If nobody can beat goku, can Goku defeat nobody?🤔 Stay with me now.

THE HELL BRO? ALMOST 3 HOURS OF WORK??? ARE YOU STILL ALIVE BROTHER?

TIER 1: 1:08 TIER 2: 21:38 31:15 Mereology 36:10 Meta-ethics

i love how you’ve sounded a bit more enthusiastic about the content your making recently :) i love this video so far (im listening while im at work)

The fact this got recommended to me without me literally even having notifications on is mad anyways another iceberg video Keep up the good work brother

Absolutely astounding! Deep, in depth, powerful and I love the improvements you’ve made over the first one, great work man, you’re really going places

Finally another philosophy iceberg to binge watch

Ive watched your vids since near the beginning and you legitimately have made a lot of progress not just in your tech quality/script/editing but your presentational skills have improved dramatically. Good job! 👍

Bro it’s cool you acknowledge the short comings of the first vid and are remaking it at a higher quality. Great channel you deserve the subs you get

Love these videos to listen to while I work or exercise! Getting the greatest pump while learning about foundationalism

i'm glad you remade this properly

Absolutely love this breakdown! I've been digesting philosophy part by part for years and this is an excellent overview. Be sure to follow up any questions with further research on the topic. This should be a springboard into more specific field research. Those struggling to understand art should explore aesthetic philosophy. If you have a religious belief you hold strongly maybe start looking through theology as a whole to have some context for what you believe compared to others. Lots of other examples are implied but basically keep growing!!

This adds value to my philosophy degree. Thank you for remaking it.

Great overview of philosophy's critical branches! Emphasizing epistemology and metaphysics not only deepens our understanding of the world but also enhances our decision-making processes, which is crucial for personal and professional growth. 🌟

31:10 mereology (wow wasnt even in my spellcheck vocabulary) reminds me of the thought process of how examing atoms on a molecular level resembles vast similarities with observing planets and galaxies on a cosmeic level. Theres another term for the perpetual scaling in size that alludes me. 30 mins in for this to be my first video of yours and you earned my sub. My only suggestion would be time stamps really benefits a video like this. Adding in my thoughts on optimistic determinism and how it correlates with nature and nurture. The thought experiment of if the entire human race became deterministic would reflect heavily on a precedent for education through nature and nurture. Overall Great work and well put together!

Great video man, keep it up!

bro made a 3-hour long video to “correct his pronunciation” but still pronounced almost every philosophical term wrong 😔 “omni-science”

Awesome video. Quite an improvement

"Casuality" 😂❤ Must be hard to spell everything right with 3 hour script

another great video from Snooki.

37:45 My understanding of essentialism is imagine a chair, there are many different kind of chairs, expensive ones, made of gold, or cheap ones made of wood, or even just a wood stump. but they are all "chair" and are univercially reconised chair, there for there must be a "ideal, perfect chair that is the most chair of all chair" out there, the esscences of a chair, what makes a chair chair if you will. This also apply to eveything, like the "ideal idea of a circle" or "ideal idea of language" so on and so forth.

So atomic time is defined by the cycles of radiation around a cesium 133 atom, in which one “second” equals 9,192,631,770 cycles, right? Now there’s the theory of observation in quantum mechanics that states, “by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.” Stick with me- so time in itself can be observed and affected just by observing it. Basically a gritty, detailed version of why when we are focused on time and how slowly it’s moving, we are actively slowing time in our perception of reality.

A deep dive of philosophy like this begs the question of if it is all pointless, if we are “thinking too deep about nothing” (spoiler alert philosophy is needed). Many will brush off philosophical questions as unapplicable to real life, a purely meaningless theoretical that only distracts from reality. Their main evidence being that you can imagine what does not exist. When you do imagine, question, etc without checking the real world, eventually (or instantly) you will become entirely divorced from reality and so become meaningless. But on the other side of the coin, knowledge by itself is meaningless. Let’s say a person only knows that a cup filled with water is easy to drink from. Sure they can use this knowledge to drink from the cup and be satisfied for life. But with simple questioning they could imagine a bigger cup and create that or a lid for the cup to keep the water for later, etc. Knowledge is only good for the exact moment it is needed. Even if you have two puzzle pieces of knowledge, missing the connecting piece, it is impossible to find this clear hole without some level of questioning and thought. (The old urban legend of NASA spending billions of dollars to make a pen work in space while USSR just used pencils, you can have all the knowledge you need to solve this problem but miss the solution without thought). All of reason is based on philsophy, and is impossible to exist without. Reason needs to be justified through thought, questioning, and debate. So take this as a love letter to your video and to philosophy itself, as it is the most important part of who we are, and it is not some form of “thinking too deep” it is truth

philosophy is cool ;) loved it man

How do you mispronounce all these words having investigated enough for a 3hr vid. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Lmfao. I just watched your 25-minute-long philosophy tier list yesterday, and my last comment basically boiled down to, "Bro, this could a much longer video with a much better rubrick of some kind, and maybe the rubrick could be made by seeing how philosophy is broken into fields." Then you released this nearly 3-hour-long beast. 😅 It's eerily as if you heard my comment and were like, "Okay, let's release the BIG ONE." I haven't watched all the way through yet (released to public only 44 minutes ago), but I'm sure it's way more in-depth than the tier list, and I'm guessing the video will probably cover the idea (another thing I commented about on the tier list video) that these philosophies are complexly overlapping. Many of these philosophies overlap or lead back and forth to one another. I see modern or contemporary philosophies as one large system of thought, or one big interlinked conversation about what the hell is happening in this universe. Thanks.

Bro you post this while I'm in the middle of work ;-;

How can one man mispronounce so many words? Impressive.

What's with the weird sfx at 40:40? Scared the shit out of me lmao

"casuality"

Some funny pronunciation but I appreciate the video haha. Leaving a comment for the algorithm

Essentialism basically states that there are core characteristics which are necessary for a person or thing to be that person or thing. A table can be made of many different materials, and come in different sizes and colors, but there are specific criteria that it retains to remain a table. The best analogy I can think of is a species holotype in biology, it's a representative of the characteristics that separate it from all other species. I hope that helps.

You get me through work.

FAVORITE KZfaqR.

Please bro make a video on reddit creepy stories your narration was awesome, continue the series ❤

A friendly and respectful suggestion if you don't mind, before you do another video about philosophy, look up the pronunciations of the names of the philosophers, and the schools of thought.

*clicks on video* "phil-" *an ad plays*

Some ideas: Mistifications, linguistics, Forbidden Literature, Literature, cosmology and astrophysics, anthropology, videogame theories

That was fantastic it didnt feel like 3 hrs tbh

philosophy is verbal gooning

nice, although it is complicated to do low levels of a philosophical iceberg without reaching Deleuze and Guattari, CCRU and maybe the more schizo and perhaps mystical areas of philosophy

at its core at its core at its core

I just wanna say good shit for acknowledging the shortcomings of previous videos and improving!

Yooo snook philosophy drop 🗣️‼️‼️

I listened to Alan Watts for years. One day I realized it actually had no value, basically just background noise....

yay new video

philosophy is cool

comment for laterrr looks goooood

I don't know why the script sound like it's been written by chatgpt but I still appreciate the effort nevertheless.

Great audio quality this time

Philosophys cool. 30 minute videos are good, but I do like these long form two plus hour videos every now and then.

NICE VIDEO

19:00 maybe it's my bias, but I think it would be interesting, cool, or perhaps wise to add Peter Singer's expansion of moral consideration to all sentient beings. I'm not vegan or vegetarian, and there are no AI or robotic sentient beings yet, but I think it's a good plan to include all sentient beings in our moral considerations. It's also shows how ethics continues to develop.

Amazing

Take a shot whenever he mispronounces a word! I died in the first 15 minutes

Just met this guy on one tv he’s pretty cool

Very cool

Babe wake up the crew new snook juat dropped!

Wh do I remember you having 10k subs

11:45 haha, yeah, some of it is pretty wild, but I think you and I can agree that "modern art" isn't a monolith. There are so many different kinds of "modern art" that it's hard for me to say one, general thing about all of it. One particular example (I think we can agree is included in "modern art") is Afremov's oil paintings. I guess he counts a bit toward impressionism (he doesn't fall neatly in that category, but it's close), and I find a lot of impressionism very nice. The abstract impressionism gets kind of hard for me to enjoy, but so long as I can reocognize what's occurring in the artwork, then I'm farily satisfied. Also, I think it's important to repcgnize how "modern art" is at least three major categories (late 19th century to about 1970s (Afremov might even be counted as "contemporary" due being newer than "modern art")): cubism (which I find kind of odd, but interesting), expressionism (some of this is very cool or interesting art but can be a bit abstract for me), impressionism (probably my favorite one of these three so long as it's not too abstract). There are other groups going on (absurdism, surrealism, dada, fauvism, futurism...). I guess you might find all of them odd or uninteresting. That's okay, I guess. 😅 All of that said, if you enjoy forms of classical or neo-classical art, then I get it. They're very well made and can be very beautiful and deeply meaningful. I think another part of how come art got so wild is that folks saw enough classical and neo-classical art, and they simply wanted something new. It had to test or break old boundaries. It had to show complex, chaotic life in a nonstructuralist manner. It had to be "new" art. Who knows if this is overall a good development? A patron can pay artists to create any genre they like to have made these days: just find an artist you like that does commission work and pay for it to get done. It may or may not turn out exactly how you want it. 😅 That's usually a rich person kind of activity depending on how popular the artist is.. ==== A few days later, at 30:15, I noticed you have an Afremov painting in your video. Do you like or not like Afremov? Is he not modern or even contemporary? When you say you don't like modern art, are there exceptions to this statement? 😅

I wouldn't worry too much about pronunciation after norepinephrine i would just go with it and make it your thing

This was so clearly written by chatgpt. So many repetitions and synonymous sentences

Hey babe, wake up. Snook just posted

Metamodernism rules!

Sin is part of their job

Zara-thrust-ah

The Ultimate Sleepberg

Could you please consider adding timestamps to the video?

Argument, proposition, term ... Term is sign from which simple proposition is made, and sign is that which represents to a cognitive power something other than itself. Proposition, is speech in which truth and falsity is found. And an argument is speech from which something else necessarily follows. And consequently an argument is made of two parts that from which something follows, which is called antecedent, and that which follows, called consequent. When I say: 'Whatever produces a round shadow is itself round. Earth produces a round shadow. Therefore, Earth is round.' The antecedent is the part before "therefore" and the consequent, the part after it. Division of Philosophy: Modern and Traditional; With this much said we can talk about the two divisions of philosophy. What is calling government is divided into tyrannical, democratic, etc. as being kinds of governments as well as executive, legislature and judiciary as being it's parts. Likewise philosophy is divisible into modern and traditional in its kinds and natural philosophy, logical philosophy and moral philosophy. Kinds of dance are distinguished into traditional and modern, so too with philosophy, being divided into modern philosophy and traditional philosophy. Modern means recent and comes from 'modus', and traditional means transmitted and comes from 'tradere' which means transmitted. Modern and traditional philosophy can also be divided into parts but the utility of which a division might only be neeeded in the whatever context which a division is made. The way in which modern philosophy is sometimes divided is logic, epistemology, aesthetic, metaphysics and ethics but this is more like the division that arises from object to which attention happen to be paid just like in linguistics is united by the fat that their area of study is language each branch is demarcated as distinct from another based on what about language they happen to study, for e.g. it is based on what they study that phonetics and phonology are marked out as distinct from syntax, morphology, pragmatics, etc. while the manner in wich they study sound itself distinguishes phonetics and phonology from eachother, for phonetics studies sound in isolation but phonology in some relation. In the partition of philosophy into three, by 'natural'. It is meant that it is not made by man, thus natural philosophy includes mathematics, metaphysics and general physics and its parts. Logical philosophy studies concepts as they are ordered among themselves while moral philosophy studies voluntary ad actions in so far as they are ordered to an end.

Cool

Never have i agreed with you more on a belief snook than your take on modern art. When a 2 year old is capable of more artistic ability, you know they've lost the plot.

“Metaphysicians”

It's clear that Pascal was living in a country that resisted the Protestant reformation. I'm the child of a Catholic father and a Baptist mother, and I guarantee that simply choosing Christianity isn't really an option. That being said, I have so many problems with Pascal's wager. I can't choose what I believe, number one, so I guess he's just recommending that I act as if I believe. The thing I disagree with the most is the idea that little is lost by believing in something that is not true. I think the entire potential of the one life you have is lost, it's one of the things I find really disturbing about religious beliefs. The great minds throughout history that were wasted on trying to determine the nature of the Trinity, and meaning of communion, ECT. Imagine how much more advanced we could be as a species if the all the theologians had been concentrating on how nature worked rather than if Jesus was divine in human form, or human blessed with a divine nature, or completely human and completely divine, not to mention the fact that early scientists wouldn't have had to face the wrath of the church for discoveries that didn't like up with the Bible.

omni-science or omniscience (ahm-ni-shents)?

Philosophy =cool? Maybe

WHAT WORDS ARE HIS?

The video got a Climate change context notice lol.

paradox iceberg next vid

Dr. Snook

Do bro know he’s on the listen while you sleep algorithm

yay!

Philosophy: Context Climate Change. Alphabet Excellence.

Cosuality 😭

I truly hate these automatic Wikipedia staples whenever key words are used in a skeptical or qualifying manner.. just stop -ewtube!

BASED

sigh* 2 hours of my life gone

Philosophy is cool

Philosophy is cool.

That was a great video!

Philosophy cool

Philosophy's cool

Truth is a made up story, it can also be facts.

day late but wsp

nice video but dude please for the love of god work on your pronunciation. made me want to rip my hair out

Let goo

"Empherical"?

its "causality" not "casuality"

Omniscience is pronounced om-nish-ence for future reference (:

A laudable effort, though if a word is in your script you should know how to pronounce it.

It's true. Not much you can do in three hours! 😅 Jk man. Love ur videos