I know the clip is from the movie "Nothing but trouble", but is it part of an inside joke or something?

@@Pocketrocket-pj1us HatsOffEntertainment is just a fan of Chevy Chase and has covered many franchises he's been in, so reaction shots of him come up fairly often. In general, he tends to use reaction shots of characters from within a franchise if he's covering a reboot or sequel.

Real horror fans know the difference between Texas Chainsaw Massacre & Nothing But Trouble. We aren't morons like you

Not if the real horror fans! I saw the comment and had no idea what you were talking about until I just now saw it! it makes sense why it’s insert where it’s inserted! Ha inserted…

Yep; I agree. The original has an important place in the history of cinema but because it's such an effective film, I do not think it is necessarily a very entertaining film. I do not watch it often and that is out of respect for it. The sequel is also a very effective film but, unlike the first, it sets out to titillate its audience and what a wild ride it is. It's the one in the series I easily find the most entertaining, and the most quotable... For a long time, it seemed to not really have much of a fan base but I think in the last fifteen years or so have really seen it get a lot more respect

I liked the second one too. My favorite part was the bridge scene. It was just so wild! The family's hide out was crazy too. It reminds me of that one movie 'Nothing But Trouble' just how junky and dilapidated everything looked.

@@willrice1050 it feels like the kind of movie Aykroyd was trying to make, but somewhere along the way, someone tried to hammer it into a more traditional comedy

The third one was really good too. I thought it was anyways. The first 3 are good

It’s their only good sequel and so is the remake for 2003

It should’ve ended after part 2

It sorta reminds me how the third Halloween film had a completely different plot from the first two, because it was assumed the Michael Myers story would just be a two-part thing. Evidently things didn't turn out that way.

He knew,he meant tcm2 to be flat out comedy,plus a town of cannibals.The cannibal town idea was also going to be used in the Ken Foree one,it was abandoned.

Part 2 should've just been the nail in the coffin

It's like after he finds Franklin's body "I'LL TAKE YOU BACK TO HELL. I'LL TAKE YOU TO HELL."

Spot on opinion I agree with your opinion 👍

Out of all the Texas Chainsaw sequels, the only one I consider canon, and think of as good, is TCM2. Everything after that was just a downward spiral into chaotic nonsense (and not the good kind either; noooo, no-ho-ho, I'm talkin' Charlie Sheen and Mel Gibson at their most bonkers and divisive, chaotic nonsense).

*BRIIIIING IT AAAAAALLLL DOOOOOOOOWN!!!!!!!!!!* [Though it should be noted that Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003 is actually pretty good out of all the post-2 entries]

That's funny!!! Seeing it is the best one!!! "BRING IT ALL DOWN"!!!!!

I know your face from Jaboody comments

Hell yes! I love your comment! I remember watching it on a VHS tape that had horrible quality with the tracking which made it even better. One of my top 5 for sure. Maybe even top 3.

Tobe Hooper knew you simply couldn't recapture that lightning in a bottle. That's why he didn't try and why his winking, deconstructive sequel is the only other TCM production worth a damn.

I agree 💯 but let’s stop making these

@@jessicafeeney3996are you the Austrian girl who reviews all the horror movies? Totally agree on stop making more. Rob Zombie makes awesome horror movies.

HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD!

Voorhees, Myers and Krueger lend themselves to sequels better than Leatherface, because those characters were consciously created in such a way that "they can stalk victims in many different environments"? Haddonfield, Crystal lake...and , the third features The Literal Street name in every title...and yet they have made it work. I don't quite understand your excuse-lending here. Quality TCM films should be no more or less challenging than any of the other three franchises. Being boxed-in by the source material is not the problem. The TCM sequels are just poorly written, poorly executed, lame ideas.

@@niceguy1774 Another problem is Leatherface is not Super Human like the others. That was my problem with it the latest is they basically turned him into Jason. It be hard to do like a Leatherface takes Manhattan because at the end of the day he's human, Jason can fight gang members and boxers in Manhattan because he's not human.

@@niceguy1774 Every town has an Elm Street! - Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

@@niceguy1774 While I’ve never been a fan of the TCM films, I was a always a fan of the those other three series (Jason, Michael, and Freddy), and I can’t agree with you that Leatherface wasn’t any different from them and that the TCM sequels only failed due to poor writing, etc. The TCM films are definitely more challenging to create a franchise out of; whereas the big three of the 80’s were simple stalk and slash killers offing teenager after teenager, the TCM films were about an entire family with a much more complicated situation. Leatherface didn’t just kill a teen and then go off to find the next one, rinse, repeat; he wore their skin, and their family ate people. The goal wasn’t the killing itself as it was with the big 3. And none of them was intended to become a franchise-hell, Jason wasn’t even the killer in the original! They only lent themselves to sequels more readily because they were simpler killers. Freddy was inarguably the more complex of the three, but he was still just another stalk and slash killer offing teenagers. The more the big 3 sequels tried to elaborate on their villains, the worse the films got precisely because they weren’t complicated villains to begin with, and their relative simplicity made them much, much scarier. The original TCM was absolutely terrifying, but it was also deeply disturbing. And that’s what ultimately separated it from the others and created a barrier to success in its sequels that the big 3 never had, and almost no one could argue that Halloween 5-8, Friday the 13th 7-10, and A Nightmare on Elm Street 4-6 (and the godawful Freddy vs. Jason) weren’t poorly written and directed. The writing got lazier and lazier and strayed farther and farther from their roots and what made the originals so great. TCM probably should have remained a one-off, but anyone approaching one of its sequels like it was any other slasher franchise was destined to fail.

You beat me to it and said it better than I ever could. Lol Cheers from Canada

Interesting... Usually, I don't give compliments easily, maybe that is my professional deformation, but you have a very interesting comment here, an interesting stream of ideas, well put, no matter that it is short, it is very good... Well, Caleb, you should try writing your ideas if you have more such as this, and develop those into bigger texts.

What about House and Re-Animator?

House sucks but Re-Animator is cool

Dead Alive

@@tomyabo5606 C'mon, House was hilarious! What was wrong with it?

@@BaranoffIsaac And one of Ryan's favorite animated films Coonskin

Gunnar Hansen has a whole chapter in his book Chainsaw Confidential about how the original cast got screwed out of money. Great book, definitely worth a read if you’re a fan of the first film. I have no interest in any of the sequels.

Why it took a dozen years for a sequel

Another notable Bryanston release was John Carpenter's student film turned debut film DARK STAR.

@@dnasty312 that's what made it so intriguing. The tag line of Part 2 was "After thirteen years of silence the buzz is back!"

I had to double check the channel because I thought it was all comedy.

@@micahjohnsonboxing6409 Comedy and Horror both share one vital element. Poop jokes. Oh and Timing.

They keep trying to bring it back. It's the thing that won't die.

All good horror is commentary on the day. It seems like trying to force the TCSM into each of the decades following the original just didn't work because it just didn't speak to those days. It will continue to fail because it doesn't have anything to say about now -- and apparently the attempt to make it relevant to today with influencers and cancel culture and whatever other nonsense entirely missed the point of what made TCSM work for its day. Maybe try something new?

There are also two movies called Leatherface and one is a prequel but it's different from the other prequel.

The Texas chainsaw massacre rocks but the Texas chainsaw massacre and Texas chainsaw massacre are bout as thrilling as gay porn (the men kind)

@@Sandlerverse Neither are even half as good as Halloween, which makes Halloween look like Halloween.

I also want to say, the canceled TCM2 sequel, All American Massacre, had the right idea on naming an entry in the series.

I hope you mean 2. Cause 1 & 2 are awesome and the rest are shit. I mean other than Jessica beil in daisy dukes there’s no value to any and yes I can’t spell her name

@@ransakreject5221 I do mean 2. None of the main actors in the new movie were born any earlier than 1990.

@@someguy3752 oh thank I was worried too.

@@ransakreject5221 that’s the only reason I watched that movie. Same with Chuck and Larry. That damn woman has gotten me to watch some shit movies.

pretty sure Bud Cort was born before the original?

what's an asmr guy doing in a comment section to a film channel?? not dissing just very confused

@@AbrasiousProductions he's very much a horror fan from his videos

Oh I get it

Unfortunately, Halloween Kills took it right back to where we started, though. Love every movie in that franchise for various reasons, but HK really neutralized a lot of that goodwill Halloween '18 bought the series.

@@robotmonthly5512 H18 was never good to begin with.

@@Clay3613 For real.

Halloween should of only been one movie.

@@misterpinkandyellow74 Halloween 2 was good.

I swear I will never understand how TCM 3 is "bad" by any means. I see it in a lot of videos listed as a BAD SEQUEL but its actually FINE and enjoyable. Nothing crazy, just straight down the line slasher stuff. Doesnt go out of it's way to explain anything, but I actually like how it just stays pretty simple. The cast is great, movie is entertaining and enjoyable. Compared to most of the garbage after, like this new shit heap, it's a masterpiece. Just a pretty simple slasher movie. Considering how STUPID convoluted and ridiculous some of the more recent movies have been, going out of their way to explain everything ever and give everything an origin, etc, I appreciate how 3 just doesn't bother and tosses some chatacters into the woods with leatherface and a new family. Simple.

@@SeanWilbanks It's not bad it just trashes lore which fanboys are butthurt about.

The remake was cool. Especially Sheriff Hoyt.

I think it was underrated, particularly compared to the shlock that's come out since. They did everything you could've hoped for with a remake, and while it's not as good it holds its own. Shout out to R Lee and Jessica Biel. Also, the trailers were sick!!

That ending got me so good

@@thankyoujodi Easily one of Jessica Biel's best performances too.

It seems like it's because the studios want to do franchises but it keeps failing. The last 3 have definitely been set up for franchises but don't make it.

@@micahjohnsonboxing6409 also other franchises are lucky to get 1 these days, no Friday the 13th since 2009. No Freddy since 2010. Halloween is another franchise that has gotten 1 or more each decade since 78

I agree with every word you said, but the tragic part is that we're way beyond the opportunity for a direct sequel to TCM2, most people who aren't fans haven't seen that movie, and Chop Top's glorious character is even more obscure.

It won’t work because Leatherface died in part 2: he got impaled by a chainsaw then blew up.

RedLetterMedia called Nothing But Trouble halfway between Texas Chainsaw Massacre and The Goonies, and I think that's the perfect description.

@MENSUN Ah whatever, that movie was friggen hilarious. By that point, slasher films that TCM inspired were diving into self-parody. May as well go ahead and do it with style in a (very deliberate) joke of a movie.

What's interesting is I wondered if the joke was supposed to be these helpless Gen Z kids can't fight back. The movie is actually more self aware then I think people give it credit for, remember the contractor fought back.

@@micahjohnsonboxing6409 The main problem with that movie, aside from its shameless cashing in on the success of _Halloween_ (2018) is that there's just nobody really to root for. It wants us to sympathize with both the influencers, at least, the main four or five, but it also wants you to sympathize with Leatherface somewhat. Thus we have nobody to really want to see win at the end, and thus no investment in any of the characters. I think this movie could really have benefited by having the Sawyers in it, at least then you'd have clear-cut villains to root against. Like, after he loses his adopted mom, Leatherface runs away because he's scared of all these people who are trying to take his home away. Then he stumbles upon some place and finds some relative who heard stories about him. Then that relative pushes him back towards the saw. It is family, after all.

Like when Heather in 3D decides that rather than run away from Leatherface she'll get on a ferris wheel which will just take her back around to where she was a few minutes later so Leatherface just has to wait for it to bring her back down to kill.

I agree, would love to see his version or STAB ala the scream movies ha

Michael, yes, but you might want to replace Jason with Freddy. Freddy is very much a shark, he was unrepentant in life, and in death he's only become more monstrous. Jason is more like an overgrown child, doing what he does out of a warped sense of love for his mother. He carries on what she started, perhaps thinking she will come back if he stops anyone from coming to the Crystal Lake area for whatever reason.

"Look what your brother did to the door!" -TCM

The Next Generation definitely did. Even the protagonist were campy.

I picked up on the humor in the first one. First time I saw it, I especially LOLed in the last scene with Leatherface stumbling around in the street with his trusty chainsaw!

It was by far the worst one ugh. Haha I agree I dunno how it had positive hashtags

People were calling it dumb fun, but not good as a TCM movie.

Agreed. It's surprising they didn't continue with that timeline. The trailer was spooky af too!

But leatherface was still overpowered. Definitely doesn't feel as dirty or rusty as the original either with it's bigger budget studio work. I still enjoyed it though

@@nikhernandez8435 yeah, wasn't it in the prequel that Leatherface just teleports into the car the main character is escaping in?

Oh yeah ,the long lost all american massacre

With how much they revere Grandpa, who is basically a mummy, it's probably a safe bet that there's some generational abuse and trauma in how Drayton controls his brothers and takes out his frustrations on them.

@@christopherwall2121 Grandpa started it all so probably. It was him quitting his job at the slaughterhouse because he didn't like the new machines they used to kill the animals and preferred his hammer and the rest of them being fired later on because less workers were needed that started everything off.

The original is one of my favorite movies ever made . Yet I agree about the sequel just because it went in such a different and crazy direction . Also it's down right hilarious.