Impact damage from that hook slammed into that side of face a few times. Yeah could see the servos that turn the eye malfunctioning, jamming or completly breaking down.

My thoughts exactly. That was the side of his face that was being crushed by that steel beam. That is like the one thing in the movie that never needed "fixing".

Same here. It was slammed with that iron press a couple of times so I assumed it was in pretty bad shape. Even in some set photos you can see the eye is off, presumably to save batteries but got me thing at some point they consider shutting it off to give the impression it was destroyed.

I always assumed that the actual eye didn't need to move, even though it did in the first one.

@@yuothineyesasian When it moved in the first one it was a puppet.

exactly

Spot on true!@@sketchbabu

the second half devolves into a saturday morning cartoon. the first film is just highly superior. also the liquid terminator is a dumb concept because its not wrapped in flesh and shouldnt be able to go back in time

@@JunjiItoDougWalker nah

@@cable7152idiot

I read about the symbolism in T2 - at first the terminator is wearing glasses and for the viewer and the characters he seems to be a threat. He is completely dehumanized (because his eyes don't show). He is a soulless machine. And then there is a transitional moment when he takes off his glasses and holds out his hand to S.Connor, which is the final transition for the heroes of the movie, that this terminator is a friend, not an enemy (and he didn’t kill anyone in the whole movie). And, on the other hand. When they visited their friend somewhere on the ranch and took weapons. Sarah put on glasses and became like a terminator herself. Her goal was to eliminate a person (Dyson)

🔥👍

He is becoming Carl.

Stitches? What do you mean?

​@@ezioauditoredafirenze8352 figure of speech that means a laughing fit, laughing out loud, bursts of laughter.

Timestamp? 10:29 Nevermind, it literally started playing as soon as I hit post.

😎👍🏼 Affirmative.

He literally mentioned that in his video. Sounds like somebody just jumps to conclusions without letting a video finish.

@@JoshuahMyles LOL! Look at who's jumping to conclusions (you). I did watch the whole video; and, I know he mentioned the damage in the video. However, I was mentioning how I always believed how the eye didn't move because it was damaged. And, I believed that from back when I was a teenager (over 20 years ago). It bothered him in this video; because, he believed that it NEEDED to move; but, it didn't NEED to be "fixed." The eye moving would indicate the Arnold Terminator wasn't damaged THAT badly. However, the fact the eye was so badly damaged proves how much the Arnold Terminator took; and, how much of a sacrifice he made in order to protect John. "Fixing" the broken eye just makes it look like less of a sacrifice. Imagine someone fighting for someone else's life; and, that person's arm was so badly damaged during the fight that it didn't function anymore. Then, someone comes along and says, "Well, the arm is still attached...soooooo, it SHOULD still function." Then, he makes some video effect to make it look like a wacky-inflatable-flailing-arm man was controlling the arm. Sure, it would be funny as shite...but, it would go against the sacrifice which the damaged-arm guy made in the movie.

He just needs a vacation in some liquid metal

@@JoshuahMyles but then he pissed on it saying "well people said the same thing in my predators face video" even though here it's actually justifiable

Ah you see but Predators jaw.... and... yeah I don't know what he was on about...

Agreed, I chalked it up to being pounded in the head with a steel beam repeatedly. Perfect in-universe explanation for it.

More than likely battle damage, yes. It never took me out of the movie. I doubt many people would argue this point.

Even in the skull of the terminator the eye is pushed back so if anything the metal should be dented the eyes wouldn’t get too stuck. Maybe stiff but not stuck

Affirmative. 😎👍🏼

True

The realistic answer is no tongue to speak with

@@dynamicender The T-800 wouldn't require any of its flesh componets such as the tongue to speak. Its voice is artifically produced.

Well, we don't get arnie's voice..but in Terminator Salvation, a T-800 with no skin imitates Kyle's voice to lure Connor.

IVE ALWAYS WANTED THIS!!! A NICE ENDOSKELETON WITH ARNIES VOICE TRYING TO BLEND IN WITH REGULAR CLOTHES AND SUNGLASSES BUT FAILING HILARIOUSLY

Needs a voice box, vocal chords to speak with.

🔥👍🏼🔥 I can dig this idea.

That makes sense because when he first gets rammed, and the eye is exposed, it's turned off like it's been disconnected, but then turns back on. It's like getting rammed several times knocked something loose.

@@jonnyb.animationstutorials7119 Yeah exactly. Not really sure why the author is so bothered lol. It makes total sense for it to not be moving.

@@captainnutsack8151I think it's cool that they edited it to make it move, but it wasn't necessary at all.

Putting CGI in the original STAR WARS trilogy was sacrilege

@@stuartsutton9350 says you

@@Bakamatsu-GojiFanArchive And many other fans. What they did with Han Solo and Greedo was despicable

@@LukeLovesRose Some of the adjustments are fine, mostly to match the look of the newer films, like Cloud City having windows to feel more open, stormtroopers riding dewbacks, and the extended celebration scene after the Empire's defeat. Even the KZfaq channel FXitinpost redid Obi-Wan and Vader's fight, which is just fantastic and works so much better in relation to their Mustafar duel. But one change I never liked was Greedo firing his blaster at Han. Han shot Greedo because Greedo threatened the Millennium Falcon, not because Han needed to be shot at first.

@@Bakamatsu-GojiFanArchive Exactly. All versions of the movie should be available, like Blade Runner.

Yeah the animatronics was much cruder back then. The first movie only had a budget of 6.5 mil, a fraction of the second one's.

@@anhnhvn that's how we know time travel will never be possible. If it was, billionaire James Cameron could've gone back in time to give James Cameron, director of Piranha 2, an extra couple of million dollars to really nail it. Alas, we'll just have to be content with Terminator being one of the greatest sci-fi movies ever made but having one scene that looks bad.

you dont have to use literally... no one would mistake that with a figurative statement

@@tonypepperoni229 Literally I don't care.

Yeah, thee prosthetic head was literal cancer

For me the worst is probably the bike scene when they are chased by the truck and it's obviously two stunt guys with the same clothes that don't look like Schwarzenegger and Furlong at all.

​@@folksurvival Yeah, I think that's most ppl's "mistake". I always found it funny as a kid and paused the VHS cause I think the guy also blew his cheeks up didn't he?😅

I just thought it was a machine so didn't care about our concepts of where bikes go, bike = faster = use bike, t1000 is all about using tools it cant make so a bike would be pretty handy to increase pace and the way it drives out the window its not like it was stuck on the top floor if it needed to get down it would just go for it and get another vehicle if it broke

👍🔥

"uMmM aCtUaLlY tHe TeRmInAtOr CaN't SeLf TeRmInAtE iT wAs SaRaH wHo PuShEd ThE bUtToN, sHe TeRmInAtEd HiM! dId YoU eVeN wAtCh ThE mOvIe?!?!" I'm kidding of course even though it is true but don't you just hate those people?? 😂😂😂😂 I was so sad at the end too! The thumbs up was just awesome! 👍

Bawled*

The thing is, it only really sticks out in stills. That's how good of a job they did on T2's practical effects and editing. Whenever I watch T2, I'm never broken out of the immersion by it's effects, acting and editing. T1 has some real dodgy stuff that does take me out of the movie.

@@alekesam You mean like the Arnold Puppet? Well the budget was more limited. They could have done better but the money wasn't there. Or what else do you mean?

@@EbonyPope Sheesh. I really said that? T1 does have some dodgy prac fx but for it's budget, Jim did an outstanding job. I wonder if I was going to make another point and flubbed the delivery? As 80s prac fx goes, T1 deserves to be grouped with Robocop and Predator as outstanding movies that immerses you in their world.

Fixing his face by punching it was indeed hilarious ha ha ha

T800 lol

I agree. I'd have loved to have seen one of the skeletons chat with someone in a movie. Missed opportunity.

@@tetrasphere8165 No, it's "T a hundred"

Very simple plot, yet one of the greatest movies of all time, great characters, scenery/ effects/ sequences

And don't forget a real helicopter going under a bridge. Maybe one of the best helicopter stuntmen of his days who made this possible. I can't think of anything comparable.

That's what I always thought even as a kid in the theater when I saw the movie, I was 11 years old.

Were* your* We're = we are You're = you are P.s. don't get mad. Just trying to help.

I'm guessing it's because once they're flesh is gone, and you can see they're Endoskeletons, they stop talking because they've already been exposed, they have no reason to keep talking.

The chopper going under the bridge is an actual helicopter. And it shows. Real effects just have this texture to them that you don't get with CG.

@@EbonyPope That's more about how the CGI is done or properly integrated into the shots, more than the CGI itself. For example, the CGI in the original Jurassic Park is rudimentary compared to the CGI in Jurassic World. The CGI in Jurassic World is far more involved than Jurassic Park. In Jurassic Park, in HD you can definitely see where the texture quality falls and the addition of bump mapping exists to exaggerate more detail, whereas in Jurassic World, those smaller details can be actually modeled now to accurately interact with the CGI lighting. That's just the start of it.

@@ChrissonatorOFL Well it still looks horrible. Or was a good decision to do most shots practical and only use CGI when there was no other way. There are only few directors left that have this attitude. Christopher Nolan would be an example. No matter how good the CGI is flipping a freakin' Semi truck on screen in the Dark Knight eat one of the most impressive things I've seen in movies so far. There is nothing animated that even comes close.

@@EbonyPope Meh, the thing is, people only notice bad CGI, or CGI you know is CGI because it would be impractical to do practically.

@@ChrissonatorOFL The only CGI I find hard to notice is the one that is kept in the dark. The way it should be. As soon as you have full lighting no matter how good your CGI is it's still visible. Even in Prometheus it was obvious that the spaceships were rendered. And that was really good CG.

but that would have an effect on everything that happens during that scene, the street gets slippery, Rick would have had it much harder to help Marty, and so on. I think this would not work added afterwards, only if it was planned from the start. nice idea nontheless dude :D

Jesus I've seen that movie so many times and never thought of that...

I mean some of it was warranted, but not 7 min worth. At least 2 min

To bad I didn't have a vhs player those days, but I agree with your holy trio proposal, the studios should do a remastered Bluray pack with these movies and include their awesome second parts too! There's still so much milk from the holy trio to be milked for years to come!

Leon Furlan, Same As Man those 3 are Quality Films! I'd add these to a similar list The Thing/Escape from New York n Robocop! They're just Soooo Fuckin Cool Man! Cheers

@@timi_ro i am just amazed that nobody surpassed the feeling of those films even 35 yrs later!? With all the cgi,big budgets and big stars,still nothing comes close! I think it just shows that not all is in the budget or movie technology and big picture resolution...

@@eddysandland58 true! They tried to remake all of them,and every try was worse than the last! The Thing (2011) remake = terrible, every Terminator after 3 = disgusting , The Predator (2018) = worst movie i've ever seen ,.Prometheus/Covenant = omg , Robocop (2015?) = ufff ,and so on! Looks like it is impossible to remake them,they should'nt even try!

@@timi_ro a set of all the movies? I don't think it'd be possible since Lionsgate owns T2 (or maybe Paramount now idk) while Disney owns Alien and Predator through fox. Unless there's a special agreement but I really doubt it would happen