The Scandinavian Gambit Part II

The Scandinavian Gambit Part II - with 3.c4

Рет қаралды 35,332

Thechesspuzzler

7 жыл бұрын

The Scandinavian Gambit Part II explains the main variations arising from 3.c4 to hold on to the d4 pawn.

Пікірлер: 19

@winstonthebelligerent7288 7 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this and also Part 1! Your knowledge of this gambit is impressive.

@chesswithsundram99 5 жыл бұрын

Nice video sir but i also want to see the third part on Nf3 variation

@andersjonsson8403 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot for this so interesting part of Scandinavian defence!

@sheikjoffer4844 4 жыл бұрын

Very nice nd use full vedios sir excellent work on openings ,sir plese keep doing this kind of vedios

@ztrem3 7 жыл бұрын

In English, "minor piece" refers to a bishop or knight. For example, at 2:25 it is incorrect to say that Black is a minor piece down - he is a pawn down. There's a big difference.

@GMThechesspuzzler 4 жыл бұрын

Hi D M, you are absolutely right.. what you say is correct.. I could have said this differently.

@exoplanet11 4 жыл бұрын

Very useful video...thanks a lot. NOTE to viewers: sometimes when you hear "pin", read that is "fork."

@sheikjoffer4844 4 жыл бұрын

Plese I followed your Scandinavian p1 nd p2 I am eagerly waiting for p3&4

@winstonthebelligerent7288 7 жыл бұрын

Hello. This is extremely thorough and I appreciate it. I do have one question. At 10:57, isn't white able to hold the pawn with Kb3?

@GMThechesspuzzler 7 жыл бұрын

Hi Ant... this is one of my very early analysis on the Scandinavian. The sound is very bad but besides that the explanations go quite in depth. Yes, Kb3 is possible but black can also come in with a check and can give the pawn up. Once the king takes, black can clear up the entire queenside and just look at the position of the white king and compare it to that of black's. It's a bit strange this clip though has not attracted too many views.

@knnihar0478 3 жыл бұрын

What if he use knight to develop and to protect the pawn ?????

@ronaldvl636 4 жыл бұрын

Nice two part video 'series', although with this one I was surprised to hear referring to a pawn as 'a minor piece' (I thought knights and bishops were minor pieces, not pawns). Cheers

@GMThechesspuzzler 4 жыл бұрын

you are right Ronald.. in other languages a pawn is a piece. In English, this is a restricted situation. A pawn in fact should be given a different name than just a pawn; everything has its own name. A Queen is a major piece, rooks are pieces, Bishops and Knights are minor pieces but this is only in the English language.

@ronaldvl636 4 жыл бұрын

@@GMThechesspuzzler Thanks for your reply. English is not my native language, but 99,9% of my chess books, chess video's, chess websites that I subscribe to, etc. are in English (so to me, English is THE chess language) and even in the Dutch language one refers to a pawn as just that: a pawn, not a piece. Also, if in the English language a pawn is not called a piece, and you're talking English in your video's, why call a pawn a piece then? That's not logical, is it? Anyway, love your video's, so, as far as I'm concerned you shouldn't change anything, because then your work would loose some of it's charm. Regards and best wishes!