The 9 Different Types Of Fighter jets Explained

Рет қаралды 12,921

Күн бұрын

To the layperson, all fighter planes appear identical. Aviation and military aficionados are aware of the diverse range of fighter jets available. The effectiveness of a fighter plane relies not only on its firepower, but also on a few crucial tactical enhancements. The plane's survival depends on its speed and manoeuvrability. Pilots must employ evasive movements and utilise advanced technologies in order to ensure their survival and gain a strategic advantage over adversaries. In order to enhance our comprehension of various fighter jets, we will categorise them into several classifications. Once you get a fundamental comprehension of the classifications, it will become much simpler to grasp the goal of each.
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Пікірлер: 44

@johndyson4109 Ай бұрын

The SR-71 is not a fighter in any form or way.. Same with the F-117, it's a bomber!

@dineshverma6087 Ай бұрын

True.....Sr 71 is for reconnaissance

@Sleepysod Ай бұрын

The “F” designation of the F-117 is quite an interesting piece to look up on Wikipedia, really hadn’t crossed my mind before

@nish221100 Ай бұрын

@@Sleepysod thanks. Just read it.

@massmike11 Ай бұрын

Yf-12a fighter interceptor version would have been a better choice

@frank-ko6de Ай бұрын

She clearly never said it was a fighter plane, learn to listen, you ridiculous nonsense.

@npaladin2000 Ай бұрын

Most of these designations are historical. Modern air forces have focused on the merged multirole/strategic fighter

@nish221100 Ай бұрын

"Fighter JETS"?!? P-38 is a prop. The examples and the text has a lot of errors (e.g. F15 is multirole, not a intercepter). SR-71 is not a "fighter"; YF-12 was.

@WolfeSaber9933 Ай бұрын

P was for pursuit. Now, it is patrol

@HarryKaemerle Ай бұрын

Isn’t the F-15 an air superiority fighter?

@WolfeSaber9933 Ай бұрын

@@HarryKaemerle It's got the rap sheet to prove it.

@scottdakadescot4127 Ай бұрын

Hello there Kim, how are you doing? I'm so glad that your voice sounds perfect again because it's so beautiful and calm.

@blackmonday5295 Ай бұрын

The F15 is the most successful air superiority fighter ever. It is not an interceptor. An interceptor would be a Mirage III.

@WalterCroley Ай бұрын

F-104 was an interceptor with very limited ordnance carrying capabilities.

@thesirmaddog8209 Ай бұрын

The best Fight Bomber was the F-111 Ardvark.... There isn't such a thing as Reconnaissance fighter

@WalterCroley Ай бұрын

SR71 was not a fighter. It was reconnaissance only.

@thpass Ай бұрын

There's a lot of overlap and a few of the examples don't belong to the "Fighter" category. The F-104 never saw service as a fighter-bomber. The F-111 would be more accurate for that category. The all weather and recon examples should not be included as "fighter" aircraft. The SR-71 was never designed for that role, it was purely reconnaissance spy plane. Military jet is fine as a broad category here.

@k.h.1587 Ай бұрын

This video is trash, but the YF12 was an interceptor version of the SR71, it didn't go into service but a few were made and flown

@moodogco Ай бұрын

The f104 was not a fighter bomber, it was a interceptor

@klardfarkus3891 Ай бұрын

F15 and f14 are multi role fighters, not dedicated interceptors.

@daudzaheer1770 Ай бұрын

F104 was not a fighter bomber aircraft

@nish221100 Ай бұрын

Not really, but it was used for CAS in Vietnam at times.

@daudzaheer1770 Ай бұрын

@@nish221100 yeah I guess as it was also used to strike enemy airfield in 1971 war

@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 Ай бұрын

SR 71 is not a fighter jet

@mahroushabib6344 Ай бұрын

You are right but the sr 71 had a fighter version the a12

@klardfarkus3891 Ай бұрын

Seems like these buzz videos are just some high school kids school project posted on KZfaq.

@congnghequansuvn474 Ай бұрын

Many of the above are not fighter, replace the word with "jet" pls

@k.h.1587 Ай бұрын

Talking about the p38 in wwII being shot down by surface to air missles that didn't exist yet

@Marcellogo Ай бұрын

Never heard of a "strategic" fighters before today and generally all of them seems invented: F-15 is NOT an interceptor and F-104 is used as a fighter bomber only in G version, previous are light fighters and the S is an interceptors. And all generally reeks of american exceptionalism and chauvinism, not a single example that's is taken from another country. No mirages, No MiGs or Sukhoi, no Fockle-Wulf or Messerschmitt, no Bae Harrier, no Saab, no Mitsubishi or Nakaijma. No Caccia, no Frontal Aviation, No PVO, no Zerstozers and not even planes from the US Navy.

@michaelhband Ай бұрын

👍👍👍❤❤❤✈✈✈

@klardfarkus3891 Ай бұрын

To the buzz every aircraft is a fighter. Total ignorance.

@dennisleighton2812 Ай бұрын

What a load of absolute bollocks!

@Hitman1978 Ай бұрын

Not sure where you're from, but you definitely need better sources of information....had to turn it off when you actually said the F-5 incorporated stealth technology...I literally could feel my IQ dropping!

@klardfarkus3891 Ай бұрын

On would thing the mig 31 would be a better example,of a,pure interceptor than the f15. Just illustrates the bias of this,propaganda channel.