Jonny P and Jonny V

Well said Andrew p

That’s Christ.

Keenan it was Christ 2000 years ago, but in a globally connected world, in a secular society, with a group of people (the cancel cult) who have no charity or forgiveness, who will terrorize anyone who suggests the oppressive patriarchal structure of Christianity, I don’t think putting Christ forward is the solution to this problem. From a purely archetypal perspective, maybe this implies the necessity of a second coming, but this would require that this figure bring an entirely different model/map; a new narrative psycho-technology. (Not associated with Christianity or patriarchal religion

@@ShannonBoschy My answer is astrologically focused. I think purity in the past was symbolised by baptism by holy water, water that is not lacking, and without sin. I think a transition to a next age is underway and has been for a while. if there's a next jesus I don't believe they will be a "Christ", meaning they won't be an anointed one. I believe we are doing better than the party tricks of christ that are now moving to the background, and christ said something like that himself. "Baptism" if we must use the word is now of air/spirit on an individual and global level. Individually we're doing deep breathing meditations as an example rather than opting for the holy water. Globally there will be less reliance on oil/coal and more on energy production without fumes. Aquarius is first saturnian (teacher), then uranian (freedom from habits). Piscean age saw two fish in opposing directions, good and evil. With Virgo opposing as the virgin (purity and service). Aquarian age has Leo the Lion as polarity (courage, everyone as a royal gift in progressing), and we will see Aquarius (integration and individuation, greater attainment of self and collective wisdom through science, freedom from clockwork and bad habits. The lifting of humanity from suffering, venturing to other planets, and more.)

elnombre sambal A fellow student of Astrology. Nice to meet you. My thoughts here are simple in their respects. The unconscious mind loves ritual. A sacred ritual, as opposed to a profane one, marks something in time. Draws a line. How do we observe and mark the transition from one stage to another as a society, when looking at the brutality and injustice of our past? How do we demonstrate to ourselves and to others that we orient ourselves towards meaning in a compassionate way? In theory, even convicted criminals who pay their debt to society, can achieve a state of forgiveness. The SJW woke mobs don’t extend to the “oppressors”m such a dignity. How do we ritualize this forgiveness at an individual level and how do we set a benchmark for others to meet to demonstrate their shift into a new way of being in the world? How do we release the white guilt we are told to feel for ourselves if we feel a sense of shame and guilt; and as a society I think all of the things you remind us of are important.

@@ShannonBoschy Hi Shannon, nice to meet you too. I think we should acknowledge the negative but focus on the positive we have achieved and are further wanting to achieve. We strengthen relationships by having positive experiences together. The joy outshines the suffering. As individuals we shouldn't focus on guilt, rather we should focus on what we want to create and keep experimenting with what will work. If there's a line or ritual that we abide by most, it's our calendar. We can acknowledge and celebrate more days on our calendar, like actually celebrate them, have major festivals, take days off. Or perhaps we can reconsider how our calendar is laid out altogether.

Lex or D.S. or Coleman would be epic!!

Thanks Lee.

Wow, indeed

it's "Sophrosyne".

@@AexisRai thx

Sophrosine.

Listen again from 44:10 . John isn't saying "faith", he's saying "fate". "[The left is really sensitive to the fact that] human beings are really subject to fate. That there is just shitty things that happen to human beings because they're finite and they're limited, and the world is an overwhelming machine, and there's historical forces and material forces - you might even say powers and principalities at work, right? And people are just subject."

@@AexisRai It's ambiguous, but sure it can be "fate" not "faith". Either way I still want to make the point exactly how I made it.