yeah but that won't stop those who look for ism's in everything

Yep.

Who cares

@@rtl1003 Peter dinklige

Nice!

Derick Mitchell as the little people said Peter Dinkleage does not speak for all of them look at the munckins in Wizard of Oz those actors did not get offended!

Dwarfs and other creatures who ended up in fairytales, often started out in serious reports from people of all cultures and races seeing them. Just like giants, mermaids and other things. Its just that movies shaped our image of these things in such a goofy way, that we think about what we saw on screen and go naaaaah, thats to weird and childish. Its not total fantasy always...if you dig into this, you find many interesting things that werent made up for kids at all. And its not a coinscedence that you can find depictions and descriptions of these things in so many differetn cultures, that didnt even mingle with each other at the time, and it was written down in chronicles too.

@@aprilgosa5779 You also have to take into consideration that the Wizard of Oz was also released in the 30s. A lot has changed since then.

The term dwarfism was coined in the 1870's , Schneewittchen ( Snow White ) was first published in 1812 ... The folkloric creatures came first

@@aprilgosa5779 They got rich.

He just didn't want any competition in Hollywood. He wanted to be the go to for those roles

He is behaving like a snob.

Wouldn't a Snow White remake only create jobs for more dwarf actors though? Maybe just seven jobs, but still...

Did Mr Dinkelage even watch Snow White the dwarves were the heros they killed the Evil Queen/ Witch! They knocked her off the cliff! LOL

I guess he didn’t know how to play the Game of Thrones in real life

This reminds me of Tommy Shelby in the final season of peaky blinders

A practice that not only Disney Inc does. But now it’s to the detriment of every company but China. Walt was a true neutral.

yes, walt disney was a genius, he changed the world, he made the best movies ever, the modern day people at disney just care about money HAIL DISNEY

I forgot what Dinklage was so mad about, was it about the dwarves controversy?

@@Abebabe413 Except it's not even controversial if you ask the majority of the little people community, it was Dinklage slamming the door behind him.

@@NotMyRealName6 ah yes

@@NotMyRealName6 A lot of people do think he just didn't want any other little people getting famous and threatening Dinklage's spot as Hollywood's go to actor for a role that needs a little person.

yeah dinklage should have been the bigger man about all this

Wasn't a villain? You do know he was a 33 degree freemason, right? And you know what that entails? Maybe do some research...not the guy you think he was!

@@ShannaM1 ​ @ShannaM420 1. No, Walt Disney was not a 33 degree Freemason, as far as I can tell. There is no official record of him joining a Masonic Lodge or receiving any Masonic degrees The claim that he was a 33 degree Freemason seems to be based on a misunderstanding of his involvement with DeMolay International, a Masonic-sponsored youth organization that he joined when he was 19 2. These are some common reasons for conspiracy theorists to label him as such: - His creation of Club 33 at Disneyland, an exclusive private club for VIPs, which some people think is a reference to the 33rd degree of Freemasonry. However, there is no evidence to support this theory, and it is more likely that the name Club 33 comes from the address of the club at 33 Royal Street in New Orleans Square, or from the number of corporate sponsors of Disneyland at the time of the club’s construction23. - His use of Masonic symbols in some of his films, such as the square, compass, and all-seeing eye in early drafts of Fantasia. However, these symbols are not exclusive to Freemasonry and can have different meanings in different contexts. There is no proof that Walt Disney intended to convey any Masonic messages through his work24. These pieces of evidence are not enough to prove that Walt Disney was a 33 degree Freemason, as they are based on assumptions, speculations, or coincidences. They can be disproved by looking at the official records of Freemasonry and DeMolay International, as well as the historical and artistic sources of Walt Disney’s creations. There's some research for you sir. If you do have any other evidence of Walt Disney being a Freemason, I would love to hear it so I can look into it myself. I would like to have a logical discussion with you about this rather than you just insinuating I have not done any research, when in fact I have very much done so, when you just throw claims that I assume you heard on a KZfaq video once and believed it completely without looking into it yourself at all. You didn't give any evidence for your claim an any capacity, how can you say I don't do research when you throw claims with no backing. I am actually a long time business researcher and love to look into the lives of many successful entrepreneurs such as Ray Kroc, Rockefeller, Steve Jobs, and, yes, Walt Disney. I have watched numerous documentaries and read many books about the man and am actually quite knowledgeable about him and his life, please don't just assume you know more about someone just because you watched a Top 10 video once. Sources: Was Walt Disney a Freemason? | Scottish Rite, NMJ Was Walt Disney a Freemason? - Skeptics Stack Exchange Was Walt Disney A Freemason? Exploring The Rumors Peek Inside Walt Disney’s Secretive Club 33 - Ripley’s Believe It or Not! Debunking Myths About Walt Disney - MousePlanet

Yep

@@ShannaM1 lol what person of power then and now isn’t a mason?!

@@CarolCityCane305 that's not the point. I'm trying to educate this person that Walt wasn't the sweet innocent man we were raised to believe he was.

Exactly!

I’m grandmother would disagree but I do agree I did not watch those movies when they came out but I do like them and it is a shame that it’s going down to the ground

well said. No, he wasn't perfect. Yes, he created a big part of our collective childhood. Accept it.

Yes a popular artist/ Animation Legend, Can obviously become Egoistic; I believe I went To school w/Disney Grand-son it's too Long of a story, (or I have little info) any Way to my point that Disney relative was Civil towards myself And he gathered "popularity " well Also good looking Family (curly blond And tall and thin well Dressed) enough said.

I never took for granted Walt Disney as a symbol of patriotism; even without figuring out what lesser qualities he had, I knew he was still a person with a big set of expectations placed on him and inevitably was going to face some moral struggles in his time, but the issues were never the status quo for Walt; at his core he desired to impress audiences with a wonderful new technology and entertainment experience and a good team behind it, and he certainly achieved that. Regards, Samuel Farris.

@@samuelfarris1949 Uh, why?

Here is how I look at him while he wasn’t perfect he did what he did out of a genuine passion he even said himself that he didn’t make cartoons and movies for money but for enjoyment which is why I personally believe he would be ASHAMED at what his company has become these days.

That would have been December 20th,1971.

Thankyou! How I wish that I hadn't given up writing a daily diary during the heady years: the memory still serves well but I guess that much detail was lost in the next joint! That was life and so busy with the excitement of the day to give the time to the page a day books that I keep and have done religiously for the past four decades.@@jmen4ever257

Meryl Streep also supports Roman Polanski and actual child predator.

A hypocritical Hollywood star? Color me shocked. 🙄

From what I hear Disney ironically became a Jewish company at one point so the joke would be on Walt Disney himself.

😂

@Jefferson Gonzalez I know it's not what was meant, but with all of the wonderful words that would accurately describe his chain smoking(

@Jefferson Gonzalez he knows it means chainsmoking

@@ytsn_THE_OG Proof?

@@SUPERNOVA0360 my reply to the statement that was posted 17 hours before you commented.

Ub Iwerks did an Amazing job with Mickey Mouse

Why what's wrong?

@@UN1VERS3S Have you seen the live action remakes

Yes it’s very sad

It was worse back in the day have you watch the video lol

@@UN1VERS3S If you had to edit a 3 word reply, I highly doubt you'd understand the point no matter how presented.

Fun fact: Sport announcer Al Michaels was traded for Oswald the Lucky Rabbit in a sport TV deal

I think that was because Oswald got taken from Disney by the company he worked with at the time. Something involving copyrights I believe. That used set him so much that he made sure a situation like this would never happen again. I also believe it’s this whole mess that inspired him to create Mickey. As a sort of replacement for Oswald. But feel free to look this up yourself.

@@OptimusMaximusNero Uh, where?

@@johnprudent3216 pretty much what happened. Oswald and the majority of Disney animation studio at the time was taken from him by Charles Mintz and Universal. It’s what set off Disney to protect his characters, and be very wary of all the big studios.

He was in the mickey mouse shorts and epic mickey

(Idealisation) is always the problem, and that can be deduced without having to apply modern morality to past events with hindsight at our sides to attack his choices in who he idealised.

@@LlibertarianGalt In what way, shape or form is idealism always the problem? Idealism is the first step towards an aspirational goal. What facts or points contribute to your deduction that makes being an idealist the perennial problem?

@@JLP627 I meant idealisation sorry, my bad.

@@LlibertarianGalt Ah, makes sense now LoL

there's no such thing as black people. we are indigenous, indians and moors. the reds are asian fake natives. the truth can never be hidden for long.

It looks the same to me for the last decade approximately.

@@fynkozari9271 Proof?

proof of what? This is not my first day on internet or KZfaq, Ive been on internet since 2006 non stop.

@@fynkozari9271 Why though?

@@SUPERNOVA0360 this is a very funny conversation.

BUT I WANNA KNOW HOW WALT DISNEY DIED FOR REEEAAAALL😡

@@niasharamos1718 died of Lung Cancer

@@tamyaevans1631 They said he died from being frozen but why did he get frozen?!

@@niasharamos1718 He didn’t die because he got frozen, he died from lung cancer. The frozen thing is just a myth, it hasn’t been proven if it’s real or not

It's Infographics, they always leave out details here and there. Either it's to save time or to make the story sound more interesting.

By trying to distance themselves from him and being a true neutral, they end up making him look like a paragon of virtue when compared to Disney Inc now.

Yes! Disney had more than a few skeletons in the closet, but the present-day wokeism is much more creepy.

Peter Dinkledge also made a point to not take roles to perpetuated negative stereotypes about little people. He never once took a role as an elf or one of the seven dwarves even while he was a broke actor surviving off of ramen.

It's interesting on how Dinkledge refused to play a mythical creature known as a dwarf in Snow White, but he had NO problem playing one in the MCU, on Game of Thrones or in the last Cyrano movie when the lead character was now a dwarf instead of having a huge nose.

@@paulwoida8249 he was 16 feet tall in Thor what are you even talking about?

@@PoetPariahMusic Yes but its based on dwarves from the Norse lore. They just made him big in the movie so he would take the role or wont get offended.

@@BOMBON187 no he was based on marvel's dwarves they are huge

Mining is one of the most physically demanding jobs in the world, so showing dwarves mining and actually being _good_ at mining can only be a good thing.

They are removing splash mountain as well. By hiding the bad, it will be inevitably repeated, rinse and repeat.

The only good thing is the animation but not when it went to fully live action.

Fun fact: The comics were originally targeted at the US only but heavily flopped there. Some say it's because they don't like reading.

Yeah i remember those. I think they stopped selling them in 2006 or something like that?

@@korribreki For some reason, Europeans loved Mickey comics, Goofy comics, Donald comics, Scrooge comics etc. But brands like Marvel or DC never got a foothold. I got a Norwegian Superman number 1 in my closet. But that's pretty much it. They only released a few comics in th EU market before giving up. One of the only comics still alive here in the modern era is Donald Duck. All other comic brands died out in the 2000's

@@SilentForrest Nah, I've lived in England, Sweden and Iceland and they all love DC comics (Marvel is also popular but not close) Belgium and Germany are both full of comic book stores too.

@@SilentForrest they never stopped making 'em

He knew what he was doing, can’t have any competition in his possible roles

Those comments were Peter Dinklage knowing he's still only the second most famous little person actor and trying anything he thinks will bump him to #1. You will never be Warwick Davis, sorry about it.

yeah but they still have the magic of entertainment that no-one else does

Family Guy did pretty good too.

@@deerejohn7209 South Park did it better

I bet they have.😁

@@lonewolf9578 Flashgitz may just have the edge there.

Before Disney brought fox, the Simpsons movie moved Disney

AMEN!

Well said hindsight is the best 20/20 you cannot apply modern morals to people 50+ years ago. You look at most people with a moral test 90℅ will fail especially if they have wealth and power.

Yea abolitionists (liberal progressives) didn't exist back then

😑 naw just do the right thing and it'll hold up throughout eternity. See Jesus Christ.

@@JohnDavis_90 haha Jesus is a special example. I wish everyone acted like him. My point is that it’s his job to judge people, not ours. 😃

He sounds like a typical capitalist.

Jon Cena , chuck Norris , me, need anymore examples of perfect humans ?

Jon Cena , chuck Norris , me, need anymore examples of perfect humans ?

He might have not been evil but his company is

@@prinnyhayate5517 facts

They both created Mickey Walt create his personalty and Ub did the animation they both create mickey

the whole point of cartoons is to entertain, of course there are some cartoons that are just cash grabs for kids but the best cartoons are the ones that have some good stories and characters, there is no need to go into any deep story just go to watch some good fun times with some characters that you love and laugh at, it's the whole point of cartoons

I'd take Walt over any of these foul beasts running Disney now. BTW guess it was time for Infocrapics to take down another American Icon.

Yes, and though they wont talk about it i think all the good things he did outweigh the bad.

Except schooling and education are two different things, especially when it comes to effectiveness.

​@@Demonetization_Symbolheavy

Is he perfect? Siding with Trash that murdered millions isn’t falling short of perfect. The guy is disgusting beyond any reasonable measure. Respect what? He was a traitor.

True

‘He isnt perfect but who is?’ He was a bad guy? Wdym not perfect. Its pretty easy to not be sexist, racially insensitive, anti this or that. Anti labor unions?

You do know he was a 33rd degree freemason, right? And you do know what that entails, right? Maybe do some research...not the greatest guy in the world & not the happiest place on earth.

@@lorelai9208 pretty common in the time period but either way that doesn’t change the fact that he created a great world

He seemed to have always been quite brilliant, drawing and creating from an early age so it really isn't all that crazy at all.

he created Mickey Mouse and his gangs and this was and still brilliants but he didn't create our childhood classic like Snowwhite, Cinderella, Pinocchio, Treasure Island, Peter Pan and so on he based them on the originala nd he based them very beautifully we didn't know of them until he based them and make them our classic but let us give a little credit to the original writes without them they're will be no (favorite, iconic childhood classics)

😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂 Well if a degenerate Mic said it it must be true

Right?! Donald has one of the shortest fuses of any cartoon character!

100%

Agreed

lol no he wasn't... he's mistreatment of women and minorities in his company is well documented lol.

Disney is not what it used to be

lol sure

Yup💯

@RGeeye you are correct, my mistake! I meant during the cold war times

Nah. He's been dead for a long time now. It was different times and the mistakes of the past have shaped our future. Without atrocities and regrets everyone would be terribly immoral.

@@WvlfDarkfire Or did L-GoL mean, the Disney Corp., for what they're doing lately? Fred

Be a killer, or rich? Is that a solid 50/50 split?

Yes but essentially it’s bad lol

@@alal2192 By today's standard, absolutely !

@@thomasridley8675 So why keep it around in todays society? Why do we pander to things that do not align with our morality. Nostalgic reasons?

@@cartier-8548 They should be a reminder of just how much our general attitudes have changed for the better over the yrs. It is part of the history of film and animation. And should be seen in that context.

@@thomasridley8675 yeh ur right back in the day racism was ok… tf

Oh yeah I saw that

For good reason

@@k4shr3di06 because he didnt like jews?

@@ahwmahwm5533 yeah

If he was alive now, he would have probably had different opinions.

Not really, especially given what was always known by society to be wrong.

@@endtheccp4228 depends really on what is moral outrage vs practical practice. Morality in such matters really only hit when the actual thing is sustainable or the owners arbitrary personality kicks in. Walt isn't some great prophet but he certainly isn't the villain of entertainment he is painted to be. He's just financially successful, though his practice of taking credit is criticized today it's also done by those who criticized him in doing so.

This reminds me when Disney made the remake movie of mulan in china 2020 in the same province of a work camp

This video is very inaccurate and lacks a significant amount of context for some of the situations.

They’re making his image Hitler’s image just look and you can see what they’re doing. …. Be intelligent. Join us 💯🇺🇸🗽💪🏼

Unrelated.

Oswald 😢🥺💔

Even though Disney created him FOR Universal.

You poor thing

It’s a great movie and if the battle flag offends you you definitely don’t understand the south. It’s a badge of freedom and liberty and independence. It was the north that was the aggressor and Lincoln the traitor.

@@theyoutube8933 they didn't say a single thing about the confederate/battle flag. Also the main reason for southern succession was due to slavery

@@surfingbrrrd you’re wrong on that point. It was the tariffs imposed on the south by the fed government to enrich the northern states. The south at the time had the most money and largest businesses.

Slavery was about to end on its own due to its high cost. Lincoln made slavery an issue when the south was winning the war and to gain support in the north. It was political move not a moral one. Most slaves actually stayed on the same farm and plantations they were already working. Lincoln hated the south and did everything he could to ruin them even though it was him and his government that caused the war.

Bullying never stops, it just evolves to skirt the anti bullying measures. By trying to stop bullying, you end up punishing the victims instead of the bullies.

It's in there, at 9.51.

Get real. Infographics is inga.ous bring overly politically correct.

@@starmnsixty1209 I’m really curious what you were trying to type when you put “inga.ous”? I can’t think of a word that’s close to that.

@@johnjacobs4280 probably infamous

I sincerely hope the op is just being ironic. If not, it's just sad.

Not all by far.

I hate him.

Yep this video doesn't want to get hated on by Disney so they played it as safe as possible but they got some info wrong.

I had the same experience watching this movie as a child, remembering Uncle Remus as a hero figure to a troubled white boy and loving the cartoon versions of his stories. Childhood memories are funny things, so maybe I missed what so many today are calling overt racism. I'm open to believing that, but would like to see the movie again first before making my own decision. I also wish others who make the claim that the movie is racist would have the opportunity to watch it first before passing judgement. Censorship often creates more problems than it cures.