It most definitely would have affected his reasoning and thought process.

Thank you for this comment which helps non-insiders to understand what happened to the loving couple

Bs

What a pity! So did my father in law!

@@aurenitapedrazzi5036 No bullshit, the Danish court gave out an official comment on prince Henrik's disease. It was real.

And He asked a very good question..."If we all want equality, between men and women, why shouldn't a queen's husband be a king consort.. when a king's wife is a queen consort?" I actually agree with him, ... Why shouldn't a man be called a King consort?? If we are equal then it shouldn't matter??? ( And notes that he said King consort.. not King )

I think Henrik was not a noble, he invented that story.

Sadly, this part about Henrik is not made up nonsense. He was a complainer.

@@nenisguevaragomez8122 lol of course he was a noble , it’s a proven fact . Ancient noble family from 1660 . And Henri de Montpezat was a Count .

@@marie34K it is still very strange that he didn't know the rules of monarchy then.

@@nenisguevaragomez8122 of course he knew them. Do you believe every silly thing the press invents and prints ?

At the time where he asked, the question, was before he got dementia. He asked a very good question..."If we all want equality, between men and women, why shouldn't a queen's husband be a king consort.. when a king's wife is a queen consort?" . ( And notes here that he specifically says King concort ) I actually agree with him, ... Why shouldn't a man be called a King consort?? If we are equal then it shouldn't matter???

The last name thing didn't used to be true. Queen Victoria was considered to have left the House of Hanover and joined the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha when she married Prince Albert. (There was a court case about some of the jewels, which had been left to the "House of Hanover". The courts agreed that she would have to hand them over. So this was very much the legal view at the time.) The Royal House remained Saxe-Coburg and Gotha until they changed the name to Windsor (and gave up all German titles) during World War I, two monarchs later. If Queen Elizabeth II had followed that tradition, the royal family name would now be Mountbatten. I don't say that Prince Philip and Prince Henrik were right to be upset about their family names, because it is a very patriarchal expectation, but they were not asking for anything new.

Because the rank of King is higher than a Queen.

I don't agree... Maybe prince Philip... But prince Henrik, has never in truly been angry about the title... But it is true, that he joked about.. that if you are married to a Queen you are a King... It was the media, that marked up that stupid story!!!

Yo desde siempre he pensado lo mismo que Henry con respecto a las monarquías dónde reinan mujeres. Me parece que lo lógico y lo justo sea que al igual que ellas se convierten en reinas consortes cuando se casan con un rey y ejercen como tal, a la inversa debería pasar lo mismo. El hombre que se casa con una reina debería adquirir el título de rey consorte, y ejercer como tal, sino ¿ dónde está la igualdad entre hombres y mujeres?.

Let me tell you over Thing. Prince Henrik of denmark , has never ben a count, he was bourgeois Witherspoon No title. I AM Dennis.

Prince Phillip never demanded to be crowned a King though. It’s his uncle Louis who thought the Mountbatten would profit more, if the back then Lieutenant Phillip Mountbatten marries Princess Elizabeth. The only thing Prince Phillip was upset about was the fact that he would be the sole man in the world who wouldn’t be able to give his surname to his children and he had all rights to be upset though. Usually Queen Elizabeth‘s children should have been eligible to carry the name Mountbatten and not Windsor, as it was for Queen Victoria and her children taking up her husbands surname Saxcoburg & Gotha later Windsor, yet Churchill for some reason advised Queen Elizabeth not to allow it. So they kept Windsor, which made Prince Phillip upset. Also about the Prince title .. usually a consort of a reigning monarch is referred as Queen Consort or Prince/Princess Consort, but Phillip was still just known as Duke of Edinburgh even after Princess Elizabeth became Queen, he hadn’t demand to be made into a Prince , it was rightfully to happen and it did. You should remember Prince Phillip was already Prince Phillip of Greece and Denmark a Prince by birth , yet he readily gave up his titles in order to marry Princess Elizabeth of GB& NI. I doubt he would be suddenly upset about about not being a Prince lol. Now to Prince Henry he was always a devoted companion and husband to Queen Margarethe , yet later on he suffered from some type of severe Dementia which made him act up. That’s all to it and not these men being cocky .

@ShinbiBelldandy pourquoi vous écrivez Danois avec une majuscule et Français avec une minuscule???

There was a Margarethe I who reigned over Denmark, Sweden and Norway in the late middle ages along with her great nephew Eric and before that as Regent for her father

Hvorfor har i fjernet mine svar

Jeg troede vi havde ytringsfrihed i Danmark!!!!!!!!

Not was she is her majesty Queen Margrethe has always been down to Earth that's why sge us adored by us Danes

Yes, he was extremely handsome.

He was sooo fine.

Could say the same with the British Royal. As it turnes out. Prince Philip has more Royal ‘Blue’ blood running through him. Than Queen had.

I hope Prince Henrik married the girl and not the title. As Danes, we are happy about all input from abroad. But we stick to our thousand-year-old royal tradition. We only have reigning kings in Denmark. So thanks, but no thanks.

Henrik would have to be born as heir to take over the Danish Kingdom. And that he was not. And Margrethe is not unfair, to do wath he, she would need to change the Danish constatution, and that she has no power to.

If he had a title of king, it would be a consort, not as a sovereign. It wasn’t like back in the Middle Ages when they tried to get sovereign queens married and make them sign a document called the Crown Matrimonial, like Queen Mary I of England when she married King Felipe (Phillip) II of Spain. That marriage and those of her father’s strongly influenced Mary’s successor Elizabeth I on not marrying (smart move… history of England could’ve been very different if Elizabeth married and her husband would’ve taken more control). Thankfully, the conditions of Mary I’s marriage was that Felipe would only be co-monarch of England as long as Mary was alive. His reign of England ended upon her death. Anyway, what this has to do with Margrethe and Henrik is that even if he had the title of King consort, their son, Fredrik, was still going to inherit the throne from his mother, even if his father outlived her (which he didn’t), he wouldn’t become King (sovereign).

What happend in Denmark in 1966????.

I’m as confused about this claim, at that point in time she wasn’t even the ruling monarch, that was her dad, she first took the throne in 1972

Whitney in dansk. Margrethe skulle forloves med franske Henri.hans far kunne ikke finde sin grevetittel.alle danskere holdt vejret i flere dage.det var både tv, radio og aviser der skrev om det.adelen vidste at det var løgn, for man gemmer sin tittel i en brandsikker boks, eller i banken. Flere dage efter sagde pressen at han havde fundet sin tittel, selv om det var løgn.havde danskerne vidst at Margrethe, kong frederik(dejlig konge),Folketinget og Frankrig som var flov over situationen, førte det danske folk bag lyset og fortalte ikke sandheden.prons joarckims børn går rundt med en falsk tittel.du kan gå ind på da.m.wikipedia.org under laborde de monteret familiens navn , og se at ha brugte en falsk høflighedstittel, som er værdiløs.2 gange søgte de om at få en tittel men blev afvist.derfor kan vi ikke lide Margrethe fordi hun har taget prins joarchims børns averetmæssige titler. Jeg var tilstede så du har dette fra første række. Venlig hilsen

Jeg tilføjer en note: slå op på da.m.wikipedia.org og skriv Greve de laborde de monpezat, så vil du kunne læse om familien . Hej