*the

Yes she was! The problem was the 'so-called royalty'.

R.i.p.Diana.

Diana would have been a wonderful queen. She brought so much to the royal family but Charles just cared about his sex life and being coddled. Obviously the monarchy was not his first interest. Not sure it is now. He is spending millions on Camilla trying to make her into a Diana, a hopeless cause. Weird because he loved the frumpy one. Now she’s spending a fortune on herself.

You know absolutely nothing about it. Diana did not care at all about the happiness of those around her. She saw everyone in terms of rivalry, or usefulness. She liked them if they had a large penis (since she was a big bony woman) or if they could groom her hair well, or play some rock music that she liked. Her "empathy" for other people was all "feel good" stuff. When she walked into a room and smiled, everyone sighed and looked at her, wanted to be photographed with her, or to be able to say that she had spoken to them. All she ever wanted was ATTENTION. And that was what she got. Charles (and Camilla as his support person) go quietly about, doing what they do, and rarely getting any attention. Have you any idea how many disadvantaged young British people have been funded for life-skills training, apprenticeships, small businesses and university degrees by Prince Charles? He doesn't just hold their hands. He send them to college.

@@MandyJMaddison Wh? Lmao why are you in a Princess Diana appreciation video if you're just spreading things like this?

@@cokecereal5691 Why do you tolerate people making unfounded statements like "Charles and Camila worry about their own happiness,"?

@@MandyJMaddison I'm not even defending them?? I'm asking you lol

@@MandyJMaddison : How cruel of you!

Beautifully said 👏❤💙💖

BRILLIANT COMMENT ... resonating all over Planet Earth, and will do forever, Laryssa!

⁹

Yes Rest In Peace

Your beautiful comment made me cry❤️❤️

@@JN-iu5lx Why can't they show affection ?

@@chris1806 Apparently keeping your emotions to yourself is the way to be in this family, otherwise any slip up can make you "political" and lean on a side of an opinion, when the family needs to be neutral and in the middle at all times to preserve the balance in the country

@@Dani_1012 right i see, thanks. But why cat they show affection to their family members like mother and father, specifically ?

@@chris1806 Its part of the custom

i read royals always use honorifics to each other, like your highness, your majesty, etc

In what way was she beautiful inside ? What did she sacrifice?

@@jenjen.rutherford8559 what did you?? Your filthy mouth full of Std's??.!!

@@jenjen.rutherford8559 Her happiness and life? Seem enough to me, but... maybe you think she should have done more. What she did for AID’s, landmines and so many other causes is realy remarkable and there are so many prejudices that she helped to mitigate... Whatever you may think of her as a person, what she did and represented was very powerful to many people. Stop being bitter just because your life may be less consequential. She was put in the position of princess and she did better than anyone else in using it for good. If only celebrities and politicians today showed half of her compassion and interest in uncomfortable but important problems, world would be a better place for sure.

@@jenjen.rutherford8559 Press play on the video.

@@jenjen.rutherford8559 p M FBI gcb hyhjn

R.i.p.Diana.

People princess was loved by all

She was loved by everyone Charles was very lucky to have her a a wife

exquisite as the wings of a line lmoth as l moonbeesmaafyn in lsdy tiny waiting to the morning dew and fat top of good for Charles who wasted his passions on a scarlet eoman

too fine for the likes of Charles the corrupt! hey

Charles the Cotupt!!

R.i.p.Diana.

Micjhpn jacks9n L

Micheal jakson

❤

That's very true, l think the female that evidently doesn't know about the Affairs between Charles, n Camilla!! And how does she know how big of a Penis Princess Di likes? Wow that's "SICK" for anyway to shout out!! Jealous much, must be a weirdo!! Diana did many things that nobody else would do that could kill them but Diana felt the need to do what needed to be done, and came out ALIVE!! She Loved many, and many loved her!! Texting me back would be the wrong thing to do, there would not be a reply!! God Love, and Protect You!

I loved Diana

whyyy though

@@user-qq6jv7vt9q Just for the charity work she did for people with aids, and leprosy, and also getting Land mines banned in Britain, many people died from stepping on them, without knowing it was a land mine. No other Royal had ever done anything like that, that's why she became an Icon in Britain. She out shone the royals, I wonder if Charles was jealous of her because of that?

So very true ❤

Agree

Agree, I do admire her. She was that type of person that you felt in love at first side. So down to earth. So sad that she had to go true so much pain, in her marriage,. Camille never ever will be not even close to her shoes. To me Camille and prince charles are to piece of trash together, hope he will never be king of England. I will love to see William and Kathy on the throne!!

@@isabelperez1504 lol - piece of trash together - hahaha - good one

I totally agree me too❤it is so worth watching her.

We are still looking at videos of her...thinking mathematically she just had to be substracted from royal equation when she divorced charles...truly a very sad princess story ...but still we remember and love her ...

She wasnt the great person that everyone made out, they both let there kids down and if she loved her boys so much why did she flaunt her self with any man she could.

@@annenorris8723 such vitriol

@@annenorris8723 it was Charles who let his kids and wife down. If she wasn’t divorced she would have died of suffocation in side Buckingham Palace. She wanted real love , but Charles betrayed her for the sake of a lady of his mother’s age.

Yes, she mentioned a couple of times with her close friends.

Don’t forget bulimia, adulterous affairs and nannies!! Add those words to your description.

@@HeatherHotcakes why do u hate Diana so much? Did she ruin your life? I was just curious..

@@RurusWorld There are few people in this comment section spreading toxicity, which makes our blood boil. Let our princess of hearts rest in peace

@@HeatherHotcakes why are u saying shit about such an angel. Diana was too good for the world, the world didn't deserve her.

@@gia5366 what was so good about her?

Her simplicity was remarkable.

I simply adored you in your photographs .......'cause I happened to live in the other hemisphere .... Your memories will still be alive and living in millions of hearts the world over for as long as the it exists .!!!! How I wish , you were here today .. playing your part , also as a grandmother ..!!!!!!

I found out many hours after the first announcement. I'd been napping and had no TV or radio on until about 5 pm local time. Hearing the news of Diana's death, I can't put into words the absolute shock I felt. Never expected anything of the sort a mere year after her divorce. She was robbed of the opportunity to build her own life on her terms. Charles got his happiness, so why couldn't she ?

@@msr1116 Because she died in an accident.

@@glen7318 That accident was not true, but an arranged murder, why? because Charles was now King, and had his Mistress Camila crowned his Queen,? straight after Diana was dead? not a husband in grief of his wife Diana, that's for sure.

I do love Diana and for the life of me I cannot see any beauty in Camilla, but humans connect , and fall in love, for other reasons, that was the sad sad fate of Diana.

Prince Charles needed a mother. Camila was more like the mother he missed as he was growing up

Maybe Prince Charles wanted to wake up beside someone who wasn’t throwing up her food and cutting herself all the time.

Duchess Camilla is a charismatic, intelligent lady. Unlike Diana she knows how to stick to the Royal protocol, which is essential for the Monarchy.

@@HeatherHotcakes After lerning about Camilla & Charles you mean ..Classless 🤥

The Queen probably had her killed. After all, what kind of influence would Diana have over the King of England?

The thing is a lot of people feel that way about Diana not just British but across the globe. I'm not.

she wasn't clever when diana was alive.They didn't realize the gift diana was.!

@@melisagalvalizi6982 Diana wasn't a gift. Wiht her volatile nature, her tendency to talk too much to hte press and her bulimia, she was ulitmately a bad thing for the RF

@@glen7318 So now it's her fault she had bullimia? Be careful with that.

What legacy ? Did she have any poor friends? Donate to those in need?

Oh God, she’s dead she can’t be crowned “rightful Queen”. If she was still alive but divorce from Charles I can understand this statement but she is DEAD. DEAD. DEAD. DEAD.

@@berryrl9 a dead person will be alot more acceptable to be queen than a mistress and a home wrecker.

When Charles becomes king Diana will be talk of the world again for being the queen the world never got to see. Charles will never be detached from Diana as she will always steel his spotlight no matter what the subject and even with her sons still talking about her and the talk on the day will be be about Charles and Diana not camilla

@@justcallmealfred1848 Diana had affairs with married men while married to Charles . Diana broke up more than one marriage!

Did she? Or did she just take good pictures?

@@HeatherHotcakes The photos of Diana were taken non stop by the people who sold them to the newspapers, they made a lot of money out of that. even the ones of her dying in the French Tunnel. They made no effort to help her, just kept snapping more photos. but deep down, I thought Charles was behind that,? why because he married Camila straight after, then had her crowned his Queen? its pretty obvious it was a planned murder of Diana. Charles as a royal had the money and power to do that.

@HappyandAtheist Prince Charles was unfaithful first she loved him ,he did not return the feelings she just wanted her husband to love her when he could not she turned to another remember she was very young when they married she needed that affection if you've watched the video of there engagement they were asked are you in love an princess Diana said of course and prince Charles said what ever in love means

Jen Demo Both of them broke clear promises that they freely and publicly made to God. This game you say where if one breaks the vow first then it's OK for the other is nonsense. Immoral behaviour by one person cannot justify or excuse immoral behaviour in another. Are you kidding?They were both shameless public adulterers. I would trust neither of them. Edward VII as Prince of Wales was far more immoral than Charles with mistresses and girlfriends and regular visits to whores in Paris. Queen Alexandra did not use this as an excuse to be the Palace slut, sex with her bodyguards, with people doubting the parentage of her children (as some do Diana 's son, Harry) and so on. Instead, Alexandra maintained her majesty, dignity and grace as Queen. Dianna had no idea, and probably never read a history book in her life anyway. Intelligence was not her strong point either.

@HappyandAtheist"PEOPLE WILL PUSH U TO UR LIMITS and WHEN U FINALLY HAVE ENOUGH and FIGHT BACK THEN UR THE BAD ONE". Perfectly quote for Diana. But for those bullies arrogant and hypocritical people it's ok for them to hurt abuse others, but not ok if someone does the same to them. Chuckie deserved what he got and more. Payback is a bitch

She was flawed.

@@jenjen.rutherford8559 And I'm assuming u r a perfect and a Saint?

1

Diana is NOTHING like Kate. Kate is a loving and supportive wide while Diana worked against Charles, and tried to trash him in her book.

@@sherryduggar8821 what are you talking?willy's treatment towards Kate has nothing to do in comparison with Charles towards Diana!I we don't forget the humiliation underestimation and abuse she undergone from Charles!Mr tampax was only interested in camilla!

@@sherryduggar8821 u seem a certified stupid

O

@@sherryduggar8821 The guy took advantage of a naïve teenage girl who loved him, was cheating on Diana even before their wedding, ignored her on their honeymoon, embarrassed her on national/international TV, bullied her about her weight until she developed bulimia, and was cold to her for their whole marriage...and you're upset she vented in a book?

intelligent ?

@@ritahorvath8207 why do you think shes not intelligent?

R.i.p.Diana.

She is a beautiful QUEEN 😍

Pat Choi- Yes, she was beautiful. Now, I suggest that you google "Princess Diana" and look into the pictures of her face for the "inner beauty". What you will SEE is a person who is planning the next move, a person who is rehearsing the next spiteful thing she is going to say, a person who is sulking because she isn't getting as much attention as that boring old lady in the tiara. LOOK at Diana, and decide whether you would want her as your "bestie", your sister, or your partner.

MandyJMaddison Now I Understand The Saying IT TAKES A POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE LIFE And Only A Few Have That 😏😆😂🙊🙊🙊

@@patchoi388 Positively beautiful!🌺🌺🌺🌺

While Cleopatra Queen of Brains, Beauty, Charisma, Power and Princess Diana Queen of Hearts and Charisma.

my jaw DROPPED. he didn’t hold back at all 😂

I was shocked like did he really just say all that; and without hesitation😳

She would definitely understand. Diana Spencer had problems with her siblings at times too

@@stellas8148 what happenes with her and her siblings?

@@milkandspice1074 The Spencers are the kind of family who row a lot. Diana had ups and downs with her siblings, and with her father and mother.

R.i.p.Diana.

NEVER!!!

R.i.p.Diana. 🖤

R.i.p.Diana.

That is correct.

R.i.p.Diana. . . 🖤

You need a therapist. You’re affected by an image not reality.

@@HeatherHotcakes 👍

Cheryl Bristol, What are you saying, exactly? Are you saying that Prince Albert Victor and Prince George were not "in the 20th century" when they were sent off to sea as midshipmen? Are you saying that Edward who announced his abdication to marry a divorcee, over in public radio broadcast, was not in the 20th century? Are you saying that the 14 year old Princess who made her first broadcast to the displaced children of Britain during the War was not in the 20th century? Are you saying that the Queen Mother, who had the gardens of Buckingham palace dug up and planted with vegetables to feed people, and who visited the worst bomb affected parts of London, to talk to people, was behind the times... in some way? Are you saying that Prince Philip who served through WWII with the Royal Navy, was not in the 20th century? Are you saying that his Mother, Prince Alice, who hid Jews from the Nazis, wasn't quite the caring 20th century person that Diana was? Are we going to say that Queen Elizabeth, who chose to have her coronation televised, and broadcast LIVE was not in the 20th century? Are we going to pretend that it was Diana who invented the "Walkabout" where the Royal person gets out of their car/carriage, and walks around shaking the hands of hundreds of people? No, this first happened on the Queen's 1st visit to Australia (which is why it is know by the Australian aboriginal term "walkabout") Are you saying that Princess Margaret, who had her photo taken in the bath, wearing nothing except some bubbles and the superb Poltimore tiara, was not quite living on the 1960s? Are we going to pretend that Princess Anne, who drove around war-torn African countries, supervising the distribution of food and medicine to starving people was NOT a 20th century princess? Are you really going to suggest that Charles, who started banging on about environmental matters, the ecology, preservation of habitat, and sustainable farming practice.... way back in the 1970s..... you don't see HIM as bringing the Royal family into the 20th century? What Diana DID was cuddle babies (the way American politicians have always done to boost their ratings) and have photoshoots that PRESENTED HER in the media as a very caring person. What Diana DID was use the media to her own advantage. She also went horribly pubic with her private business, as if she was on Oprah Winfrey, or the Jeremy Kyle Show. This is very 21st century, isn't it?

@@MandyJMaddisonthanks for your history of the family and those who reigned and those of the family who wanted nothing to do with the crown or had no access to it. The vlog was only about Diana, so not sure why you put all the past royals in my opinion to try ti diminish what I have stated. However it is my opinion of what I know and saw through the media. Personally the family, and mainly Charles treated her unfairly at the end her legacy are her sons. Did you know her on a personal level to declare that she used the media?

You made a statement that Diana propelled the Royal Family into the 20th century. That statement is made quite often. It is nonsense. Why have you focussed your comment on distinguishing between those who reigned and those who didn't? What sort of red-herring is that? The questionable matter is whether Diana propelled the family into the 20th century. You are saying that she "embraced ordinary people". What exactly do you think the Queen Mother was doing (as Queen Consort) when she walked around the bombed streets of London during WWII? Concerning her use of the media- I have background information on both of her most famous publicity shoots, the pre-planned strategy of photographing her holding the hand of a man with HIV/Aids, and the brief photographic shoot in Africa of her with a limbless child on her knee. The Martin Bashir interview.... did she USE the media, or what? We are talking about an interview that was PRE-PLANNED to the extent tht she took elocution lessons before she made the interview. It was done in short takes, like a movie. It is carefully devised in order to give the WORST possible impression of the Royal Family. Your questioning that Diana "used" the media is foolish and naive. What exactly do you think she was doing? Do you realise that when she decided to do a "tell-all" interview and invited that reporter, That it happened in her apartment at Kensington Palace? Diana, at the time, was separated from Charles. She had no Royal Duties, but was continuing some Charity work because, as she stated in an interview, otherwise she would have nothing to do. So there she was in a double apartment at London's most beautiful palace. She had two hairdressers who came each day to style her hair. a manicurist, personal trainer, astrologer, secretary, cook, housekeeper, butler, chauffeur, and security. Skiing holidays in Switzerland, and anything else she wanted. For which she was doing nothing. except some charity work and social appearances. The boys were at Eton. She was in a relationship which lasted two years with the well-respected Dr Hasnat Khan. And in this situation and in the setting of a Royal Palace- she invited in the media..... promoted herself as the victim of the Royal Family, and as the only person who cared for people SHE SAT THERE IN THE ROYAL PALACE AND STATED THAT CHARLES SHOULD NOT BE KING. She was living a life of total luxury at the expense of the Royal Family, and in the middle of all that, this is what she did. And you think that she was a NICE person?

@@MandyJMaddison despite what you introduce in your reply. In my eyes she was a wonderful person during her time. The queens mother too. They have a duty to the public especially if the public is contributing to their welfare.

Cheryl, I don't know what you mean by "a duty to the public". If you mean that Diana had a duty to do charitable works, and to perform Royal Duties, yes, she DID. She attended Royal functions until about 1989 (I think. I can't remember the ate off hand). She continued to attend charity invitations until the settlement, then she dropped all the charities except four. If you mean that ten years after an informal separation, and while still supported by the Crown Estate, she had a duty to call in reporters and bad-mouth the heir to the throne- no she didn't. Diana wasn't a wonderful person, but the press and various agencies (like the anti-land-mine campaigners) were able to USE her popularity in the media in order to achieve results. She WAS sympathetic to Aids sufferers, ans she WAS sympathetic to children who had their legs blown off. But don't imagine that Diana actually DID anything, except turn up for photo shoots. She didn't campaign, call meetings, make speeches, plan fund-raising, or do anything practical. All she DID was go where she was invited and hold a hand, or have a child on her knee or five minutes for a photograph. If you want to talk about someone WONDERFUL, then seriously check out Princess Anne, the Princess Royal. This month she is attending thirty different engagements. People think Diana is a saint because she went to a hospice. Well, what have you got to say about the woman who visits Broadmoor Psychiatric Hospital for the Criminally Insane? You think of Diana hugging babies? Well, Princess Anne doesn't do that. She can be found teaching slobbery pimply incontinent disabled teenagers how to ride horses. Takes more patience than hugging a cute baby. When you think of Diana going to Africa and walking along a carefully cleared path, then it is an iconic front page photo. BUT the REALLY WONDERFUL Princess Anne was risking her life driving around war-torn parts of Africa in a 4WD, to supervise the delivery of food and medicine to starving children. This month's engagements for Princess Anne include one prison visit, one disaster commemoration, four associations for people with disabilities, six medical facilities, two facilities for needy people, several guilds, a couple of educational institutions, a couple of horse related events, a football match, and chairing a meeting of the Save the Children Fund. And her photograph will not be on the front of the Newspaper EVEN ONCE. People need to start getting straight in their minds just WHAT the Royal Family DOES, and WHO it is that does most fo the work. We are dealing here with a woman who is nearly seventy, and who has worked at the same pace, ever since she made her first state visit (to Australia) when she was about seventeen. So when I hear Diana continually praised as a "wonderful person" 25 years after her death, then I wonder why people are so unrealistic. Look up Princess Anne.

have no fear, siblings can have repeated falling outs over the years and return to tight relationships more than once in a lifetime. happens all the time.

Yes you’re 💯 right about that & it truthfully is incredibly heartbreaking.It wouldn’t have happened if their beautiful mum was still here with them.

Let's get over Harry and Meghan.

@@peggooo I dont think it will happen for a long time, if ever. William is someone who doesn't give his trust easily and if somone breaks it as Harry did, it wont be healed easily

@@peggooo That good to know, I hope Harry and William do return to tight relationships , they both Loved there mother Diana. she showed them a lot, how a loving wife and mother should be.

That is right. ( I 'm an ugly woman and I know it).

R.i.p.Diana. 🖤

That is true.

She didn't dedicate most of her life to public welfare. She did charity work but she did less than Anne or Charles.

@@glen7318 You have to be Joking, She did charity work but she did less than Anne or Charles. I have never seen a video or read a book that Charles did charity work! if he did why is it not know then?

I also agree with your comment because I think she would’ve been extremely proud of her son Will & her daughter in law Kate. I also feel she most definitely would’ve been over the 🌙 about her son Harry’s choice to follow his 💜 to be in love with his beautiful wife.She’s looking down on them every single day & thinking I’m a proud “Mum” because she loves her sons with every single beat of her whole entire 💜 & soul.

@@Taylor-xj1xf markle is garbage

William and Kate are doing a great job. They have all my respect ! 🌹

Yes he sure does & he always holds his head down a lot exactly as his beautiful precious “Mum” always did.

R.i.p.Diana. 🖤

R.i.p.Diana. . . 🖤

R.i.p.Diana.

She certainly didn't love everyone. She had a temper, fell out with friends pretty often

@@glen7318 Oh so you were one of these friends? what a joke.

What?

That’s a 😢 way of thinking about a woman who was always truly beautiful on the inside & out.

Of course you never age when you die young.

It is the narration of cameras and photographs. For example when Prince Charles embraced his sons no photographs were taken. That is why we have no narration about Prince Charles being a good father.

@@ritahorvath8207 I know this as well but Charles never was very forthcoming showing love and affection for his boys until much later but I do believe he lacks in this area because he did not receive from his own parents children learn what they live nanny’s don’t count parents do I also understand what his parents had to do after the death of Queen Elizabeth fathers death things in their lives totally did a 180 sad as it was I just feel Charles and his sister missed out on a lot of love from their parents

@@lauratibbles6598 Thats not true. Charles just didn't hug and kiss the kids all that ofen in front of cameras, and at times, the papers publsiehd shots of Di kissin them but didn't bother showing Chalres doing it