Become a member of this channel to get access to exclusive perks: / @vologdamapping
Пікірлер: 444
@VarskDarkness2 ай бұрын
If Hungary and Slovakia are red, Serbia should definitely be red also. They're even more supportive of Russia.
@ninjawarrior89942 ай бұрын
This and their fluctuating relationship with Kosovo, a close ally of the US in the Balkans. Also you can split Bosnia into 2, with Srpska being more pro Russia.
@Prororo2 ай бұрын
@@ninjawarrior8994didn’t they stop being staunch allies of Russia after the invasion of Ukraine and is now actively trying to get closer to the west?
@Cashman91112 ай бұрын
is this was supposed to be "The Second Cold War " map then having Russia dark red makws no sense as it should be China that should be dark red, Russia is only a local player here - "junior partner" to China
@henricoz_9745Ай бұрын
@@Prororo Vucic still makes declarations favouring Russia tho
@liamnacinovich8232Ай бұрын
@@Cashman9111honestly what I’m observing is an ever growing ‘axis’ out of Russia, China, and Iran. They all have the common goal of breaking American hegemony but they all have immense differences in what they want from a post American world
@BlockyO2 ай бұрын
This is hard, because “pro-Russian” doesn’t necessarily mean allied with China as well
@fidtrumpdump862 ай бұрын
Yep. India is the greatest example. And what's more difficult is they are also a US ally, however also part of BRICS. That's why I think personally they should be white. It's too difficult to decide on a side
@arthur__lt2 ай бұрын
I would call India neutral, I think their non alignment policy is pretty huge
@houseplant10162 ай бұрын
They mostly lean towards Russia tho, historically, the USSR (and later Russia) have always had good relations. Especially when the west supported Pakistan.
@TheAmericanPrometheus2 ай бұрын
@@houseplant1016 India does cooperate with the US on security issues via the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue though
@houseplant10162 ай бұрын
@@TheAmericanPrometheus True, the U.S is indeed trying, but that's mainly to counter China, not Russia. India literally just developped a very capable missile together (BrahMos) and is buying like 13 times more oil now. It's definitely leaned towards Russia.
@betula21372 ай бұрын
Nah the true alignment is cricket. Combine all the cricketing countries, like Australia (totally no discrepancies in this blanket statement)
@germanempire86782 ай бұрын
@@houseplant1016eh about the oil thing, india is buying more russian oil cause its cheaper for them to buy from russia, there's nothing russia can do about it cause the only way for them right now is india
@cuberrt2 ай бұрын
Personally, I would do a purple color for countries that are kind of aligned with both sides (India, Pakistan, Hungary, etc.)
@yanx4797Ай бұрын
He added that now
@jjj123m2 ай бұрын
Here are some ideas I have for other colors: Purple - Pro-Russia and Pro-West (i.e. India, Turkey) Yellow - Pro-China (i.e. China, Laos) Orange - Pro-Russia and Pro-China (i.e. Kazakhstan) Green/Lime - Pro-China and Pro-West (i.e Pakistan)
@Eed-gr5mr2 ай бұрын
I feel like India should be white, Serbia should be red, and I think Bosnia should be blue.
@djordj18942 ай бұрын
Bosnia can be colored blue only if Srpska is separated and colored red. They have been much more supportive of Russia than Serbia itself.
@NeoZondix2 ай бұрын
Serbia does not side with Russia in this conflict, they are warm towards Ukraine, and India leans towards Russia heavily
@Alexandrosa-bv1yo2 ай бұрын
Maybe the "klošars" (degenerates/masses/riff-raffs) support russia but the government is 1000% neutral
@MrSake5552 ай бұрын
The officials of Bosniaks and Croats in Bosnia are in support of Ukraine, while the Serbs support Russia. I guess if we go by majority, Bosnia should be colored blue.
@TheAmericanPrometheus2 ай бұрын
If Imran Khan comes to power in Pakistan again you can pretty safely shift Pakistan to lean red
@georgios_53422 ай бұрын
The thing is, the 2-side view of the world used to be true in the Cold War, but as we're moving to a multi-polar war, you see the sides being very different in different regions of the world. For example Russia has good relations with China and India, but those two are on the brink of war. At the same time, you see traditional allies like Turkey and Azerbaijan, that are on very good terms bilaterally and support eachother in Armenia/Nagorno-Karabakh, but have very strategies in the wider Middle-East, and especially the Gaza Crisis.
@Punker85_YouTube2 ай бұрын
I agree, I think this map isn't a bad idea but, as you said, the current world isn't as 2-sided as like the Cold War
@Ocelot8352 ай бұрын
Well, Cold War actually had something like this though so it's not that unique. Moscow having good relations and ties with two of it's allies, that despise each other and are predicted to go to war? Somalia and Ethiopia before Ogaden war. Other states playing their own game in the region outside of two "oficial" sides? Rhodesia and South Africa comes to mind. Personally, I'm not quite sure the current geopolitical state of our world even qualified to be called "Second Cold War". The lines are much more blurry and the world is not divided by ideological disagreements, it's more like collective interests of the Western powers coliding against "rule-breakers" states that do not even cooperate that much with each other on the deep levels.
@RMProjects7852 ай бұрын
Yeah, I think you have the Western Bloc, the Russian Bloc, China, and non-aligned States
@kennethreiser12962 ай бұрын
I disagree, while there may be local interests with countries Like Turkey or China the United States is still such a dominate power block everyone else falls into either a Pro, or Anti US camp at least for now. Turkey having it's own goals in the middle east is true for the most part all it's done is fight Iranian and Russian backed groups, and it lacks the recourses to stand as a major power on it's own. As for India friendly reactions with Russia or not if China lunches a full scale invasion they will get some level of US support, same for any country directly attacked by China, Russia or Iran, thus melding the 3 Alliance blocks together While there many things that could end it in the future, such as a war between china and Russia over Siberia, Iran causing major trouble in both of those powers with their Islamic minorities or the US taking a isolationist turn strategically, the 2 sided view of the world is viable, least for now
@G-Cole-012 ай бұрын
if this is "multipolar" then the sino-soviet split should've made the cold war a 3-way.
@JirMirza2 ай бұрын
People are most curious about which side India will be on because of its relations with China, but it depends more on Pakistan, so if we think that India will be on the opposite side to Pakistan, it is a nice map 🔥
@cajunpower2 ай бұрын
India should be neutral however as of lately, it depends more on the Hindu Nationalist.
@runajain57732 ай бұрын
@@cajunpoweras I know as we do not use any hindu nationalist bjp have not problem other minorities about muslim it mostly on historical issue but as I know they do not hate muslim india most neutral on Ukraine russia war and israel Palestine war
@LeonidasF2P2 ай бұрын
Omg JirMirza!!!
@outerspace73912 ай бұрын
Ever since the coup against Khan, Pakistan's western alignment is clear as day, and yes they're indeed trying to abandon cooperation with China
@thatvexiolАй бұрын
@@cajunpowerwell ,as a hindu nationalist (not the minority oofing variety) i'd say it depends. Hindu nationalism is a large umbrella, we have many factions but 3 large groups , such as the pro west group of bjp in which I am , which makes the smallest of the 3 , according to my own experience about 17% of NDA supporters , we mainly want a hindu nation that is a democratic country and is minority friendly but embraces it's original hindu culture like the hans do in china . Then the 2nd one is Russia friendly (but not china) , they are our extreme members , they either want an autocratic state or even a theocratic state . They want a "strong man" figure to lead the country According to my experience, they make up about 21-24% of NDA members, but these are also the most vocal ones . The largest group and the absolute majority are the people who want what benefits India rather than one side of this cold war , ie they want a third side and a multipolar world , they lean somewhere between my ideology and a theocratic state Tldr : it's really complicated but we will most likely join the side that benifits us the most so probably the west since Russia is a dirt bag
@marcelow86062 ай бұрын
Slovakia and Hungary should be white at worst. Both countries still send humanitarian aid to Ukraine after all, and don't question their membership in the Western world. They also both condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine and consider it as a violation of the international law, Orban himself said it recently during the Visegrad Group Summit
@The_Soviet_Onion2 ай бұрын
True
@ramennight2 ай бұрын
Yeah, but not 100% supporting Ukraine now means your a traitor these days.
@NeoZondix2 ай бұрын
No. Slovakia scammed Ukraine about production of self propelled artillery and doesn't follow the contract, while orban openly supports ending the war by allowing Russia to stay with the lands they stole. They are definitely not neutral
@houseplant10162 ай бұрын
Hungary absolutely not.
@marcelow86062 ай бұрын
@@houseplant1016 Why?
@mattheww.15832 ай бұрын
Changes I would make: Blue: Japan, Switzerland Light Blue: India, Colombia, Egypt, Vietnam White: Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia, Armenia Light Red: UAE, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Red: Venezuela
@spidereye4412 ай бұрын
Why Switzerland Blue
@fidtrumpdump862 ай бұрын
Switzerland is better neutral honestly. Not even for the meme, they didn't even condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine right away, rather when they were pressured into siding. They have no interest in any of the wars, nor do they want to join NATO or the EU anytime soon. I do agree that if there were to pick a side it's blue but still, white is probably the best. I do agree with everything else in your list though
@RMProjects7852 ай бұрын
Also blue for South Korea
@bubblesxd2 ай бұрын
Japan blue but Switzerland light blue
@Juan-qu4oj2 ай бұрын
UAE is allies with Saudi Arabia, recognizes Israel and is enemies of the Houthis and Iran
@aaryanbhatia49392 ай бұрын
There's a civil war in Myanmar, I would argue the military government is Russian friendly and the democratic forces are western friendly
@Dave_Sisson2 ай бұрын
I think Russia has declined to only being a middle power and the war in Ukraine proves that. The only super powers are China, USA and perhaps Europe if they get their act together. The biggest non super power is India and who they ally with will be vital in deciding the balance of power in future decades.
@communist7502 ай бұрын
He should add that war, it's one of longest civil wars in history
@johnothwolo2 ай бұрын
@@communist750 longest genocides*
@swaminathanbalakrishnan13992 ай бұрын
And plus they are just two of the factions; the Rohingyas are pro-Iran/Houthi and there are many ethnic minority rebels who are aligned with god knows who (some say China)
@outerspace73912 ай бұрын
No Myanmar is a unique situation, there are no real pro-US factions there
@Usonan-Foderation20162 ай бұрын
Last time i was this early, rome was under German Control
@pakistanimapperr2 ай бұрын
1940s or collapse of roman empire
@mrcocoloco72002 ай бұрын
What flag is that?
@Usonan-Foderation20162 ай бұрын
@@pakistanimapperr Collapse of the Roman Empire
@Usonan-Foderation20162 ай бұрын
@@mrcocoloco7200 Collapse of the Roman Empire
@mrcocoloco72002 ай бұрын
@@Usonan-Foderation2016 Huh?
@deadteddybear24232 ай бұрын
I think Nepal and Bhutan should be white due to their "silence" politically.
@SocialistWorldRepublic2 ай бұрын
Nepal is communist, so i think they are pro-east
@outerspace73912 ай бұрын
Indeed
@raptoro07922 ай бұрын
I think you could also colour the Netherlands dark blue since they are also involved in the Red Sea crisis
@CoolEdo2 ай бұрын
Cuba: survive
@mateuspokemon012 ай бұрын
You have quickly become my favorite mapping channel. Covering history is great but covering history *as it is happening* is such an amazing concept. It is also easier for us who have other ocupations to keep updated with the whole geopolitical situation. Thank you and keep up doing such amazing work!
@padinspi112 ай бұрын
Great idea! A few things i would change: -i haven't researched it enough but chinese influence in the pacific has been growing and i think countries might be considered leaning towards China -Armenia is also a difficult situation. They have been historically pro-russian but this seems to have changed lately. They did sign some pretty important military treaties with France lately, and some european countries (again France especially) have openly supported Armenia rather than Azerbaijan lately. So i guess maybe these 2 countries could be considered neutral, or at least Armenia could
@thatoneperson15772 ай бұрын
I know it might make the map a lot harder to read, but maybe you could try colouring countries like india, pakistan, saudi arabia, hungary, etc. with red and blue stripes. for example, hungary might be medium blue/light pink, because they're a part of the EU and NATO, but are also somewhat sympathetic towards russia. politically
@Calgary_Has_A_Cool_Flag2 ай бұрын
Perhaps Armenia could be very light blue. I remember reading that Armenia distanced itself from Russia after Moscow was silent during Azerbaijan's complete subjugation of Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenia has held military exercises with America, and I think was considering leaving CSTO. They've also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine as well, I believe.
@brodbreiss2 ай бұрын
Moscow was silent because the Armenian government let the attack happen and stopped claiming the territory. Pashanyan is the biggest traitor to Armenia
@outerspace73912 ай бұрын
For now it'd be safer to put it light red or neutral. Not outright western as of now
@tony5ify2492 ай бұрын
"WW3 proto" 💀
@averytiredman48572 ай бұрын
Bro is preparing for the future, but I remember he also did a "how russia would invade ukraine" before it actually happened. So not too surprising.
@tony5ify2492 ай бұрын
@@averytiredman4857You're not helping my man
@pakistanimapperr2 ай бұрын
Biden: Putin has been isolated from the world *Also Putin:*
@captainmcawesome79082 ай бұрын
You can always convince some african warlords of your shit just by spouting "but the colonialist west!!!111"
@marceltelang78252 ай бұрын
Isn't Xi Jinping the leader of the second eastern block
@sadfrog152 ай бұрын
Putin has been isolated from everywhere that isn't a struggling third world nation or dictatorship
@doctorballs83092 ай бұрын
@@marceltelang7825Definitely, Russia is just the most outspoken anti-west power at this point apart from maybe Iran
@TheMrCrowle2 ай бұрын
@@captainmcawesome7908I don't see the lie, west are like less 30% human population and even latinamerican populations supports more russia/chinese narrative than the west one, so gtfo son
@xXShmendanXx2 ай бұрын
I would love this as a monthly series or so
@captainterra45812 ай бұрын
i would love to see that true map of the world video, sounds so interesting, but please do whats best for you man
@VologdaMapping2 ай бұрын
Thanks mate!
@jonathanong32342 ай бұрын
@@VologdaMapping What color is Singapore? I can't see.
@icantthinkofaname81392 ай бұрын
I’d be very excited to see something like this!
@OfficialSaul2 ай бұрын
Heard his voice for the fist time😃
@oracle3722 ай бұрын
Oh :( I'm so sad you abandoned the de-facto world map, I was so excited for it
@taraedwards-white51892 ай бұрын
The world is divided by a new Iron Curtain.
@Serennissimo2 ай бұрын
This are changes I will do to this map: Pls Haití, India and Pakistan shold be in white (also Afganistan) Venezuela and Cuba should be more red Vietnam and Switzerland should be slightly in the blue colour I would like a better representation of the African conflicts anyway , great job!
@georgios_53422 ай бұрын
3:05 the first one was pretty good! Aspides means "Shields" in Greek. By the way, Egypt is also supporting the mission in the Red Sea, because they're losing out big time due to trade restrictions on the Suez
@redluna6222 ай бұрын
I had a similar idea to this as I myself also like making maps. On my map though I had the idea of coloring Russia yellow while keeping China red and the US/West blue (I thought about also maybe coloring Iran green but I don't know if I should go with that or not). I like having the multiple colors cause it shows more context on political alliances as it is a multi-polar world nowadays. India is pro-Russia but anti-China so it'd be a lighter yellow as only an example. I also think for nations allied to more than one color (think Pakistan in your case), I'd mix in both colors, but I'll leave that up to you. I think your map looks really good nonetheless. Keep it up!
@kamata-kizzle58172 ай бұрын
I have actually been making a map just like this for the past couple of years and used your last video on the de facto world map to expand my map. there's definitely a lot of differences between countries on mine. I even call mine the Modern Cold War map
@ewokrothaar84342 ай бұрын
Impressive. Very nice.
@jakecarroll95002 ай бұрын
Would love to see where you go with this! Do you have a link to a non-red/blue map?
@dracothegreat19502 ай бұрын
You could perhaps do stripes or use purple colors to describe the mixed relation countries. I don't know how confusing that would be to actually do though lol Very much in favor of this becoming a weekly thing as you mentioned, I've been looking for some source of information on global matters.
@kingdomofgenevamapping2 ай бұрын
the prelude to the 3rd great clan war
@MappingEagle2 ай бұрын
I'd recommend making India neutral and colouring Hungary and Slovakia very light blue. If it comes down to it, they'll side with the west but they are still somewhat supportive of Russia
@Scrungge2 ай бұрын
Awesome video my dude
@Willpolita2 ай бұрын
I'm from Brazil and your point is very correct, even last year we were buying Russian oil. Our current president has always been anti-American, but that type of criticize and praise
@Yuio_Quaz2 ай бұрын
I had a similar project back in 2021, I ended up not updating anymore since the map I was using didn't show every unrecognised country and because I didn't have any time for it. For the EU I had always thought about highlighting its border and colouring that, tho it probably wouldn't look as good. For India (and Iran and Türkiye as well) I chose to colour them in a different colour (green, orange, and purple respectively), together with the countries that were close to them politically (for example Türkiye, Azerbaijan, and N Cyprus were bundled up together). Anyways, I think of it as a fantastic idea, it would be really interesting and useful to follow such a project
@junglebogged32Ай бұрын
My suggestions: 1. Serbia pink; Hungary/Slovakia stay pink, Switzerland stays white 2. Include wars in Ethiopia, Libya, CAR, Myanmar and Somalia even though they aren´t proxy wars (maybe add yellow colour for neutral warring factions) cause these wars are still necessary for a weekly world news series. 3. Include the other EAC countrys in light blue 4. MAYBE (idk so much about it) make the subconitinent situation all-white since the Anti-Indian factions are pro-chinese and India anti-chinese even though China being a major red player.
@sircoloniser54542 ай бұрын
Egypt is pretty pro Western, might not be happy with what’s happening in Gaza but well, its still way more pro Western than pro China
@6000.2 ай бұрын
Fun fact: Egypt is almost double-warlocked, surrounded by countries at war that are surrounded by countries at war
@not11nome07thefirst2 ай бұрын
What about their relationship with Russia? They seem to be somewhat close.
@redacted70602 ай бұрын
They are part of BRICS+
@widodoakrom39382 ай бұрын
Egypt dump USD for Yuan
@Juan-qu4oj2 ай бұрын
@@not11nome07thefirstEgypt is selling ammo to Ukraine
@junglebogged32Ай бұрын
My suggestions: 1. Serbia pink; Hungary/Slovakia stay pink, Switzerland stays white, Usbekistan pink cause of SCO and GUS membership 2. Include wars in Ethiopia, Libya, CAR, Myanmar and Somalia even though they aren´t proxy wars (maybe add yellow colour for neutral warring factions) cause these wars are still necessary for a weekly world news series. 3. Include the other EAC countrys in light blue 4. MAYBE (idk so much about it) make the subconitinent situation all-white since the Anti-Indian factions are pro-chinese and India anti-chinese even though China being a major red player.
@Tarquinthetyrant2 ай бұрын
Poland should be deep blue
@DiMacky242 ай бұрын
We are in a second cold war, a good way to demonstrate the complex dynamics.
@ssg9offical2 ай бұрын
This is an amazing map 👏 👏 👏
@umegadarkstar26572 ай бұрын
Hey, I also made a west vs east map like this. Though west vs east alignments are quite ambiguous, since many countries are playing both sides and have their own immediate interests. For example I coloured turkey and azerbaijan purple as there own factional block.
@giathinhnguyen925Ай бұрын
Finally, a map when Vietnam is neutral
@jelen72172 ай бұрын
0:32 "news of the world" is great album :D 👍
@monkeypie87012 ай бұрын
I think you should have extra colours when it comes to Turkey-Iran-Pakistan- India - China relations, as your enemies enemy isnt always your friend. Also you have a good voice, you should do more videos like this👍
@junglebogged32Ай бұрын
Nooo I was so looking forward to the de facto World Map
@user-uf2df6zf5w2 ай бұрын
I tried to make a map like this, with mostly the same results. However, I found it quite difficult to determine the allegiances of most African countries. Also, the world is more complicated today than during the first cold war. Some countries, like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and India should be colored as the centers of their own smaller regional blocks. Also: where did you get the blanc map for this? It's often hard to find a suitable one.
@harrisonshone77692 ай бұрын
I think a major difference between this cold war and the previous one is that the third world (lead by India and Brazil) is much, much tougher. It's really an independent "don't get us involved in your silly shenanigans" bloc which is veeeerrry loosely unified by a desire to see a more multipolar world. India, Brazil, Turkey, much of South America and most of Africa and Southeast Asia aren't so much anti-western as they are ambivalent about the west, and many of these nations also have disagreements with western countries and Russia-China aligned countries. India is the biggest example. India is deeply suspicious of China, with which they have huge border disputes, conflicts over water and a grudge due to China's attempts to surround them via the string of pearls. However India is also suffering from significant democratic backsliding (or at least a backlash against western style liberalism) and retains amicable relations with Russia and Iran. India's greatest geopolitical rival, Pakistan, is friendlier to China than it is to the United States. Turkey is a member of NATO which has huge issues with Russia regarding it's support for the Assad regime, but also has huge issues with the Americans regarding American support for the Kurds, and is much more willing to negotiate diplomatically with Russia than almost any other member of NATO. Saudi Arabia has been moving closer to China since the beginning of the Biden administration and especially since the start of the war in Gaza. Finally, I would caution against depicting the Beijing-Moscow-Tehran triangle as a unified alliance rather than an informal dictator's support club unified purely based on weakening American hegemony (and in the case of Russia and China, cooperating against islamist terrorism in Central Asia - which is a rather loose term given that the Chinese Communist Party seem to think terrorism = Uyghurs). They will all quickly turn on each other if they achieve their goal of a general American withdrawal from Eurasian affairs. I'm not saying this to critique the map, which is of course amazing, and you are of course aware of how oversimplified this is. I don't want to discourage you. I think the issue with mapping the myriad entangling alliance systems and overlapping influences in the modern world is that depicting them all would create so much overlap that it would make any 100% accurate geopolitical map illegible. It's a weakness inherent in the art of mapmaking rather than any failure on your part. But this system you've invented here is by far the most comprehensive I've seen anyone use, and I look forward to seeing how you update it as time passes!
@esellipion81572 ай бұрын
Definitely make this weekly, you will be capturing history!
@Saskmapper2 ай бұрын
I am Serbian you should put us the same color as Hungary and Slovakia
@outerspace73912 ай бұрын
After the failed western color revolution in Belgrade, I think its far to put Serbia as slightly red yes
@SlovakLutheranMonarchistАй бұрын
I ja sam iz Srbije i Slovak, upravu si. Srbija treba da bude minimum svetlo crvena.
@Ryan-hh4yv2 ай бұрын
For countries like Brazil where there are a lot of tribal nations within it, I would suggest adding something separated like a little not that says they support one side or the other or only color the parts that are directly under the Brazilian Government's control.
@zirconiumofficialgameschan75512 ай бұрын
EU ambassadors have allowed the allocation of 5 billion euros for the purchase of weapons for Ukraine, the Belgian Presidency of the Council of the EU reports. This means that Ukraine will also be supported by: Ireland, Malta and Austria!
@chillyfox20782 ай бұрын
My take on the Myanmar conflict: the junta is hard cause China supported forces against them but otherwise: - peoples defense forces are mostly pro Western maybe light blue - the northeastern ethnic armies are + kachin, wa, the communists, ... are reliant on China and should maybe be lite red - other ethnic armies are mostly neutral
@chillyfox20782 ай бұрын
+ little mistake in Oman enclave in the UAE not being colored
@TheAidiwashere2 ай бұрын
*Sees your naming of the file in the top left* HEHEhehe...heh O_O
@user-dt5nj3uk2s2 ай бұрын
1. India should stay red. 2. Serbia should turn red. 3. Haiti should be white. 4. Colombia should be blue. 5. Turkey should be white 6. Switzerland should be blue
@ArgLarper2 ай бұрын
Love the work, and I agree in the global possessions as you represented them, but I feel like the Western and Eastern Blocs are different in nature. While NATO has strengthened their alliance and structure after the Soviet Collapse, the new Eastern Bloc works differently. Key players present complete different ideologies, they may work together because of shared objectives at any given time, but their geopolitical affinity is the result of Western pressure rather than anything else. I think the big 3 players: China, Russia and Iran, should each have a unique color, maybe in tonality of a warm color to denote their closeness. I do agree that there are players that play differently, Turkey and India, maybe Brazil, but their influence outside their border is limited. I don’t like the idea of them being a mixed country. At the end Turkey is part of NATO and India of the BRICS+ I do adhere to the notion that the world, geopolitically, is going in to be multipolar, with different nations taking regional relevance and their alignment to the great powers will be more limited than seen in the Cold War.
@runajain57732 ай бұрын
Brics is not nato it just economic military and trade talk are there it not military alliance
@armenianmapper31682 ай бұрын
Armenia is distancing from Russia. It should not be pink in this map. + Azerbaijan clearly has allience with Russia since february 2022, 2 days before the Ukraine invasion . They cooperated in the ethnic cleansing of Artsakh and they are prepearing for invasion on Armenia, Azerbaijan from outside and Russia from inside of Armenia. I don't know what opinion will you have on this , but Azerbaijan is not the country of the West that much .
@hazzmati2 ай бұрын
Are you serious about Azerbaijan wanting to invade Armenia? They already got Nagorno-Karabakh what more could they possibly want.
@armenianmapper31682 ай бұрын
@@hazzmati yes, I am totally serious. Currently Azerbaijan controls Armenian territories , and from the day of invasion , CSTO did nothing to help Armenia, Russia did nothing too. Azerbaijan is planning the invasion , and they will not stop until they occupy the Syunik province of Armenia .
@hazzmati2 ай бұрын
@@armenianmapper3168 but why? Sorry for all the questions I'm trying to understand the conflict as best as possible. I looked it up Syunik province is populated almost entirely by Armenians and it is not an exclave within Azerbaijan like Nagorno-karabh. Plus its rightful territory of Armenia.
@armenianmapper31682 ай бұрын
@@hazzmati Starting from 1918-1921 and 1991 Azerbaijan tried to occupy the whole Syunik province. Nakhijevan was cleansed from Armenians during 20th century, Artsakh canished last year , now the Syunik province is the last barrier between Turkey and Azerbaijan. They call it "Zangezur corridor" and they will do everything to occupy this territory , and this is now a life or death question for Armenia and its independence. Even if Syunik is full of Armenians , Azerbaijan will do a genocide to clean Armenians out of the Syunik. In Azerbaijan right now there is a total propaganda , where Armenia is called "Western Azerbaijan" and claim that Armenians never existed and they came only when Russians occupied these territories in 19th century (I'm serious). They are falsificating the whole history and also they destroy the physical marks of Armenian presence. Churchs , Crossrocks and Christiann-Armenian architectures are being destroyed right now in Artsakh, like how they did that happened in Nakhijevan. The only provacators here are Russia , Turkey and Azerbaijan. Armenia is the one who is defending itself from ethnic cleansing and occupation from the dictatirships .
@RenBR2 ай бұрын
The idea is interesting. However, trying to simplify this 2nd cold war based on only 2 camps focusing in a single conflict (ukraine war) may be impossible. We are entering a period were there ware multiple cold wars happening at the same time. Some are aligned and others are not. Perhaps a better option (more labor intensive) would be to create multiple maps (1 for each conflict hot spot). Though this could require more work, it could provide better results. Example: * Map 1 regarding the ukraine war global position, though this could also be replaced by a map regarding Russia challenging NATO with Ukraine as the battlefield (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 2 USA vs China (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 3 regarding Israel x Palestine global position (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 4 regarding China vs Taiwan Global position (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 5 regarding Iran vs Israel global position (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 6 N.Korea vs S.Korea (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) * Map 7 India vs China (you could assign % values in order to determined the color overlay) With those maps ready, you could use those % values in order to merge all 7 maps into a single 8th map. The color scheme would probably end up quite varied.
@chat47832 ай бұрын
This proves that geopolitical does not have hard alliance, as every country got their own personal intrest.
@Forg22 ай бұрын
Columbia and the US are fairly close but they aren’t really outspokenly against russia
@robrot4042 ай бұрын
I get that this is an oversimplification, but we have to recognise a very crucial difference between the First and Second Cold War the first one was a "bipolar" conflict, i.e. Two superpowers fighting for global hegemony by fighting in proxy wars which would determine the alignment of each state. This war was won by the US, establishing a "unipolar" world order in which they alone dominate world affairs. Not everyone is happy about this arrangement and a coalition composed of emerging superpowers and regional powers emerged seeking to undermine US hegemony and create a "multipolar" world in which no power dominates globally. Other than that they have little in common and often find themselves fighting each other, like how Russia and China are competing for influence in Central Asia, China flirting with the Taliban while it is fighting Iran, and there's plenty of other examples. To keep it oversimplified I think the colours should be based on their relationship with the US alone with Blue being friendly and Red meaning hostile rather than a spectrum between Russian alignment and American alignment like how it was in the First Cold War, since it is outright wrong in some cases like China which is definitely more dominant in it's relationship with Russia or India which is friendly with both Russia and the US.
@Matthew_0802 ай бұрын
Thank you for your detailed analysis of ongoing conflicts!
@Sean122482 ай бұрын
Awesome map
@hexry11392 ай бұрын
Italy should be lighter blue, it has a commercial trade with China
@luonggiaphat79462 ай бұрын
Ok, so I think there're a few things incorrect with this map, so here's my thoughts on what should change. -Brazil is still under the Lula's administration, so it should be light red. -Both India and Turkey have mixed alliances, so I would suggest painting them in a 3rd color or a mix of red and blue, as "mixed alliances". -Cambodia is currently being invested heavily by China, and it stills supports China in the South China Sea matters, so it should be red. -Call me out if I'm wrong, but isn't the post Sadamn government of Irag is a US puppet, so even if the Iraqi population resents the US occupation, shouldn't it be light blue.
@fulano5393Ай бұрын
What program you use?
@Isvakk2 ай бұрын
*Map of political alignment* Community: "100 nuanced takes, on the history of superpowers" *Is there a genicide in gaza?* Community: "haha Transnistria belongs to Bolivia haha"
@VenFlyte24 күн бұрын
Were you also playin CON?
@Elendor092 ай бұрын
Oh shit
@B_men_apo2 ай бұрын
The Netherlands technically sent one staff officer to fight the Houti’s. The current government is very pro us but the most probable next one is more sceptical
@junglebogged32Ай бұрын
Please include wars in Ethiopia, Somalia, Central Africa
@Funnymoments_yt2 ай бұрын
WARSAW PACT COME BACK MY FREND😂❤
@marcoparra9462 ай бұрын
Switzerland stays neutral because it’s Switzerland.
@the_feedle2 ай бұрын
Armenia's current government is more western-leaning
@Graylacemaps2 ай бұрын
Switzerland 🇨🇭, although all the memes or jokes say that they are the most neutral country in the world I would say they would be Ukraine/USA leaning because first they have eu policy’s and they have somewhat recently condemned Russia 🇷🇺 in the war in ukrain
@Escen12 ай бұрын
3:40 only 4% of sri lankans have a negative view on india and they are large trading partners am i missing something??
@UnluckyCantaloupe4Ай бұрын
He gave up lol, we Brazil defeated him 😅😂
@magma4402 ай бұрын
I think that Turkey should be the same colour as Hungary and Slovakia. All 3 are in NATO but all 3 are also led by populist conservatives with pro-Russia/imperialist leanings.
@MachinimaGothic2 ай бұрын
Indonesia should be slightly red
@goldenfiberwheat2382 ай бұрын
5:36 it won’t flare up. There is only one road that crosses the border and it goes through Brazil. Any offensive would have to go through dense uninhabited forrest with no roads. Such a war is unfeasible and to say otherwise is a maduro cope
@skhugo12 ай бұрын
I feel like Chile should be neutral, especially with the current government, they are in situation like Brazil but with the US, west leaning but openly critical of some OTAN policies. Chile openly supports Ukraine, but it also strongly disapproves of Israel campaigns in Gaza. Chile also has very positive relations with China.
@Diomaialemainlatino2 ай бұрын
Damn, mid-late 20’s and early 30’s are gonna be fire fr🔥🔥 (i’m gonna die young in WW3 and civilization will be wiped out in nuclear fire😅)
@junglebogged32Ай бұрын
And now I am asking you guys: How can you support the Eastern Faction? It is a bunch of Autocracys (exceptions confirm the rule) starting all the wars
@stephmod74342 ай бұрын
3:01 it's pronounced as "Aspeedhes"
@viktorgames27372 ай бұрын
That file name though...
@JustJ_KK2 ай бұрын
Make the conflicts different Colours it would help understand it more
@thealbanianmonke218Ай бұрын
I also think Djibouti should be neutral because they have so many allies and everyones chill with them
@piyumalubayasiri26422 ай бұрын
Sri lanka is not allied to china against india. Srilanka is allied to both india and china in a kind of mediocre way. And sri lanka is way more leaning to the red team than blue.
@richardgamer52792 ай бұрын
I think Serbia and Brazil should be pink, and also I think India it's ok with pink color
@umarutsc798820 күн бұрын
acho que você está correto em deixar o brasil branco, nossa política externa é de neutralidade apesar de atualmente haver esforços para não penalizar a rússia devido ao BRICS - é algo a se pensar. ótimo vídeo :).
@powergrassp77692 ай бұрын
Friend, you missed a lot of things. For example, Libya and Ethiopia are both at war. So is Myanmar. They should be similar to Sudan in the picture.
@notanothermichael4676Ай бұрын
Great work but imo China should either be an equal to Russia or its own faction.
@esellipion81572 ай бұрын
Look up the burundian invasion of the drc btws
@sachacendra31872 ай бұрын
I believe you forgot to color blue some French overseas like La Réunion or Kerguelen. That's just a miner nitpickbut yeah. Also I wonder what to do with other civil wars like Myanmar.
@magnusschive46962 ай бұрын
I have a few points to consider, and I am by no means an expert As many people have pointed out, India could maybe be white. But another way to make it clearer could be to make China its own axis, but then again, you're not painting axes centered around one nation, and the overlap with the Russian/Iranian one would be quite big. China is purple on Liveaumap. One way to portray countries who are part of an alliance, but acts counter to it, would be to include diagonal stripes. Serbia is difficult, but I think Republika Srpska could probably be coloured some sort of red or pink. I might be wrong on all three points
@westaustralisch2 ай бұрын
I think Nepal should be light pink as the Prime Minister is a Maoist