so.... like an block buster action movie?

@@AgroSquerril ...only for the bar occupants to point their guns at you.

@@stavinaircaeruleum2275 And all you had was a knife.

Would like it, but past 66 likes, before 69

A perfect analogy

Aliens "what did we do" Human with a probe "you know what you did"

Also Humans: "It isn't genocide if they aren't civilian casualties; you were willing to risk more than 61,000,000 soldiers and you lost them."

Aliens: You will service us! Humans: One moment please, retrieving Geneva checklist. For the Algorithm!

@@aj_the_infamous1013 No one but humans gets to explore uranus! :D

@@MarkGast I worked on a farm. I can safely say, those aliens got serviced quite well.

Big Smoke lives on as the Spirit of Humanity

Ratatatatata

ALL YOU HAD TO DO, WAS FOLLOW THE DAMN TRAIN CJ!!!!!!!!!!!

URAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Or maybe "You have chosen an incorrect settlement imbecile"

The aliens really did try and say that they came in piece when they destroyed the largest city and told us to surrender or die.

@@johnjohnjohnson7720 They will join the viltrum empire... Or die.

"You don't seem to like it when the spear points in the other direction doncha!"

That, in general, is the most effective way to offer peace. Neither side has any illusions.

Hello Xenos. Welcome to gunboat diplomacy. We have had several centuries of politics dedicated to it.

@@carlfranz6805 Speak soft. Big stick

To summarize most attempts to conquer humanity… Alien civilization: Alright filthy humans it’s time for you to- *Ninety percent of the military gets vaporized in a hail of lead and fire.* Humanity: *Just standing there smug with fifteen various degrees of weapons behind them.* So, peace talks? Alien civilization: P-Peace talks please.

Then again, that's just a game with no real consequences.

this is actually the real life doctrine for nuclear war. mutual destruction

@@stevenrodriguez763 well, that's what they're SAYING to scare the others off from doing it. Would they actually? That's the question.

@@giarnovanzeijl399 yes since countries that include china and russia have dead man switches. its more or less an automatic choice, im almost certain the US has some sort of dead man switch too.

@@giarnovanzeijl399 we are about to find out :)

lol yup

Its also a case of it doesn't matter if "You missed, with a cannon!"

@@tyler58701 don't forget if you want to confuse your enemy use music (red vs blue warthog song starts playing)

@@aj_the_infamous1013 Don't you mean Puma?

@@joshadams5602 What in Sam Hill is a Puma?

As far as I see it if they don’t win the war quickly enough we will take anything they leave behind and reverse engineer it. And in a state where our governments actually come together , we would become monsters

@@user-mu8ok5xf8d Humans will only unite if there is a greater treat to us than ourselves. If we don't know about such treat we will continue to continue fighting against ourselves

@@user-mu8ok5xf8d If aliens were to even win said wars, who's to say that the descendants of humans wouldn't seek revenge and progress in technology behind the scenes? Going by most stories, any alien encounter would be good for humanity as long it doesn't result in extinction.

The civ's in these stories are a joke. We do not want actual aliens to do anything harmful to us. Any real movement by an Alien force at this point in our development would wipe us out completely. It would be entirely up to them whether they wanted to let us live. Even reverse engineering would take much much longer than these stories say. It would be worse than trying to figure out an I-phone as a caveman. Our only hope is that any aliens who show up are peaceful or some sort of parody of themselves. That or they don't show up until we AT-LEAST figure out how to travel faster than light at will. Once we have a couple intergalactic spaceship equivalents we can talk about fighting aliens.

@@Merilirem Relatively to an alien race, we would be much quicker than them if they haven't had any change in their history for 400 000 years. We would likely suffer defeat at first if they don't wipe us out, we would slowly but surely start to be integrated into their society, their technology could with time and effort be retrieved and reverse engineered, sure it might take years, but it would still be feasible, reverse engineering is already taking place all over the world on smaller isolated scales, now imagine if all of humanity would focus their eyes on one single target, if even just one single individual would succeed, more would follow.

Let us show our definition of war...

lol , given enough time i think they would

Then it wouldn't be a moon anymore! "Its not a moon"

If not the fact it plays major part in planet's biosphere, we definetly would turn it into attack moon

they didn't have gigastructural engineering installed

They just turned the lights back on hehe

quite an achievement considering the usage of homing missiles.

Sounds more like an awakened empire visiting earth and getting their asses kicked and tech stolen. and then the humans became the new crisis.

@@zeehero7280 When crisis visits tall empire with strong enouth fleets to resist, while it has full stock of alloys >:D

@@Crazylom Always nice when your future vassals visit you to submit.

Implying they have hearts in their heads.

@@Merilirem hmmm smart

if they did have heads they would have brains and give up much earlier.

“Don’t mess with the Nation that needs medication.”

"The middle east" not any specific countries of course because why would an American ever want to know exactly who they're fighting, nope because one foreign brown person is quite like another right? Of you knew the name of the individual countries you were bombing you might start to see their citizens as human and we can't have that, your leaders need you frothing at the mouth to kill whoever they point fingers at next or their corporate lobbyists bottom line might take a hit.

@@seekingabsolution1907 you seem to be taking a KZfaq comment meant to be a joking reference FAR too seriously

@@seekingabsolution1907 And that's how war was declared on Israel! Wait..

This is what we build and blow up when we’re having fun. Imagine what we build and blow up when we’re pissed.

Gotta have sexy time before going to war.

We need to have hormone release first.

Alright bot of you, why have sexy time when you can build weapon of mass destruction at a speed even the most advanced alien couldn't even dream of?

In fairness, they could have studied some stoners by mistake while here...

@@basrengangetch.2042 Wait... That's not sexy time? I have got to get out more...

Sounds like a skill issue

No

Only because they ended up getting that many engineers that quickly.”

apart from the foolish zenos, no

@@crayonchomper1180 *filthy xenos*

The Empire clearly was.

yup

Or as the more accurate term was: "Fuck around and find out."

@@renewalacumen1770 I prefer “ play stupid games, get stupid prizes”

that they do

Earth, _mostly_ harmless.

@@shanerooney7288 From every other story that describes earth, no. It's not mostly harmless.

@@phasepanther4423 You not a fan of the classics?

@@shanerooney7288 I tend to prefer the deathworld descriptive tag that some stories place on earth. That to prevent panic, other governments limit any information about the human homeworld. The last thing they would need is to know that the friendly little human in the room next to theirs is nearly impossible to kill and is from a species capable of great feats even in the face of death.

That's so damn cool

I mean it's not like we have been doing that sorta thing for our entire history, practice makes perfect right?

-humans- Europeans*

@@honkeykong4049 none Europeans have had a fair bit of experience too

It's not unrealistic though, humans tend to go overboard in every aspect. Why have a car that just is enough for the things you use it if you can also get one that's twice as strong? Why only make weapons that will work if you can make them long range hole punchers with enough force to level a building? Why only eat stuff that is enough to survive if you can have a feast? And to be fair, we humans are quite good at reverse engineering stuff :D The one word to describe humans: MORE

I was thinking Hell March myself.

​@@robertschumacher2707 that is another good option

Now to figure out which hell March. I'd personally nominate hell March 1.

>.>; Gamestonks?

@@tanknerd7193 pop

I'm sorry, we have WHAT?

Also, Tsar bomb actually was around 1.4 times weaker than it was INTENDED. The one in charge for bomb test and it's cores desided in last moment, that it would be boom to big to handle for Earth, and desided to unload one core off. It would be ~90Mtons, if not precaution.

@@Crazylom also 50megatons nuke is about the same yield as 1kg of antimatter would get you.

@@zeehero7280 Haven't played with that yet. But had some fun with pasto and antipasto...

I hope they don't use them. I'd hate to have to restart civilization again.

The Emperor protects, Xenos fear, and Khorne laughs.

i don't understand , maybe you should demonstrate

@@AgroSquerril to bring the words of Leonidas to the xenos "ah I think that's not possible, I think I sprained my knee as I killed all your warriors back then"

@@wolfoffenris9951 love that line

For the algorithm for Argo for the empire

probably

Like, only complete dumbass would be picky about anything when you can stomp alien roaches with buddies together

what "kind" they used an orbital strike to destroy the most populace cities, and then went to ground invasion; this suggests imperialistic tendency. Given human history, do you think any nation would willingly cede itself to be a vassal of an alien empire?

@@henrypaleveda7760 Yes. Without the shadow of a doubt. Do you have any idea how often city state/kingdoms bowed to a superior enemy to avoid taking unnecessary causualty ? That's what would happen here. Other question. Do you really think government from OTHER countries, you know, the one not getting hit, would want to fight an enemy that didn't attacked them directly ? One that could wipe out THEIR cities and THEIR population rather quickly.

@@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine I meant with the knowledge of history and how it went for them ,do you think most countries would rather be vaslized and turned against the others under the thumb of an (genuinely) inhuman force? I also noticed that most capitulations of the kind that you talk about were because they couldn't send for help in time, evacuate, or thought that their neighbors might also surrender. With the state of communication between countries, i don't think that one would give in on account of the others barring something like spite.

@@henrypaleveda7760 You really think countries communicate that much ? Think of any global effort and how much of a pain in the ass it is to extract an empty promise that won't be followed. Here's the thing. Humanity is fractured and it's very much an "every man for itself" kind of deal only country size. If there is no extermination threat you can be sure most small or peaceful country are gonna surrender within the week.

@@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine I figured with the paranoia, people would not trust aliens that wiped out several cities in a day to be peaceful and would rather at least feign alliance with other countries; if you look at the cooperation efforts during the second world war between allied countries, I think it is a good example of the behaviors that I was talking about as well as highlighting your points about division and indecision.

Same!

:)

Technology is weird and not linear so it’s a crapshoot. Most likely you would end up with a civilization greatly more advanced in some aspects, the same in others and likely quite far behind in other areas of technology. Since a lot of knowledge in human experience has been brought about by seeming chance and directed focused effort. Every sentient organism is going to have biases it trends to when developing technology.

​@@axiomshift4666 Certainly, but it's not quite a crapshoot. There are natural and hypothetical barriers that any civilization that wants to reach the Kardashev scale must overcome. My point was mostly concerned with the timespan that evolution works on. From primordial ooze to complex thinking organisms... we're probably looking at billions of years; several hundred million at the very least. The chances that there are organisms that reached sentience at roughly the same time as we did and thus had at least a few thousand years before we show up in their neck of the galactic woods by the time they can even communicate with us are vanishingly small. It could happen, but I remain skeptical about the prospect, given the numbers involved. The above radically changes as distances increase, since more volume of space = more chances for the above to actually happen, but at some point you run into the end of the observable universe and, unless we can break the speed of light (impossible under known physics, with a few theoretical workarounds that we don't have the math for yet), that's likely as far as we'll be able to go before the Big Rip catches up to us. Mind you, given the sheer amount of time and space involved, if humanity expands outside Earth, we could easily evolve to become aliens to one another eventually, but it's doubtful either one of us will see that possibility unfold... or maybe we have already and this (our universe) is simply an ancestor simulation - it would certainly explain why it's so comparatively early in the lifespan of the universe and why we're seemingly alone out here.

@@DarkVeghetta I figure that even with hundreds of millions of years aliens wouldn’t necessarily be all that much more advanced in every category Depends on more than the strict flow of time. What I think will have more of a effect than time necessarily is the traits and biases of the species at hand. Especially since the projects needed for exceedingly advanced technology seem to require massive social cohesion.

@@axiomshift4666 Relative power isn't only about scientific ability, but industrial capacity. This, as you rightly pointed out, is governed by social cohesion. I doubt a species lacking teamwork will ever progress past rudimentary scientific understanding, even if all of the constituent individuals are geniuses by our standards. Passing on knowledge and working together to get things done are likely the more important factors. That said, a very efficient hive organism like an ant colony really doesn't really need technology to out-compete pretty much everything in their area, at their scale. As such, being too good at social cohesion can be a detriment to evolving technology. There are many factors to consider, but time might be among the most important, as it governs the ability for a species to evolve the other traits necessary for true sapience and what we would recognize as civilization (which is another discussion altogether - actually recognizing something is sapient and/or has a civilization; it might not be as intuitive as most expect).

@@DarkVeghetta they would have to be fairly lucky and or well suited to not have periods of instability or stagnation that effects their advancement. There is a lot of “good enough” points of technology where to go further would be immense effort for seemingly not much gain. One of my favorite sci fi tropes was about civilizations stagnating because they had made entertainment vr and all needs were met by automated processes. Thus no more need to advance at all. This is part of why I think the species traits matters more than strict time.

thats a daily thing

Funnily enough, it is theoretically possible to convert matter into anti-matter. Dumbed down to the most common understanding of the process, it literally is dump enough of the right energy into something, it'll eventually cause the matter to convert into anti-matter.

@@thomasschulz2167 FTL Lasers, Infinite energy and mass, two years to design both a lunar shipyard, six months to build. Humanity is either A. Space Wizards or B. Anime Protagonist.

@@gmradio2436 stole alien tech, it's possible, depending how advanced that tech is. starts with handheld weapons, then ship wreckage.

@@zeehero7280 That would only bring human tech equal to or if being very generous slightly above the alien tech. Not gods that break the very laws of physics.

@@gmradio2436 the laws of physics? as if we even understand a fraction of them. Just like most good versions of FTL drive dont break the laws of physics.

Yeah but the again, those 1,000 are the only threat to anything.

@@bogustoast22none25 Yeah, going by the millions of drones that even just a single ship used, it's safe to say that these ships are MASSIVE, maybe warhammer40k style in size, could likely deal with a whole solar system or two with just one of these ships and wipe them out of existence, with all the lunar bases on the edges, they likely have a network that's galaxy wide, so these 1k big massive ships are likely only used when a threat significant enough is present.

@@MrHuntingClaw *"Could likely deal with a star system or two with just one of these ship."* That's exactly the problem. 1,000 ships for 100,000,000,000 stars means 100 *_Million_* star systems per ship. And that's the _lower_ bracket.

@@shanerooney7288 If the far majority of those stars are calm and dealt with smaller ships for domestic use rather than intergalatic use, then you basically only have the galatic scaled ships stationed on all the edges, intervening when absolutely needed. You don't need some solar-system destroying ship stationed around every single species within a galaxy, it would likely suffice with ones used for tinier businesses.

@@MrHuntingClaw If 99.99% of the stars don't need Earth ships, that still leaves 10,000 stars per ship. I don't think you really appreciate the scale of the numbers involved here.

kept going

For the algorithm

FOR THE ALGORITHIM AAHHH!

For the algorithm

I mean antimatter cannons and singularity causing weapons should have some decent range and I’m sure not all planets are particularly worth protecting closely.

They said something like a hundred lightyear range on some weapon or other...

Should they? Tell me vow that antimercury stuff is supposed to work and ill tell you why these concepts are retarded.

@@carlfranz6805 They have cannons on lunar bases with 1000 LY range that causes short-lived singularties.

@@inso80 first create antimatter, them use nuclear fusion to turn the anti hydrogen into anti Mercury. Contain with magnetic or gravitic field opposite or around equal mass of regular mercury. On impact have mercury and anti mercury collide. Depending on quantity of mercury and anti mercury explosion may be grenade sized to planet sized.

Except it's Birch world in terms of OP

sounds about right

For Argo

yarp

Thank you for the dono , not sure why KZfaq didn't notify me about this one, youtube being youtube I suppose.

For the algorithm

glad you enjoyed

For the algorithm

For the algorithm

For the algorithm

For the algorithm