he could see what people like you cant, thats whats amazing about him he went into those places and described it with such detail so even a person that never was there could understand in a way, why do you think your reality is any more real or solid than the reality of a dmt dimension? even science, quantum physics can tell you that reality is not what you think it is, its really not solid or factual in any way more than your experience and perception of it, its all inside your own head, he was a modern day shaman travelling into places i would not dare to go myself right now and bringing back information about the nature of universe ,it really is an infinite mathematical fractal or atleast that how the human mind can comprehend it, with the language of mathematics, what im getting at you waking up every morning drinking your coffee isnt any more real than diving into a psychedelic dimension that was one of his core messages

If you have ever exspeeienced a high dose psychedelic trip, you will know that they can be very eeal and very solid. You are just the only one who it appears to.

That’s because Terrence noticed after comparing his notes/effects with other peoples’ experiences that there was clearly an undeniable degree of intersubjective motifs and recurring/underlying themes and that psychedelics appeared to have this quality of “aboutness” to them. Even Nightshade deliriants presented this phenomenon. I’ve never heard his brother Dennis disagree with him on that… Does he in this video? Because them comparing notes with each other, as well as just assessing the repeating motifs and archetypes of other peoples’ trips on certain substances and basically taking it all into account (including context and presumed individual degrees of conditioning, etc.) nevertheless (presumably both of them together) were able to reconcile and outline that there was a more or less; characterizing “structure“ and type of topology (a ‘shifting topology’ as Terrence once put it). And that there nevertheless, even given the variability and broadness to the content of trips that there is still something “trying to poke through”, something thematically consistent and recurring. And if we have to give Terrance credit for *anything* we have to give him credit for his descriptions on the “aboutness” inherent in the phenomenological/topological landscapes of psilocybin mushrooms and ayahuasca. That is hands-down what he was most accurate about and always has been most accurate about. Now although maybe not 100% on ALL “details”, especially in his assessment of the psilocybin an ayahuasca “entities” themselves; his ‘maps’ of the experiences in terms of just the overall archetypal composition were almost basically complete and at the very least; fairly comprehensive. So since he noticed that these experiences didn’t just have a thematic composition, but that these themes were actually noticeably and statistically intersubjective and essentially “universal“ despite being quite peculiar and specific oftentimes that one could theoretically “map out” the spaces. This is why he advocated the “alone in silent darkness” methodology because it mitigated as much of the potential outside influence and input from other people and all the other stuff that could compromise this as much as possible. To see “what the thing was for itself“. And you know… His “maps” if you could even call them that for the ‘archetypel profiles’ of say LSD and Datura; although they were presented to some degree, they were clearly incomplete. But they still were more or less ‘accurate’ even in their own respects and limited formatting. Even if some elements were merely ‘hinted at’ or suggested rather than confidently declared. And Terence himself also even admitted that his own DMT trip and his modeling of it seemed “pretty radically different from everyone else’s“ yet still maintained that his descriptions of psilocybin and ayahuasca were essentially universal and therefore generalizable, which they were. Now, he may have glossed over a few details one could definitely say, or that he left out some rather key nuances and prefaces and did have some “miscongruencies” but unless we’re being *that* nitpicky (which I do tend to be) he still, in his overall picture and modeling of the phenomenology of psilocybin and ayahuasca (often for the purpose of intentional contrasting) is still the best representation of their intersubjective archetypes by far. And his proto-models for even LSD and Datura were certainly provisional and required further analysis and work to be done but we got to give him credit still I think for pretty much nailing the other stuff. And his position of “self-testability” works pretty well in regards to this concept, the only thing you really have to worry about or lookout for is whether or not you heard his descriptions before or after you tried to analyze the actual contents yourself. Thankfully I have the benefit of knowing my experiences that *do* match-up, pretty much identically to his descriptions and which occurred BEFORE I listened to them. Either way, he was correct about the universal archetypes and ‘themes’ for psilocybin and ayahuasca was my point, and he was ‘starting to get there’ with others like acid or datura or even salvia (although he did almost entirely ignore mescaline) and I honestly probably could’ve helped him come up with more comprehensive mappings of the archetypes for a least the acid and datura, but I still have to give him credit where credit is due. Anyways, I don’t really see Dennis McKenna arguing against THAT idea specifically at least. Especially since he’s seemingly touched on this kind of stuff even in contemporary times, and has even gone into more detail (possible expounding) such as how ayahuasca seems to represent the “counselor” archetype and psilocybin is more of a “teacher”, etc. Or how the mushrooms “are very mischievous” and all that. Or how ayahuasca seems to go more in the direction of the whole “plant-human-symbiosis thing” than psilocybin. If you’re not referring to the intersubjectivity of the core archetypes of individual substances then my bad but as far as I could tell; however the archetypal mapping seemed to be among Terrence’s top ideas and issues to emphasize. Most all of his other more “far-out” beliefs and hypotheses he seemed to only have partial faith in.

It's out there already....

Yeah this exists

It sounds like his voice, but it's no where near HOW Terrence spoke about these things. It just sounds like a scripted chat.

Terrence was special. We need more people like him... not bots that replicate his cadence and speak the wisdom he knew. You do have 100s of hours of his talks available and if you are imaginative and patient enough you can have a sort of intellectual connection of your own with him. Not the same as a conversation but we have to be flexible or only dissatisfied we will be. Listen to a segment of his talks, pause it mentate on the idea or philosophy and form your own questions or ideas and look for awnsers in his other talks or in your pwn searching of the collective intellectual artifact that is the net. I hope this message finds you well. As Terrence said to live in ecstacy is the best expectancy.

I don't like the idea of that kind of thing. The AI is not him or anyone living but could become possessed with demonic entities like haunted houses and other inanimate objects can be possessed by entities.

With a loud SQUACK

Thank you! Subscribe to my free newsletter if you wanna stay up-to-date on the podcast and other stuff: mindandmatter.substack.com/

I agree

I acquired mine from an online dmt psychedelic store they ship discreet¿?¿

In✓telegramzz][

_cospeed£££

He's on Instagrams also on Telegram with the below handle as...

*Mycopete.*

👀 @psychedtripx got ............all kinds of........ Psychedelic stuff ......

ON TELEGRAM💨🔑