Sailing into the Future: The 10 Forthcoming Aircraft Carrier Concepts Revealed

Рет қаралды 135,531

6 ай бұрын

Embarking on a new era of maritime prowess, forthcoming aircraft carriers promise to redefine naval capabilities globally. These mighty vessels, at the forefront of naval innovation, boast advanced technologies and strategic designs. These behemoths represent the next frontier in naval power. As nations invest in these floating fortresses, the seas anticipate the arrival of vessels that will shape the future of naval warfare. Join us as we explore the impressive and diverse world of the ‘10 Future aircraft carriers’.
------------------------------------
Credits:
www.globalsecurity.org/milita...
daydaynews.cc/en/military/968...
modern-warships.fandom.com/wi...
www.renderhub.com/pxfpxd/type...
navalpost.com/babcock-and-hhi...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
• Enterprise (CVN 80) Su...
-------------------------------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Пікірлер: 535

@jonathanbaum3499 6 ай бұрын

As long as they stop naming carriers for politicians. Personally, I like the historical carrier names or battles: Saratoga, Lexington, Yorktown, Midway, etc. Another Nimitz would be fine.

@kevinstorm1771 6 ай бұрын

I'm Australian and have no agenda here, but I feel that you're right. They should be named for significant Naval battles or Naval personnel of note. Politicians have nothing but ego to offer unless they have served in the USN.

@honfmeilingfleet957 6 ай бұрын

USS Aggressor could be perfect name

@jonathanbaum3499 6 ай бұрын

You're just jealous. @@honfmeilingfleet957

@ZboeC5 6 ай бұрын

Have to agree there. Politicians shouldn't get naval ships named after them.

@celticgold2011 6 ай бұрын

USS William "Bull" Halsey

@scottjackson5173 6 ай бұрын

As a US Navy veteran who served aboard USS Ranger CV-61. I recommend a new Ranger join the fleet. As well as Saratoga, Lexington and Kitty Hawk. A return to traditional names. Instead of pandering to political expediency.

@alfredvelazquez3306 6 ай бұрын

YES.....THANK YOU!!!!!

@warrenpuckett4203 6 ай бұрын

At least G Ford, Nimitz, GHW Bush and the JFK actually were actual in the war stink sailors.

@whyjnot420 6 ай бұрын

There is a part of me that desperately wants USS Normandy to be the first in a long line of, well, can't be frigates since CG-60 is a Ticonderoga, so it will have to be cruisers.

@beboy12003 5 ай бұрын

Amen.

@user-ut9gr9mn2i 4 ай бұрын

Yorktown,Wasp,Hornet, bull Halsey, Niagara,John Paul Jones

@NFS_Challenger54 6 ай бұрын

I consider naming CVN-82 "USS Lexington". When was the last carrier to bear that name? That name has got some historic value within the US Navy. Not as much as Enterprise, but still significant in it's own right.

@henrychu495 6 ай бұрын

sadly the US navy has confirmed that carriers will keep getting people names, Lexington might be used for one of the LHA/LHDs though

@cosmoray9750 6 ай бұрын

India Be the Next China?| kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jrinjdNiqbLOl5c.html

@jaybee9269 6 ай бұрын

USS Lexington CV-16 is a museum ship. Sadly USS Midway is the biggest museum ship…no supercarrier museums.

@331SVTCobra 6 ай бұрын

@@henrychu495 Start a grass roots petition. I'll sign it.

@331SVTCobra 6 ай бұрын

Yorktown, not Lexington. (I knew a guy that served on Lexington at Corral Sea and Yorktown at Midway. Talk about bad luck!)

@thomasheyart7033 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 USS lexington. Why? Because it's a carrier name

@darrelbautista9038 6 ай бұрын

If Possible CVN-82 may name USS Constellation

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Constellation will be FFG-62, first of class for her class of frigates.

@RobertSharp-kg1tb 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 name suggestiom Yorktown, because of the Revolutionary battle at Yorktown.

@alexanderleach3365 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 should be named Saratoga.

@markgranger9150 6 ай бұрын

Why Yorktown was a better ship.

@rodneylove8027 6 ай бұрын

USS Hornet CVN-82. In honor of CV-8.

@ronmaximilian6953 6 ай бұрын

Unlikely as long as we keep flying super hornets as our primary aircraft aboard carriers

@janthony1970 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 my thoughts would be to name it after the first USN carrier USS Langley

@jaybee9269 6 ай бұрын

The man Langley didn’t actually fly. So, no.

@Charlie1776_ 6 ай бұрын

Awesome!

@vivekjoshi5600 6 ай бұрын

ins vishal is a different project it will be a nuclear powered carrier but because india cannot make more nuclear reactors till 2030 (they are making nuclear submarines first) so a sister ship of vikrant class is under construction(will start ) because indians need 3 carriers but their nuclear powered one will take some time to build and it is seen as replacement of vikramaditya so by which they want 1 more carrier so they are doing easy task before hard one.

@tywallace2379 6 ай бұрын

To be named after another fallen sailor who posthumously earned the Congressional Medal Of Honor

@alexandergroppe448 6 ай бұрын

How about CVN-82 USS Intrepid!

@jonathanbaum3499 6 ай бұрын

I'm also good with Essex, Wasp, Hornet, Iwo Jima, Franklin, Kearsarge, and JJ Clarke.

@nphil93992 6 ай бұрын

Essex, Wasp, Kearsarge and Iwo Jima are already in use on the LHD's

@dean8842 6 ай бұрын

I vote for Hornet. It would be good to once again have an Enterprise and Hornet cruising the seas under the banner of the Stars & Stripes.

@gasparguadalupethecante6377 6 ай бұрын

good video excellent video great data you are beautiful the buzz you are good at information

@LegitTurd 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 Ranger

@Bloodwhiner 6 ай бұрын

USS John C. Waldron, commander of Torpedo Squadron 8 at the battle of Midway. Awarded the Navy Cross for attacking the Japanese carriers though the squadron lacked fighter cover. The entire squadron was lost but drew the Japanese fighters down to the deck leaving the carriers open for dive bombers to attack.

@KkevrockK 6 ай бұрын

That’s very worthy!

@troylaudette7804 6 ай бұрын

Excellent choice!

@henryhoward9454 6 ай бұрын

That puts you in direct conflict with the guy above who suggested it be named for ADM Mitscher

@sebastien3351 5 ай бұрын

That attack by Torpedo Eight, took real guts! I hate to think of the horror those poor crew members of Torpedo Eight experienced, they saw it coming, there was no escape and, one by one they died.

@johnbrobston1334 3 ай бұрын

I served aboard the Waldron, DD-699. I'd rather than name go to another destroyer.

@mikejacobson14 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 should be named USS Eugene Ely. The first to take off from and land on a ship. I also think he was responsible for developing a number of naval aviation techniques and devices.

@tankythemagnorite9855 6 ай бұрын

What about USS Jimmy Doolittle?

@MrTak44 6 ай бұрын

Make that lead ship of the doolittle class drone carrier with an innovative automated launch hanger so drones can land on the deck at the same time.@@tankythemagnorite9855

@hurricaneace143 6 ай бұрын

I agree for both and now I'm upset neither have a carrier named in recognition of their contribution to naval aviation

@beboy12003 5 ай бұрын

I don't know if any ship was named after him, but how about CVN-82 USS James Dolittle, the commander of the strike force who lead the attack on Tokyo in April 1942.

@thetankcommander3838 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 name suggestion: Clarence Wade McClusky. Naval aviator and famous dive bomber pilot from the Battle of Midway (1942). A native of Western New York, I feel a Rust Belt city like Buffalo deserves to have a ship named after its most famous naval aviator.

@christopherhanton6611 6 ай бұрын

also he was the captain of the Casablanca-class escort carrier Uss Corregidor

@Errr717 6 ай бұрын

Very good suggestion. I agree.

@thetankcommander3838 6 ай бұрын

@@christopherhanton6611 I hadn’t read into his time as an admiral much. I’ll keep that in mind.

@mrow7598 6 ай бұрын

People like that have Destroyers named after them.

@jeremygautier9776 6 ай бұрын

name cvn82 NEIL ARMSTRONG

@xyyyyx3247 6 ай бұрын

If you want to create content, pay attention to details, your image of 003 is incorrect.

@rodneyalaking8241 4 ай бұрын

And hire a real narrator.

@williamdodge5123 6 ай бұрын

USS FORRESTAL CV-59 82-84

@cmderinchief 6 ай бұрын

For CVN-82, I'd go Challenger or Columbia for the former space shuttles. However, I like the current trend naming aircraft carriers after ex-Presidents ...except the Enterprise, you gotta have an Enterprise carrier in the fleet. Could you imagine if they kept the registry numbers like Star Trek? Enterprise could be CVN-65-B. :D

@andrewkirch5920 6 ай бұрын

CV-6-C...

@MC-nb6jx 6 ай бұрын

Agree about the Enterprise.. Maybe elect a President Enterprise?😉

@christopherhanton6611 6 ай бұрын

well the new navy missile sub class is name after district of Columbia , and a Los Angeles attack class sub to USS Columbia (SSN-771)

@Ravege98 6 ай бұрын

I respectfully disagree, no us navy ship should ever be named after any *politician* of any era, party affiliation or accomplishments. Politicians are public servants and no ship, city, street or any other thing should be given over to those who serve the people.

@michaelhusada2276 6 ай бұрын

Ex presidents who had served in the military. As for Doris Miller (CVN-81), he was not a president but a Distinguished Cross recipient.

@lawerancedodd690 6 ай бұрын

USS CHESTY PULLER

@XBritishTom 6 ай бұрын

I'd like to see Ranger or Langley come back.

@blaircrocker9845 6 ай бұрын

I second the uss Langley or uss hornet

@michaelhusada2276 6 ай бұрын

Langley would be cool. Though one of the other WWII carrier names would be good too.

@trevorhart545 Ай бұрын

How about recognising the previous natives e.g. USS Chief Sitting Bull ?

@Knights_Oath 5 ай бұрын

CVN-82 The USS Robert Heinlein. A graduate of the US Naval Academy who had his very promising Naval career cut short due to tuberculosis. The former Lt. Heinlein would eventually become of the founding authors of Science Fiction and was awarded its first Grand Master Award.

@titobobcookingvlog 6 ай бұрын

❤ watching from romania

@carstenwagner3355 6 ай бұрын

One suggestion for CVN-82: The name for this carrier should be Marc Andrew Mitscher. He commanded the US carriers (Task Force 58 or 38) during the Pacific War and participated in the Battle of Philippine Sea and the Battle of Leyte Gulf in 1944. He also commanded the carrier Hornet in 1942 while it transported the B-25 for the Doolittle Raid.

@ZboeC5 6 ай бұрын

This is one of the better proposals for sure. Even better it's a name that hasn't been used before and highlights and memorializes another of our heroes.

@kayakutah 6 ай бұрын

Great idea. But two combatant ships and NAS (now MCAS) Miramar is named after him (Mitscher Field).

@carstenwagner3355 6 ай бұрын

@@kayakutah Agree. But this is not the same league than a CVN. So I think it still should be a honor for a ship to be named after this Admiral. And if the US has no names left, they could name it the USS Dönitz. 😉

@nphil93992 6 ай бұрын

USS Mitscher, currently DDG 57, previously DDG 35

@dean8842 6 ай бұрын

@@carstenwagner3355 Did someone mention donuts???!!! Yum...!

@thewarroom1944 2 ай бұрын

CVN-82 should be named Saratoga, Ranger, Lexington, Yorktown, Hornet, or Wasp. Yes, I’m a sucker for the WWII Aircraft Carriers.

@perrystevenson6364 6 ай бұрын

I say yorktown or lexington.

@MrJunglebear1 6 ай бұрын

USS KITTY HAWK

@chipschannel9494 6 ай бұрын

Admiral Frank J. Fletcher Coral Sea/Midway command.

@matthewcunniffe1304 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 should be named after William. F. Halsey

@larryparks9595 4 ай бұрын

If they ever want to add a general's name again How about Douglas MacArthur, Omar Bradley or George S. Patton.

@impacking 2 ай бұрын

I agree. Admiral Halsey deserves the tribute.

@larryparks9595 2 ай бұрын

@@impacking I agree with Halsey as well. If they can name a carrier after Eisenhower, I also favor naming one after MacArthur, and Patton as well.

@brianbennett9737 Ай бұрын

I would prefer Spruance. Spruance was a better decision maker and more reliable as the leader of the 5th fleet than Halsey as leader of the 3rd fleet. He deserved the 5th star more so than Halsey who famously fell for the Japanese ruse at the Philippine Sea and ran the 3rd fleet into TWO typhoons with many hundreds of lives lost.

@impacking Ай бұрын

@@brianbennett9737 Spruance has already had an entire class of destroyer named after him.

@HemiHitter 6 ай бұрын

CVS 82 Halsey

@MarlaWilliams-ro5un 6 ай бұрын

There is already a Burke class destroyer named Halsey DDG-97

@slorter10 4 ай бұрын

Expensive targets

@tgsgardenmaintenance4627 6 ай бұрын

Personally, I don't think Russia need a carrier at all! Also , why do the French build one big expensive carrier, when two smaller cheaper carriers would make more operational sense??

@nphil93992 6 ай бұрын

French grandstanding, and a lack of Money. CDG was supposed to have a sister or sucessor but cuts cancelled the program. As bad as the Royal navy now is in terms of size, the french navy is even smaller.

@donaldcarey114 6 ай бұрын

Educate yourself - with CV's size has its benefits.

@Dreadwolf3155 6 ай бұрын

is the CV carrier concept itself out of date? Should we move insted to something like drone carriers and or ordenance ships?

@eddihaskell 5 ай бұрын

No. There is nothing that projects superpower force lke a 100,000 supercarrier with an airwing of generation 5 and eventually 6 manned and unmanned combat aircraft. That's why the Chinese are busy building 2 carriers the size of the Ford class right now, and have plans for more in the next decade. Russia and India are even planning to build them. And the UK just built two carriers (the Prince of Wales and Queen Elizabeth) that are the size of the old Midway class - 70,000 tons full load.

@Nemesis_678 5 ай бұрын

Yeah especially after the advents of hypersonic missiles,they are high priority as well as vulnerable targets 🤔🤔

@Curtis69213 4 ай бұрын

Yea, cause nothing projects power like a drone buzzing in the air. Super scary

@johnbrobston1334 3 ай бұрын

@@Nemesis_678 They've always been high priority vulnerable targets. That's why they travel surrounded by powerful floating air defenses. And carriers are like wasps, you kill one all you accomplish is to have its family gang up on you.

@Nemesis_678 3 ай бұрын

@@johnbrobston1334 air defenses can always be overwhelmed and about that wasp analogy the rest of the ships can't do much except launching missiles in retaliation at enemy ships which they would be already doing in war

@user-ut9gr9mn2i 4 ай бұрын

USS John Paul Jones ,USS Olaver Hazzard Perry, USS Gettysburg,USS Bonhome Richard aka USS Bonnie Di ck 10:23

@daviddooley5361 6 ай бұрын

I think they should name CVN-82 USS Kittyhawk.

@MarlaWilliams-ro5un 6 ай бұрын

Another "Shitty Kitty"?

@michaelleonard7579 6 ай бұрын

Someone should pay attention to your graphics. The 003 is reversed and someone should have figured that out each time you added a follow-on carrier. Angle deck is always to port and the island is to starboard. Plus the 003 is in trouble as they were supposed to have started sea trials in 2023, much of what I've seen is that they are having problems with EMALS. The first aircraft carrier built keel up was the USS Ranger CV 4 and the USS Ranger CV 61 was decommissioned in the summer of 1993. Many of the active carriers carry equipment that was on previous carriers, such as anchor chain or anchors. And since almost everything is scrapped or sunk not much is left to be utilized.

@Harldin 6 ай бұрын

It took the Americans with all their vast experience and knowledge of operating CATOBAR carriers 5 or so years to get EMALS up to scratch, China with zero experience is going to find it very hard work to go straight to EMALS.

@arrjay2410 6 ай бұрын

Interesting. You still need to work on the vernacular english and the pronunciations of some of those acronyms. They're hard even for native English speakers. Overall your speech is clear and easily understood. As for CVN82, I think they should call it the "Dwight D Eisenhower". Seeing as they will probably be well into the process of scrapping the first one by the time they get around to commissioning CVN82. He was a leader well worth honouring.

@kro9703 6 ай бұрын

I doubt they will scrap the Eisenhower, Mothballed in reserve maybe, or even sold. BTW I served on the Mighty IKE 87 to 91.

@rodneyalaking8241 4 ай бұрын

The voice is computer generated.

@johnhester9167 3 ай бұрын

I suggest the USS Midway after the first all carrier naval battle in history.

@MrKillahippo 4 ай бұрын

that Russian one is still a concept, you get that sinking feeling.

@keithnoneya 6 ай бұрын

The aircraft carrier shown as a soviet carrier is not Russian, it's the USS John F. Kennedy, with an F-14, S-3 and two H-60's on deck. The next carrier should be named after AMM1 (Aviation Machinist Mate 1st Class) Bruno Gaido for saving the Aircraft Carrier USS Enterprise in combat during the battle of the Marshall Islands here; kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ost4rNqWsKe7daM.html Later during the Battle of Midway AMM1 Gaido and his pilot Ensign Frank O'Flaherty were shot down, captured, tortured and murdered by the Japanese Navy. They were weighted down and thrown overboard from the Japanese destroyer Makigumo & drowned.Thanks for sharing. Best Wishes & Blessings. Keith Noneya AT1 USN/USNR-TAR Retired

@williehayes1729 4 ай бұрын

"Hayes", you know that guy that came after useless Grant. And while I'm not a fan of naming ships after politicians, I can be a fan of naming CVN-82 either Lincoln or Hayes. naming a cruiser with Presidents names would be ok, but naming Destroyers after Presidents is Crazy. And as a personal after thought, naming Submarines after cities or states is nuttier, akin to naming Tug boats after NFL Teams. Right, enough rambling, give the names of ships as the USS Ship Naming command wants. I'm retired - but I still vote, putt my vote in for USS "Hayes" CVN-82. I can sit back and watch their heads explode.

@micahfrempong1600 6 ай бұрын

bruh that indian carrier is a direct copy of the british HMS Queen elizibeth

@AudacityHimself 6 ай бұрын

I think that was the Queen Elizabeth

@micahfrempong1600 6 ай бұрын

@@AudacityHimself I think it was one of the renders for the Indian one

@percyshaddock8673 4 ай бұрын

Without doubt this ship (CVN 82) of course named after a great, brave Vietnam Veteran John C.McCain Navy pilot and U.S. Senator - USS JOHN C. NCCAIN (CVN 82) sounds great😊

@MASMIWA 28 күн бұрын

In looking at future conflict scenarios, carriers may go by the way of the battle ship. Both Russia and China have carrier killer missiles and as such, it makes sense to keep carriers out of their range and in so doing, its fighters cannot reach the enemy without refueling. Refueling aircraft are probably land based and are also targets of opportunity. What we are witnessing in the Ukraine conflict is the rise of drones and missiles. Sea warfare will be dominated by destroyers, frigates, corvettes, submarines, and underwater drones. If that forecast holds, aircraft carriers are just expensive white elephants. Having said that, for small regional conflict where US airpower can dominate, carriers still make sense excluding the cost factor. It remains to be seen if regional conflicts are the norm or are we headed for another world war.

@billotto602 2 ай бұрын

I think USS Forrestal, after the first super carrier ever built & a former Secretary of the Navy.

@tankythemagnorite9855 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 should be USS Ernest E. Evans. The guy who rushed the most powerful Japanese fleet that ever sailed, with a Fletcher class destroyer.

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Already given to a planned Flight III Burke. DDG-141.

@tankythemagnorite9855 6 ай бұрын

@@peterson7082 ok

@GrowFoodSustainably 3 ай бұрын

CVN 82 may be named Star or Spangle.

@lloydhorn7834 6 ай бұрын

I think they should name CVN 82 the USS Nimitz in honor of Chester W. Nimitz the admiral who led us in world war 2 in the Pacific.

@nphil93992 6 ай бұрын

The current USS Nimitz may still be in service when the time comes to name 82 so that is not likely to happen

@cherokee43v6 6 ай бұрын

@@nphil93992 Actually, they planned to retire the Nimitz once the Kennedy was available to replace her. Originally, they were going to do it when Ford was ready, but Ford took so long they gave Nimitz another short term refit to keep up the fleet numbers.

@ImWatchingYou2012 6 ай бұрын

All that firepower , but cannot protected the southern border.

@rogerb3654 6 ай бұрын

at 1:16, you imply that the carrier pictured is the incomplete Soviet Aircraft Carrier Ulyanovsk....it is actually the USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) that has since been de-commissioned and is waiting to be scrapped.

@E8ey3kd7shbedi8shwhsjsj Ай бұрын

It would be cool to name the next 2 ford ships after doris miller "hornet" and "yorktown" to be with uss enterprise

@thomasseidenschnur4998 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 name suggestion: James T. Kirk ;-)

@ZeroDarkness- 4 ай бұрын

Or William B.Adama Or John Sheridan

@wyatthale3861 5 ай бұрын

One thing I noticed, these carriers don't seems to be designed to take advantage of VTOL planes, which seem to be in the near future for aircraft. Instead, they just use the same big island runway concept and are putting in electromagnetic launchers. The launchers are a great achievement, but if VTOL isn't that far off why keep putting the time and money into putting them on carriers? Instead of a big island, why not put more emphasis into launch doors, plane elevators, and cargo space so when military planes are refitted for VTOL the carriers are ready take advantage of that? I mean I imagine with vertical takeoff carriers could double or more the number of planes they can launch at one time, so why not plan ahead for that?

@milaemouse8442 6 ай бұрын

The Brits. They KNOW how to name ships!

@ZboeC5 6 ай бұрын

The Brits have all the best ship names.

@Venezolano410 6 ай бұрын

🇬🇧👍

@DaniG.German883 5 ай бұрын

@@Venezolano410esqueleto

@ianrichards909 4 ай бұрын

@@ZboeC5Why… because one is named after a Queer and the other one after a Queen?

@frank-ko6de 3 ай бұрын

@@ZboeC5To make up for their lack of actual quality ships.

@Jeff-fv2tn 6 ай бұрын

CVS 82 should be called USS Bill Halsey after one of the US Naval admiral of WW2

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Recall a destroyer already is

@MarlaWilliams-ro5un 6 ай бұрын

@@peterson7082 Correct. DDG-97

@Maddogg414 6 ай бұрын

Uss Audey Murphy he won the ngma and he was a hell of a fighter

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Navy with few exceptions like carriers and a handful of frigates and the odd destroyer doesn't name vessels for Army persons.

@douglasseab7912 6 ай бұрын

CVN-82 America

@XBritishTom 6 ай бұрын

There is an amphibious ship named USS America

@barrymiller3385 6 ай бұрын

Well.... of that little lot the Fujian and Kennedy are in the water and being fitted out. We can look forward to seeing them in the near(ish) future. Enterprise and (probably) 004 are being constructed. We should see them sometime during this decade if all goes to plan. The others are all in the planning stage. Ranging from Enterprise (definitely happening) to Shtorm (extremely unlikely to happen).

@drgonzo305 6 ай бұрын

The 003 has huge problems with the catapults(why they went for Electromagnetic catapults on a diesel is beyond me) and the flight deck cracking in half under its own weight. I doubt the 004 is going to be built anytime soon

@barrymiller3385 6 ай бұрын

@@drgonzo305 I was aware of the issues with the catapults. Not a surprise given the problems the Yanks have had with theirs. I have seen the pictures of the 'cracks' on the deck. I very much doubt they are cracks in the deck itself. My own guess would be that they are cracks in the non-slip surface applied to the deck. Not great but nowhere near as serious as a crack in the deck itself.

@JonMartinYXD 6 ай бұрын

The Shtorm will not be built. Neither will the Lider class "destroyer" or the Tupolev PAK DA.

@drgonzo305 6 ай бұрын

@@JonMartinYXD I call it the shitstorm

@niweshlekhak9646 6 ай бұрын

@@barrymiller3385 USS Doris Miller is under modular construction, now that USS John F Kennedy is in water and will soon relieve one of the dry docks.

@larrybremer4930 3 ай бұрын

I am happy Doris Miller is being honored. His story is exemplified by the discrimination of making black people in the military do menial jobs yet this guy showed they gave as much value as anyone else to our ranks with his heroism during the attack on pearl harbor. I would like to see a USS McClusky or any of the many other heroes of Midway since that was one of the defining battles for the US Navy.

@richardjosephus6802 6 ай бұрын

Uss Midway.

@elezquizofrenicopg5596 6 ай бұрын

El Fujian tiene 318 metros de eslora no 300.

@LeoH3L1 6 ай бұрын

I've been wondering why no nation has tried to make a carrier that has the landing area running aligned with the ship, but down the port side, have the "island" more towards the back of the ship like the Gerald R Ford class, and have the catapult area directly in front of the "island" along the starboard side of the ship, this way both can be aligned into the wind, and both can operate at the same time.

@benchapman2401 6 ай бұрын

That's the point of the angled flight deck. To allow aircraft to land whilst others take off towards the bow of the vessel. Simultaneous operation has been around since the 50s. The added bonus of an angled deck means if an aircraft botched its landing, it has the ability to take off again without interference to aircraft lined up at the catapults.

@DOI_ARTS 6 ай бұрын

In wartime they could launch 2 planes, it's not like launching a plane is quick.

@MarlaWilliams-ro5un 6 ай бұрын

@@DOI_ARTS Technically with 4 cats as currently equipped, US bird farms can quickly launch their birds off all 4 cats ALMOST simultaneously if needed to get a sortie in the air.

@steveleonard6712 3 ай бұрын

Also like the suggested USS YORKTOWN

@MichaelHeal99 6 ай бұрын

I dont think carriers should be named after politicians. Too devisive for the American public. Name them after American heros or historic locations in American history.

@wnajr5 4 ай бұрын

The USS Harold E Stassen, after the youngest person to ever to be elected as a U.S. governor. Stassen resigned from office in 1943 to serve as an aide to "Bull" Halsey. He was sent to be the first into Tokyo by Halsey after the Japanese surrender and before MacArthur arrived to save U.S. and Allied P.O.W.s (including "Pappy" Boyington) from being slaughtered. Stassen called to D.C. by FDR, before his death, to be a member of the U.S. team that helped create the United Nations. Stassen was Officer of the Watch on the U.S.S. Missouri when the news of the Japanese surrender came in, moments after a Kamikaze attack had ended. He served under Eisenhower as Ikes "Ambassador for Peace" and tried to get Nixon replaced as Ike's V.P. in 1956.

@seanlangmaid5206 6 ай бұрын

USS Arizona after the Lost at pearl harbour Or USS Nimitz

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Nimitz might take a back seat, but Arizona is a Block IV Virginia boat.

@Curtis69213 4 ай бұрын

There not naming a ship Arizona

@billkilbourne6409 6 ай бұрын

CVN 82 could be named U.S. Grant. Presdent Grant was instrumential in the reconstruction after the Civil War, despite a coropt adminstration

@morenokp71 2 ай бұрын

CVN-82 should be named USS FAFO (joking)

@rodneyalaking8241 4 ай бұрын

CVN82 should bear the name USS Michael Murphy. After the US Navy Seal officer who won the Medal of Honor.

@larryparks9595 4 ай бұрын

CVN-82 How about admiral's William Halsey or Ray Spruance or General's Douglas MacArthur, George Patton, or Omar Bradley?

@codyhilton1750 4 ай бұрын

MacArthur, you have got to be kidding?

@larryparks9595 3 ай бұрын

@@codyhilton1750 If they can name one after Eisenhower, why not MacArthur?

@codyhilton1750 3 ай бұрын

@@larryparks9595 MacArthur was a phoney. Caught with his defenses down in the Philippines after Pearl Harbor. Didn't approve the MOH for General Wainwright. Invaded the Philippines just so he could say "I have returned" when the Chiefs of Staff disapproved. Didn't think China would intervein in the Korean War. Truman fired him. Burned down the Bonus Army villege in 32 when told by the President not to cross the bridge. Awarded the MOH in 42 only to boost moral (note Wainwright).

@rdeeeezy 6 ай бұрын

America bringing the HEAT on aircraft carriers.

@GrowFoodSustainably 3 ай бұрын

Do not name CVN 82 MaoTzeDong, please.

@floydfulgiam6102 2 ай бұрын

I would say the USS Kitty Hawk or the USS Lexington it should be name of the carrier does not name yet or be name the USS Yorktown

@randybentley2633 6 ай бұрын

Though Miller is well deserving of having another ship named after him, I can't help but feel that there is another African-American sailor, for whom this ship should be named. The sailor that comes to mind for this honor is Ensign Jesse L. Brown, the first A-A to complete the USN's basic flight training program. The relevant reason for his name being a better choice, rather than Miller's, is that Brown's NEC is the whole reason that Aircraft Carriers exist in the first place, its complement of aircraft and their daring pilots. As for Miller, given that his moment of distinction happened aboard a Battleship, it makes sense to name a ship that is the USN's modern analog and a vessel class that has become the Ship of Heroes, the Arleigh Burke Destroyer.

@nphil93992 6 ай бұрын

Royal Navy names sound much more menacing. Thunderer, Vengence, Dreadnought, Warspite, Audacious, Indomitable, Invincible, Venomous, Vanquisher, Vanguard, Valiant, Defiance, Devestation, Dauntless, Dragon etc etc etc Since our goverment has no intention of having a proper navy any more somebody should carry on the proud names.

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

That line of adjectives, verbs, and adverbs are used for small craft in U.S. line typically. You also got names like Wasp for the LHD,

@markanderson4163 6 ай бұрын

Nope

@impacking 2 ай бұрын

Why not USS Leyte Gulf?

@briwiz9816 6 ай бұрын

The only president names that can be used had to have served in the us armed forces

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Not explicitly

@MarlaWilliams-ro5un 6 ай бұрын

nope.

@mysygisun3335 22 күн бұрын

なぜ、ch航母003＝018福建は左右が反転してるのですか。❓ 018福建は、・満載排水量85,000Tレベルの間ですが、なぜ英Qエリザベスより、先に出るのですか。又建造中のch019原子力航母は120,000Tの設計の様ですが、数字が出されないのですか。

@rob46711 6 ай бұрын

USS Forestall would be a good name for CVN 82 in honor of the first Secretary of Defense and the world's first supercarrier.

@days927 6 ай бұрын

You put the picture of Fujian upside down.

@days927 6 ай бұрын

And the length of the Fujian ship is 320 meters, not 300 meters, The width is equal to Ford, 78 meters wide.

@azzajames7661 6 ай бұрын

The ccp aircraft carriers are just a floating scrapyard, until it is sunk, probably because of its very poor quality😆

@markanderson4163 6 ай бұрын

Saratoga, Yorktown, Lexington...stop naming them after politicians...especially politicians that never served.

@toxicgracie3772 6 ай бұрын

As an American, I love your accent!! :)

@colinf.1198 6 ай бұрын

its AI

@toxicgracie3772 6 ай бұрын

@@colinf.1198 Hmm 🤔 Idk

@mofleh177 6 ай бұрын

@@colinf.1198 I don't think it's AI, She frequently makes pronunciation mistakes like someone who's English is not their mother tongue.

@khaosApophis 6 ай бұрын

@@colinf.1198Think again.

@deinsleif 6 ай бұрын

USS Nemesis CVX-1 ?

@user-sd1sj2yh2p 5 ай бұрын

She's the first female to explain military weapon in my opinion

@davidpage3893 4 ай бұрын

AI generated female voice.

@user-sd1sj2yh2p 4 ай бұрын

@@davidpage3893 but she sound a little bit different

@jnishimura01 6 ай бұрын

USS Hyman G. Rickover SSN 795 should have instead been CVN 82. Admiral Rickover directed the original development of naval nuclear propulsion.

@markgranger9150 6 ай бұрын

He was a subby he wouldn't like being on a carrier. They should have named a class of subs after him

@hilairelaplume1616 6 ай бұрын

I would be a little surprised even with the general r4 supercarriers coming into service if we have multiple wars on multiple fronts including Russia China and Iran retiring the old aircraft carriers might be out of the question

@AlbertoMartinez765 6 ай бұрын

These are all subject to whatever wars or other thing's that come up plans change all the time look at the F-22.

@markgranger9150 6 ай бұрын

Iran doesn't have aircraft carriers. Has never had an aircraft carrier

@hilairelaplume1616 6 ай бұрын

@@markgranger9150 .....ok?

@nDjinn1 6 ай бұрын

Its should be called the USS Archer. After the great Stirling Archer.

@anthonyharwell3092 6 ай бұрын

Uss John Wayne " the duke battle group, motto rough and tough and don't take shit off nothing ..... Like navy tp"

@GodzHammer 6 ай бұрын

"Fully Indigenous design", why must you mock us???

@robertmills2147 6 ай бұрын

The USS FDR

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Taken by an Arleigh Burke class

@markgranger9150 6 ай бұрын

The new carrier should be called USS YORKTOWN the only carrier to be at the battle of the Coral Sea and Midway.

@richardcleveland8549 6 ай бұрын

Is it my imagination, or is the narrator Chinese? Makes me wonder where this video was produced. Could be robotic, I suppose . . . .

@johnwang2882 6 ай бұрын

India

@richardcleveland8549 6 ай бұрын

Thanks @@johnwang2882

@richardcleveland8549 6 ай бұрын

@@johnwang2882 Possibly, but I still think Chinese. Whatever it is, it sounds VERY robotic.

@rjmercer042 6 ай бұрын

Stop naming carriers after people, especially politicians. Go back to traditional names... Lexington, Saratoga, Wasp, Hornet, Yorktown.

@peterson7082 6 ай бұрын

Wasp is already taken

@rjmercer042 6 ай бұрын

@@peterson7082 ya, it is an amphib carrier IIRC.

@fredtsc33 6 ай бұрын

Reminding me of the UK carriers, Korea's CVX shouldn't have twin islands. It looks so obscure!

@azzajames7661 6 ай бұрын

Twin islands are a smart idea, as if one gets taken out the other can take over their controls😜

@oliviarodrigo2025 Ай бұрын

Cvn81 😂 no name 😅❤