This Anti Submarine Destroyers Is More Advanced Than You'd Think

This Anti Submarine Destroyers Is More Advanced Than You'd Think - Udaloy II class

Рет қаралды 999,683

Күн бұрын

For today we will discuss another episode about Udaloy II class of anti-submarine destroyers from Soviet Union.
The Udaloy class, Russian designations Project 1155 Fregat and Project 11551 Fregat-M, are anti-submarine destroyers were built for the Russian Navy between 1980 and 1999. As of 2010, eight destroyers were in service. Two vessels Project 1155 Fregat I (Udaloy I) and Project 1155.1 Fregat II (Udaloy II) were designed by Russian state-owned company Severnoye Design Bureau. They complement the Sovremennyy-class destroyers in anti-aircraft and anti-surface warfare operations. The codename Udaloy comes from an archaic Russian adjective, meaning daring or bold.
The Udaloy II is a modified version of Udaloy I. Twelve Udaloy I and one Udaloy II-class vessels were built at Severnaya Verf and Yantar Shipyards. The Udaloy I-class ships were commissioned between 1980 and 1991 while the first ship in the Udaloy II class, Admiral Chabanenko (BPK 650), was commissioned in 1999. The second, Admiral Basisty, was scrapped during construction. The Udaloy II Class is designed to balance the anti-submarine and anti-ship capabilities. Only eight Udaloys are in service today, but they still give Russia a capable anti-submarine platform.
All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/

Пікірлер: 446

@Rumbler298 2 жыл бұрын

At 3:07 that is the Marshal Shaposhnikov which was returned post refit. It looks different from other udaloys in which its second 100mm AK-190 gun was removed and replaced with modular 16 VLS cells for oniks antiship and kalibr cruise missile. Its large SS-N-14 anti submarine/anti ship missiles was replaced by smaller Kh-35. The remaining udaloys would be retrofitted and upgraded based on that giving them better land strike ability

@gyasiansa3358 2 жыл бұрын

True

@valuedhumanoid6574 2 жыл бұрын

The Russians do build 'em pretty. Their ships and aircraft all have sleek, sexy lines that make them so nice. And dangerous af. I used to read a lot of Tom Clancy books, both fiction and non-fiction and he was very keen on the Russian designs.

@KondorDCS 2 жыл бұрын

True, but the Burke and the Ticon are also very easy on the eyes.

@Kwaj 2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Soviet Navy put some "sexy" stuff in the water. My personal favorite is the Victor III nuclear-attack submarines. That towed array pod on the stern fin was crazy genius and wicked cool. The exquisite Sierras and the stunning Akulas would adopt it, but my heart is still with the Victor III.

@marcschepers8144 2 жыл бұрын

i dont like the russian designs in planes. i mean outside looks good but practical part: the cannopee (Cockpit) dunno name. is almost in every plane a hard back. so you cant look behind u. wich is an disadvantage, hence the need to put more into 3d trustvectoring then western planes. stealth in su57 only frontal not sides, wich means it has to be lkucky to be flying frontal towards enemy. and in cas eof f35 f22 it wil not know where they are and cant track em as ez as they can track him. even with ground radars and radar planes. they are great at shows empty no weapons etc. but for example yust recent 20-20 alot of planes in russia are being equiped withg radars etc that even the EU and america had for atleast 10-20+ years. i mean look in syria where they had to use american mafde gps systems to drop vbombs becouse theirs didnt work., you should always think yourt opponant is way better then u are so you improve even more skill. and even witrh f35 and f22 already with so many upgrtades while the su57 is stil in early acces and only 8 are made and 4 active for duty., so lo oking cool vs tech is going to be diffrent. also a10 IMO stays coolest design. even tho it has no radars etc amnd is oldscool.

@r.p5380 2 жыл бұрын

@@marcschepers8144 Russians not gonna be fighting worldwide just in Russian turf like east Europe or North Pacific they have ground radars which will negate the bad plane radars

@marcschepers8144 2 жыл бұрын

@@r.p5380 russia army is slowly in every old soviet country giving propoganda that everything that happend is the wests fault. russia is gearing up. and i always say: If theres someone who is intent on beating u up, and you think by acting passive that he isnt going to hit you. then u are a fool. you either strike first or you fight back with everything you have in order to do as much damage. Russia is this bully at the moment. sure america nato etc bully aswell. but russia was the one who before trum,p retreated from the nucliair treaty to produce hypersonivc nukes, torrpedo nukes etc. so why wait for him to strike first . hi sintentions in syria libya al;l old soviet states shows hes gearing up. and yes ukraine made a deal to be guareanteed safety by the russians if tghey got rid opf the nukes. i say arm them with nukes and also low yield nukes. make sure if any of us get hit, russia wont be a part of the map again. you dont go half in to a fiught you go full in. russia has as much to lose as us. and yeah and want to see my kids grow upo. but i be damned if we dont stand up against a bully

@trevortaylor5501 2 жыл бұрын

The russians designed their own marine engines and power plants since 2014 as stated my Mr. Shoigu. UEC or united engine corporation has undertook the work. Its called the import substitution program. You might want to do some fact checking before broadcasting. In the old days under the soviet union the work was spread out throughout the different states to employ lesser regions with work, as was the case in ukraine. Since the collapse of relations with ukraine and sanctions from the united states and the european union they decided to go forward with marine engine building from scratch within russia proper since then.

@Senbonzakura776 2 жыл бұрын

Some beautiful destroyers. When I was stationed in the UK I got to go on the Admiral Levchenko and the Admiral Chabanenko during port visits.

@admiralbeluga6438 2 жыл бұрын

Wow 😳 it's my drean to go inside big warship

@admiralbeluga6438 2 жыл бұрын

When was this???

@cg3.0_slowburning2 2 жыл бұрын

Its a old ship but still very capable of modern naval warfare if upgraded properly it stll has quite a few years left in her

@jacobp.2024 2 жыл бұрын

A lot of older ships still have use, especially when it comes to guarding maritime trade. It's just we're about to see an age of AI-assisted equipment that's going to put this stuff too far behind the curve to be useful for international warfare.

@clb_52 2 жыл бұрын

Russian ships have more armaments and capabilities than American ships

@martindevon3204 2 жыл бұрын

@@clb_52 that's why they're always broken down. To difficult and costly to service

@clb_52 2 жыл бұрын

@@martindevon3204 all ships break down

@r.p5380 2 жыл бұрын

@@martindevon3204 Russian ships break down just as much, however you are showing you have a premade notion that Russian ships are inferior so before you continue please neutralise your bias

@AC-ri3qz 2 жыл бұрын

Very impressive that’s what a war ship should look like 👍

@firstlast167 2 жыл бұрын

I think that design is lacking in stealth

@robertlangley687 2 жыл бұрын

Lacking in stealth but at the same time sexy and menacing, if that were a woman I would steer clear and leave her alone

@Uretard2121 6 ай бұрын

No lacking anti quefer tech and not Soviet it’s qufer ppls Soviet cruiser run if you see it . During the civil war killed quefer battle quefer ship

@TimeMinsu 2 жыл бұрын

Since I live in Korea, I first saw a Russian ship at the International Fleet Review in 2018, and it has a different power than the United States.

@Napoleon1815-l8c 2 жыл бұрын

The Russians sure know how to arm their ships with missiles, guns, rockets, etc.

@scottgordon600 2 жыл бұрын

Back in the day, it always seemed that if something got "stuck" (didn't matter which nation) in cold weather, there was always a Russian (Soviet) ice breaker coming to the rescue.

@bramveneman 2 жыл бұрын

Nuclear powered offcourse!

@revolutsiya9070 2 жыл бұрын

Ah yes... the mighty power of Soviet help!

@toolfreak78 2 жыл бұрын

Of course they are advanced. people who think Russia uses old stuff is dumb. Russia modernized his whole army. Thats why it is smaller, but more mobile and advanced. The army of Russia is focussed on defense and not offensive. That's why Russia has the most tanks of the world.. Thats one sign the red army is build on defense.. The US army is build on offensive thats why they have more aircraft carriers..

@louiscypher4186 2 жыл бұрын

The US focuses on Naval strength because 95% military invasions would come via the sea. The RF focuses on Army strength because 95% military invasions would come via land. Also your argument falls apart when Russian tanks are designed for offense, it's why they have less armor and move faster. They are designed to overrun enemy positions as fast as possible to support an infantry surge. US tanks are slower, more heavily armored and hit harder. Both nations still inherent their military doctrines from the cold war. Russia feared a US naval invasion so they focused submarines because 1 sub was a threat to multiple surface ships. The US feared a land invasion of europe so they focused on Tanks which could take as big a beating as possible.

@toolfreak78 2 жыл бұрын

@@louiscypher4186 and what kind og naval strength?? Aircraft carriers.

@toolfreak78 2 жыл бұрын

You think all tanks are light.. do your homework man. You know nothing about the russian army and you know nothing about the US army..... since when have russia sn offensive army man?since never because russia is a defence land .USA is offensive thats why they have 20 aircraft carriers and russia only one. Know ur history man.. russia was never an offensive country.. russia does not like war, like the US does.

@toolfreak78 2 жыл бұрын

What a bullshit man..

@toolfreak78 2 жыл бұрын

You say so much shit.. and you dont even know that a lot of aircrafts belong to the navy instead of airforce.

@beforeyoujudge2036 2 жыл бұрын

I love Russian technology, it's sophisticated and advance. From Philippines

@RasPutintheGreat 2 жыл бұрын

Oo nga, sana sa kanila na lng tayo bumili ng mga gamit..

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

@@RasPutintheGreat rusian equipment is only paper in usa

@Shammie19 2 жыл бұрын

@@RasPutintheGreat Russian technology is not that good

@titanproductions3628 2 жыл бұрын

@@Shammie19 Propaganda 🤡

@beatport1216 2 жыл бұрын

🇮🇳❤🔥❤🇷🇺

@holdfast453 2 жыл бұрын

7:30 Vladivostok bridge. Conversely, no bridge is allowed between Portsmouth and Gosport over the neck of Portsmouth Harbour with the motif of bridge being prime enemy target to block the harbour and the naval base. Russian navy isn’t that worried by the look of it.

@WhiteStar762 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks i was wondering what bridge that was. I first was thinking the bosphorus or the new bridge in crimea.

@AtroposLeshesis 2 жыл бұрын

Umm no, No I can’t say they’re more advanced than I thought. The better question is; Do they possess enough to make a difference when facing a enemy ship fleet

@Gow-13510 2 жыл бұрын

Their ship are designed to be able to fight on their own with little to no support from other ship

@gadielplays2419 2 жыл бұрын

@@Gow-13510 most Russian ships are

@ghostmourn_alt 2 жыл бұрын

They are heavily armed compared to American or western ships. Four 30mm Kashatan gatling guns! - I suspect that up close they are just 100% beastmode. Those Kashtans could probably wreck any surface ship that came into their firing envelope.

@lexburen5932 Жыл бұрын

and then from a distance they have to deal with the 100m naval artillery gun. it will be difficult for surface ships to come close to this vessel.

@nounou1605 2 жыл бұрын

with this TORPEDO boat we can be the masters of all seas it's amazing

@ikill-98 2 жыл бұрын

All Russian vessels can relay on their own even their aircraft carrier Cruiser it's stack with a lot of weapon but that will effect on its maintenance cost The US aircraft carriers needed to be escorted and protected with destroyer but that will also effect on the defense budget

@CharlonClarke 2 жыл бұрын

well said

@CriminalOverPoweringSocietyCOP 2 жыл бұрын

that exhaust leaves one hell of a heat signature

@abdiganiaden 2 жыл бұрын

It’s better to focus on what ship is good at rather than try to create a Frankenstein that will have faults. Besides, US has money and Russia don’t which shows that they need to mix up.

@Thetequilashooter1 2 жыл бұрын

Why are you comparing it to a carrier? US cruisers and destroyers can perform independently as well. A carrier can also defend itself and project a lot of power.

@SigaSigaJohn 2 жыл бұрын

Yes, indeed US aircraft carriers need to be escorted... what about Russian aircraft carriers?... ooopps, there are NO Russian aircraft carriers, almost 90 years after the US built their first carrier and Russia still can not design/make one... this alone says a lot ...

@simul8guy75 2 жыл бұрын

Only ONE Udaloy II class destroyer was built. Only 7 or the original 12 Udaloy I class ships are still in service (several of which are currently out of service undergoing overhaul/refit upgrade). Not much of a threat.

@henryvacal7402 2 жыл бұрын

A beast of a ship.

@MountainDewbies 2 жыл бұрын

Such a beautiful ship, gotta love allot of boom boom(:

@tsclly2377 2 жыл бұрын

the bigger they are, the bigger a target

@pedrobarros3564 2 жыл бұрын

Arma russa são tão boas um cruzador só com tiro foi para o fundo do mar

@nomad4240 2 жыл бұрын

I love it when you say Udaloy.

@legkostypov 2 жыл бұрын

Опять автор не в теме, проект 1155 по классификации является БПК (Большой противолодочный корабль), а не эсминец или фрегат. Его оборудование и вооружение заточено для борьбы с ПЛ (подводными лодками). По своим характеристикам он спокойно обеспечивает противолодочную оборону всего ордера в эскадре.

@saishaktipanda 2 жыл бұрын

Please make a dedicated video on Vishakapatnam class destroyer please please please please 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 a request please 🥺🥺🥺🥺

@tomjohnston3393 2 жыл бұрын

Indian destroyers have a shortage of VLS tubes when compared to destroyers of other countries of similar displacement. This suggests inefficient ship design. Also the propulsion system, most sensors and weapons on Indian destroyers are just sourced from other countries so there is not much unique to talk about in a video.

@akirayuu7318 2 жыл бұрын

You can see that video on "military detective" and I think that channel is more informative than this one

@BestPlconEarth50 2 жыл бұрын

Sorry those only exist in ones mind!

@saishaktipanda 2 жыл бұрын

@@tomjohnston3393 When the brahmos will hit your British destroyer it will be ravaged and by the way the tomahawk your ship uses is American. And you will tell we make it in our island then I must say Barak 8, MF Star and many others are Indo Israel product the propulsion system of Barak 8 is from DRDO and more than 2/3 rd of the components is indigenous and ofcourse propulsion system is where we lack. And lacking vls cells I must say brahmos is way more heavier than other of your sub sonic missiles which we can shoot it down by our Barak 8 and by the fact AMERICA DID A STUDY AND ITS OWN DESTROYER CAN'T STOP 2 BRAHMOS COMING AT A TIME BECAUSE its radar cross section is like a little bird and you get only 20 sec to response. So our destroyer is way more ahead of your BRITISH DESTROYER. SO GO GET GOOD INFORMATION BUDDY I DON'T WANNA SPOIL YOUR IMAGE

@saishaktipanda 2 жыл бұрын

@@akirayuu7318 thanks bro I have seen it. I request because I like his tone and editing in a way

@nipundilshan6081 2 жыл бұрын

Russian ships never stop 💪💪💪💪💪❤️

@renelargenio6882 2 жыл бұрын

Old but gold

@legkostypov 2 жыл бұрын

Again, the author is off topic, project 1155 is classified as a BOD (Large anti-submarine Ship), not a destroyer or frigate. Its equipment and weapons are sharpened to combat submarines (submarines). According to its characteristics, it quietly provides anti-submarine defense of the entire order in the squadron.

@yuripotecknov5164 7 ай бұрын

Dude what? Project 1155 is the Udaloy. NATO classifies it as a destroyer, the Soviet Union gave it the project name Fregat, not correlating it to an actual frigate

@legkostypov 7 ай бұрын

@@yuripotecknov5164 В каком полку служили, юноша? В штабе НАТО?

@yuripotecknov5164 7 ай бұрын

@@legkostypovI’m confused by what your asking

@skyedog24 2 жыл бұрын

It's like a prototype that they've made one of but it doesn't really function from the inside out

@Nathan-ng1jt 2 жыл бұрын

A great Cold War Destroyer, they certainly get their money's worth out of now middle aged ships.

@bbgcars 2 жыл бұрын

DAMN WHY DO RUSSIANS MAKE SOME OF THE BEST LOOKING SHIPS IN THE WORLD..LOOK AT THEM LINES! ITS LIKE LINES USED ON SOME FAMOUS SUPER YACHTS!

@nicksurla1624 2 жыл бұрын

You know some things should remain a secret until the need to surprise... thats the way it should be...

@ueks69 2 жыл бұрын

Yes it is much more advanced than one should think, for one it floats.

@mca1960 2 жыл бұрын

This tiny little russian navy with a few ships. Nothing to fear..... 😁

@PukaHeadMan 2 жыл бұрын

Wow, what a warship! But does the Russian Navy have a Hammerhead Corvette!?

@darkguardiangaming5996 2 жыл бұрын

this ship is damn heavyly arm

@Chunkylover. 2 жыл бұрын

With lack of numbers it comes with power

@brianfoley4328 2 жыл бұрын

The Udaloy class of Destroyer is a very capable ship, it's real downfall is numbers. If the Russians had as many Udaloys as the US Navy has Burke class ships then NATO would be in real trouble, but they don't and they won't...so while the Udaloy is a very capable ship they would be quickly hunted down in a real shooting war by the vastly superior numbers of NATO ships.

@r.p5380 2 жыл бұрын

Russia has a very sneaky trick in that they have hundreds of frigates/corvettes, all of which come with missile tubes that could fire hypersonic missiles

@juryfilatov4520 2 жыл бұрын

@@r.p5380 everything is right. Russia cannot come to visit you, but it is very dangerous to think that Russia has no teeth in the sea. Light corvettes don't have hundreds of launchers. But there are quite a few of them and they can even be found in fresh rivers and lakes. And they have 4-8 full-fledged long-range anti-ship missiles. And despite the devastation in the 90s, Russia still has the most powerful anti-ship systems

@dimatrue 2 жыл бұрын

Irrelevant. Any major confrontation will escalate to nuclear exchange and the end of civilization as we know it. What do you prefer, to be incinerated or to be frozen to death?

@jorgefierro3096 2 жыл бұрын

If its Russian made its well made 👍

@bengreg2457 2 жыл бұрын

U mean like the Russian automobile 🚘? Lol. Just kidding . Russians have lots of cool gear.

@jorgefierro3096 2 жыл бұрын

@@bengreg2457 when it comes to war gear yes......automobiles I dont know.

@simul8guy75 2 жыл бұрын

Unreliable piles of junk....

@istvansipos9940 2 жыл бұрын

yes, that's why every1 wants to buy Russian technolo... Oh. Wait. Stop it. some Russian products are well made, some are not.

@simul8guy75 2 жыл бұрын

@@istvansipos9940 - "Everyone" (meaning poor countries with a small military budget) want to buy Russian tech because it's CHEAP! It's also garbage. Every major Soviet/Russian client state that had an armed conflict with a Western client state in the last 3 decades had their Soviet/Russian equipment utterly destroyed. Both Gulf wars and the wars between Egypt and Israel being prime examples.

@SigaSigaJohn 2 жыл бұрын

I could not see how the Udaloy class is more advanced than someone probably thought, as the video title suggested... It is a rather old design that is being modernised / upgraded with newer electronics and weapons, as in every other navy...

@dmitrybarabanow 2 жыл бұрын

cool rusty troughs)))

@gaius_enceladus 2 жыл бұрын

Beautiful ships!

@caesarjosefus2692 4 ай бұрын

Was it that Admiral Levchenko that was used in the movie 'Hunter Killer' by Gerard Butler?

@kritik7049 2 жыл бұрын

American ships: looks gorgeous Russian ships: menacing, Intimidating, floating fortress 😳 Chinese ships: just a copycats, low quality

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

Yea I agree 🇺🇸💪💪💪

@hellmarch3043 2 жыл бұрын

American ships looks like a barn on the boat.

@Barrawitzkaa 2 жыл бұрын

I remember the "Hood" was the proud of the English Navy in the 40s ...... a floating fortress ..... for 4 Minutes. War - though technical impressive - is cruel shit! We´re all friends, we are one!

@Kwaj 2 жыл бұрын

The Russian Navy isn't a blue-water force. Even at its height in the mid 80's, the Soviet Navy wasn't blue-water either.

@julwiezdeghorz5089 2 жыл бұрын

Lol. Russian boomers were even patroling near the US east and west coast during cold war. And even Russian frigates reached the waters of New Zealnd.

@metalmadsen 2 жыл бұрын

What ?? They had Cruisers, carriers and nuclear subs.

@Kwaj 2 жыл бұрын

As expected, many people in the comments are unaware of Soviet naval doctrine. Geographically, Russia has extremely limited access to both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The Soviets knew it, accepted it, and effectively designed their navy around it. As opposed to power-projection like the US Navy, the Soviets geared their navy toward defending waters around the coast. That's not a blue-water strategy, nor is it a weak one; it's just more defensive.

@Kwaj 2 жыл бұрын

@@metalmadsen "They had Cruisers, carriers and nuclear subs." Nearly all of which were relegated to defending the waters around the USSR.

@guojunhao8062 2 жыл бұрын

@@Kwaj go search it up instead of bluffing

@ericknkili 2 жыл бұрын

I just want the title of that background music.

@ailbinail1105 2 жыл бұрын

قوة جبارة

@subjectc7505 2 жыл бұрын

The one thing we all can give credit to the Russians is they know how to arm thier vehicles to the teeth.

@johnnydepp7762 2 жыл бұрын

Ты прав )

@jacoblongbrake8230 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah so when it catches a fire like most of their ships it makes for a great firework display

@jacoblongbrake8230 2 жыл бұрын

@_______ • 1000 years ago what???

@jonathanbonapos1008 2 жыл бұрын

She has a teeth that any ship will afraid to come near her

@sudhendugupte7562 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@EnterpriseEN 2 жыл бұрын

0:04 is that Admiral Panteleyev

@user-vr2jn1wn1s 2 жыл бұрын

Очередная история про аналоГовнет!

@RobertLane-ry7wv 19 күн бұрын

Goddamn, they should have just named the thing The Porcupine

@someonerandom6137 2 жыл бұрын

Still a very capable and potent ship, but the biggest disadvantage would be that almost all modern warships have a reduced rcs (stealth) design.

@humorpalanta 2 жыл бұрын

They seem to be using the speed flag. But did they equipped the Detonation flag?

@k98_zock_tv47 2 жыл бұрын

No need! If undetected +10% speed and thanks to the citadell layout, no detonations possible....cause - russian bias :)

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

@@k98_zock_tv47 🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪

@richessery8475 2 жыл бұрын

How advanced do I think this ship is? Hardly at all. Still ten years out of date compared to Western navies.

@redblueyankee8343 2 жыл бұрын

30 years

@dieterdettwiler4393 3 ай бұрын

Dieser russische U-Boot-Zerstörer ist fortschrittlicher als Sie denken: dass ich nicht lache. 40-Jahre alte Technologie

@samueljaronel3628 2 жыл бұрын

Ang Ganda Naman nito warships Ng russian ibibigay mo na Ito sa philipinas

@asian2265 2 жыл бұрын

Those frigets are older then me 😆

@user-gz2eq6jh1t 2 жыл бұрын

Наследие союза

@swarup9736 2 жыл бұрын

Oh my gawd soo many armaments! Russian ship for a reason ....🔥🔥🔥🔥

@alphasixfive1658 2 жыл бұрын

Klingons on the STBD Bow

@Nis-vl6xg 2 жыл бұрын

1:50 水兵が半袖半ズボンだ！なんか始めてみた気がする。

@tomwheatley6807 2 жыл бұрын

The question is, could it track and shoot down a f35?

@sasomilenkovski1376 2 жыл бұрын

if s 200 can shoot sistem old 1960 can shoot stealth f 117 then can shoot and f 35

@tomwheatley6807 2 жыл бұрын

@@sasomilenkovski1376 Not sure about that one, f35 is miles ahead of all other aircraft, but maybe your right

@Ving_Demon 2 жыл бұрын

ага..только их всего 2 и им почти по 50 лет))

@sashan1975 2 жыл бұрын

6 в строю 2 на модернизации самому старому 40

@Ving_Demon 2 жыл бұрын

@@sashan1975 Самостоятельной выйти в океан и там не утонуть могут только два)

@sashan1975 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ving_Demon мне то не рассказывай сказки.

@Ving_Demon 2 жыл бұрын

@@sashan1975 Это ты мне сказки не рассказывай

@sashan1975 2 жыл бұрын

@@Ving_Demon ну расскажи, каким кораблям по 50 лет и какие из 6 штук не могут выйти в море.

@Rubensky44 2 жыл бұрын

pretty big for a frigate

@darthvodder7426 2 жыл бұрын

The Moskva has reached its final destination! The bottom of the Black Sea!😀

@wandra6608 2 жыл бұрын

Love Rusia

@MuhammadNasir-uj2us 2 жыл бұрын

Bravo Rusia

@thierrymamin8339 Жыл бұрын

Ces destroyers ont le même problème que le Moskwa : une dca d il y a 40 ans, incapable d intercepter un exocet ou un harpoon. Avec deux croiseurs Slava ça fait une dizaine de navires qui doivent être moder nisés ou retirés.

@commander57 2 жыл бұрын

If you have to tell me it is more advanced than I think it isn't.

@user-tf4jl8zj4w 2 жыл бұрын

Меня всегда удивляло модернизированные БПК называют фрегатами , неее ну у нас

@sasongkowibowo4806 2 жыл бұрын

Sya fdari indonesia dari dulu saya sangat suka dengan persenjataan rusia hebat

@quymaitv7755 2 жыл бұрын

Ồ tầu khu trục của Nga to dài ,có hỏa pháo,tên lửa mạnh hầy ,đánh được cả tầu ngầm là ok

@dieterreinhard8025 2 жыл бұрын

Kennen wir doch alles!

@AtroposLeshesis 2 жыл бұрын

Why does the sound the torpedo makes when hitting the water sound exactly like my ‘Number two 💩 when it splashed down in my toilet?

@obiiito 2 жыл бұрын

This is RF admiral Panteleyef?

@blobloblaw12 2 жыл бұрын

Oodles of Udaloys

@mmmoroi Жыл бұрын

The word anti-submarine destroyer is funny, as all destroyers were originally called submarine destroyers.

@patriciarussell120 2 жыл бұрын

If it is Russian, is the best.

@pstanyer1 2 жыл бұрын

Don't worry it will be in dry Dock most of the year with the rest of the fleet awaiting repairs.

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

😁😁😁💪

@titanproductions3628 2 жыл бұрын

@pstanyer1 Propaganda 🤡

@limedickandrew6016 2 жыл бұрын

Sounds like the Royal Navy.

@kirilskobelev1330 2 жыл бұрын

Амурчета,голи и въоръжени)))

@MartianLivesMatter 2 жыл бұрын

Soviet Union? What year is it?

@user-cx9qx1wn6z 2 жыл бұрын

Mạnh nhất t2 luôn đấy

@shamilabdullah9996 11 ай бұрын

If kamikaze drone Attack Can this ship survive?

@Ataman_ol. 2 жыл бұрын

with light steam

@askme5805 2 жыл бұрын

Russia has weapons, we Czechoslovakians has rest and lowest uncomment rate in Europe :)

@charleskmedeiros7310 2 жыл бұрын

Viva a Rússia

@reecom9884 2 жыл бұрын

The biggest disadvantage the Russians have is they are just a navy of one. All of their technology upgrades are developed in-house. The NATO countries integrate and share their advance technologies in their new ship design. Commercial western companies are competing to sell their advance equipment to NATO navies. You know how far behind the Russian technology is when they say their brand new sonar system; ”The Zvezda sonar system is considered by its designers to be the equivalent in terms of overall performance of the AN/SQS-53 on US destroyers…”, comparing it to an old US SONAR system and not being better. The US alone has 62 Arleigh Burke Class destroyers and 2 Zumwalt destroyers, plus the rest of the NATO countries with their modern destroyers. The other big disadvantage the Russians have, is they now are without strong allies like NATO on their side. The difference between NATO and the Russians, when NATO conducts large scale war games, they conduct their large scale war games with their allies. When the Russians have large scale war games, they play mostly by themselves or sometimes with the Chinese; it’s good to have friends

@TP-ie3hj 2 жыл бұрын

Well when you make a video that has a voice over reading a wiki page updated in 2009 you get what you get. Russian tech may not be as flashy nor costly but its still effective. No matter what you compare its the same old story. A Russian boot covers your foot, you can walk in it fight in it and it has rope laces lasts a long time. Great foot wear $20 a pair! A NATO boot has a carbon fiber arch support and an adjustable heel catch with kevlar stitch and ballistic nylon....you can walk in it you can fight in it and it costs $480 a pair........While this is not a factual example it illustrates the point.

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

@@TP-ie3hj rusian ship is always got sunk by us ship

@Chunkylover. 2 жыл бұрын

@@adrianepenalosa8875 hmm🤔 ?

@TP-ie3hj 2 жыл бұрын

@@adrianepenalosa8875 Name a single time a Russia ship was sunk by a USN ship? Never took place. If however your argument is that the US with 700 billion a year budget is more powerful than a Russia and its 60 billion? Of course it is.

@adrianepenalosa8875 2 жыл бұрын

@@TP-ie3hj 20 rusian ship was sunk only by uss seawolf submarine during thats why soveit is already broke

@sayedyusuf5464 2 жыл бұрын

বাংলাদেশের সরকারের উচিত সাবমেরিন ডেসটযার তৈরির কারখানা জরুরী ভিত্তিতে তৈরি করার একান্ত দরকার।

@victoriaregina8344 2 жыл бұрын

🤣 so what if it's more advanced than we think, doesn't matter when you have ten times the amount of destroyers

@EloTheMan1 2 жыл бұрын

tldr big ship with lots of dakka

@stefancreciunas6381 2 жыл бұрын

O rachetă e mai avansată decât ai crede...

@Gina0008 2 жыл бұрын

I sink it everyone in cold waters. 1 Wired torpedo is all it takes from my sea wolf.

@putraiman9804 2 жыл бұрын

Ini bukan kapal... Tapi gudang senjata terapung

@Crashed131963 2 жыл бұрын

.The real point of a large aircraft carrier is to launch the The Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye (Eye in the sky). Its radar our ranges any surface ship. Its radar disk is much too large to put on and helicopter or vertical lift jet. The US will alway see the other side first . Even non-catapult carries can not launch them from a ramp deck. A Russia ship will be detected hours before it detects a carrier group.