Agreed, this is a game I can pull out with my family that resists playing more complicated games, and I don't mind playing either. I hate to brag, but when the Target I shop at just stocked the game on their shelves, they were running a 30% off all games promo at the same time. I ended up getting it for $14!! I've spent more on a simple one deck of cards game....I was thrilled to get such a well produced game, just released and new for what I think is currently less than half the MSRP.

I think this game fits nicely between Sushi Go and 7 Wonders. And I own all three! 😂

Couple months, probably December

Two player is definitely the worst player count for this game in my experience. You don't cycle through the cards enough to hit double resource cards or use your tool cards to the maximum effect. Resources that your banking on can come up in the first half of the game and then not at all in the second half. I like the game a lot but the first time I played two player I liked it a lot less.

Two player is definitely the hardest way to play it, as stated, you don't get as many options for resources or to trigger your tools. My GF and I play it two player all the time... But we always add a fifth round

@@rbtorelli1994 forgot I had this game. Maybe I’ll give it a go at 3 players this week.

No kidding. It was on Tom's top ten nature games of ALL TIME.

That's up to you of course, but I do hope the words we say are more important than the number. But you're right, so many games come out.

No no no to this.

Agreed, they need to stop trying to talk mediocore games up. I really feel like Wendy needs to let her ratings reflect more with her valid criticisms. She should not worry about being too negative when she is not that into a game. Give it a low rating and don't worry about anyone's feelings.

Disagreed! Because not everybody has hardcore gamers with so much free time to play. I love high medium games, but friends tend to find them like if they were heavy games instead (which, of course, they're not). So, I've needed to keep my collection in a light spectrum. For an experienced gamer as they are, a good game probably feels ok or even 'meh', but it's mainly because it's compared with 10 000 games and also personal tastes. With 10 000+ tried games, you only get pickier. Pickier in a way a mere mortal would not be. For example, they put 'Fluxx' into UNO level, and I love Fluxx. Of course, I would like to play Deus, instead, but I love the fast changing nature of Fluxx and even with luck factor involved, Fluxx does give me a mental strategic satisfaction. There's no way Fluxx can get even an 8 or 7 for them. But it is great for me. After a while watching DT, I noticed Tom gives better rankings to games that my people will find slow and heavy (and actually are not). Because Tom CAN play real heavy games. And I have NO chance to. That's why Zee reviews are more accurate to me. Anyway, I concede you have a point. I bought a DT supposedly 'ok' game and I did not enjoyed at all. It felt like plain Monopoly to me. No hard choices. No real thinking. A mistake. In the other hand, I think it was indeed 'ok' for my playing group. Nobody complained. And they DID about The GoodFather Corleone's Empire and Deus. We also not love enough Terraforming Mars. And I heard worse for Splendor (I've not had chance to tried it myself yet). Even Carcassonne was a hit in one group and 'meh' in the other two. That's why I love GameBoysGeek reviews. He said if you like this or this you would like/love this game. If you don't like this or this, this game it's not for you. And as Zee, he favors medium to light games. Games I actually have the opportunity to play.