No video

The weapon that destroyed the Royal Navy's first aerial target since 1991

  Рет қаралды 74,119

BFBS Forces News

BFBS Forces News

Күн бұрын

The Sea Viper is one of the world's most advanced and powerful air defence weapons, especially when coupled with the Sampson radar on board a Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer
The missile system was the weapon responsible for shooting down an attack drone that was targeting merchant ships in the Red Sea.
This was the first time since the Gulf War in 1991 that the Royal Navy had engaged and destroyed a hostile aerial target.
Watch our video above outlining how this incredible weapon works.
More: www.forces.net...
#forcesnews #royalnavy #navy #weapons
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: forces.net
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: www.instagram....
Twitter: / forcesnews

Пікірлер: 224
@kristianffblessing2348
@kristianffblessing2348 8 ай бұрын
Impressive ship and missile combination.
@ohmybrowncow
@ohmybrowncow 8 ай бұрын
agreed, glad the UK is on NATO's side :)
@Scythl
@Scythl 7 ай бұрын
People are talking about cost, but if I'm not mistaken it was Aster 15 used. Which I think is being replaced by CAMM (sea ceptor) in mk 41 vls, freeing up space for more Aster 30. As a result, this provides an excellent training opportunity for a real world fire scenario, which, considering the rarity over the past 30years of air defence missile usage and the increasingly unstable world, is probably well worth it.
@manxman8008
@manxman8008 8 ай бұрын
Always proud and admirer of the British defence forces
@123xidhgbv
@123xidhgbv 2 ай бұрын
This is french missile Aster.....
@joso5554
@joso5554 7 ай бұрын
The Aster missile family were and are developed by MBDA. Originally it was developed by the French Aerospatiale Missiles, who also developed the Exocet, the ASMP and the AS30L, among others. To this day, it’s the only 100% European ATBM capable missile.
@saminsiddiquee2059
@saminsiddiquee2059 8 ай бұрын
Great system
@alanmcmillan6969
@alanmcmillan6969 6 ай бұрын
Still a potent threat to an enemy!
@stamfordmeetup
@stamfordmeetup 7 ай бұрын
I have a similar feature on my car to protect against attack from the rain, it's called the vindscreen viper.😃
@Buckblacket
@Buckblacket 6 ай бұрын
Is it a BMW?
@brendanpells912
@brendanpells912 8 ай бұрын
They ought to develop a better defence against drones, maybe a hunter-killer drone armed with a small minigun or a shotgun. Drones tend to fly slow and won't detect something sneaking up on them so it should be possible to get close and shoot it down, as long as it's fast enough to intercept them. An enemy with hundreds of cheap drones could exhaust the supply of missiles on the ship.
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
There are cheaper missiles avaliable, the type 45 is getting CAMM added. But air to air off a helicopter might be a good option.
@BigDaddyButthead90
@BigDaddyButthead90 7 ай бұрын
They already are developing drones that fire martlet £20k missile, guided anti air
@vannustube
@vannustube 7 ай бұрын
they don't use missiles against small drones, the CIWS is for that (1.5km range, but maybe against slow moving drones up to 5km range) (although having some mini-gun/shotgun drones as you suggest would add another layer of defence which could be beneficial)
@brendanpells912
@brendanpells912 7 ай бұрын
@@vannustube It's easy to evade a CIWS by not getting close, and it's not like the drones are being used to attack vessels with self defence systems.
@jonnyh9388
@jonnyh9388 7 ай бұрын
They are…….
@hoilst265
@hoilst265 8 ай бұрын
I like how they made the booster by simply shoving a bigger rocket up its arse.
@Fester_
@Fester_ 8 ай бұрын
The challenge of enemy aerial drones - what would Crocodile Dundee do ?
@robthornley8188
@robthornley8188 8 ай бұрын
Would have been nice if they had told us who makes all this kit?
@marks281172
@marks281172 7 ай бұрын
MBDA (multi-national collaboration) and BAE (for the Radar)
@solarpanel9085
@solarpanel9085 7 ай бұрын
Reminds me of getting G.I.Joe vehicles when I was a kid and reading the description of what they were capable of.
@WaldoTheWombat
@WaldoTheWombat 2 ай бұрын
Is it like the Tamir from Iron Dome?
@arronbingham6517
@arronbingham6517 6 ай бұрын
Drones cost is 500 dollars. That's a million dollar missile being wasted on it
@123xidhgbv
@123xidhgbv 2 ай бұрын
French made missiles by Aérospatiale, then became mbda France plus collaboration with Italia.
@notlikely4468
@notlikely4468 8 ай бұрын
Problem is the ships only carry 20?....30? of these missiles With no RAS So...lets say you're in the South Atlantic...again You're good for a day or two of operations And then you're going to begin to sweat
@averagejoe8358
@averagejoe8358 7 ай бұрын
That's what the merchant and auxiliary fleets are for.
@BigDaddyButthead90
@BigDaddyButthead90 7 ай бұрын
Let's say a South American country put their entire airforce in the sky, the ship would still have spare missiles
@notlikely4468
@notlikely4468 7 ай бұрын
@@BigDaddyButthead90 Let's say that South American country encroached on your naval element to the point that you fired those missiles to defend yourself And as soon as those missiles were launched their targets ducked back out of range Do that 3 or 4 times And now it's "You have to ask yourself one question...Do you feel lucky? Well...do ya....punk?" "I gottsta know...man!" Reloads require a dockside crane and a motionless ship to gently thread a very fragile missile into a long and narrow tube To me...that's a vulnerability
@BigDaddyButthead90
@BigDaddyButthead90 7 ай бұрын
@@notlikely4468 Argentina doesn't even have an airforce anymore
@notlikely4468
@notlikely4468 7 ай бұрын
@@BigDaddyButthead90 Then I guess we don't have to worry About....them
@paulwalker427
@paulwalker427 8 ай бұрын
what drone did it intercept? Slow moving propeller driven?
@ashleygoggs5679
@ashleygoggs5679 8 ай бұрын
probably, not many nations are using jet powered drones especially the Yemenis.
@iainreid9822
@iainreid9822 8 ай бұрын
Compare that to the damage and cost it would have caused the merchant ship had it not been intercepted..........
@properjob2311
@properjob2311 8 ай бұрын
a DJI lol
@hourbee5535
@hourbee5535 8 ай бұрын
Basically a flying lawn mower
@cobbler40
@cobbler40 8 ай бұрын
One ship makes it very vulnerable.
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 7 ай бұрын
It’s with USS Eisenhower, USS Laboon, USS Gravely and indirectly connected to USS Philippines Sea( cruiser attached to Eisenhower strike group)
@mosshark
@mosshark 7 ай бұрын
60G turns. jesus.
@dc-4ever201
@dc-4ever201 8 ай бұрын
A lot of people whining about the missile cost versus drone cost. Let me break it down for you a multi million dollar ship is destroyed or damaged requiring drydocking for repairs or goods having to be rerouted around Africa burning more fuel all increases the costs which will be inevitability passed onto us the consumer. This is not a great thing consudering we currently have inflation and a cost of living issue in the west. So yes missiles are the solution, also missiles and their warheads have an expiry date on them due to the chemicals used, if not used they have to be paid for to be refitted or disposed of...let that sink in before you whine about the cost of a few dozen missiles.
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
The problem isn't that bit was the wrong choice, it's that if you scale up we can't sustain it.
@timmurphy5541
@timmurphy5541 8 ай бұрын
With any luck the main effect would be to put a lid on insurance costs - I imagine they might be even worse than losing one ship.
@richowens600
@richowens600 7 ай бұрын
🇬🇧 Royal Navy best in the world
@daniel-leejones8396
@daniel-leejones8396 7 ай бұрын
Get Sea ceptor fitted and replace Aster 15 giving 4x the missile load for short range air defence, I have no idea what the standard load out of the 48 missile tubes is but say it's 50/50, 72x Sea Ceptor and 24x Aster 30 giving a total of 96 missiles seems a lot better then 24x Aster 15's and 30's giving only 48 total, 12x Aster 30's would leave room for 108 Sea Ceptor so 120 in total, just requires government will to stop leaving our quality weapons systems lacking
@LeeTillbury
@LeeTillbury 8 ай бұрын
Who makes this impressive weapon?
@chamilton6983
@chamilton6983 8 ай бұрын
MBDA
@ashleygoggs5679
@ashleygoggs5679 8 ай бұрын
The Sampson radar. Its arguably the most capable maritime radar in the world right now.
@hourbee5535
@hourbee5535 8 ай бұрын
Impressive price tag and low inventory numbers.
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 8 ай бұрын
Mix of european countries, primarily UK though.
@mikearmstrong8483
@mikearmstrong8483 8 ай бұрын
The Aster 15 & 30 have been around for decades, and they are French in origin. Currently made by a consortium of European countries.
@PhillyKid07
@PhillyKid07 8 ай бұрын
Drone = $5,000, Missle = $200,000...... we all know how this is going to end
@iking95249
@iking95249 8 ай бұрын
It's a lot more than that pal
@verdebusterAP
@verdebusterAP 8 ай бұрын
Thats a moot point A Russian T-14 cost 4.6 mil yet $27,000 precision guided 500lbs bomb will turn it to shreds Weapons costing less than their targets is fact of life in warfare
@richardlyd7450
@richardlyd7450 7 ай бұрын
And the loss of life!
@simonjohanson3418
@simonjohanson3418 7 ай бұрын
Exactly ! @@ninobixio6156
@Brookspirit
@Brookspirit 7 ай бұрын
How much would it cost to replace the ship?
@jon1801
@jon1801 7 ай бұрын
My taxes paid for it. So proud of the value for money 😂
@niravramdarie9898
@niravramdarie9898 8 ай бұрын
Wonder how this would compare with Barak-8 missile?
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 8 ай бұрын
MUCH better. Is the quick answer. Detailed Answer - On average the aster 30 in trials was 10% more accurate than the barak 8 which is huge that's the different between a 20 year old missile and a new missile. Aster 30 range is nearly 2x. It can hit much higher targets, has much better active radar and a Better data link.
@sshep86
@sshep86 8 ай бұрын
Sweet Jesus. But can it play crisis?
@heartofoak45
@heartofoak45 8 ай бұрын
The Aster 30 missile costs about $2 million each. At a cost like that these convoys need to start paying an escort fee.
@Phil_AKA_ThundyUK
@Phil_AKA_ThundyUK 8 ай бұрын
Yeh too expensive to maintain against £500 drones.
@anignorantbrit
@anignorantbrit 8 ай бұрын
Exactly, one of the primary reason why energy weapons are the likely future. Missiles are just far too expensive.
@nicholashughes8214
@nicholashughes8214 7 ай бұрын
Does anyone know how many of these missiles are produced in a year maximum numbers and how many the Brit Navy has in stock? I was wondering how long the navy could sustain combat
@SpookyFox1000
@SpookyFox1000 7 ай бұрын
Are you Russian ?
@ottermanuk
@ottermanuk 7 ай бұрын
Damn the Chinese navy just straight up asking in the KZfaq comments now are they 😂😂😂
@syprince6643
@syprince6643 7 ай бұрын
And this is why the British royal navy IS the best in the world! Bits it not something we should make our enemies aware of is it? Or is it?
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 7 ай бұрын
The days of us being the best are long gone, but we still manage well at times
@jeraldsamuel5598
@jeraldsamuel5598 7 ай бұрын
Useless against torpedoes 🦈
@bobthebomb1596
@bobthebomb1596 7 ай бұрын
You decoy torpedoes, for which it carries the Surface Ship Torpedo Defence (SSTD)
@darshanaratnayake6186
@darshanaratnayake6186 8 ай бұрын
What’s the difference between SM 6? Same effect
@verdebusterAP
@verdebusterAP 8 ай бұрын
The SM-6 is designed to do far more than the Aster
@PotatoSalad614
@PotatoSalad614 8 ай бұрын
its newer
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 8 ай бұрын
SM-6 on average is less accurate, but has double the range, Better active radar, is ABM capable, has a huge payload, and can go a bit faster.
@ramal5708
@ramal5708 7 ай бұрын
Also SM-6 is proven to be used in anti surface roles, while it's questionable with the Aster. SM-6 would be the main dual role missile for the USN if they have enough SM-6 missiles in the arsenal, since they have been slowly removing Harpoon missiles from their ships, which is decades outdated.
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 7 ай бұрын
Forgot to say, MULTIPLE times more expensive (SM-6)
@jayhollyoake9419
@jayhollyoake9419 8 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@paulmoore4344
@paulmoore4344 8 ай бұрын
Merry Christmas Peeps, and well done at tracking a cricket ball, 2024 will be a great year for English Cricket, expensive but GREAT 😁😂😂😂
@RaySqw785
@RaySqw785 8 ай бұрын
French Aster Pif paf coupled with Thales kaBand sensors , deadly ;)
@trs4u
@trs4u 8 ай бұрын
Awesome but those ... flaps 0:26 look a bit like a work in progress?
@dannycorbett7449
@dannycorbett7449 8 ай бұрын
Seems crazy that they have to use 1million pound middle to take out a 10k or even less drone
@marnig9185
@marnig9185 8 ай бұрын
How many pound is a burning Container ship🤔
@ashleygoggs5679
@ashleygoggs5679 8 ай бұрын
And then think how much money is lost in trade good if it hits a large container ships, or if someone dies. Any life is worth more then 1m
@jools2323
@jools2323 8 ай бұрын
@@marnig9185 Even ignoring the cost imbalance between the drone & the missile, a ship can ony hold so many missiles and will run out of them quickly.
@ScottMason-ss8ww
@ScottMason-ss8ww 8 ай бұрын
The point is, it can take out drones, planes, helicopter, supersonic, ballistic.... Maybe we should get a few, catapults and air rifles just for cheap drones.. Would that please you?
@jools2323
@jools2323 8 ай бұрын
@@ScottMason-ss8ww It's not the point because it's unsustainable. What happens when there are hundreds of cheap drones?
@BRITISH87PATRIOT
@BRITISH87PATRIOT 7 ай бұрын
Anytime a British ship aircraft is the story there's always someone in the comments who are pathetic and put everyone everything down?!
@cobbler40
@cobbler40 8 ай бұрын
This is not really a missile to use against a drone. What would they do against a drone swarm ? Phalanx is also not really for use against a drone.
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
Phalanx is good against drones attacking the ship, the problem is they were attacking different ships.
@buskiller40
@buskiller40 7 ай бұрын
fit the 57mill naval gun that is going onto the type 31 they have crazy rounds for that beasty@@davidhouseman4328
@jamesmanuel2883
@jamesmanuel2883 7 ай бұрын
that's where 40 and 57 mm Bofors coming on the newer frigates comes in - air burst rounds
@davidrobertsemail
@davidrobertsemail 8 ай бұрын
It’s a great destroyer. But there’s only 6 of them. Not nearly enough. One may be able to track a thousand targets at once but so what? Air defense ships can be easily overwhelmed by missile salvos.
@tylerclayton6081
@tylerclayton6081 7 ай бұрын
Depends on how many VLS cells you have and what they can launch. British ships don’t have a lot of VLS cells, so they should use the ESSM Block 2 missiles. ESSM’s are cheap and effective air defense missiles that can be quad packed in a single VLS cell. So a single cell can hold 4 ESSM instead of just a single missile like they usually do. So if your ship only has 32 VLS cells, you fill 8 of them with 32 ESSM’s, or 16 of them with 64 ESSM’s
@davidrobertsemail
@davidrobertsemail 7 ай бұрын
The load outs for the cells do vary by mission. It’s always a compromise. The type 45 is supposed to be getting 24 sea ceptors fitting in a couple of years. The Arleigh Burke class has 96 VLS cells in comparison to the 45s 48 cells. Same size of ship roughly.
@bobthebomb1596
@bobthebomb1596 7 ай бұрын
@@davidrobertsemail Although the primary weapon, the SM2 missile, does not have active terminal guidance and is launched in pairs.
@kingomedlanki6151
@kingomedlanki6151 7 ай бұрын
Cue all the armchair admirals
@PABLO1SEBASTIAN1
@PABLO1SEBASTIAN1 8 ай бұрын
Los primeros "que temen a la apertura económica" so los que rstán subvencionados por el estado, manteniénfose en una burbuja de ineficiencia y brevendismo lamentable.
@gatecrasher1970
@gatecrasher1970 7 ай бұрын
who cares?
@touchofgrey5372
@touchofgrey5372 8 ай бұрын
👎👎👎👎👎 Kilometer, NOT Ki-LO-meter! If you can't say kilometer properly, just use miles; you're using it right now, anyway!
@rogerhudson9732
@rogerhudson9732 7 ай бұрын
Drones are best destroyed with a missile like the small Blowpipe the army uses, that would be more cost effective than Sea Viper.
@bobthebomb1596
@bobthebomb1596 7 ай бұрын
All depends on the drone; how large, what is it carrying?
@bigskunk801
@bigskunk801 8 ай бұрын
What they forgot to say is how much a rocket costs. It’s s 1.5 mil. Shooting down a 20k drone or missile
@FullThrottleRacing535
@FullThrottleRacing535 8 ай бұрын
Yet it defended a ship worth hundreds of millions with its cargo
@mrsentencename7334
@mrsentencename7334 8 ай бұрын
Also in a war it goes both ways as we would be slinging cheap drones at them
@bigskunk801
@bigskunk801 8 ай бұрын
@@FullThrottleRacing535 actually the missiles n drones being shot down are aimed at Israel. Two merchant ships have been targeted but the military ships haven’t been targeted. Check out the channel. What’s going on in shipping. To understand shipping economics on the planet.
@eanjamesmogg9488
@eanjamesmogg9488 8 ай бұрын
Could have used the Phalanx cheaper but they wanted to test it out lol
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
No they couldn't, it wasn't attacking them, but others, phalanx is self defence
@freedom14639
@freedom14639 7 ай бұрын
The Sampson cannot detect stealth. Whether that be a missile or stealth fighter. And this video is also confusing Sampson working in tandem with Artisan.
@jamesmanuel2883
@jamesmanuel2883 7 ай бұрын
Given that it is touted as tracking cricket ball sized objects travelling at mach 3, I would say it has the ability to track stealth. Tracking stealth is also part of its spec.
@k-ron7403
@k-ron7403 6 ай бұрын
Most modern systems can track stealth closer in. Even the best military boffin can tell you stealth buys you time, not invulnerability. It allows you to get in closer and get a first shot that’s all. Most modern systems are just too powerful these days the issue comes when the missile has to use its own seeker which is much less powerful. However close in even they get don’t have issues these days. Again stealth = first look, first shoot capability that’s all
@MarkFarrington-hb2ne
@MarkFarrington-hb2ne 8 ай бұрын
We are still trying to fight colonial wars for the benefit of a small wealthy elite. The servicemen at the end of WW2 realised this and put a stop to it and we were eventually forced out of what had been our colonies that we had plundered to enrich our wealthy elite. We are doing the same now, when will the people of this country learn the lesson again and put an end to this global conquest and plunder
@robertluiswilliams7189
@robertluiswilliams7189 8 ай бұрын
Money conflicts of. Interest by. Contract tinents and partners. Create. Drama. And. Volitile. Config. Fig? Errr. Ration s. 🍔
@hourbee5535
@hourbee5535 8 ай бұрын
A million dollar missile on a billion dollar ship took out a drone made of plywood and powered by a lawn mower engine. Congrats.
@750triton
@750triton 8 ай бұрын
A drone which was on its way to destroy a ship with a billion dollar cargo. Thank you
@hourbee5535
@hourbee5535 8 ай бұрын
@@750triton the drones they use are hardly going to destroy as massive container ship.
@heybabycometobutthead
@heybabycometobutthead 8 ай бұрын
​@@hourbee5535The people in Gaza thought it was funny too, are they still laughing?
@robertpatrick3350
@robertpatrick3350 8 ай бұрын
That’s a very disparaging description of the Drones the Houthi’s are using…… unless the lawnmowers that they use have a range of over 1,000km……
@roartothecore3364
@roartothecore3364 8 ай бұрын
Not going to destroy a ship? Someone doesn’t know how fire and flammable stuff works 😂
@jjsmallpiece9234
@jjsmallpiece9234 8 ай бұрын
A £1.5m missile to take out a £5k drone,,,,
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
And yet the actual cost of a drone strike would be far worse, both for the ship it hits and the wider economy as a whole.
@GarmondPhil
@GarmondPhil 8 ай бұрын
£1 Million to launch, to kill a £500 drone, your doing it wrong.
@lukeevans1945
@lukeevans1945 8 ай бұрын
The odds you are smarter than the the entire R&D and procurement departments of several nations Vs you parroting things russian bots say aren't favourable. Testing crew readiness, missile performance, protecting a container ship worth far more than 1 million ect is the reason. Your comment is the equivalent of someone watching football for the first time and seeing the goalie pick up the ball and screaming "it's football kick him off the pitch" you clown.
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
You're ignoring the bigger picture. If that £500 drone hits a cargo ship, it causes millions in damage to global trade as companies reroute their vessels. That drives up costs, which are passed onto the general public, so it costs us all more.
@GarmondPhil
@GarmondPhil 8 ай бұрын
@@Orbital_Inclination you completely miss my point, there are much cheaper ways to bring down a drone.
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
@@GarmondPhil that depends on the engagement range
@fredhunter7129
@fredhunter7129 7 ай бұрын
Wrong weapon system for £10 drones you need cheap weapon systems to be capable of attacking a100 plus drones at once same with Houthi small boats one boat one kill weapon like a supersonic cannon ball kinetic snergy rounds.
@c0linwhite489
@c0linwhite489 8 ай бұрын
Bit off a waste use the main gun that was 1 drone how many missiles on board oops
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
The main gun isn't designed for anti-air fire at that range, and it wasn't in range of CIWS either
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 8 ай бұрын
No, 80. 48 Asters, 24 CAMM, 8 Harpoons.@@Bushcraft-xz6xd Also, Phalanx is going to be VERY good against slow moving drones, like VERY. It could take on alot more.
@SCscoutguy
@SCscoutguy 8 ай бұрын
@@Orbital_Inclination it most certainly is. The Mk 8 4.5 is actually pretty good in the anti aircraft role. These drones will never get close enough to use it however.
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
​@@EnglishScripterCAMM is to be added but hasn't been done yet.
@verdebusterAP
@verdebusterAP 8 ай бұрын
The ships will never be close enough fire guns or CIWS its all missile shooting
@cobbler40
@cobbler40 8 ай бұрын
These ships are an exercise in how not to design a propulsion system.
@EnglishScripter
@EnglishScripter 8 ай бұрын
They have been fixed.
@ThePalaeontologist
@ThePalaeontologist 8 ай бұрын
Ah yes, because you know better.
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 8 ай бұрын
The design is good, the implementation is bad.
@richardlyd7450
@richardlyd7450 7 ай бұрын
What 'she' goin on about???
@davewebster1627
@davewebster1627 8 ай бұрын
Why are you giveb all of this information away to our enemies who will make a weapon to knock out thus one
@ashleygoggs5679
@ashleygoggs5679 8 ай бұрын
Becuase this is public information so the enermy probably already knows it. And the information that is given out is generally understated anyways. Its also not 1 ship protecting these routes its a coalition of allied ships making the straits the most protected air space in the world right now.
@Buckblacket
@Buckblacket 6 ай бұрын
They make their weapons in a shed. They'd need to step it up a bit...
@Jimmythefish577
@Jimmythefish577 8 ай бұрын
The fact it’s been 32 years since the RN had to engage an airborne target tells you everything you need to know about the RN and its roll in the defending our nation. They’re basically civvies in uniform.
@MarkSmith-jt3pt
@MarkSmith-jt3pt 8 ай бұрын
The fact the navy hasn't fired a missile in anger in years mean they've be doing the job perfectly no wars
@PotatoSalad614
@PotatoSalad614 8 ай бұрын
The Royal Navy before 1914 hadn't fought a major battle in over 100 years. This comment is daft
@trs4u
@trs4u 8 ай бұрын
I suspect the RN prefers nicely square sandwiches with the crusts not trimmed off.
@British142
@British142 8 ай бұрын
​@@MarkSmith-jt3pt well said 👍
@lachlanchester8142
@lachlanchester8142 8 ай бұрын
Or maybe it’s because Afghanistan isn’t near the sea
@jayspik6498
@jayspik6498 8 ай бұрын
I hear also that piece of junk destroyer is also suffering from periodic electrical systems failure and that’s the ship the UK 🇬🇧 sends to the Red Sea.. What a clown Navy..
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
That issue was solved years ago. Your information is a long time out of date.
@jayspik6498
@jayspik6498 8 ай бұрын
@@Orbital_Inclination No it wasn’t it was reported this week that HMS Diamond was still having electrical failures.. Hence Piece of Junk..
@Orbital_Inclination
@Orbital_Inclination 8 ай бұрын
@@jayspik6498 Diamond is still awaiting her PIP fix for the propulsion system, but a workaround has been in place for years anyway. Type 45s have been fully capable for years, since the propulsion system problem was identified and new procedures put in place. The PIP upgrade removes the need for those procedures, reducing burden on the crew.
@bobthebomb1596
@bobthebomb1596 7 ай бұрын
Yeah, they chose a US designed intercooler which was not up to the job.
@k-ron7403
@k-ron7403 6 ай бұрын
Hmm I love the smell of troll in the morning 😂
An in-depth look at the Type 26 frigate design
13:50
Navy Lookout
Рет қаралды 432 М.
U.S Artillery’s Radical Transformation
19:26
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 868 М.
Алексей Щербаков разнес ВДВшников
00:47
CHOCKY MILK.. 🤣 #shorts
00:20
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
7 Days Stranded In A Cave
17:59
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 71 МЛН
How Electromagnetic Armor Vaporizes RPGs
14:07
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Why wasn't Portugal Conquered by Spain?
18:19
Knowledgia
Рет қаралды 988 М.
How Aiming Artillery without Seeing Target Works
14:39
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 640 М.
The $800,000,000 Salvage of Costa Concordia
24:17
Waterline Stories
Рет қаралды 670 М.
Secrets of China's Naval Powerhouse Explained
25:55
Sub Brief
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Ships of the Future: The Coming Revolution in the Shipping Industry | FD Engineering
51:43
Free Documentary - Engineering
Рет қаралды 630 М.
The Weird Looking Ship that Almost Started WW3
12:44
Dark Seas
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Ukraine's Sea Drones are Getting Crazy
38:58
Warographics
Рет қаралды 795 М.
How Did Israel's Assassination in Iran Happen?
9:03
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Алексей Щербаков разнес ВДВшников
00:47