoom range, thanks for confirming for me. i like my 28-75 tamron but at longer zoom range, i cant get tamron. thanks Mr Abbott
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's definitely an overstatement. I've bought one, myself, and its an extremely useful lens.
@ask4mukul 3 жыл бұрын
Effective Review.....today i got the same
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Enjoy. It's a great, useful lens.
@antoniosmarnerospetphotogr5971 4 жыл бұрын
You don't have 20fps with the A9 but 15?
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's correct.
@OccultDemonCassette 4 жыл бұрын
I like the simpler design without all the bells and whistles of these Tamron lenses. I'd say the only thing I'd actually add would be the programmable button.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Fair enough. It isn't really all that limiting in the field if you're accustomed to it.
@SuperDigitalMe 4 жыл бұрын
Is it also good on a A6600?
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I haven't tested that combination, but I see no reason that it shouldn't be.
@Schroeder3000 4 жыл бұрын
oh my god - i didnt see this beauty in a while: a Zehn Mark Schein ! :) @8:23
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I've got a number of viewers who enjoy seeing the older currency.
@kane01337 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Always love the currency / old antique things :)
@DentargPL 4 жыл бұрын
The only lens I miss at the moment is 70-200, but I'm not convinced that this is the one I want. Hope Sigma one would have IS built in.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
If you're not in a rush, the Sigma should come in the latter half of the year and might be the one you're looking for.
@seanhe4606 4 жыл бұрын
It will, but it will also be much heavier
@DentargPL 4 жыл бұрын
@@seanhe4606 I'm stronger than Jared Polin, so no issue here ;).
@luckgod1857 4 жыл бұрын
I heard someone in the film that the tamron is to release 70-200 f2.0 in the future I wonder if it is true.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That would be a very interesting lens, but it would have to be pretty huge.
@Dan.gibson.photographer 4 жыл бұрын
Łukasz Godlewski to my mind big apertures is more of a Sigma thing with their Art line 😉
@marcusb.1818 4 жыл бұрын
I have preordered the lens and received it on Saturday. However, I decided to return it. The lens sells for 1500€ on the European market. IMHO, the price is too high for the built quality: same plastic like on the 28-75 or 17-28, but almost double the price. I feel ripped off
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
That's definitely a high price for the lens, so I don't blame you.
@afrank3029 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI 16900 SEK here in Sweden thats a whopping 1630 Euro - getting close to the GM... :/
@burritobrosvideos8060 3 жыл бұрын
But will it balance in a tripod?
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Easily. It is quite lightweight.
@RockyMaiviaMiami 4 жыл бұрын
If you are looking for more reach buy apsc. 1.5 built in
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, though an a7RIV gives you 26mp even in APS-C mode.
@afrank3029 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI And if Im using the 70-180 on my a6400 how is gonna be the resolution, do I get 24 mp or less?
@roozbehbey 4 жыл бұрын
Full frame has numerous more advantages than an apsc sensor.
@RockyMaiviaMiami 4 жыл бұрын
A Frank you get all 24 megapixels and you would have a 105-270 focal range. A7r would be a beast though.
@afrank3029 4 жыл бұрын
@@roozbehbey I have also a A7RII ,but the awesome autofocus on the A6400 would be a big help while birding...
@lijinping 3 жыл бұрын
Why Dustin only have 100k subscribers?
@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын
Good question!
@derekshearer9049 4 жыл бұрын
Why 180 and not 200
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
Several reasons, but the biggest is that the 20mm compromise allowed them to create a smaller, lighter lens that retained excellent optical performance.
@derekshearer9049 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI. I guess you missed my point. Why not 170 or 150. Just seems arbitrary. Your answer explains the result not the reason why....
@GBO76 4 жыл бұрын
1 dollar is 0.88 € (Euros is the money in for most Europeans)...That Tamron cost 1199 USD in the US...it should cost 1058€. But guess what, retail price in Europ is 1499€. I won't buy Tamron anymore, no matter how good they might be.
@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын
I completely get it. Unfortunately the problem is not the relationship of the Euro to the dollar but the Euro to the Yen.
@GBO76 4 жыл бұрын
@@DustinAbbottTWI Theorically yes, but 1USD = 107yens, and 1€=121yens. So even with taxes, nothing justify that price gap.
BalcevMMA_BOXING
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Chris Turner Photographer
Рет қаралды 18 М.
PetaPixel
Рет қаралды 91 М.
PhotographyExplained
Рет қаралды 13 М.
xunyu
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
One More German
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН