Excellent video - thank you for that. Maybe you should consider to show your measurements in parallel with metric units. Best regards from Berlin

You forgot to mention Tesla Autopilot is not free but $5000 option

Lol I was wondering how the low roof of the ipace beat the Tesla Greatvideo by the way I’d love to see the same comparison on the Audi ✊

@@elmaan AP is included in the base price now but it is essentially lane keep. You may be thinking of FSD and that is a $7k option.

@@elmaan The basic driver's assist features that the I-Pace offers for $3K are free in any Tesla now. For $7K, you can get FSD.

Yes and you are a awesome Jag fan unlike some others here (dont forget about superior air suspension)

@@DarkWing494 luckily the ipace doesnt cost 80k or something haha

Agreed

No argument from me. Competition drives innovation and should lead to lower priced options. In the Uk I'm waiting/hoping for the German Gigafactory to reduce European 3 and Y pricing.

Look at what BNEF says about.bnef.com/blog/battery-pack-prices-fall-as-market-ramps-up-with-market-average-at-156-kwh-in-2019/

😂😂

Design by its nature is subjective and not really quantifiable unless it is serving a particular function. Your opinion of the interior may differ from my opinion, although as a Model 3 owner I will concede there are aspects of the iPace interior I like better and I might like it a bit better overall, but I am a fan of the Model 3 spartan interior and would have a hard time giving it up; that uncluttered look works for me. On that same track, how do you want to measure "driving dynamics"? Because if you can't measure it, we're back to dueling opinions.

@BLACKVIEW USA Don't get me wrong, I'm OK with "clutter" when it serves a purpose as it would in an airplane, but this isn't even remotely close to that. The vast majority of "clutter" that's been removed by Tesla is unnecessary in an EV (tach, oil temp gauge, oil pressure gauge, turbo boost, battery/alternator voltage...), have been addressed with in the 10 driver presets for set it once and forget it (seat, mirror, steering wheel adjustments), or can be done by voice, or for some things a combination of presets and voice. And I guess I can't imagine giving af (not even a little) what "every guy in the office thinks" of what "my new gf" looks like. But that's just me.

@BLACKVIEW USA For my situation, I'd actually like to have seat heater controls accessible by the back set passengers, but I can see the value in not having them (small kids); but this seems a really small issue especially considering heated rear seats is something most cars don't even have. As for the presets, I have 3 presets set for just me in slightly different seating positions that when selected (about 1 second as well) the mirrors and the wheel automatically adjust; I don't have need (or want) for independent/dedicated mirror controls or steering wheel adjustment controls. And I disagree with your stance on voice commands. I use it nearly daily for the navigation system, and occasionally for the climate control; it's simple to use and it's very competent (and it's activated by a steering wheel button push so the mic isn't constantly open like it is for Siri, Alexa and the like). "Maybe you haven't been In a normal car recently, but they have tach, temp and fuel." I don't care about temp or tach because they're irrelevant in an EV. The last NORMAL car I owned (I'm excluding the Prius we still own as a second car that neither my wife nor I want to drive because of the Model 3) was a Subaru WRX. Driving an ICE has gotten less complicated in the recent past about what a driver needs to pay attention to, but with an EV the only data displayed on a traditional instrument cluster that's relevant to me while driving is my speed. "range and kwh" are different ways of displaying the same information and I leave with a full "tank" every morning so I don't even look at my "gas gauge" even though it's right there below the speed. What, aside from speed, do you want an EV to display? The fart noises are just silly (although based on my experience, do you know who finds the fart noises most entertaining? Well educated women. Who knew?); Netflix while sitting waiting for a ferry or waiting to pick up my wife at the airport is pretty cool.

Tesla's pretty good in this area as well, last time they did a comparison vs the Model 3 it was not a competition, like not even close, check out Motortrends for details iirc. The Model Y will probably be somewhere between the 3 and the i-Pace in nimbleness. So no, I highly doubt the I-Pace would out-handle the Model Y on the road, BUT it should be better for off-road on the other hand due to higher clearance.

Well said, Ash. The logic this guy uses would result in a Prius being more desirable than a PHEV X5. Dumb.

This is true, however the iPace base price also negates it from getting subsidies from Canada and many of the state subsidies which can also be significant. Tesla consumers can still qualify for many state and international subsidies, largely depending a base price does not exceed some limit to meet subsidy guidelines. I doubt Jaguar qualifies for many subsidies as the price is so much higher for what you get.

So they failed upwards then.

@@strykerace people don't pay sticker price for i-Pace. 20% less in many cases.

@@ckgrier2 I ordered a model 3 performance model in August 2019, delivery in 2 weeks. I found out about the I-pace, the local dealers had a surplus on their hands. Test drove the I-Pace Jag and I was sold on it. With the $7,500 federal tax credit and a very big discount the price was about the same as the Model 3. The I-Pace is a drivers car, and I can pull off the road with out damage because of the greater ground clearance. Tesla refunded my deposit in less then a week, the cars really don't compete with each other. If I drive cross country, I take my Ram pickup with camper, I can stop and camp any where, so my driving is only around the LA area and I charge at home.

Jaguar has more luxurious feel and has better fit and finish.

Blackberry had the same functionality. The jaguar does not.

and the blackberry being more expensive than the iphone.

@@rally2247 wrong

@@Tuck_Frump???

@@rally2247 Apple sucks. Tesla is so much better.

Anton Vilinskiy and then they don’t have such a Good supercharging network

Don't forget superior interior quality.

@@errorlooo8124 Thats true no CarPlay and Android Auto on Teslas. I thought it would be an issue, but now I prefer Teslas wireless setup. Native google map engine in Tesla works good and I switched to Spotify for music as soon as I learned Tesla added it, so now I got everything I need without having to plugin. I just thow my phone on the charge mat (Model Y has it stock) and go. Also keep in mind that CarPlay and android platforms are not designed for big screen, so you only have one app open at a time, while in Tesla you have both map and music open.

@@baileyryanpatrick17 Jaguar had nicer interior as far as materials went...but Tesla's minimal design feels very clean, more spacious (esp rear seats) and uncluttered. Tesla's seats are also way nicer unless you are putting up $4000 more for premium buckets in the iPace

But I bet the jag is built better.

James Franklin I did.

Are Weapons of Mass Destruction particularly affordable these days? Incredible

tombuckley91 .....or maybe disruptive?.

what

@@davidpearn5925 Ah indeed, I would very much imagine said weapon would be somewhat disruptive. Alas, I struggle to find the relevance to Tesla.

tombuckley91 so you don’t get the threat to the old world? I’m pretty sure Toyota does.

Thank you!

Until Tesla wants you in a newer car and takes features you paid for away from you. Unlike the Jaguar, you only RENT your Tesla until Elon thinks you should get a newer one. An iPhone is around $1k...a Tesla around $50k. Are you really wanting to treat your car like an iPhone?

@@billcichoke2534 oh please educate me as model3P owner what have I lost? All I know is I had so much awesome upgrade since I had the car(track mode V2 is latest rage if you haven't heard)

Ian Thomas LOL....wow. Talk about a snowflake.

Yet Tesla never have to pay for their advertising unlike all other car company because the product is clearly superior, just look at sale statics or resale value lol.

@BLACKVIEW USA already have model 3P have you even had time to update on how awesome trackmodeV2 (free and over the air!!!) Or you can just plug your ears in your denial I guess(once again check out the sales numbers that slaps in your face on "no one wants lol)

​@BLACKVIEW USA try to compare numbers in premium cars space. Dealers don't want them cause they don't need much maintenance for dealers to make their money. But hey if you truely believes in what you saying try shorting the stock now you will get 3X+ more money compare those who were shorting it at $200 dollars LOL

@BLACKVIEW USA the world is clearly leaving you behind...stuck firmly in the 19th century.

Suggestions for new cars are: Porsche Taycan, Audi E-Tron and Chevy Bolt.

Right - thank you!

Very good point. Not that the I-Pace is unsafe, but Tesla is of course safer :) no quite 10X I thought (I may miss the latest number)

@@simoc24 Yep, not 10X. Yet. But the Jaguar tested did not have 5 star safety either.

I kinda think it’s bad marketing and they just aren’t building them very quickly, I guess by choice.

He certainly was not forth coming with features the IPace had that were not even available on the Model Y when he was so detailed on the additional $6k in options you would have to add to the IPace, it's obvious this review is far from neutral, but I am sure that the majority of viewers ate Tesla fans so neutral doesn't matter anyway.

It took 12 mins for Jonathan Stewart to not mention the $7500 federal tax incentive that Jaguar. Weird that he also didn't use the Performance upgrade package specs for the Y Performance which drops the range to 280mi. Jaguar also boosted range by 8% but left EPA range alone back in January. It's still lame by comparison but it's noteworthy.

@@anthonyc8499 See my comments elsewhere under this video about key points for the Tesla that he also forgot, so that should equalize things. 😉

Thanks for the clarification. I mentioned specifically in the video that the range was with 19" wheels.

@@Cleanerwatt thanks Jonathan but barely anyone gets the Performance Y and only 27% of Model 3 buyers get FSD.

@@anthonyc8499 but they have the option of enabling anytime they'd like, they have all the hardware just need to pay the extra money!

Crazy to think that they would limit their vehicle's road capabilities to tailor it to the rare cases of off-road driving.

In the uk the only time people take their vehicles 'off road' is when they accidentally mount the curb at their local supermarket.

Nobody is going to take a $70k vehicle off-roading. That's almost laughable. That's why these high priced SUVs are a joke. The biggest among them is the Mercedes G series: $100k and you are going to scratch the paint by going off road and brush past a bush? Nope, not gonna happen. Buy a used Jeep until the Cybertruck comes out.

@@dzerres Not to mention the G series are just UGLY. Worst status symbol ever.

That's what I love about dealerships, the price depends on something, not a level field, was 7500 the Fed tax saving part of the 16k?

The range is the big factor here. Charging speed is an equal big factor. Would not even consider the i-fail.

@Tesla Dude That’s what most people hate about dealerships. 😇

@@MyUniversalUniversity No, 23500 off with the federal tax credit. There was a $6k conquest bonus for Tesla owners IIRC.

@@jay-ru-me At a total of $23,500 of sticker, at least it's getting in the realm of competitive depending on the priorities of the buyer. While the Model Y is better in just about every objective measure, even I like the look of the iPace better and could see some going for it for this reason (even though I know that look diminishes its interior space and wreaks havoc with its efficiency).

It's probably not possible with the current battery tech as the price of the battery is too high but Musk has hinted that a

@@MrArtist7777 Price has dropped. Tesla is very close to $100 KWh...

I would love a small 2nd car just to commute to work; only 16 miles each way. Take Little un the 1.4 miles, (each way: walk when weather is ok), to nursery when the weather is inclement. £15,000 would be a nice price. Don't need FSD or any of that stuff.

@@user-jt1jv8vl9r If you`re in EU there`s now Skoda citigo EV, its pretty much VW e-up so...decent range and nice little car... Price with incentives is also affordable too... Don`t know why there isn't anything like that in US tho...

@@user-jt1jv8vl9r Then why not look into a used leaf or something? With your requirements, even a poorly maintained leaf with severe battery degradation would be more than enough.

nonsense

Thanks for catching that. The Model Y Does indeed have +1.3 inches more headroom in the rear.

2nd3rd1st at this moment. I agree he should have mentioned it, but he should make it clear that the model y will have an option for towing soon just like the model 3 didn’t have it at the very beginning

@@neobow1 But the Y doesn't even have a point on the body to attach a tow bar, i'm curious how Tesla would fix that

2nd3rd1st they will add it. In fact there are photos online of a model y test car with a tow hitch

@@neobow1 Ah very good, ty

2nd3rd1st as of today you can order the model y with a tow hitch :)

Thanks for the kind words and the suggestion.

Drag races fun to view, but spec comparison is pretty accurate and easy.

For the price, a used i-Pace is a sweet deal. Even Model 3 is dropping in price. www.cargurus.com/Cars/price-trends/Tesla-m112

who will buy such a costly model y then whos interior is so shit. In real world people will accept certain quality from the model y if they are paying too much money as air suspension cost 15000 dollars alone ( its one of the most costly equipments in a car)

@@golupandey1006 $15000 for an air suspensions? Is that made in Mars. You can get an aftermarket air suspensions for 3-4k now.

@@rj8u you dont get what is put on luxury vehicles, better search before commenting. you can also get pretty much anything on after market but they 3rd grade compared to equipment used in luxury cars. you are educated enough to search that.

@@golupandey1006 Get back to me when you can actually buy or drive a Tesla before commenting on a car you have experienced 👍. Only stupid person would pay $15000 for an air suspensions 🙉 may be you should be the one educate your self.

@@rj8u that doesnt change anything

The model y is also offroad capable.

@@odisy64 Yeah, but with the the higher clearance of the I-Pace and the air suspension, the I-Pace certainly has an advantage for off-road applications.

@@toddwright662 clearance is important but traction control is also and i believe tesla has the best slip detection and output timing. But this only matters on steep surfaces with snow or ice which you dont always encounter but you also dont always require a huge ground clearance if the trail is somewhat even. I offroad in my jeep and its not always the same situation on most trails.

@@odisy64 Fair enough. I don't offroad so I'll take your word and experience for it. I'm in agreement with you that Tesla is likely to have better traction control. I assumed greater ground clearance would be a significant positive factor; maybe somewhat less so than I thought.

@@toddwright662 in some trails, ground clearance is the most important thing so in some situations the I-Pace will do better and go where the tesla cant. But both cars will do miserably in a trail that maxes out my jeeps capabilities so consider them both light offroaders but something like a cybertruck would totally shit on my jeep in nearly all conditions except for turn radius and approach/departure angles.

There is no Air suspension option on the Model Y.

It's a fan vid. I love my Tesla, but many of the finer points were missed in favor of the Y. If the Jag/E-Tron are in the budget, everyone should test drive them too.

@@usamericans6045 Yeah, I think the Y is the clear winner regardless, but the video fails to compare styling, interior, road noise, handling characteristics... all things a Jaguar customer would be interested in. In the interest of impartiality those should have been included.. though to be fair, most of those are subjective anyway.

Good Idea.

I just added this Correction to the comments (pinned) and description - thanks: The Model Y has +1.3 inches more headroom in the rear (not less as I accidentally put in the chart and mentioned in the video).

Given recent Tesla price reductions, my comment was way off.

I saw one for real the other day in a car park. They look a lot better in the photos. Looks like something heavy dropped onto it.

CGI effects :)

Because their motor is more efficient and their software manages the batteries much better.

Tesla built a more efficient car there are a million little ways to reduce your electricity consumption. The biggest things are probably the motor's efficiency the temperature management system and the amount of wiring in the car (oh and more weight). A stat I heard was that the model 3 had over a mile of wiring inside the car and the model y got that number down to 300 yards. The I-pace also has the disadvantage of being less efficient which means they have to have a bigger battery pack to increase the range which in turn makes the car weigh more which makes it less efficient. Inefficiencies compound and make the car bad.

shuriken48 that’s a big part of it I am sure

The battery chemistry plays a huge role. Tesla has been improving it for some time. I'm not a battery expert so I can't quite explain how it works...

The aero on the i-Pace was crippled at the earliest stage of the design by the insistence of using a Marque defining ICE grill! The rest is just less talented engineering. Watch their pre-production PR promotional boasting videos. Hilarious!

Cross Trek is 8.7 inch clearance. I-Pace adjusts up to 11.

Range and charging speed make the I-fail the dog!

*@MondoTV* -- Tesla's terms of use and warranty statements clearly point out their effectiveness while a car is in service during its lifetime. That _'lifetime'_ ends when aTesla vehicle receives its Death Certificate in the form of a Salvage Title. Tesla has no control of that. The Insurance Company that appraises a vehicle after a wreck determines that it is a _'total loss',_ and part of paying the claim on an insurance policy is seeing to it the car is reported as non operational. The final step is the application of a Salvage Title to said vehicle. Tesla has no obligation whatsoever to offer services of any sort to Salvaged vehicles. Their responsibilty ends the moment a Salvage Title is generated. The vehicle no longer has access to any of the services that were applied to it in the hands of its original owner, who purchased it from Tesla. Anyone who chooses to purchase a Salvaged Tesla from a junkyard auction is rolling the dice. Tesla employs no mechanism to recertify or resurrect a dead car. Nor should they. Just as Ford has nothing to do with the circa 1927 Model T cars that were chopped, modified, and converted into T-Bucket Dragster Hotrods running Chevrolet small blocks decades later.

redxsage Right. But they also shouldn’t have the right to disable features remotely in the interests of “safety” - what are they - the safety police? Your Mom? They really don’t want you resurrecting old cars because it affects their bottom line - one less Tesla on the road means one more sold. It’s also anti- environmental, an EV without DC fast charging is essentially useless - so that embedded carbon will now go to waste. The more the get like Apple the less I like them.

musinclind37 so you’ve driven an iPace and your opinion is it’s a dog? Sound like you put a lot of thought into that.