The Premier League have voted to make a huge change to the spending power of the big clubs. Is it too Draconian and could it destroy the league? Mark Goldbridge has his say on the latest football news.
Пікірлер: 1 300
@ashspeaks118 күн бұрын
Am I the only one thinking Mark completely missed the point here? The current system isnt sustainable and the other leagues arent spending anything near close to what Premier league clubs are spending.
@wankerflaps18 күн бұрын
yeah, premier league teams in particular are inflating prices in football way too much. I think it'll be good for the economic stability of the industry
@robertelliott221618 күн бұрын
Yep he is a hyperbolic click baiter.
@WistiPurpleday18 күн бұрын
Real spends like 800 mil a year on these matters. So the english top clubs are now around half of what the spanish top clubs are in spending power. This is not a transfer budget. It Transfer, Salary, Agents fees, Staff Salary. This is a massive massive cap on the league, Real already spend 40 mil more on wages a year than City who is the top english wage spender so do Bayern so you are also just lying.
@drchunkybiscuit997318 күн бұрын
Yep, you're the only one. 🤭
@whyme00718 күн бұрын
@@wankerflaps Yup and this is how Rashford gets a $100M price tag. It's crazy how inflated the English players' market values are. It's not sustainable
@AJure818 күн бұрын
You should be happy, surely United wouldn't risk throwing 100m at a player like Antony again
@iam_kxylee18 күн бұрын
Why does Man Utd always spend a lot of money on shitty players ??😂😂😂
@murasame145018 күн бұрын
@@iam_kxylee Well to be fair they also spend a lot on good players like Casemiro. Not saying that it was a good deal. United just throws out money like it's nothing.
@davidsaville523918 күн бұрын
@murasame1450 Personally, I think Manchester United overpaid on Casimero for the length of contract!!
@Mufcw199918 күн бұрын
@@iam_kxylee called having John Murtough and Richard Arnold as recruitment. They’re bankers, didn’t have a clue what they were doing.
@murasame145018 күн бұрын
@@davidsaville5239 Yeah, I said it was not a good deal they made, but they still got a good player out of it.
@djolo514018 күн бұрын
If city votes no, i vote yes, simple
@alfiemorris228218 күн бұрын
I couldn't agree more if 115 says no then we should say yes
@Sliptz.0518 күн бұрын
@@alfiemorris2282 but united said no aswell lol
@MC-ie8xl18 күн бұрын
lol United said no too dummie
@Rainer-mr18 күн бұрын
Haha what a 🤡
@alfiemorris228218 күн бұрын
@@MC-ie8xl United were city before city dominated the league of course they gonna say no they want their glory back
@stephenandrews131817 күн бұрын
Missing the point entirely. Newcastle (your example) can’t dramatically increase spending because the % of income overrides the anchoring.
@user-gh7mi2nj4i17 күн бұрын
Correct
@amko12318 күн бұрын
If city are against it you know its good
@JonWPK18 күн бұрын
Ain’t that the truth
@iam_kxylee18 күн бұрын
115 Charges FC
@user-xw3vi4nk2y18 күн бұрын
Wrong. This will destroy the league.
@multipl318 күн бұрын
And Uniturd
@BigDeyum18 күн бұрын
@@iam_kxyleecry
@ha04Rry18 күн бұрын
this is undeniably a good thing mark. i think you’re just a bit scared United are going to get left behind now they can’t outspend smaller clubs
@Jake97x18 күн бұрын
Exactly!!!!
@Triple_X_X18 күн бұрын
And he's scared Prem will lose their FAKE top spot
@Amberle7318 күн бұрын
You'd think united fans would be all for it with the amount of money they've wasted on bang average players 😂
@cyberturkey7718 күн бұрын
No he's scared City have already spent enough so it doesn't matter now City will win every year because no club can come close to their spending,
@ps5andstuffhere18 күн бұрын
Might help them by accident. Maybe stop buying 80 million pound dogshit players like Antony lol
@lezsmith667518 күн бұрын
He’s just obsessed with Man City
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
But yet he Claims he doesn’t care about city
@Silence876617 күн бұрын
Obviously. There was no issue when Man U was dominate.
@ervinschrodinger868118 күн бұрын
Clubs against spending cap:- City, United and Villa What was Villa planning to do? 😮
@atikurrahman930418 күн бұрын
Villa has are hella rich. They get in the top 4 consistently and they will spend big.
@DomNUFC99018 күн бұрын
@@atikurrahman9304they can’t tho cos of ffp. They are literally in the same position as us (Newcastle) We have owners who want to spend big but can’t
@brianharley645218 күн бұрын
U do know villa have one of the richest owners in world football 😂
@davetherave156418 күн бұрын
U do know Newcastle have the richest? More than the prem combined 😂
@Cairo200418 күн бұрын
@@DomNUFC990the new rulse are replacing ffp
@joelweber518 күн бұрын
This is the boring side of football that's very important
@philbobaggins9718 күн бұрын
Mark, you cant moan about the PL being uncompetitive and boring last week and then moan about this which will bring every team closer together. This is a brilliant move. Also the limits which will be set will still be more than 99% of European clubs can afford so i dont see the PL being outspent
@bet365profitsdaily18 күн бұрын
He just does it for the views. Do not trust this guy😂
@YodaSkywalker17 күн бұрын
If the new system is implemented it will give city and some other clubs the extra incentive to leave and join the super league
@paulorganisation117 күн бұрын
Do you know the meaning of moaning?
@Hello-wy2px17 күн бұрын
@@paulorganisation1do you?
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
@@YodaSkywalkerstop them then? Why do you act like they can’t do anything the prem could ban them if they do that plus the uk government is pssinh a law that would stop clubs from joining a super league.
@jasonali412218 күн бұрын
Man U's biggest problem is that they waste shed-loads of cash on duff players.
@xxxalgotshxxx18 күн бұрын
True
@garlic_bread476917 күн бұрын
Duff beer
@garlic_bread476917 күн бұрын
Duff beer ha
@SweptDust534018 күн бұрын
Delete this Mark, seriously because you’ve reported it completely wrong, Newcastle won’t be able to spend more than 85%. For a man who bigs himself up for integrity this is really egregious
@tristanramsaroop977618 күн бұрын
He doesn’t have an actual clue it’s hilarious and all the plastic fake United fans clammed and agree with him 😂
@noqualityassured517118 күн бұрын
The worst part is there’s people who believe everything he says like gospel even though he has no clue about anything
@user-xw3vi4nk2y18 күн бұрын
Isnt the 85% rule only applicable to clubs in UEFA competitions?
@mymemories92518 күн бұрын
If a massive club like Liverpool agreed? Then im not bothered about man utd in the mud and tinpot man city overspending as usual .Then im with the other teams including spurs, west ham etc! This was needed
@user-xw3vi4nk2y18 күн бұрын
@@mymemories925 because John Henry wants to pocket extra cash dividends out of club.
@jeffbeasley828318 күн бұрын
European clubs on average spend less than midtable and even some relegation clubs in England. So this only hurts the biggest clubs really and is a massive help to the other 99% of clubs. I didn't expect a United fan to want it so not surprised your overreacting like this
@WistiPurpleday18 күн бұрын
The problem here is that you are gonna be losing out on big players. City now now have around half the spending power of Real because of this cap.
@jeffbeasley828318 күн бұрын
@WistiPurpleday again it seems like only City and United would be adversely affected. Everyone else either nothing changes or its a big help, unless you think teams should spend more than 400 million per window
@Hello-wy2px17 күн бұрын
Wouldnt this corrupt the Premier League even more in the eyes of other leagues? The only reason the Prem is seen as the best league in the world now is because they have so much money and spending power, so all they do is buy the best talents from other leagues and so on. With the new system, more clubs will be able to spend more money, only adding fuel to the fire no? Now instead of only the top teams throwing money around, the majority of the league will have that ability.
@McElvisss17 күн бұрын
It won't benefit the smaller clubs when they spend way more than they can afford and they start going bust. Then everyone will be crying.
@BullRadu17 күн бұрын
@@Hello-wy2px the premier league is corrupt to the bone, what are you on about? where there is big money, there is corruption and that's why you never seen any scandals in bundesliga like you've seen in serie a, premier league and laliga
@mrclegg12317 күн бұрын
The fact this guy is saying £450m isn't enough is scary. 99% of the other clubs in the world can't spend a 10th of that
@kev599518 күн бұрын
Will Mark ever stop crying about City? No. If it was United winning 6/7 leagues you would not be crying about them.
@skylar774018 күн бұрын
I support anything that makes the game fairer and stops clubs buying or cheating their way to success.
@samuelkoomson601718 күн бұрын
Like the Ferguson era?
@CamFields9418 күн бұрын
@@samuelkoomson6017 How?
@MarkWalmsley17 күн бұрын
@@samuelkoomson6017how did you get that from what he said? Most of us including me want football to be fair. I don't want a ref to not give fouls and cards because "he's trying to keep his hands in his pockets" only to the have the get get out of hand and begin to give out ridiculous cards. I want decisions to be fair even if it goes against my club. I want there to be something like goal line technology for throw ins and corners and often those decisions are wrong and we all know a corner often leads to a goal. I also don't want teams taking the Mick with shell companies over paying players and managers (and likely refs) so one team completely takes over. Some of the best games are small teams Vs each other. Its sport, it's meant to be fair and it's being ruined by money in many different areas.
@skylar774017 күн бұрын
@@samuelkoomson6017 I'm not a Utd fan however, I am a football fan. We need a league where ALL teams have a chance to win titles and trophies and to qualify for European competitions. All we get now is City winning virtually everything every single season and the bottom teams taking it in turns to get relegated and this shows something is wrong. No team should be winning the title every season.
@AintNoWaye17 күн бұрын
arsenal fan 😂😂😂
@johnsimmonds587618 күн бұрын
Didn’t bother UTD fans what they had the best Manager, best squad, biggest revenue and bought all the best players! Hypocrites!!!
@IR1717171717 күн бұрын
The question isn't "why are these fans for or against it?", the question is "should all fans be for or against it?" Some people will be in favour of unfair things that benefit them. So what? Who cares? How does that get us anywhere closer to the truth?
@leespn439617 күн бұрын
UTD didn't do 115...
@mickfoskett662917 күн бұрын
We earnt it,didn't buy it!🤬👹
@sambog263516 күн бұрын
@@IR17171717has to be the most pointless comment ever!
@dhirshg16 күн бұрын
Hate them but United earned it!!!
@hansegiltaanevig750018 күн бұрын
You missed the point: The current FFP will continue as is, but the anchoring will come into effect only for the clubs have very high revenue. This will have no implication for clubs like Newcastle or Brentford, only Man. City and perhaps Man. United as of now. The % of revenue will still limit the spend for all other clubs.
@timp441717 күн бұрын
Completely correct. He needs to make another video correcting this one.
@MrFrosti314 күн бұрын
Absolutely correct
@jonathandonohue994214 күн бұрын
He works for talksport are you surprised he's spreading false information?
@calinho768914 күн бұрын
This will have implications on clubs like Brentford as they will now be able to spend 85% of their revenue.
@hansegiltaanevig750011 күн бұрын
@@calinho7689 My point is that the anchoring rule will only have an effect on Man. City's and (perhaps) Man. United's spending. The 85% rule will be what will limit other clubs' spending.
@medveten18 күн бұрын
Nobody complained during the Man U or Arsenal eras of dominance.
@makavelismith18 күн бұрын
Why would they? Self-sustaining clubs.
@joebarnes10018 күн бұрын
Arsenal have never been dominant, never won the league back to back and never won the champions league.
@goonerboz602318 күн бұрын
@@joebarnes100arsenal were the first team to the win the league three times in a row in the 1930s
@joebarnes10018 күн бұрын
@@goonerboz6023 I don't think the original comment was referring to the 30s.
@goonerboz602318 күн бұрын
@@joebarnes100 you said they never won the league consecutively I was just pointing out you were wrong that's all
@peterm754818 күн бұрын
We desperately need a salary cap to help out the smaller and the promoted clubs to survive in the PL.
@calinho768914 күн бұрын
And to make the whole competition more competitive. In theory this would make the prem even more exciting in the long run. I see the biggest issue in the big clubs potentially leaving the prem for a super league.
@robertilardi629018 күн бұрын
It's called a salary cap just like the NFL.
@Bushcampbros24618 күн бұрын
And premiership rugby
@WistiPurpleday18 күн бұрын
No it is not. This is how much you can spend on transfers. "Salary" cap. Is how much you can give players in "salary" hench the name salary cap.
@dylthomas100518 күн бұрын
@@WistiPurpleday Its not that either. Its spending entirely, on wages, agent fees, transfers etc. Its spending as a whole, not on just one particular aspect.
@Bushcampbros24618 күн бұрын
@@dylthomas1005 it kinda is
@robertilardi629018 күн бұрын
@@WistiPurpleday Are you upset by it?
@lumbago.is.serious18 күн бұрын
it’s not the end of the premier league because smaller clubs get a chance to compete against the bigger clubs and be up there fighting for europe and maybe the league
@Triple_X_X18 күн бұрын
It's the end of your huge financial cheating against the true authentic leagues ..Now the leagues with legit integrity will rise up and even more with the new champions league money
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
@@Triple_X_Xhere AGAIN!! Do you watch every single channel that covers English football??
@lumbago.is.serious18 күн бұрын
@@Triple_X_X im not man city fan mate im a burnley fan so you saying burnley are financially cheating?
@Triple_X_X18 күн бұрын
@@GIBBO4182i can sense the fear in your voice .. You're scared of Prem losing its FAKE top spot
@voight-kampff361118 күн бұрын
That's the theoretical story of corruption. Real practice is that big clubs are getting stronger.
@Will528118 күн бұрын
Fixing PGMOL is the first priority, PGMOL is the only thing killing EPL now
@nicklasaxelsson7118 күн бұрын
We need to take off city from pgmol
@samuelkoomson601718 күн бұрын
@@nicklasaxelsson71like the Ferguson era?
@TottoHolm17 күн бұрын
@@samuelkoomson6017 Exactly. Both of them lmao.
@meentage17 күн бұрын
We just need to remove city from the epl then everything would be better
@g8le16 күн бұрын
It clearly isn't, the economic model of the Prem isn't sustainable.
@ryanroberts292118 күн бұрын
Good luck to the clubs with stupidly high wages
@jared_slouch39518 күн бұрын
Mark is just upset that his new Sugar Daddy at United can't spend huge. Claims to be a football commentator of the people but was completely wet at the idea of Qatar taking over his club.
@LetsBeHonestImAPrat11 күн бұрын
They can spend 400 million a year, that’s a ton of money
@Petersworld7718 күн бұрын
The new limit applies per year to football related wages + agents fees + player transfer amortisation, not what they can spend every summer as you initially said. Not just players either, mangers & coaching staff also included.
@royalblue485218 күн бұрын
I remember ferrari complaining over the f1 spending caps
@WhoMadeThisBurger6918 күн бұрын
Yeah well, if you have infinite money and still can’t win, maybe just let it happen right.
@chrisf.959517 күн бұрын
How did this end for them?
@calinho768914 күн бұрын
And still formula 1 is dominated by a single constructor, Red Bull. So this certainly isn‘t the solution to all problems.
@insertgenericusernamehere240218 күн бұрын
Odd seeing chelsea abstain and Villa against it...
@thefenian3218 күн бұрын
This is just a way of stopping City from being annihilated by the 115. Brush it under the rug with new shiny rules.
@TWOScottRage18 күн бұрын
Yep, i thought the same. But they still voted against it.
@sterlingmarshel629917 күн бұрын
not even close - it will help reign overspenders like city and manu
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
No but ok
@thefenian3217 күн бұрын
@@TWOScottRage Easy to vote against something you know is going to pass and you are in the minority. Adds to the facade that they are against it when in reality, they will get to spend millions when the rules are applied to them as Mark mentioned in the video.
@sambog263516 күн бұрын
the dirty cheats will get away with it!!
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
FFP isn’t working as it is. Glad to try something new
@kirkham11118 күн бұрын
Just scrap it all
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
@@kirkham111then Man City and Newcastle just outspend everyone and win everything
@alexchoo719018 күн бұрын
@@GIBBO4182United and Chelsea have out spend everyone what have they won.😂
@dylanDR18 күн бұрын
@@alexchoo7190 😂😂😂 cooked
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
@@alexchoo7190 this would potentially be outspending teams by an astronomical amount. Not £200-300m over a decade
@nikhilprasad811517 күн бұрын
I live in the US and am a Man U fan, this is a great thing. Never understood the goal of mid table teams like Brentford/Bournmouth who can never get European football. This helps with parity and makes the league more interesting
@sambog263516 күн бұрын
do not turn football into nfl!! nfl clubs just move location if they want 😂😂😂 ridiculous! u probably want a tv break every 2 minutes and everyone has to wear marshmallow suits n helmets
@wa5x5on18 күн бұрын
Thats actually decreses the chance of a super league Mark. The only way the SL can gain support is if prem clubs continue buying every talent from all the leagues and the fans get fed up with it. PL basically have to do this and put a leash on its clubs to stop the SL from gaining popularity.
@exeter198517 күн бұрын
The proposal doesn't work because Premier League clubs aren't competing solely against other Premier League clubs. They also compete in International Competitions. Here in the states, NFL clubs are only competing against other NFL clubs.
@xCestLaVie117 күн бұрын
It ruins the experience for fans. Majority of fans root for larger clubs. It really blows to see your club have the potential to do more but is stunted. Also how your larger club brings in more viewership and the smaller clubs benefit from that already.
@virupakshawalla573417 күн бұрын
I would break away and make a super league if I was a big club 😮
@Bert-lw1ot18 күн бұрын
FFP hasn’t worked! Something had to change
@ajcgolf6918 күн бұрын
Spending isn’t just about transfers, it includes wages, rent, all the costs of a club
@GamingExplorerMike18 күн бұрын
I support liverpool, and if it makes competition closer, that's great. Pointless teams spend most money wins, not a sport.
@marineboy196416 күн бұрын
The problem is when qualification to European football, it is really complicated you are capped even more
@ianbehennah661818 күн бұрын
He didn’t mind when Utd dominated.
@Jake97x18 күн бұрын
Isak owns van de ven
@kylephaneuf997517 күн бұрын
Basically Mark wants a communist system where everything is equal regardless of merit, as opposed to a capitalist system where good performance and management is rewarded.
@calinho768914 күн бұрын
Seems to be working just fine in American sports.
@rael199917 күн бұрын
I like the idea because it makes the league a lot more competitive. The big problem is all the best players wouldn't come to the Premiership. So all of a sudden we wouldn't be competitive in Europe anymore.
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
Where would they go? No one else can realistically compete
@rael199917 күн бұрын
@@StrikeBolteafc ...If wages significantly dropped in England they'd obviously go abroad to clubs offering more and it wouldn't need to be the ridiculous levels we have now if there was a huge drop in England.
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
@@rael1999 that doesn’t answer my question what clubs would be able to compete
@dhirshg16 күн бұрын
@@StrikeBolteafc Saudi!!!
@StrikeBolteafc15 күн бұрын
@@dhirshg true but that affects every European league not just the prem. also do you think Saudi will realistically pass the prem? They have bought lots of players yet with they still aren’t that popular. They are the biggest in Asia not doubt but won’t be able to compete with the European teams
@giventema400917 күн бұрын
Mark in all honesty you a hypocrite when man United was I bet u were not complaining man United is a giant if we removed man United the league would be better. If u were I fully agree with currently other wise you just pushing your ego.
@thundavolt18 күн бұрын
This is good because it could force the top clubs to share more TV revenue with the bottom clubs. This also makes the Championship more valuable. The other leagues are so top heavy that it won’t help them at all.
@andrewwright419518 күн бұрын
People are paying more to watch it on TV disgusting
@xCestLaVie117 күн бұрын
So the top clubs put in more work to bring in more revenue, it is a genius idea to punish hard work 😂 decades of work so bournmouth fans don't get their feelings hurt.
@alphamale369215 күн бұрын
How about we force your parents and you to donate half of your income to homeless people?
@andrewwright419515 күн бұрын
@@alphamale3692 why would we do that when they would use it for drugs
@alphamale369215 күн бұрын
You missed the point bro
@y2k42y2k4218 күн бұрын
Its Turkeys voting for Christmas with this anchorage system. The Premier league is going to kill the very best product it helped create with these restrictions. The Americans owners are going to kill our game. Next they will suggest no relegation.
@SWJ_18 күн бұрын
🎯💯👏
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
This is good it makes the game more competitive
@turboOdkurzacz18 күн бұрын
Completely misunderstood what is being proposed. The revenue cap will be applied first, clubs will not be able to spend more regardless of the anchor.
@OffMetaProfessor17 күн бұрын
This rules change won't hurt Man City much at all, Man City already don't spend the most on transfers and still win due to being a better run club, with a better manager and better team set up. Arsenal, Man Utd and Chelsea have all spent more than City over the last 5 years etc.
@DavidRegaL-lw5xz17 күн бұрын
The thing is his supporters here mostly Liverpool fans are just delusionally obsessed with City because of repeatedly falling short of them..they don't realise Utd's have actually spent more and taken the most advantage since the 90s and if Utd finally get it right through wasting so much money it will be them and City competing just like 2012,2013 and 2018 with Liverpool and Arsenal no were near.
@sambog263516 күн бұрын
better run club ahhhhh 😂😂😂 wtf u been smoking? everything city has achieved last few years is from cheating!! dirty scumbags!! and u acting like is from being well run 😂😂😂😂
@MadchesterM19USA18 күн бұрын
I don't remember the squwarking and belly aching between 1993 and 2010. I wonder what has changed
@ianroberts808918 күн бұрын
Seems people forget that man City having the most money now, is the same as man utd having the most money in the 90's hypocrisy at its finest. Not a City fan!!
@dhirshg16 күн бұрын
Hate them both but you can't compare apples and oranges! City are now actually trying to buy class, history and pedigree - let alone trophies. Laughable. No credibility.
@calinho768914 күн бұрын
Well that was because United earned their spot. City was just lucky they were bought up by a country.
@sunepba18 күн бұрын
Finally the league will be more competitive and the so call big club cant bully the small clubs. If any club want to be competitive, will need top manager and best recruitment team
@kajonblackwood804917 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@obinnamadichie17 күн бұрын
Delete this comment 😂😂😂
@sunepba17 күн бұрын
@@obinnamadichie maybe u dont know how market works dude. At the moment so call small teams can't spent more because of FFP. Look at the newcastle, richest club in EPL but they still can't spent because of restrictions where as clubs like united Arsenal city can spent without any issue. So if from next season spending cap remain fixed for all the clubs, then clubs like everton, forest, villa, newscastle will burn cash too without the worry of point deductions.
@Marais-cu3vo12 күн бұрын
Basically Goldbridge is upset that other teams can spend as much as Man United.
@zahir956216 күн бұрын
As a Liverpool fan it doesn’t really affect me much tbh, we won’t be spending 300M on bench warmers every season, it’s a W for me🤷🏾♂️
@SWJ_18 күн бұрын
Spending cap = more dividends for owners and share-holders. I’d rather as much money stays within the game as possible.
@roberteast682218 күн бұрын
Let’s give it go. Better than the current situation.
@luisteixeira980617 күн бұрын
I don’t understand how you can complain about city having an amazing team, when united spent even more on terrible players and coaches
@grsmustard913918 күн бұрын
Clubs used to be about supporters being part of something that united them, to play football and other sports. And that's what it should be about. Now its about money, money, money and different philosophies on how to spend it.
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
It’s always been about money. The “golden age” of serie a in the 90s was full with owners using at as a money laundering scheme. Take of your nostalgia lens and realise it’s always been like this
@Diogo8515 күн бұрын
It's always been about money, you just didn't see it that way back then.
@grsmustard913914 күн бұрын
@@Diogo85 You don't know what you are talking about.
@grsmustard913914 күн бұрын
@@StrikeBolteafc You don't know what you are talking about.
@StrikeBolteafc14 күн бұрын
@@grsmustard9139 explain how then. Enlighten me and don’t just say you don’t know what you are talking about that’s not debunking anything
@sandwormgod477118 күн бұрын
I'm all for fairness, but City already have the advantage. Their owners have already spent over and above their income, and are now in a position to cash in on that spending. The Premier League have cocked this up again as usual.
@karlomatovina315618 күн бұрын
What are you talking about? City never spent more above their income, not even once. I dont know where you saw that, but it is clearly false information. Bias toward City by media once again
@DavidRegaL-lw5xz17 күн бұрын
Yeah blame everything on City..lol
@jimbo605917 күн бұрын
Yes, they need to get done for 115 befire the end of the season. I would say do a rangers on them.
@madeinengland948817 күн бұрын
@@jimbo6059 that’s not gonna happen though Man City bring too much money into the league and this is bad for all English clubs competing in Europe
@jimbo605917 күн бұрын
indeed it is I agree. corrupt
@muhammadhamzazafar690317 күн бұрын
When anything is related to Man United, Mark absolutely loses it. he is a great spokesperson when he is neutral and its not about his club. however when man united is in the picture, he just completely becomes contradictory
@OffMetaProfessor17 күн бұрын
If there's a club in the championship or league 1 with a low budget of say 25m, then they manage to get promoted to the prem, does every team have to sell half their squads? Like, wtf are these stupid rules, the premire league would either have to rapidly change the rules again or purposfully try to stop clubs like that being promoted.
@charlieknight743118 күн бұрын
This is good for avoiding cheating. However, teams like Burnley and Bournemouth and Wolves can not be completed with Arsenal City and Liverpool because that's stupid, and English teams will struggle to complete in Europe.
@neurosurgeon126117 күн бұрын
Compete!! Sorry to pointed out.
@Mike-ro8oh18 күн бұрын
Wouldnt Arsenal & Liverpool also have a higher limit yet they voted it in ? i guess it depends on how classy your club is
@ChoCho-db4zo18 күн бұрын
Arsenal already have young squad ready to compete and they didnt need spend so much money meanwhile the biggest loser of course its united
@DavidC117 күн бұрын
will benefit all teams in the long run
@colupton741518 күн бұрын
Pretty sure this is all leading to Man city getting away with their 115 charges...
@TheBillABCTV18 күн бұрын
All clubs should be able to spend what they like.
@rijoytalang128418 күн бұрын
1.4 billion in 2year that is incane revanue for a club
@circle286717 күн бұрын
imagine a man utd fan saying they are fighting with their hands tied behind their back. lol lets just forget how much arsenal and man utd spend every window
@ElainaMaruyama17 күн бұрын
If 115 City are against it then I'm for it. Plain and simple.
@kennedynjenga49218 күн бұрын
What about when Manchester United were winning titles
@chrismcgregor27217 күн бұрын
Why not just cap all PL clubs spending to the HIGHEST clubs revenue?? That way owners that want to boost their lower revenue, with their own money, can. It also stops the top revenue clubs getting too far ahead, but they arent being screwed over. Using the lowest revenue is just stupid. It weakens the PL's most powerful assets.
@Silence876617 күн бұрын
Next! There was no problem when Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal was dominant. Next please.
@Mikey7218215 күн бұрын
*This is great news for the Premier League, too much inequality. Obviously fans of the biggest clubs will hate this, because its alot more competition!*
@Chall118 күн бұрын
Good. Stops them overspending! Spend within your means and start having a more competitive league!
@WistiPurpleday18 күн бұрын
450 mil a year on everything football related is really low. Real is allowed to spend like 800. So its not gonna be competitive it gonna make England a worse league. So maybe you are right more competitive because they are making it Italy and will be overtaken by other leagues when they can't keep players soon.
@Chall118 күн бұрын
@WistiPurpleday For me, it isn't how much you spend. It's the way in which you spend what you have. And if you haven't got the money, then you sell to buy. That's what we do in the lower leagues, so why can't the so-called elite? You also have your youth academy and your loanees to fill on the bench if you can't buy extra.
@bna91918 күн бұрын
@@Chall1spending isn't just transfers. If what Wist said is true then it would make the league more competitive by making the top teams worse. It would be better to have the top teams remain at the level they are at and try to give the teams below more of a chance
@StrikeBolteafc17 күн бұрын
@@WistiPurpledaynot they sent where did you get from? They can not spend 800 mil every year
@WistiPurpleday17 күн бұрын
@@StrikeBolteafc That is literally what they are allowed to spend by the spanish rules yes. Read more and talk less about stuff you know nothing about thank you.
@pandeleeds00718 күн бұрын
Total spending cap is actually brilliant
@xxxalgotshxxx18 күн бұрын
Is good for Man U because they spend lots of money for trash players
@Larry4life18 күн бұрын
This really reeks of tears. Please stop it. This is the level, and it's been this way for at least the last 5 years. Grow and adapt.
@progress2success40217 күн бұрын
Why is everyone so bothered about the premier league keeping its status as the best league while languishing in the bottom half of it every year with no chance of ever breaking into Europe? When I was a kid the Italian league was number one and we still had plenty of class players from around the world.
@jamiehayes588818 күн бұрын
I am a liverpool fan , BLOODY GOOD JOB I want villa i want burnley too all be given a fair shout . Its now a farmers league its become like F1 the richer you are the better you are . Its bollox should be about youth and managers getting tge bedt out if there players
@geordietoonforlife.115518 күн бұрын
Well said Jamie 👍👏👏👏we want a competitive league not just for the few.
@robbojnr2718 күн бұрын
its always been that way you clown
@samuelkoomson601718 күн бұрын
Like when Liverpool were dominating?
@jamiehayes588818 күн бұрын
@samuelkoomson6017 wasn't entirely financial reasons for domination tho was it ? Liverpool earnt the right just like utd did in the 90s Now teams exploit the ruled just like city and Chelsea, small clubs just throwing money left right and centre and although that is happening Liverpool are still competing.
@xCestLaVie117 күн бұрын
@@jamiehayes5888liverpool spend, stop pretending they're a small club. So delusional 😂
@martinhowes357818 күн бұрын
I think it's a good idea it means all teams are on an even start. Plus maybe the clubs will reduce ticket prices so its more affordable to go as they don't need as much revenue
@bna91918 күн бұрын
Why would teams willingly decrease their revenue if their costs remain the same?
@priddeygoodfitness056718 күн бұрын
Mark in the video you rambled on that that isn’t what you would do to change things so what would you do to change things?
@suhailjamil390918 күн бұрын
Also a huge point being missed here is: if all clubs can spend a certain amount based off the bottom club revenue, then let’s say Mbappe or a similar player was available on the market for £200m would he go to Bournemouth or Everton or even Man Utd (lol) or rather go to Liverpool/City/Arsenal? Surely spending is directly correlated to which player is available and which club he prefers to go to otherwise spending over a clubs revenue on overpriced average players will defeat the objective of running a profitable sustainable club and instead would rack up losses? Higher spends need Europe and success to bring in higher revenue but if lower clubs aren’t doing that then it’s a bad financial decision. No wonder the clubs with a brain voted against it 😂
@Ireton18 күн бұрын
It's idiotic the premier league won't compete with foreign clubs
@cursedepic272418 күн бұрын
Can talk about Newcastle next video
@cursedepic272418 күн бұрын
Please
@Gearshift__18 күн бұрын
This is a good thing i think. Helps the league be more competitive top to bottom.
@alexperryman2318 күн бұрын
As long as 115 FC don't receive punishment, these measures just increase the gap. I guess that was the Premier League's intention tbh.
@YagaLaughZone18 күн бұрын
This is crazy we haven't strengthen our team (United) and this rules is coming out now. Thats absolute madness.
@TWOScottRage18 күн бұрын
Youve spent 1.4bn 😅
@sterlingmarshel629917 күн бұрын
manu have the highest payroll in the EPL
@az-rule8418 күн бұрын
This is good to be fair. Smaller clubs can buy good players and make the epl stronger
@woods770018 күн бұрын
It might acc make the epl weaker coz the best players will go to different leagues as they want to play for the best teams and if the best teams in the epl cant afford them they will move to different leagues
@Hunter-zp5hd16 күн бұрын
The big problem is not the equality in the EPL, as the league in its entirety has to compete for top players with the Real Madrids, the Juventus, etc. The EPL is not a stand-alone league in comparison to the NFL, MLB, NBA, or NHL. All of those leagues are the preeminent in their respective sports. For soccer, there are a number of top leagues, and they all have to compete with the same basket of elite players. So if spending is going to be curtailed, EPL quality will suffer.
@StephenBolger18 күн бұрын
If the limit were very low, like $100 million, then it would do more harm than good because clubs wouldn't be able to sign the best players like other countries can. However, if the budget is still big enough for clubs to sign the best players while making the Premier League more competitive, i would be in favor.
@Olly.K.18 күн бұрын
that's actually a W, makes the league more fair
@Jur1_0018 күн бұрын
Yes but the Premier league is in the position at the moment where it makes more money than every other league in Europe. If that changes it’s going to be a big problem
@xCestLaVie117 күн бұрын
The top clubs work harder to bring in revenue that helps the entire league but your idea of fair is to punish them? You have the socialist mind virus that makes zero sense. 😂
@Samin-qi8gz18 күн бұрын
Get in the FA are finally trying to stop Manchester City. And the 115 FFP charges are still loading.
@Dualshock91118 күн бұрын
But they are not gonna stop Chelsea who have spent a lot more than ManCity? Why? Ooooohhhh wait, they haven’t won as much as we have. Ahhhhhhhhh
@Samin-qi8gz18 күн бұрын
@@Dualshock911 If Chelsea want to spend money this summer according to the FFP rules they have to sell players. Don't talk without knowing.
@Dualshock91118 күн бұрын
@@Samin-qi8gz sir who’s talking about this summer? We are talking about what all 3 clubs did previous windows NOT THIS SUMMER tf???
@sambog263516 күн бұрын
@@Dualshock911u have to be one of, no change that, you are the dumbest person i ever seen make comments. as they say, you cant fix stoopid 😂😂
@danogunner16 күн бұрын
The cap is fantastic. Let the best managers win because they’re the best, not because they have the deepest squads filled with overpaid stars
@David9169017 күн бұрын
People are missing the point this will be a bad thing long term because it will incentivise the big clubs to agree to a super league and we don’t won’t that this is all planned to push for a super league
@David9169017 күн бұрын
@@777abcgaia a fixed top 3 horserace or teams winning the league the teams you mentioned arsenal, Chelsea and united have not won leagues in a while I agree the league is rigged for city but the others nah Chelsea and united ain’t even top 4 😂 and if anything the way arsenal have been playing the last few seasons and improving there young players they do deserve a league title
@sterlingmarshel629917 күн бұрын
won't happen because the fan base won't support it
@drkempo197718 күн бұрын
115's FAULT
@Triple_X_X18 күн бұрын
This isn't advantageous only to your fodder clubs in Prem Bronzebridge.. It's a huge advantageous to the TRUE AUTHENTIC leagues
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
Boring anti English rubbish from this 🤡🤡 AGAIN!!
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
Another anti English comment! 🥱 You’re obsessed with us
@GIBBO418218 күн бұрын
🥱 get a new thing little guy!
@orwellboy195818 күн бұрын
Its smoke and mirrors, so the city charges get wiped.
@stealthblack971317 күн бұрын
This will become a problem for europian compititions since the premier league will become even more competitive the players burning out will be more, injuries will be more.
@TWOScottRage18 күн бұрын
Does City paying off officials come out of their transfer budget?
@ozzy_221318 күн бұрын
Finally because city needs to be slowed down it’s pathetic their rise to the top
@Dualshock91118 күн бұрын
Don’t act like we spend the most and a lot every window, Chelsea and UTD have outspent us for a couple of years now. It’s because we win, you get blinded by it and think it’s down to money
@TheMillieBurton18 күн бұрын
They will do the same with Girona as well.
@marcnmonaful18 күн бұрын
"Pathetic" rise to the top? I'm not sure you understand the meaning of that word.
@alexperryman2318 күн бұрын
That's what you lot don't get. City already did the crime, they are now benefiting off its spoils. This only hurts every other club trying to close that gap.
@Dualshock91117 күн бұрын
@@alexperryman23 I need more than that bro, I’ve heard that like 10+ times already
@AlanBrownPhotography17 күн бұрын
It’s not just Man City that have a leg up over everyone else. For the sake of clarity, just check the squad value/cost and wages for the traditional 6 and compare that to others (who are not allowed to spend to the same level). Super league? We already have one with the richest 6 clubs competing against one another.
@Exciteknight18 күн бұрын
Since Premier League came out it’s always been about the money to win the league the old division was more balance
@Diogo8515 күн бұрын
It's always been about money, it didn't start with the premier league. Sports are and always have been a business.