Masterly and insightful analysis. In particular, one can only concur with you in every respect with regard to both the authenticity of the current slew of materials to have emerged in the last decade and the murky origins and pedigree of the American iterations. The sheer bloody awfulness of the writing - in terms of style and aesthetic - of Martinet's output (let alone the subject matter) is, to me, a clear indication of its bogusness - for want of a better word. You mentioned, I think, in another recording, the work of J.-K. Huysmans. Huysmans' writing is, for example, the very antithesis and suggests one excellent touchstone for testing the authenticity of works fetching (or purporting to fetch) from the O9A tradition, old and new, namely the quality of the prose. I have only recently discovered your excellent channel, and look forward to working my way through your work: I expect it will be an interesting and enlightening experience.

I have few comments to the content of the video. I will be providing some reasons as to why Martinet Press can be considered O9A literature to a certain degree. Joshua Sutter being an FBI informant is not news, confirmed somewhat recently and has been suspected by few for many years. First, O9A is an “non-organisation” where most members self-initiate, there is no leadership who sanction what is considered O9A and what isn’t. O9A doesn’t have sanctioned or “official” literature. There is what is considered to be the core literature such as the Black Book of Satan and Naos, which is where most practitioners begin their journey. It is up to individual practitioners to create music, literature, games, etc. This is one of the main advantages and possibly one of the biggest weaknesses of the O9A, the practitioners define what O9A is and what it can be and it is highly malleable. Second, O9A encourages the creation of O9A inspired organisations (which can deviate from traditional O9A nexions) for ideological, insight or other purposes. Hence something like Martinet Press and the nexion which it is affiliated with has a right to exist within the O9A worldview. Thirdly, for many years Martinet Press and the nexion which it is affiliated with received high praise from a sizeable quantity (maybe even majority) of genuine affiliates and practitioners for “making O9A dangerous and scary to the public again”. When it was time to reap the harvest and cope with the consequences of selecting this path, too many dropped off. I never liked any Martinet press literature or the nexion from which it comes, but the fact that it was largely supported both monetarily and ideologically for years with little controversy should not be rejected. Overall the damage done by Martinet Press to the O9A is largely positive. Weak and unviable formations such as the O9A must be destroyed, for nothing positive can come out of weakness. The best aspect of the outlook I present on this issue, is that the O9A world view totally supports it.

It pisses me off so much that journalists write alot of inaccurate, false propaganda about a certain topic and they don't bother doing the research in order to prove their claims

My advice for anyone associated with the O9A. If you're gonna buy material from Martinet Press, make sure you have prior knowledge or do the research on a specific book from Martinet Press you intend to buy beforehand in order to know exactly what you're getting

I have two points I will make as briefly as possible. Glad to see you read the article I attempted to link. Eric Striker did his homework before publishing the piece. If you didn't read it, you surely articulated what I was trying to communicate; from Josh Sutter & the publishing company (amongst others topics) you sorted it out. I, for one admit I know nothing about the real 09A doctrine. 2. Regarding foreign affairs, intelligence, etc I am certain jewish oligarchs dominate every aspect of society & government. Every war, social program, trend, whatever is designed to weaken & ultimately erase western gentiles. The beginning of the end was 1945. We lost a long time ago, unfortunately.