She can, but won't

That’s what the party majority does

AGREE

She thinks she still a teenager 😂

Came to say the same

I was thinking the same. It looks like she brought her son to the hearing, the young boy seated behind her…??😮😮

Yes, it certainly does!

She knows the answer but can’t actually say it because she is a fascist activist

She has all the answers but she has to parse every syllable

Here’s the thing though; she already is a judge!!! She is just being nominated for a higher court! The question is what sort of verdicts has she been rendering up to this point?

None of these folks ever have a yes or no answer on Biden’s picks , there all evil lol

She isn't being elected.

If she would get her teenage hairdo our of her face, she may be able to think properly.

💯

She was confirmed hahahah

All of them always say "I don't remember, I'll look into talk later, I cannot speak of behalf of and many more".

Painful, embarassing, cringeworthy, sleep inducing etc. etc

😊😊😊a⅓❤​@@isobelmiddleton6353

Cruz for President!!

@@zombieheadpopper800go away

Because she KNOWS that if she answers truthfully then she'll be forced to deal with the contradiction in her agenda. She knows the logical loophole that she has and refuses to go down that hypocritical road. If you love affirmative action, great - just say so! It's infuriating. The strategy is to stonewall, use as many extra words as she can over 5 minutes, and just "get through it." If we did a drinking game for every time she says, "Senator, again..." we'd have to call the paramedics for alcohol poisoning.

She didn't fumble. Her ideology would be revealed by an honest answer. She's fine with racism and racial discrimination.

Its a very obvious question with two choices o e of which is very obviously the correct answer but these liberals can't answer basic questions.

Well we don’t do morality anymore a ? , well we know everything we need to know about you .

Should judge's sense of morality affect how judgement is rendered? If law says slavery is legal, should judge ignore the law because he/she thinks it's immoral? It's a common debate point at law school. How about guns? If a judge thinks it's immoral to have guns on school grounds, can he imprison a teacher for having gun at school when the law says he can? Morality is subjective, law is not. Judge should always ethically make legal rules, not moral rules.

The playbook is to PRETEND to be loyal to precedent to get nominated, so they can pontificate on the immorality of the law, bloviate on how morally superior they are and how they must tear down the legal standards of oppression. Theater, and bad theater at that.

This is all a game … kangaroo court … it’s like a SNL skit

@@dk418 Yes, it should affect the issue, welcome to the world of common law. Morality is always used in decisions, it is the imperative and underscore of the law itself. Law is always balanced with personal and socital morality in literally every important case ruling in history...

What would joe Biden say?

Why?

current adminstration., they just want to kiss A** toget appointed.

Because not everything in life is black and white. How great of every issue was clearly right or wrong with no gray areas. Do I think the rights of Transgender are important? Yes. Do I think their rights may threaten the rights of the masses? Depends on the context. This is just an example.

Because her agenda is to racially discriminate

She’s scared,in case it might turn out,not to be wrong.(Just kidding.She’s an idiot).

cause she supports racial discrimination. Its not rocket science.

Democrats

@@randallharrison3254 Yep if lips are moving you know they are lying Democrats.

Was Asians part of Affirmative Action?

Have you ever seen any one of them answer any questions? Republicans or Democrats they do the same. And cruz is just a clown just looking for gotcha questions for fox news soundbites.

@@abelincoln7346 Yes, they were held to a higher standard than everyone else. Thereby limiting their potential as they literally had to out perform everyone else just to be even. That is what Cruz is talking about when he mentions that Harvard is before the Supreme Court right now for doing

1:35 _Harvard_

incompetence is required, intellect is not, principles are not wanted, self sufficiency is not wanted.

The disgraced, twice impeached former president had a number of judicial candidates rated not qualified by the bar association that Cancun Teddy voted for.

@@ConsensusReality you mean the one who was acquitted twice in the Senate?

This is horrific

Yeah, the "senator" thing irritated me too. Why can't she just answer yes or no? It's a simple question. Do you still agree with what you wrote then?

@@robinstewart6510 Mark Zuckerberg started it and they, the sheep, followed. It's a tactic, calling them by their title over and over. The senators should tell them to stop thanking them for the question and stop saying senator.

@@robinstewart6510 Senator...

@@robinstewart6510 The questions require a more elaborate answer not a yes or no, using certain words, repeating them actually it’s a strategy in order to gain time, in order to answer something even tough it has nothing to do with a possible answer, as well as irritating the other party… her whole demeanor is weird starting with her face hidden half way by her hair… looks like a teenager with issues… the style…

SenAtor

Yep. But government is different. You are usually hired because you're crazy, not in spite of it.

@@JohnSmith-ys4nl crazy and incompetent of keeping a job in the private sector.

Employers have to hire people like her. It's the law. Maybe she'll sue because she didn't get the job based on biases that the senator thinks you should have intelligence and a moral compass. She can't answer a basic moral question.

That's actually the most honest thing she said. Her job is to interpret the law. It's the legislature's job to insert collective morality into the laws. The problem is, she's shown that she's not capable of interpreting the law.

@brandonbuchner1771 I wouldn't use the term "honest." Nothing these people say means anything. The left is never held accountable for their actions or words. I don't see y your rebutting this one

@brandonbuchner1771 if you're a judge and you've not once considered morality in any of your cases/sentencing, I question your Judgement.

@@ahorvath102194 These people are clueless. I guess they think Judges should be NPCs.

Lack of Candor.

her family must have paid for that diploma

@@jr1252 she must have taken the CRT route

Harvard's .....Affirmative grad

The TYPICAL Harvard graduate.

Does Cruz help or hamper?

Anita Hill needs to be nominated.

How about a simple Yes or No even?

@@nevaehstarrojas3918 That's not a how judicial nomination process works. You have to maintain, or at least a visibility of, impartiality divorced from moral sentiments, however widely echoed.

@@kate9576 Much more qualified than the mediocrity whom she accused.

This way she can’t be wrong because she simply fails to answer.

“SeNaDeRrr”

Correction: She can answer it. She just won't answer it.

I'm just surprised that Ted can even remember his own name.

@@davidhughes8357 I'm sure that sounded funnier in your head

The sky is black

you mean fluttering eyelid. 😀 I would like to trim that hair off her face.

He very specifically asked her, more than once, whether that was her stance today. She continually neglects to answer simple questions, with yes, or no, answers, in order to run out the clock

She will get voted in because the Dumocrats will vote for her.

@@keithfreitas2983 We will see. Until now NO law of Biden has passed the Senate :D

You need to watch more judiciary committee hearings. They are all like this. Every single nominee refused to answer questions.

@@acmenipponair why lie? Do you just assume your audience isn't going to check it? You're probably right. Unfortunately for you, I'm not your audience. The Senate increased the debt limit on Dec 14, 2021. The Senate extended gov't funding, 69-28 on Dec 2, 2021. Aug 10, Aug 11, June 8, April 29, 2021 all passed budget-related stuff. April 22, a measure to combat hate crimes against Asian-Americans passed the Senate 94-1(only Senator Hawley likes hate crimes against Asian-Americans) On July 29, the Senate unanimously approved emergency funding for the Capitol police and for expanding the Afganistan visa program. You are a liar. You just make stuff up. You should be ashamed of yourself.

She says his name every single time to burn about a second for every question.

Please leave Jesus out of it

Another nut case who not bright at all.

Heart blowing too !

Well said!

Yep. That's how those Socialists 'roll'. Hahaha.

True

You said it in a nutshell!

cruz seems angry. He should take a vacation to mexico.

I get ur sentiment but she’s walking on broken glass up there. How would you feel if you had to go in front of the senate when you were trying to get promoted? My point with this is that if she stays calm and gives meh answers then she’ll get in, but if she gives bold answers or says one thing out of line she’s out of there. Not to mention they’ll bring up any bold statements she makes here in the future. It reminds me of how Beto said he was coming for our guns and now that’s all he’s remembered for. She doesn’t want to be Beto.

That would be logical but we dont do that in the west anymore. So cut that out.

@@KachinaPeak the problem is theres already troubling things shes said and having no answer rather than a bold answer isnt much better. How it looks to the public when she dodges the same basic question so much that the senator has to break it down further and further to the point hes trying to get through to a child. All these nominees are the same they just couldnt help but get emotional and go on twitter or write something in the past. She should be thrown out with anyone else linked to the left. Weve had enough weak left wing madness its out of toutch it doesnt work and th3se people need to be punished.

@@KachinaPeak "if she stays calm and give meh answers then she'll get in." This is exactly why this government is so f up.

This is what we get for giving women so many rights.

She has Sergeant Schultz Syndrome I see nothing I know nothing.

That is a scary thought..

Exactly. Studied how to get out of answering questions

I’m so thankful there vetted like this , it’s a dangerous time in politics to be so careful vigilant and of sound mind is critical to our (real) democracy not there made up as we go along ideology of democracy.

@@kennethmeeker6369 I hate to say this but if the 2020 election taught me anything it's that we don't live in a constitutional republic, we live in the normal human condition that has prevailed since the dawn of civilization -- a fascistic oligarchy. This is the tried-and-true basic state of human political behavior. It's how we evolved.

Same s*** every video no answers and no backbones and no accountability

@@jackblack6844 You said it, brother.

Then that rules out the most recently inducted Supreme Court judge.

@@jackblack6844 I've seen more spine in jellyfish...

If that were the case, 7 of the 9 justices sitting on the Supreme Court wouldn’t be there today…in a perfect world we would also have a court that doesn’t have lifetime appointments and term limits for all of congress. FOTM is that judges are supposed to be completely obtuse, because that’s what being non biased is.

I feel sorry for those people who “UNFORTUNATELY” had to go before her in Court! She’s Definitely Crooked 😡

The American people are a failure, so it fits quite nicely...

And study tells us that is a common reaction from someone being willfully untruthful or dishonest. Take this garbage out, it stinks.

Someone feeling anxious or telling a lie blinks more often, and a person deep in concentration or thought blinks less often. But what if you blink far more or far less than the average? Excessive blinking may indicate the onset of Tourette syndrome, strokes, or disorders of the nervous system.

Honorable blinky

@@OleNieling Liars tend to blink more because lying is stressful. Under stress, eye blink rate increases (Mann, 2013). People tend to blink more rapidly when they become nervous or when they hear or see something unpleasant

She did a tremendous job of hiding behind her hair. I guess she thought she was invisible.

Like you're a constitutional scholar

@@ab8588 So you're saying that purple suspenders grow on ice cream trees?

Well said. They are so accustomed to lying that they can't make a true statement when they have to.

I wouldn't nominate her to serve fries in a burger joint 🤡🤡

@@neill.m.herbert @R R. Didn’t reply to you or me; it’s a sure sign of a hit and run troll.

Oh, she COULD answer it but she knows she'd put herself in a bad light.

She already put herself in the worst of light. By skipping and hopping around the answer. She's just a lion sack of doodoo

Try asking her if she knows what a woman is.

​@@laurenceseale😀

Not a bureaucrat, but a federal judge for life!!!

they are afraid to answer because they dont want to upset thier base . when can change weekly..

@@randy1ization If that is true, I am very concerned about the mental stability of their base.

Do not give her the job

@@ultimategaming5022 Tell that to the Democrats.

She’s there to discuss her credentials and legal philosophy. Not her “wokeness” or personal political beliefs.

SOMEBODY! Get this woman a barrett!

@@jacksoncowsert6964 So you're in favor of her being appointed to the job? Her personal beliefs have nothing to do with how she will do the job?

@@jacksoncowsert6964 No wonder you have no followers and an empty profile. Welcome to you tube where you can never be sure whether the person to whom you are replying actually exists.

@@phylliscole4331 Whether or not her personal beliefs will affect how she does her job is important. Whats not important is her personal beliefs.

Research covering one eye and what it means. Use Duck Duck Go.

I was thinking there same thing. Any are you hiding your gave. She is signalling to the Democratic party

She's is signalling to the Democratic party with a half face exposure

She probably would have unironically said that they were "just following orders"

@@bobflemmet7454 sadly, I believe that you are correct.

Good point in arguing a case to be made, go to logical possible conclusions and back away.. to find where.. 'it is wrong'.

her answer " that paper was co written by a fellow student"

most every nominee is just as bad --- we are F'd

That hair needs to be swept off her face.

Yea!! what the F is with that hair?!!

They believe that conservatives have appointed radicals to the bench incorrectly. Therefore they believe they are reciprocating. It's always how it goes. A good example of this would be MSNBC being as partisan as it thinks Fox is. They ideologically escalate constantly.

Harvard

​@@20alphabet😀

Socialists believe they are invulnerable to criticism. It's a self-inflicted blindspot they use to trample over the rights of others constantly. So this Socialists couldn't care less about what questions Cruze had. That's practically written on her face.

Cruz only has so much time to vett her but it doesn't matter anyway Biden's nominee's will not answer a straight forward question just like Joe Biden does when he answers questions from the media.

valley girl?

@@slowginn7712 He always answers Media : 4 SCOOPS OF CHOCO CHOCO CHIP !!

Yeah, she could be a dangerous choice... I tried to put myself in her place and wondering why was shr so hesitant...a number of reasons 1) she is expecting the question on something she wrote about and normally she aimed to keep the stance she had (or would do everything to dodge around not to confirm nor deny it) 2) discrimination, for her it is not necessairily something wrong because it depends on which side you are when there is a discrimination 3) she is always being put in defensive mode and they are making it difficult for her to get out of that mode

Cruz should have asked her that...would you as a judge found what you are doing now be contempt?

Yep

Never TRUST ANYONE who has 2 eyes 👀 but only uses 1…..

always thought that hairstyle was evidence of inherent deception - this is my world face and this is my me face

@@liljoe5139 Did she think she was in Hollywood ? ........... Biden ADM is worse than H. wood

You’re not wrong

@Troyphy was I that obvious? That tie though? Hawt