R.L. Allan Sovereign Longprimers can be purchased here www.bibles-direct.co.uk/products/?c=94 and here evangelicalbible.com/product-category/r-l-allan-bibles/allan-kjv/ .

Thanks for your information on the Longprimer. That was very informative to see the differences of the different printer's versions.

Thank you for your review. I don't have any premium Bibles but I'm interested in this one. Love and peace.

This was exactly what I needed to see, Thanks!

Thank you for your review. I actually enjoyed the mini Bible study at the end!

Very nice review, I really enjoy how indepth you go with your reviews. I also enjoy the RL Allan . God bless.

That's a beautiful print in that Bible. Thanks for sharing brother.

they are all nice bibles, good to show all 3 together so you can see what you are getting with each bible, thanks

Lovely opaque paper and minimal glare. The saying "You get what you pay for" applies here.

Looks beautiful, one day I'll break down and get a meriva leather before they're gone.

I've been binge watching your videos for a couple of hours and stopped but this just came up on the algorithm and I thought i haven't see that one. Think this is a good Bible. Had some trouble with a couple of Allan's with either 1) the book block not being totally straight. 2) the typeset missing letters. It looks like they've sorted their printer out but not the uniformity. I'm going to order that purple one anyway in a couple of weeks God willing, thanks for the review Grant. God bless you.

You're the best bible reviewer on KZfaq IMHO, what most do including me is just sharing the materials. If someone truly wants a great "review" this is the place to come. I think the sovereign is my favorite kJV bible, its not perfect but I really love the bible as a whole. The Mariva is very nice but seems almost to soft LOL, the goatskin has a full yapp and keeps the form which I really love . That's a beautiful bible brother I'd like to have one not marked up someday mine was slightly used but still its awesome to own. You've been busy brother I have lots to catch up on, and thanks for the prayers😇

Thats a Beautiful WORD OF GOD

I considered this one, but went with the Cambridge Turquoise instead. (1) Good sized readable font. (2) Translators to the reader preface. (3) Italics for supplied words. (4) Line matched.

Hi Grant. I am a huge fan of your channel. Thank you for all of the informative content! I was curious if you know why the translator notes in the longprimer always start at #2?

So if you would choose one between Longprimer and Turquoise, what will it be, and why?

Between 62 and 52, which one do you like more, and why?

Thanks again for great review. Will you be doing any reviews on wide margin bibles?

Honest opinion - Allan’s Meriva Calfskin vs Highland Goatskin (bearing in mind that Allen is using the calfskin as a substitute until the highland can be farmed again - and that they are the same price) I have the Westminster Meriva - would you know if it’s the same as that?

I use a couple older World publishing large print reference Bibles I have collected (as new). They were from the late 70s or early 80s. I love them as compared to modern bibles as they have India paper. The ghosting, even on the so called "high quality" bibles, does not compare. They should still use this paper. There is nothing better.

I'm not a fan of many of the bibles with red text for Christ or red text for chapter headings etc.. I find it harder to read, distracting, and it's especially bad for people who are somewhat red/colour-blind because it can make it very hard to read. PS. If you ever get a chance to compare this with a 52 in a video that would be cool. I think you'll appreciate the differences between the fonts/boldness. Then you could also compare the typography like you did with page 1004-1006. You'll notice immediately that the 52 (which I own) has a less bold font overall. You might like the boldness IDK. I think the paper is also supposed so be a bit "creamier" of a color for the 52? Anywho. I love the meriva calfskin. I'll be receiving a goatskin 43 soon and I would like to get a 53 someday or a 63. I would like to see R.L. Allan make a 72 and 73 (Longprimers with WIDE MARGIN!! Meriva and Goatskin respectively). As far as I know the sovereign is supposed to be bolder than the 53/52/43 I love the Longprimer font. Do you know which fonts are similar to Longprimer (that are more common? For word/pages etc) Thanks! That Turquoise that you're comparing with the 62 at 17:30 has font that to me just looks a little bit too "playful". I love how "flat" and "straight" the longprimer font looks especially if you compare the lowercase "L" and the all of the "S" letters. Obviously both are nice! Just trying to point out little things I notice. I can see why people like the Schuyler font. I can also see why some people do not care for it. If they made a KJV without their logo (if they changed their logo) I might try one but I am not a fan of the 5 crosses. I don't know why. It just rubs me the wrong way and I can't tell why. *EDIT I actually like the line spacing and overall font of the longprimer too because it feels like the ink is taking up all the room on the page yet there's still the perfect amount of room and characters per line to easily read.

How many different Bibles do you have? Have you ever counted them all?

What does the number 62 denote? Or the 53 etc?

Do any Allan Longprimer KJV Bibles have italics for supplied words? Is the dictionary in the back for words whose meaning has changed? Thanks

Watching reruns brother 😉 I noticed that your Sovereign print problem is identical too mine on page 1006 and 1004 . 1004 is very dark , I find it unusual that my older Highland Goatskin edition has the same ink fading. I have come too the conclusions that it's not low ink nor ramdom when they print these. I believe their high quality printing is giving us an exact copy of the original longprimer used to make these with flaws an all. I also found this same printing issue with my Cambridge Concord in John 3:16 the red letter text is faded and actually slightly broken up . I'm willing to bet that even the black prints have some printing variations issues at JN 3:16 . I had people check their bibles at one time and everyone said their red letter prints were all the same way. I wonder if your black text Concord has faded and choppy print at JN 3:16? You would think that technology these days in printing could fix this especially when folks are dropping $250 + for a premium . Anyways...yes I'm bored 😉 Blessings brother .

Is this the Allan bible that has the least show-through?

😤... HOW MANY TIMES MUST I SAY LEAVE LINKS? Also more greek and latin reviews pwease :3

I don't care for the schuyler's or cambridges or even LCBP. As far as I understand LCBP is not CBP. CBP seems pretty great I would love to see them leather-line their bibles too. I prefer R. L. Allan's overall.

I find that whenever it says *The Best MSS. Omit. that usually those lines are very important and what it really means is "Modern Translations often Omit ...." PS. By "Best" they mean the ones that were kept in best condition or rather the ones that were kept by the kings/queens etc not the people. in other words "best=worst" in my eyes. The R.L. Allan Longprimer 52 is very similar and just as great!

so much changes in the words

This review plods along. It could be done in 5 minutes 👎👎👎👎👎👎