The Last Duel - Ridley Scott & Jodie Comer on a woman's voice & the madness of crowds

Рет қаралды 17,592

2 жыл бұрын

Ridley Scott and Jodie Comer are interviewed by Stefan Pape for The Last Duel. Directed by Ridley Scott, the film stars Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Jodie Comer and Adam Driver. Damon and Affleck adapted the book by Eric Jager with Nicole Holofcener.
Plot: A historical epic, “The Last Duel” is a gripping tale of betrayal and vengeance set against the brutality of 14th century France. The film, which opens in cinemas nationwide this October, is a cinematic and thought-provoking drama set in the midst of the Hundred Years War that explores the ubiquitous power of men, the frailty of justice and the strength and courage of one woman willing to stand alone in the service of truth. Based on actual events, the film unravels long-held assumptions about France’s last sanctioned duel between Jean de Carrouges and Jacques Le Gris, two friends turned bitter rivals.
The Last Duel will be released on the 15th of October, 2021
#TheLastDuel #JodieComer #RidleyScott
---------------------
For syndication or usage opportunities please contact syndication@heyuguys.co.uk.
---------------------
More from HeyUGuys:
Website ► HeyUGuys.com
Follow us on Twitter ► / heyuguys
Subscribe here! ► bit.ly/HeyUGuysYTSub
Facebook ► / heyuguys
Instagram ► / heyuguysofficial
---------------------

Пікірлер: 59

@sun131089 2 жыл бұрын

The fact that people still having this conversation if doubt after the movie clearly states much hasn’t changed .....what a film !

@sonnymp1337 Жыл бұрын

It has... They are just self centeted and like to tslk about themselves all the time. Narcissistics.

@two_owls 2 жыл бұрын

The title card for part three literally says "The Truth" - pretty blatant, imo!

@RShadow12 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! I’m surprised by how something that blatant could go over some people’s heads

@naderzein2435 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly! It's like people didn't even watch the film. No wonder Ridley is frustrated lol.

@two_owls 2 жыл бұрын

@@naderzein2435 I was listening to a pair of film critics on a podcast and while one liked it a lot, the other said she didn't because the woman was just a pawn for the men to fight over and I'm over here like...Yeah, that's the point of the movie, and it spends almost half its runtime looking at that injustice from HER perspective lol!

@naderzein2435 2 жыл бұрын

@@two_owls it's frustrating as a fan of film seeing takes like that, I can only imagine how annoying it is for the filmmakers LOL!

@oddicocidic 2 жыл бұрын

@@naderzein2435 she didn't know that she could be burnt when she spoke out. dam this dude doesn't even remember the story he directed. i guess everyone is dumb when they speak out in anger.

@naderzein2435 2 жыл бұрын

The film literally says "The truth according to Marguerite Carrouges" and then fades to just "The Truth", as if you couldn't stamp the point any clearer. It's like people didn't even watch the film.

@lotsoflogan49 2 жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly

@lotsoflogan49 2 жыл бұрын

The movie is split into chapters, each one with the title, "The truth according to" whichever character. On Marguerite's chapter, as the new chapter text fades out, hers is the only one where "The truth" lingers on screen. I also thought it was completely obvious

@sadiqurrahman9741 2 жыл бұрын

I also noticed that. The other two times it fades normally and all at the same time. I actually checked that out after niloticing that just to be sure lol

@guyblack 2 жыл бұрын

One day ridley scott is gonna be the subject of a film

@datatsushi2016 2 жыл бұрын

Ridley is always making me laugh lmao

@ssg8tee 2 жыл бұрын

I love how real Sir Ridley Scott is … and he is absolutely correct in asking, “how stupid can these people be?”. Clearly, Le Gris was guilty! I guess the misogyny of men is a hard habit to break!!!

@oddicocidic 2 жыл бұрын

she didn't know that she could be burnt when she spoke out. dam this dude doesn't even remember the story he directed. i guess everyone is dumb when they speak out in anger.

@sonnymp1337 Жыл бұрын

Give me a fkn break

@caitx1248 2 жыл бұрын

It was really clear her story was the truth in the film, people really are just stupid. I love this man hahaha.

@oddicocidic 2 жыл бұрын

True, but she didn't know that she could be burnt when she spoke out. dam this dude doesn't even remember the story he directed. i guess everyone is dumb when they speak out in anger.

@elenavorobeva6747 2 жыл бұрын

I love the way Sir Ridley let the audience decide what his film is about and then tells what he thinks really happened.

@shantoreywilkins651 2 жыл бұрын

💜❤

@ritamacwan9901 2 жыл бұрын

The true essence of storytelling

@zaimnaqvi8893 2 жыл бұрын

I swear lol just bad film making pushed by an agenda

@elenavorobeva6747 2 жыл бұрын

@@zaimnaqvi8893 you mean "great"? Never use bad filmmaking and Ridley Scott in same sentence(no offense)

@zaimnaqvi8893 2 жыл бұрын

@@elenavorobeva6747 ngl that was a bit harsh I confess as I truly enjoyed the first two perspectives as the first one laid the story and the second didn't have many scenes that overlapped instead filled in the gaps. However the third perspective(victim) repeated some scenes and changed completely how some things happened(and I'm not referring to the rape here btw but all the other shit like the scene where the knight comes home from war and hugs her in the first perspective and not the third infact chooses not to hug her in the third). I mean if you wanted to make it that whatever she said was "true" then doing it from the start was a better idea instead of making the audience watch scenes that would basically be deleted. In addition I find it highly suspect that they showed the victim as seeing everything as "the truth" instead of showing her perspective filling in some gaps like what was done with second perspective and then letting the audience decide since it would have created more of a cliff hanger and perhaps a better ending. In truth, I really see this film making process as being bias towards "believe all women"/"believe women" agenda among others.

@basoaldo 2 жыл бұрын

Another thing that I noticed on the movie (its a small detail): In the Court, someone says "His majesty, King Charles VI". But the classification/designation of Kings using numbers is a historian classification. No one used IV at the time. Most likely they would say "King Charles".

@allanm3247 2 жыл бұрын

Such a fantastic movie, I loved it. Thank you for making it. It's such a nice contrast to the comic book films. This was deep, layered and well done.

@algocursi2564 Жыл бұрын

I don't wanna be disrespecful, but it hurts me the point of view of people about movies based or inspired by comic books. But at the same time, I understand...

@ssg8tee 2 жыл бұрын

Also , how can Jodie Comer be SO cute? ❤️

@trueandika 2 жыл бұрын

Ridley Scott is crazy lol

@lmfaouch Жыл бұрын

They movie is incredible. I haven’t been blown away by a movie like that in a while. Ridley Scott never stops delivering

@paulhoffmann3405 2 жыл бұрын

You gotta love Ridleys answers here!

@arumba7345 2 жыл бұрын

Wow he's 84 good for him.

@VeronicaSywak Жыл бұрын

0:15 "ALL MY BrOs DIdN't BeLIeVe THE WoMAN WaS AKSHUALLY RApED HurR DuRR"" Are you all aware that you 1. Sound like an NPC misogynist 2. Directly insulted Ridley Scott and Jodie Comer to their faces? Ridley crafted a gorgeous film and Jodie delivered a nuanced performance but for some reason you entirely failed to understand the movie. I love how Ridley basically called you and your friends morons. Jodie could barely hide her disgust at your comments. You embarrassed yourself.

@chessic4 2 жыл бұрын

Well that gave away the entire movie ending, lol.

@Nazaba09 2 жыл бұрын

So did history.

@masmoney5731 2 жыл бұрын

I thought Ridley Scott was American by his movie choices, he is very British 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 !! although I heard him speak with an American accent before !

@basoaldo 2 жыл бұрын

The base of this emotional true story is Marguerite of Carrouges bravery by exposing a rape situation to her husband and Lord, risking her own life. But the movie clearly shows that she only knew about this while being interrogated in the trial. I gess questions is: would she act the same way if she knew about this before? The movie also shows that naturally this is not what she expected.

@genki2705 2 жыл бұрын

Adam Drivers' character swore to the end that he was innocent. He's the quieter, more forgiving character throughout the movie, ready to give in. Given the way Matt Damons' character treats his wife and his constant urge to get even more powerful and richer. It doesn't seem entirely out of thin air that he could've made his wife lie.

@GentM2015 2 жыл бұрын

How stupid can you be? - Ridley Scott

@65g4 2 жыл бұрын

I dont think its fair for Ridley to have a go at us milenniels thinking its our fault thats the film failed. I like historical films i have not seen this film but i would be open to give the film a go. Maybe theres just too many movies to see these days you dont have to see everything. He has made historical epics that have been successful before like Gladiator. Maybe he just has to realise this film is not as good as that.

@analogecstasy4654 2 жыл бұрын

Why are the accents all over the place?

@TheIrishBosnian 2 жыл бұрын

The worst thing about the movie is that you had to watch that rape scene twice. Good movie though.

@ocean4332 6 ай бұрын

Ридли Скотт это псевдо режиссёр в Голливуде, который не умеет снимать фильмы, он не делает свое кино, а нанимает профессиональных режиссеров и операторов для съёмки фильма. Скотт не платит деньги этим профессионалам, а потом убивает их.

@elliotstannard5621 2 жыл бұрын

The Madness of Crowds? Are we going to hear some Douglas Murray? Edit, having seen the interview: ... Oh... Right... This movie is the product of the madness of crowds...

@adrianmurray2884 2 жыл бұрын

What the... thanks for the spoiler alert! Ruins the movie in the first 20 seconds!

@oddicocidic 2 жыл бұрын

She didn't know that she could be burnt when she spoke out... dam this dude doesn't even remember the story he directed.

@Necromonger69 2 жыл бұрын

"Get woketh go broketh" - knight parsival

@zaimnaqvi8893 2 жыл бұрын

Meh I don't see the point of having the first earlier perspectives if you're just gonna repeat what happened that the first 2 said and make the first 2 perspectives to be wrong in the third and what the victim says is the absolute truth and there is no question about that. I think this movie was to an extent playing on social justice movement and was biased in that sense with its creation.

@walli7754 2 жыл бұрын

... Right, I think you are missing the point of pov or, just, stories. Also, sorry dude, but you are the one projecting here lol

@zaimnaqvi8893 2 жыл бұрын

@@walli7754 no I understood the POVs still doesn't make sense to play it out this way unless there's an agenda also I'm far from the only one that has given this critique of the film either

@walli7754 2 жыл бұрын

@@zaimnaqvi8893... What agenda? Dude, I am sorry, it's more then fine if you did not like it but this is just dumb.

@zaimnaqvi8893 2 жыл бұрын

@@walli7754 dude it makes no fucking sense to give three perspectives then say the victim's memory was entirely true even though it contradicts on many critical situations with the knight's perspective for instance the hug scene after the knight comes back from war. It would have been better to give all 3 perspectives and leave the rest up to the audience in a cliff hanger sort of way and commence with the last duel instead of playing on an agenda of "believe women"/"believe all women"/"believe all victims" and basically making the first 2 perspectives worth shit and the final one aka the victim be telling the truth.

@masmoney5731 2 жыл бұрын

@@zaimnaqvi8893 I imagined before matt Damon killed him that she was going to open her trap and confess since they had the camera on her, the story would have taken a turn not knowing what’s going to happen. I disagree with you.