Hatty Tarrant I not only think about them and I watch them but I also think about my mom and dad and my sister besides me watching it some laughing some find it embarrassing but nevertheless we washed it as a family no hidden agendas in these shows I don't think just pure family entertainment

It's ok but I wasnt exactly rolling.

Indeed. Gone Too Soon.

A Goth Queen as Morticia.

How old was she?

@@kirankhan720 ...she was 53 when she passed away (colon cancer)

Wow.. That is young....

Not to mention that Jackie Coogan was the child actor with Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton.

Lol 😂

LOL! Good old Uncle Fester. Always good for a laugh.

so funny XD

I Laughed So Hard

Alright thank goodness that he's still with us. How do we send him a letter of thanks to him and everyone who made this show so popular and a favorite

that line was amazing too

Which Episode?

@@LegoPostPresidency It’s the Wednesday Leaves Home episode

Itˋs funny too, in the Episode Morticias Romance 2, who Uncle fester played Ophilia and Gomez stated that he doesnˋt want to marry her. And his Reaction is so funny

She was the OG, the Original Goth.

And as Ophelia, just as beautiful

and she could really act👍

ferna2294 just gold? It's Platinum

Amen!!

#1 show right here on KZfaq

tbf the crap shows from the 60s probably just aren't remember.

He's basically Curly if he came back from the dead and went nuts.

Curly was actually 11 years older than Jackie Coogan (the actor that played Uncle Fester), but both were equally nutty!

He's basically Curly if Curly were clever enough to be a mad scientist!

Why Soitenly!!

Excellent Lord Prince Zuko!

Well, he'd have an unfair advantage.

"Expert Swordsman" proceeds to get rekt in the only actual and legit duel he participated in the entire series. XD

​@@akaneriyun4774that's fun for him. Remember when he fenced Tully. He was impressed he cut him.

Naturally

@@generalshadow9027 Loaded?

I do! Maybe I could _marry_ into a family like that! ;)

an interesting and valid point, however the more chivalrous type would call this a rationalization for cowardice, regardless of it's logical merit.

​@@orangedalmatian Then I'd be a living coward and the chivalrous guy died with his honour and ideals intact. I can only pray that the other guy, in his dying moments, thought his chivalry was as valuable to him as my life is to me. I'm actually reminded of a story I read once about an old fencing master who's having a pint down at the pub. There he's confronted by a big, strong, arrogant youth who mocks him and boastfully tells his friends that he could easily defeat the decrepid old master in a duel. The old master accepts this challenge and tells the youth that they can have a one-on-one duel in a back alley, just the two of them, mano a mano, right then and there. The youth follows the old master out into the alley, but when the old man turns around he angrily points towards the alley entrance behind the youth and scolds the kid for breaking the rules of their engagement by bringing his friends along with him; they can have their duel once the youth has told his friends to go back into the pub again. When the kid turns around to look, the old man takes his head off from behind. The old fencing master then goes back to the tavern, picks up his beer, and tells the kid's friends he taught their friend a lesson in fencing that he won't soon forget. Moral: Old fencing masters don't get that way by making themselves easy to kill.

@@GrahamChapman That is an interesting story. And I guess the whole 'honour vs life' dilemma has been an age old dynamic, it really just depends on the individual's priorities. I guess in a way, Cowardice by definition is the act of valuing one's life over their convictions or pride. Whether that's a bad thing or not is more a matter of context and cultural perspective.

@@orangedalmatian Eh, you'd have to do a lot more to qualify as a "coward" in my eyes than merely valuing your life above convictions or pride. (Though it also depends on _what_ "convictions" we're specifically talking about here; petty convictions _should_ be abandoned in a life-or-death situation imo, but higher values must not... If you pull shit like sending innocent non-combatants into battle in order to give yourself some extra time to run away then I'm obviously not going to be all too keen on forgiving that kinda bullcrap.) For the most part though, I find that "coward" is just the taunt that the fool and/or brute resorts to when they realize that though they may be skilled or strong enough to win against their adversary, they're not _smart_ enough to win against them, and feeling that their foe employing guileful, pragmatic cunning is unfair they resort to whining and banking on them calling their opponent a "coward" for defeating them using cunning instead of strength and/or skill will provoke their opponent into attempting to win on the fool's/brute's terms... Personally, I feel that if I was confronted with a situation that could either allow me to stay alive for another day to protect the things that I hold dear, then I find that preferable to dying an avoidable death over petty chivalry which would leave me unable to protect those things, and people who value their chivalry over the things they'd put their lives on the line to protect cannot be particularily virtuous people in the first place, (I mean, would _you_ care about being chivalrous if the lives of innocents were at stake?) so calling me out on shooting them in the back just wouldn't feel very self-aware of them to me.

I guess, though, that's kind of more along the lines of "winning, no matter the cost".

Oh he embraces death, but that doesn't mean some injuries don't hurt like hell.

In the back!

Ever been shot? lol

No, that was the monsters family.

So, he got you in the back?

Ooh, I like that idea. After all, it would still be a "duel"... ON MOTORCYCLES!

Andrew Bull seriosly the yami way

Does he get to play too? The possibility of more powerful cards? IN THE BACK!!

In the back!!!!

And That's Jackie Coogan

'Send an Insulting Letter *with swords? *naturally I'm sorry for the correction but I'm really bothered by this :)

Mine's Wednesday

If only he had that musket back then. You can bet no one would bother taking away the Tramp's kid if said kid threatened to shoot 'em in the back.

He was in it twice

The 90s movies with Raul Julia were wonderful.

They don't shoot you in the back. They shoot you in the front.

Obi-Wan Kenobi 20 years?? hummm didn't Trump won say last year if he shot someone in Time Square he could get away with it.

"I'll shoot him in the back"

Obi-Wan Kenobi QUIIIIIIIICK!!!!!

but he insulted the family honour....

+Obi-Wan Kenobi Ben don't give him ideas, that means he gets more food and conjugal visits.

He made him funny and lovable too.

@@jaengen Indeed. He has an adorkable "curly Howard"-esque vibe.

Steven Smith your a hairy disembodied hand

Carolyn Jones is the best Morticia

that is not the honorable way

@@generalshadow9027 I know but it's the safe way.

the maya chronicles Amazon Prime. The whole show is free to watch on there

MGM also uploaded 14 episodes.

It says it in the description.

Sean Will , the film version changed a lot of their characters. They are a “normal” family, but that enjoys macabre things. On the series he is more like a grumpy uncle, that likes the “old ways”, and criticizes new stuff. The films tried to make them more edgy (for example, look at Wednesday of the series, and compare to the one portrayed on the 1991 movie). So, no, he isn’t a masochist (if you don’t include his thing for electricity as masochism).