There was at least one tank on tank ambush by Ukrainians on a Russian tank + IFV convoy with everything visible in the early days of the war. But it's indeed something that has only very rarely been recorded and is therefore quite interesting.

there was one in Syria

Where can you find these combat footage? I can seem to find none so any help please?

@@GM-xk1nw Link?

@@redcrewmate927 4chan?

Man, I really do wonder what it feels like to sit in a tank and take a round from another tank to the front, where most of the armour is. Must be terrifying, especially knowing that they see you while you don't clearly see them.

@@Alex-dq6vo id imagine your ears must be ringing for hours, if another shot doesnt come in and take you out.. but hey, its a quick death at least.. your brain wont even register the ammo cooking off

there is no fear in Russian tank, Komrade

@@Alex-dq6vo You're usually vaporized on spot & have to be hosed out afterwards if the vehicle gets recovered & taken back to the motorpool.

@@OlegVulkanov Vodka kills fear- no good for fighting a war though.

a soviet republic vs soviet republic*

@@Tracer_Solos_The_TF2_Verse🤓

Maybe, the person'll be able to understand, that the war is against the nazi system and "Bandera's people",supported by the "West", though, not without civilian victims.

А теперь попробуйте об этом сказать украинцу. И вы тут же станете рупором Кремля 😂😂😂

Ogaden War

apparently an AT missile hits the surviving tank as it reverses in the rest of the recorded vid, not gonna look for confirmation of that myself but do be an L to win and then loose the flip

@@kennyplop nope, fake news

@@blackpaint9093 source ?

@@Benjy68Kill give me the source video of what he claimed. There is none

@@kennyplop Source: Trust me bro

Why do you think the drone is in the air, your viewing pleasure?

There have been reports of both sides having close drone support for some tank units since around June though there is some debate over how widespread and at what command level they are being deployed at.

I lost it at "rush B"

@@MunyuShizumi ikr i just died with that xD💀

@@bubbles190 Well, propaganda is certainly a part of why the drones are recording the footage.

Lol

also none would happen if Piłsudski decided to fuck France opinions and just seal club Moustache Man Germany (when it still had barely 100k soliders) before dying.

Steinerov was sent to Kherson to protect the flank from Steinerenkos assault!

Steiner couldn't mobilise enough men

@@javidmurvatovYT nonsense, with the power of hitlernium, he could’ve achieve victory

Its actually a moving coffin

T-64 sees a T-80 coming. "We're probably about to die."

"Breech has been damaged!"

God; Dont fear son death isnt that frightening…u wont feel a thing when the tank got shot… Its would be just brief….whoooshhhh….boom I means u didnt even hear the boom sound and then u come to me. 😂😂😂

they dont feel no pain

T-64bv has 3 crewman, also, while turret crew is most probably screwed it isn't always the case and the driver has good chance of surviving unless the shot hit the lower front plate

Hmm ... Hover a Drone right behind your Tank. 3rd Person View.

It never was. At the Battle of 73 Easting, one of the largest tank battles in modern history, the engagement range was roughly what you see here. As a general rule, the engagement range of any tank battle is subject to terrain, weather, sensors and all matter of other conditions. It could be measured in tens of meters or thousands of meters. A smart adversary that isn't equipped with the best sensors will seek to engage at the closest range possible so as to nullify the enemy sensor advantage. But, if the traverse speed, projectile tech and crew skill aren't there, they will likely still lose...

you then realize Russian tanks don't have spalling turned on in their ammo carousel in wt

@@user-pb2th3tc8u Or a camera on a long retractable pole.

@@tackytrooper I think Iraq won that battle, they destroyed many abrams, but the US counterattacked and overwhelmed them with airforce and tanks.

Yes it feels surreal. Just like that all the men of the tank crew are dead. For what? These conflicts are complicated and we as humans are faulty to let a escalation like this happen, where innocent suffer. Of course some are to blame more for than others, the ones which act as aggressors and escalate things unnecessarily instead of searching a more peaceful and diplomatic option. One thing you can say for certain is that the unnecessary loss of human lives and wars in general are just terrible and it needs to be prevented at all costs. (Edit: Changed some of the text, because I originally wrote it so that it seemed like it's unclear who the main aggressors of this conflict are.)

They just uploaded the rest of this video clip, all the Russian Tanks get destroyed by anti Tank missiles when they go in reverse.

@@CrucialConflict. where can i find that?

@@torvalis1968 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ptWgnc59uMzMd2w.html The Sun news channel

​@@CrucialConflict. Fake news

Tanks drove so close to each other not because they couldn't see each other, but because the trees prevented them from making an accurate shot at the target. Ukrainian T-64BVs have been modernized, they have thermal imagers, it's not bad tanks. T-64BV tanks have no problem in visibility, this is not about that at all. It's not WWII, not Vietnam, not Afghanistan, not Iraq, not Yemen. Which tank you're sitting on almost doesn't matter in this war, because era of tank battles ended with WWII. Most of the tanks in this war were destroyed by artillery fire, atgms and kamikaze drones(especially ukrainian tanks). For a drone and artillery, any tank is food. Tank battles account for less than 1% of all destroyed tanks. Even helicopters destroyed 10 times more tanks and other vehicles in this war.

And teammates never place wards

Indeed! It's the reason Sweden decided to buy the Leopard 2. The indigenous Swedish tank concept was similar to the T14 Armata with all the crew in a box using cameras to look around. They realised that firstly, Sweden didn't have the technology or expertise to make the tank and secondly that it was impossible for tank crews to have good awareness without being able to look around themselves. Apparently it messes with the human brain to just use screens.

If they had excellent situational awareness this entire exchange probably wouldn't even have happened.

@@GuardDog42 and you say this why? It's very obvious the Ukrainian vehicles were probing way before the engagement took place, so the T-80 knew who and what they were up against because they didn't sweat the T-64 at all and moved up slowly to get line of sight on the Ukrainian tank.

@@michaelbruce6190 it's not obvious at all, in fact it's SOP for russian federation mechanized infantry units and armor to screen with artillery fire after contact with basically anything. From the looks of things I imagine the Ukrainians were basically watching the road at that moment while moving about hoping they didn't end up on the receiving end of indirect fire. if the russians knew what they were up against why would they push the point in close quarters when they have the advantage at range in both vision and firepower. If the other vehicle was quick on the draw even without thermal they could have so easily landed a shot almost instantaneously. If the treeline was easy to see through why wouldn't the russians just shoot while their flir could see and the enemy's antiquated optics couldn't? Because they just didn't know, this was very clearly an oh shit moment, I think they knew the enemy was there sure, they just didn't think they were anywhere near that close. I think the russians pushed because they thought they were peeling and wanted to push the point. If the russian vehicles knew exactly what they were up against there would be no reason not to stagger your approach away from directly where the enemy vehicle was looking. Armored war just isn't conducted at these ranges like that. What we're looking at is fear, panic, and confusion. With fire superiority you just don't park a tank a hundred feet from another tank to capitalize, that's not a tactic that's an accident.

Russia has extreme advantage in tanks. It shows that they try to force a fight

Yeah a drone would be very nice to have for the tank commander here.

exactly, and I love how people (shills) tried pretending the "war in Ukraine is the end of armored warfare", when it's been shown again and again that each sides success heavily depended on the success of their armored forces. The problem with most couch potatoes and keyboard warriors is that they spent the last twenty years watching modern forces fighting literal Tatooine sand people from Star Wars, while Ukraine is the first war between near peer adversaries.

@@CH3TN1K313 People really want to be "The Deboonkers". A lot of people like tanks and think they are very cool so these guys come out of their basement being all like " I need to debook this and look very smart!" Pathetic delusional creatures.

@@CH3TN1K313 with drones and atgm tanks are kinda no longer the king of the land

@@CH3TN1K313 For tank warfare this war only proved what people have known since the tank was invented. How you use the tank is the most important part of the tank. It is interesting to see just how near peer this war actually is considering at the start of it, on paper at least, it was a bit of squash match.

@@mrguiltyfool the outdated ones - maybe. Guess what, 90% of modern tanks are somewhat outdated - APS was a thing of 1980s-1990s, just like ERA. Yet we see T-72s without APS and Leopards with completely naked sides, not to mention that neither of NATO tanks have ERA on their roofs against whatever missile, coming from helicopters or drones.

@@Ben-ek1fz thanks for the correction Joseph.

Russian bias, am I right? xD

they only won because they had artificial spal reduction, smh smh 😒

@@Nave4x4 real game has none, it's just what people say to cope with there massive skill issue. 😂

@@CombatArchive_1 yeah sounds like a skill issue

Have you seen top tier repair costs and line up?

@Cultured Anime Waifu [Russian Waifu] Bro look at youre username. Get a life.

@Cultured Anime Waifu [Russian Waifu] Typical Russian troll or bot clown... :D

@Dust ah yes and when its Russians dying everyone says "hAhA OrCs deAd sO FuNnY SlaVa BraZiL"

that's the saddest part. dying for nothin(

​@Dust nice try snowflake!

It was the tank crew last heartbeat 😢. Im really angered that Ukrainians die for NATO. People say Stalin was crazy. But what about the US, that slaughtered millions post WW2. That used chemical warfare in Vietnam.

@@nemiw4429 xXD

Without an IR sight finding the target via visual range would have taken several times longer in such an environment. Even knowing that a tank is in front from the drone information does not fully account for occlusion via foliage, smoke etc.

@@murmenaattori6 having been a gunner on a Bradley fighting vehicle I agree 100% there's a good chance the Uke tank never even saw the russian in the final engagement.

They probably were also confident that their armor would hold up even in case they didn’t get the first shot. Ukranian T-64BVs use really old ammo and have an outdated cannon. I don’t think it can penetrate the front of a T-80BVM at any range.

Basis of the 1st Gulf War armored turkey shoot.

@@mystictomato9466 Even still armored protection is never guaranteed. Not every spot has composite behind it nor can reactive armor cover the entire tank. The lower armor glacis and turret ring are notable weaknesses which could be penetrated even with older kinetic penetrator and hollow charge ammunition. Pure high explosive can also disable a vehicle due to the high amount of explosivr filler for the 125mm HE ammunition.

The Chaos of Battle, the Fog of War. Those are reasons.

"Modern"...T-64s are 50-60 years old, and T-80BVs are nearing 40 years old.

@@FlinnGaidin the Abrams is 40 years old what's your point?

​@@gabenewell3955 Yea, and the abrams can engage from such a distance that back in the Gulf War the iraqi tanks(pretty sure it was T72, just a tad bit more advance than T64) could not even see them, much less shoot back. Though it is worth poiting out that despite being 40 years old, the Abram does get alot of upgrades in its electronics and vision.

@@gabenewell3955 the _earliest_ production Abrams are around that old, yeah... what's _your_ point?

That's an interesting way to put it

ehhh more like throwing darts at eachother a few feet away

no its a tank fight

No it's a gun fight

Yup, exactly like a knife fight… if you were throwing, throwing knives, and those knives exploded on impact. Sure

lol

Ivan (T-80BVM) ⁍ Igor (T-64BV)

@@oogie493 damn russian bias again

@@axender4508 That is true though T80 is younger and more advance than T64

@@scorpiontdalpha9799 joke timmy

tank battles do happen in modern day, like in Iraq or Afghanistan during US invasion. But it's much more smaller in scale because techs are going forward fast.

toasted hellishly

I think modern war is still a lot like ww2 surprisingly

TRULYTRUE TRUE, I agree with you completely absolutely and I agree with your perspective, SOCIETY has a FLAW, it can only MAXIMIZE ARMOR, ONCE, after that, SOCIETY can only MAXIMIZE PENETRATION, We reached PEAK ARMOR COMPOSITES AND COMPOUNDS in the ENGLISH 100 YEAR WAR, with PLATE ARMOR, we never saw useful armor since, it’s basically designed now to give you a small chance of survival without guarantee it will happen again or at all actually, we will never have armor ever again that exceeds penetration values

And when all the modern hardware is lost we carry on fighting with bayonets, the modern is temporary and works it’s way back down to hand to hand combat in the end

Sitting in the bush and shooting rpg7 after rpg7 is tank killing tactic since ww2. Like there are stories where one tiger, sherman, nashorn, Jackson are parked in bush and just shooting down 10-30 vehicles unspotted... I'm tank driver... I think noise and just being on 30 hours shift is just... You don't know your name let alone there is something 1 km away in the bush... Training is extremely hard, after 24 hours you sometimes pull full right turn instead gear up, track pin is broken and all 3 of us are completely pissed because of situation... Tank training is hard, add possiblity to be killed (never been there) must be molind bogling hard

Queue the “vanya-and-five drive by each other” meme

people really dont understand how blind you are inside of a tank. even the most modern tanks are virtually blind to everything under 100m

@@dragancrnogorac3851 The cause of 3,670 main battle tanks that were destroyed on the Eastern Front in January 1944 could be determined: by Panzerfaust: 58 (= 1.6%) and by Panzerschreck: 9 (= 0.25%) I think you need some sleep badly! ;-)

@The Bear you know how little difference make actuall killing thing. It was killing tanks 70 years ago, it is killing tanks today... Pancerfaust, rpg7, štugna, javelin... Same effect on tank just different manufacturing date on weapons and tanks

what the tanks can't aim up from that distance ?

Could have been a frag round meant to disable any infantry before getting the T-80 into the treeline

@@vovin8132 it is

@@solid_fire9388 It would make more sense to have the BMP-3s rake the trees. This way the tank isn't caught while reloading, or with a frag in the breech when APFSDS or HEAT is needed.

Bro the tree was still intact

I imagine all 4 guys or however many it is all screaming at each other.

@@whatfreedom7 probably not far off from sounding like this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ep9dqdJ6s6zPc5s.html

@@whatfreedom7 3

Interesting analysis

"There is a partly justified criticism that peacetime generals are always fighting the last war instead of the next one." [20 November 1937] W. Churchill - Time doesn't repeat but it has a kinda circular rhythm.

As far as I know Recon drones are used for commander's to get operational awareness or small ordinance drops. ideally it would be useful for every squad to have a drone but they would need to have a full production line for drones. A majority of drones Ukraine has are predominantly donated by civilians. So my best assumption is they don't have enough.

could give away tanks position/ awarenes of a possible tank

Drone isnt that invisible to see Yes it will give great view advantage but also revealing your position and give the enemy a heads up that there are enemies nearby

Average Sd. Kfz. 234 flexing its reverse gearbox

@@rolandb2108 Before it broke?

@@bell3287 better question: Where oil

@@bell3287 Never broke, was very reliable

And some were slower. It's not like all tanks back then had the same reverse speed.

unless you are Russian they write you off as a deserter

Yet you think its great sport to see russian troops geting obliterated. You make me sick

In the age of the cellular phone and internet, nothing surprises me anymore.

@@Tamburello_1994 Actually it surprised me that it took seven months to get a clip like this.

@@derkernspalter I'm a cold war kid when grainy, retouched photographs was all one could ask for. Still shocks me to this day the access available -- at one's fingertips I might add.

During daytime, you could spot and engage a tank from miles away using the gunner's optical sight. This is in an AMX 30-B2 which is an old tank. At such close ranges you don't even have to rangefind. Just send it where the reticle is and watch the fireworks.

@@pvtj0cker the AMX 30 can't see through a treeline without thermals...

They could not have the info. There is some problems with different frequencies of tank radio and troops radio. The same like in US army when they put telephone booth at the back of tanks to have troops-tanks connected. So could be that tanks had drone info and could be not.

Both Russians and Ukrainians are known to use jamming extensively. This could have been a situation where Russians had the situational awareness and Ukrainians did not, otherwise it's baffling to see a solitary Ukrainian tank prancing around and not backing the fuck out of there while two Russian tanks followed by the two BMPs racing towards it in broad day light.

@@f1aziz the Ukrainian tank although much older had a gun that could kill the more modern tanks. The Russian t80s would probably outperform the Ukrainian tank at medium or long range. The decision to try and kill the tanks at close range might have been made. Ukraine has done other such close range attacks, killing the leading mbt and stop the apcs it was escorting. In this case there were 2 russian mbts making it more dangerous.

Didn't wiggle the turret during reload, probably bought into the premium tree

Bro got uptierd he had no chance. We clearly need br decompression.

Should have side climbed

... I hate (fuking love) this game...

Probably (that only 5% overall usage) gold ammo was used here.

He shud have taken cover behind the destroyed tank behind him. But what do you mean "like a vide game". What is he supposed to do, if trees block his view? Like i said, best option would habe been take cover behind the other tank, only leaving the gun visible.

@@nemiw4429 I used to play world of tanks and war thunder way back and tanks used to always drive forwards and backwards constantly no throw off opponent's aim so he either misses or hits something he wasn't aiming for. It was a joke referencing that

I hope they bought the battle pass.

This what war does. It creates mother without sons and daughters without fathers.

@@juliomaldonado4028 What a massive L of a comment

Right way to think about such horror, rip 🕊

Better to die like this on the battlefield then by fucken drunk driver on the street.

@@thomasw695 NATO doesn't have friends, only vassals

@@thomasw695 Putin asked to join NATO in 2008, was rejected because thet way there would be no reason for NATO to exist

amen

@@iMost067 against China honestly

@@thomasw695 that would be nice

This is Russia burning through its cold war stock. Its new production is not on the same level though in terms of volume, not even close. If Russia survives this conflict intact with some kind of economy, it will take it decades to replace the losses it has suffered. Most likely, for a time it will become an infantry-centric force, and will have to revise its doctrine simply due to the lack of available vehicles.

Also that these tanks all used to be in the same military a few decades ago.

i have news for you - almost all NATO tanks are 20 century production. i have a much bigger news - 90% of world tank fleet produced more than 30 years ago

Russia has dug up even older T-62s to send to Ukraine, as well. When will we see T-34s? 🤔

@@FlinnGaidin I highly doubt there are even a significant number of T-34s well enough preserved to be returned to service.

I have been tanked many times. The worst part is the hangover.

@@g.k.1669 Ffs

not exact. ukrainians got no chances to escape. nazists, that controls and terrorizes their country (guess who paid this pigs again, huh), just placed charges inside the vehicle and welded ukrainians conscripts inside. so they just had no options. that's why they had to fight even against the whole tanksquad. that, what's really stressful.

Танк сратих московитів знаходився знизу на вигідній позиції, по друге ціль була не одна. Слава Геройам!!!!!!!!

@@user-es9iv3vv7b eng pls

@@paint_black, he said oink oink

@@user-es9iv3vv7b Cope harder

Wanting to get out of trouble just as quick as you found it isn't a bad thing.

That's a dumb Analogy; whether your legs are tired or not, if a bear is running towards you, you are fucked. Whereas if you have good reverse speed, you are not so fucked.

The reverse speed is important since turning around is suicide in an open battle (weak rear armour).

Play enlisted bro it’s becomes even more important

As a Japanese tech tree player，both Type 90 and Type 10 have great reverse speed. With Hydrolic system that good for hill battle；I can often dodge shots and ATGM from a long distance. Or simply take a shot then reverse down the hill. I also have Soviet top tear and yes，T72s reverse speed is cancer. I usually just turn and running while smoke or backward a bit then turn and run.

kek

😂

@@moozer its 2022 and people still use "kek"? Bro still living in 2015/16

@@General_Rubenski kek

@@General_Rubenski kek

💀💀💀💀💀

+ According to Intelligence

agree

Those are T-72s...

@@Nyarlatha Mf watch the fucking video

If it's a BMP it's destroyed not abandoned.

A 5:41 you can see that it is an BMP-3. The open crew hatches on top are clear visible.

If that is true, it makes it quite harrowing. Imagine making the decision to help others, knowing it might be your end.

That's how almost all tank ob tank combat is. Whoever sees first will shoot first and who shoots first will most likely survive

Most likely, but doesn't have to. First shot is always nice though

​@@81Heino You don't have to worry because while you are talking here on youtube, your UkrainiaNAZI regime soldiers are being turned into WORM FOOD by Russians. Talk is cheap, keep talking son, because Putin might aim a nuclear missile at YOUR HOUSE NEXT TIME. And if you enlist and join those UkrainiaNAZI soldiers, YOU WILL NOT BE LEAVING UKRAINE ALIVE. ---------------------- Not quite, according to U.S (UNITED STATES) Department of Defense reports studies, the U.S Javelin ONLY has a 19% chance HIT RATE in the Russian - UkrainiaNAZI war. A ATGM like the Javelin with a LOW HIT RATE like that is HOT GARBAGE. Also, the CANADIAN MERCENARIES who have fought in Ukraine reported RUSSIAN TANKS have SENSOR THERMAL imaging devices capable of seeing FARTHER than the RANGE of Javelin ATGM sensors. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sLRigceaq7CqmGQ.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p82HjKWX1864nKc.html In fact, a Russian tank saw a Ukrainian soldier smoking from a loooong distance and FIRED ONE SHELL and wiped out 3-4 Ukrainians. When another Canadian mercenary named WALI attempted to engage the Russian tank with the Javelin ATGM, HE FAILED because the Javelin ATGM sensors CANNOT DETECT and ENGAGE the Russian tank.

Armor not supported by Infantry is asking to be destroyed.

@@81Heino заткнись сволочь. За эти слова ты ответишь сука!

how will twitter spin this so its ukraine destroying a russian tank?

Would you post a link of that video

The Germans had the advantage of camping so they knew where it was and already had their gun set on it, they just didn’t know if the Pershing was a new German tank so they didn’t fire

@@markosimic6634 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oK5gqpyqzMC4eZc.html

@@markosimic6634 Search for "Sherman vs Panther vs Pershing" on spottydog4477's channel.

Outnumbered and Surrounded, Combined Armor Doctrine Dignified!

ukro tank got gaijin'd

@@Gamer-dw6ho lol!

stood no chance (got up tiered please decompress Brs)

@Cultured Anime Waifu [Russian Waifu] I don't believe we have any good guys in this movie just Ukraine's western cannon fodder and Russia's desperate attempt to counter west

@Cultured Anime Waifu [Russian Waifu] not really. Can't call invaders good guys

@Cultured Anime Waifu [Russian Waifu] What is good and bad? A hypocritical system we humans made for our self interest, why is something "good" or "bad" ?

@@triadwarfare how are they invaders?

@@triadwarfare That account is a bot I see him in every comments section posting generic comments like this. No point replying to it.

Not true If the ukrainians don't kill the russians invading their country will be taken over and their culture eradicated. But yes the casus belli for russia is non-existant beside a paranoid, greedy old dictator trying to make a move before his time runs out and ruining his and other countries in the process.

The squad leaders were able to relay information to the tank crew through the drone footage. The Russians knew where the Ukrainians were before the Ukrainians knew where the Russians were.

Yes. This further shows that tanks aren't just some invincible fortresses and can be destroyed in a blink of an eye.

There's plenty of ways to die in war, and not many of them are enjoyable.

We saw that in syria i hope russians and ukrainians too :)

Israeli doctrine as well. Part of being a tank commander. So much better to not be buttoned up all the time.

As the Soviet tankers said, after heavy losses, experienced tank crews let a couple of fighters forward their tanks for reconnaissance and correcting the actions of tank crews. The same thing happened on the cramped city streets to detect ambushes and the enemy with faustpatrons. Crew members often acted as infantry to prevent enemy ambushes on their tanks.

Even with the hatches closed German tanks had far superior situational awareness than Soviet tanks in WWII.

@@davidarnold9324 and why the IDF cmdrs put their dog tags around their ankles.The losses were horrendous,but they prevailed.Brave men

Israeli tank commanders used to do the same thing, ride shoulders-out or even stand on the seat and go waist-out. It gave them superior visibility but they took horrendous casualties from artillery. One unexpected benefit of standing on the seat is that if your tank gets blown up underneath you, you're often blown out of the hatch like a cork - while surprisingly survivable, this is not a comfortable or safe procedure, and some men didn't survive the ride, but in several notable cases during the Yom Kippur War, Israeli TCs survived MULTIPLE ejections from different Centurions over the course of several days of fighting. Shmuel Askarov, Avigdor Khalani and Yossi ben-Hanan all had this happen.

Yeah on a operational level. But on a tactical level, its ridiculous to think a Tank would never have to reverse to get into a better position. Its a stupid design even with the doctrine accounted for.

@@wordofswords5386 I agree, it's stupid and ignorant. Even in the past rushing tanks in like that will just get yourself killed and provide additional roadblock for your enemies. Imagine a tank convoy getting ambush and the front tank is taken out. Good luck reversing or manuvering out of the line, might as well jump out and run.

@@omegacentauri73 Germans would not say that

So basically a rush b all in

Soviets/Russians arent Pussy. Retreat isn't in thier doctrine. thats why they do it so badly sometimes.

There is hardly anything correct in this video... like for example all that babling that darts are not affected by the reactive armor...

@@Bialy_1 well APFSDS-T isn't really affected by Kontakt 1 ERA other than the thickness of the outer steel skin of the tile which is only about 5-10mm.

@@nemisous83 yeah, someone here didn't pay attention to what he was saying

Очень большая вероятность поражения осколком

In Russia, it's more like World of Tanks, so you gonna see a lot of complaining about arty, real soon.

Lol

Someone had to do it

Except that this conflict was started when an oligarch like Putin decided to invade a sovereign nation. Should have dealt with him when he took over Crimea, and reversed illegal the border incursions/expansions in Georgia as well.

Young men on the Ukrainian side are defending their land against russian fascists, who came with the war

@@jimr5703 If you think that the responsibility of this conflict soley lies on the shoulder of Putin alone & oligarchy is limited to Russia, then it means you are seeing one side of the picture. Just dig out the pre & post Ukraine Russia war armament sales globally & check out who tops the list.

@@1pinkmann Indeed but it isn't as simple as you are suggesting. The destruction of Ukranian state equally lies on both Russia & the West. This conflict can be averted through dialogue but certain Western stakeholders doesn't want that to happen. The proof of which is 2014 Nuland-Wyatt leaked call.

​@@muhammadshehreyarkhan1851 Dialogue is impossible. Ukraine won't let russia take even 100 meters on it's territory and will fight until boarders returns at state of 1991year.