Agreed

@@fakeking8860 p

@@alakamcconnell6162 what's that

So, you can't read yourself? It costs less than Rs500.

​​@@vimalnehaI do read...I have bhgavad Gita but these people give wide range of perspective of gita.

@@rupom448 Please read with perspective that you may be a woman. This is the prominent perspective currently.

He is a cultural thief, trying to appropriate what Sanatan has to provide. People like you consider him a devotee. He is a Christian, wearing Hindu symbols with a wide range of goals to destroy our structure. But he won't be able to...

Nice name😊👍

@@MrSachin8006 👍

@@MrSachin8006 👍

👍

@@MrSachin8006 👍

Read Bhagavad Gita by Acharya Prashant

Yes but they aar hardly aastik

Yes you are 100% right ,

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Mee too .. same here

@Wreckner Lord in islam also demonic and godly concept exists . Don't be so kattar

Why do most swamis avoid this topic?

Yes there is no god

Kyo ishwar brahman h,vo sab kuch h sarv vyapt h.hmm sab uski murti h

Buddists do believe in Devtas Gandharbas Yakshas and all. Read Dhammapada. Jainsim also believe in existence of Gods but they don't see God as some supreme controlling power.

God is an Abrahamic religious concept and had no relevance to Sanatana Dharma. So is spiritual. Ishwara, Bhagavan, Sakti are not synonymous with God of Abrahamic religions. Atma gyana , Atma visara is not spiritual as spiritual comes from Christian Spirit. Confusion galore here!

@@vish2553 Oh I see

Anon Zed currently reading invading the sacred

@cool guy You got to read it How does coca cola taste?

RM hindu fakir

That is also weakness of Hinduism and as Hindus cannot be unified for anything.

C Padman the term for God in sanatam dharmah is yantras sanskrit for tool instrument God in sanatam dharmah is an instrument to inner awaking transcendence higher dimension but that's the cool thing about sanatam dharmah it allows for debates disagreements it like quantum physics negative and positive in the deeper level they are NOT contradictions they are complimentary

and this is the reason sanatan dharm is time tested in ancint times many civilizations came and gone e.g egypt,aztec but indus valley civilization remain stood up tot he time bcoz we have so many sages ech time santan dharm got attacked durong medieval era due to ivasions new seed or branch comes out to protect them santan dharm four branches hinduisim-buddhisim-jainisim-sikhisim and all these basic philosophy of karma do good deeds u get good and bad deeds will result bad from great techers like to siddarth gautam to adishankracharya to gurunanakdev to guru govind singh etc. thats why i think why in dasm granth guru govind singh written the guru is brahma.the guru is vishnu,the guru is shiva, guru is parbati and lakshmi guru saakshaat parabrahm tsme shri guruve namah.

@@GauravSingh-zc5bw They are not dharma but religion. Religion means blind faith. Only few people in this world can understand logic. Hinduism is about seeking.

​@@robertmitchell8630Emilio

well those who don't believe in omni god because of the problem of evel and suffering aren't in the same boat

@xyz define hindu first

20:25

Tell me you are challenging an academic on more than your TV watching experiences.

Som Nath Adhikari No

+Hardik Patel it is more than that read this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura

Hardik Patel sanatam dharmah always makes a space and place for each path atheist monotheist agnostic etc

Som Nath Adhikari , he is right, asura means not an atheist.

I can philosophize ... That your creations?

Asura actually means one who not regards existence of divine. Eat drink and be merry.

Universal God.

1. God did not stop Abraham because the Abrahamic god is a Dom/master in BDSM-style, and requires complete obedience of his sub to please the Dom/master. If you’ve watched the Netflix series Snowpiercer, then Mr. Wilfred is the Abrahamic god, and requires his loyal servants to slice themselves with a blade in his bathtub to prove their devotion to him. 2-3. God did not stop Satan because a Dom/master wants his sub to be lured so that the sub can then be appropriately punished. Sometimes the sub itself likes it, both the temporary freedom from the Dom/master, and the consequent punishment after being caught. Mr. Wilfred also does this with his servants, putting them positions where they could be free but then watching them willingly shackle themselves back unto him. 4. It is the Dom/master’s prerogative to intentionally put his sub in a compromising situation, and then still punish the sub for allowing it to happen, even though the sub would also be punished for refusing it to happen. This is very common in the BDSM scene. There is no way for a sub to avoid punishment, the sub may merely pick the route to get there. 5. I’m not sure what your question is asking. 6. Where does it say meat is unavailable in heaven? 7. Mary became pregnant even though Joseph had not yet consummated the marriage with her so he could not be the father. She cried and begged and said she’s never strayed and always been faithful. Joseph eventually accepted her claim. The only logical conclusion once you accept Mary’s claim is that she was impregnated by a ghost. In mathematics this is called proof by contradiction, or proof by reductio ad absurdum, and when you conclude something absurd it means one of your assumptions was false. Monty Python’s Life of Brian explores this in depth. 8. The Christian faith does not believe in reincarnation. It’s a strange exception that Jesus is a avatar/reincarnate of god. They also believe another avatar/reincarnate will come in the Rapture when all the good are killed and ascended to heaven and all the evil are left to wander a hellish post-apocalyptic earth. It’s unclear if that last avatar/reincarnate will need a diaper in his early years or if he’ll descend to earth fully-formed like Arnold Schwarzenegger as a Terminator.

@@TheLazyVideo Finally a believable explanation to the bible’s inconsistencies

God also

Slip of tongue

Yoga Maya is not energy, it is illusory power.

There is no god,, but there is all pervading Brahman...

Spirituality

And god

He is the head of oxford centre for religious studies and i hope he knows better...

No bro they rejected Vedic authority.

+Samrat -> Sir, The population of India is well over one billion people. I should think that you might find someone in that population who teaches the Bhavagad Gita and who you can accept. Why not start there? It is hardly true that it is always foreigners who teach the Gita. As a Westerner, I am very very pleased to have this introduction by this man as he is saying it. I also listen to Hindus who teach the Gita. Sir, Maybe you would like to ask who is listening when you object to who is teaching, because what, after all, is skin color or tribal origin? Does Sri Krishna only host Indians? Yes? Then maybe I have misunderstood Sri Krishna and should consider all to be merely a materialistic universe. Thank you for your time.

Classic dog whistle response. Hardly creative or even coherent.

That has to do with Marxist dominated history in India. Hindus dont even learn basic Hinduism in school. Indians are more busy in promoting Muslim appeasement.

he is a foreigner in a foreign land. I really dont care abt his race...

1)Because of Inferior complexity. 2)government don't teach hindu philosophy in the school. Because it will hamper secular fabrics (according to so called intellectuals).so many Hindus do not know what Hindu philosophy (Santana dharma) is about.

Then please elaborate, just don't keep knowledge to thyself.

Hitler was influenced by Darwin read books first...

Ravi Karthaka . He has a Hindu name bcos he is an initiated Iskcon devotee. A scholar who has helped many to follow the path of Krishna Bhakti.

Just live it.

What you want to say

Some times war becomes necessary if there is no option that is why evry nation have the Army and cops to protect themselves and it is never been a wrong every creature has right to defence and defensive offence no body can't denied it

It depends ,when they are with scholars they don't teach basics ....For common people they teach the basics...

" if one doesn't believe in god then there are no rules" ??? (4:26). I guess i am too common to understand the wisdom in that because i just cannot help but wonder where the ethics of non believers stand there.

People who are there believe in god thats why they are there ....He is a great scholar but if he complicates the topic with upanishads and other stuffs things will be complicated for common people...