No video

This is The Way the World Ends. Nuclear War, with Annie Jacobsen

  Рет қаралды 12,538

The Origins Podcast

The Origins Podcast

Күн бұрын

Subscribe for exclusive content at lawrencekrauss...
Learn more and support the foundation at originsproject...
A note from Lawrence:
Many of you will have been waiting for this podcast after my brief review of Annie Jacobsen’s new book Nuclear War: A Scenario on Critical Mass. I took advantage of our discussion to flesh out some of the harrowing details of her remarkable fictional account of a plausible 72 minutes which began with the launch of a single nuclear missile from North Korea and concludes effectively with the end of modern civilization on the planet. As I indicated in my review, as former Chair of the Board of Sponsors of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists for over a decade, the horrors of nuclear war were well-known to me, but the realization of how quickly a scenario such as Jacobsen envisages might actually play out was something I had never really imagined.
Jacobsen is no stranger to thinking about defense issues and has penned numerous books on defense-related issues, including a history of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in history. She is also a seasoned fiction writer for television, penning three episodes of Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan. Her new book combines her interest in nuclear war related issues, and interviews with a host of military officials involved in nuclear war planning over the past five decades, with her skill in framing a tense dramatic narrative. The result is compelling.
I know from experience that most people would rather avoid thinking about the threat of nuclear war. But it is only by confronting it directly that the public might have a possibility of at least slowing the military juggernaut, powered by a combination of a huge bureaucracy that works effectively to maintain its existence, and a cold war mentality the drives efforts to continue to grow and modernize our nuclear weapons establishment-all the while in spite of the fact that everyone who has seriously thought about nuclear war knows it is unwinnable. As Einstein, who helped found the Bulletin’s Board of Sponsors said over 60 years ago, with the creation of Nuclear Weapons “Everything has changed, save the way we think”. My hope is that discussions like this one may help us change even that.

Пікірлер: 139
@YT2024Hayward
@YT2024Hayward Ай бұрын
Let me bring an optimistic point of view. For those of us who looking to buy our first house, I bet property values will go down.
@ThunderBucket-ws5jp
@ThunderBucket-ws5jp Ай бұрын
Yes, but not for lack of landlords trying to raise them
@juliepowell9065
@juliepowell9065 Ай бұрын
Frankly, I am glad I am 76yo. Not much time left anyway. My heart bleeds for my 39 nieces and nephews and their kids. They have No Idea!
@thepresi2
@thepresi2 Ай бұрын
Lawrence, you always talk 80% of the time during your interviews.
@pietwandelaar1743
@pietwandelaar1743 Ай бұрын
Sadly, yes.
@AFROJOE2323
@AFROJOE2323 Ай бұрын
Lawrence was respectful, quit bitching
@TomHawk640
@TomHawk640 Ай бұрын
Didn’t find him intrusive.
@yasirsultani
@yasirsultani 24 күн бұрын
Krauss is incredibly annoying with his constant pestering and hoggs all the bandwidth for himself. Like shh for 1 sec.
@annapaproc8822
@annapaproc8822 Ай бұрын
As nuclear weapons become more avalaible to more countries around the world, nuclear war is just a matter of time.
@TomHawk640
@TomHawk640 Ай бұрын
Russell (Bertrand) thought so. No dummy.
@TomHawk640
@TomHawk640 Ай бұрын
Doing science, like “doing” the imaginative use of words (poetry, on one definition) is at base also thinking imaginatively. Of course that won’t exist if Annie’s take is plausible.
@TomHawk640
@TomHawk640 Ай бұрын
MAD: makes no sense, obviously. The residue of a competitive, profit-driven mindset, where that mindset meets the military industrial complex.
@robertjulianoph.d.1423
@robertjulianoph.d.1423 Ай бұрын
I have listened to a number of interviews of the great Annie Jacobsen, and as always she shined here. However, she was barely given any time to speak on this particular podcast episode as the interviewer dominated the interview with his perspectives. He should learn how to conduct a proper interview from great podcast hosts like Lex Fridman. His three hour episode featuring Annie Jacobsen is the gold standard of interviewing!
@theozarktrekker
@theozarktrekker Ай бұрын
Well you have to understand that Lawrence considers himself to be the main attraction of any interview or discussion. That’s how he rolls.
@AFROJOE2323
@AFROJOE2323 Ай бұрын
I think the podcast is great! I think if you don't appreciate lawrence's style, then perhaps you should continue to watch lex fridmans instead of complaining.
@Agent_KD6-3.7
@Agent_KD6-3.7 Ай бұрын
Lex is a relentless yawnathon.
@robertjulianoph.d.1423
@robertjulianoph.d.1423 Ай бұрын
@AFROJOE2323: When the only way the guest (i.e., Annie Jacobsen) can speak is by *apologizing* for interrupting the host, you know something is terribly terribly wrong! 🙄
@kylekoehmstedt5449
@kylekoehmstedt5449 Ай бұрын
​@robertjulianoph.d.1423 if you thought this was bad, go listen to Joe rogans recent episode with Annie. At least this guy stayed on topic
@theliterarycornerwithautho5981
@theliterarycornerwithautho5981 Ай бұрын
One of the very "best" podcasts thanks to The Origins Podcast. Bravo!
@Seekthetruth3000
@Seekthetruth3000 Ай бұрын
As a species, we need to grow up and do away with violence and warfare.
@vykintasmorkvenas6839
@vykintasmorkvenas6839 Ай бұрын
How do you imagine achieving this when the most powerful country in the world has to choose a president from such candidates as Biden and Trump. The world seems to be doomed.
@AFROJOE2323
@AFROJOE2323 Ай бұрын
@@vykintasmorkvenas6839 Well said lol... well said.
@krish2nasa
@krish2nasa Ай бұрын
“ The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.” -Carl Sagan.
@votemonty1815
@votemonty1815 Ай бұрын
Had to order her book after running out of free audiobook time on Spotify.
@behr121002
@behr121002 Ай бұрын
One wonders, as I have often wondered and been frustratingly puzzled by is why in this world, in this existence and place in time, the voices of people with knowledge, intellegence and wisdom such as we are hearing here are drowned out, relagated to the sidelines, ignored etc., and those in of lesser mind (even childish mentalities as we are now experiencing) in positions of power who ignore, sideline and denegrate these important voices, instead hold sway and influence in media and among the populace of so many countries. We are truly living in an upside down world.
@josephdonais4778
@josephdonais4778 Ай бұрын
"A plan is useless. Planning is everything". ~ Dwight D Isenhower This quote speaks volumes on flexibility to me. It is my favorite. I often see remarks on the internet some trying to explain it away by referencing it's context as though afraid... as if he was saying, "Don't plan". The quote needs no context.
@ellenjohnsen-ub8ze
@ellenjohnsen-ub8ze Ай бұрын
Why do you have a guest?
@cheri238
@cheri238 Ай бұрын
Thank you, Lawrence Krauss, for having author and journalist with this discourse of nuclear war and the Doomsday scnernario . Congratulations on your new book, Annie. The only suggestion I may offer is Iian McGilchrist's books and lectures, " The Emissary and His Master, " The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World," The Matter With Things," Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World," 2 volumes (2010) In these books , Dr. Iian McGilchrist shares with other scholars in various fields of philosophy, sciences, history, literature, and art in how th change course the direction we have created over centuries of wars and divisions, be it philosophical, religious, or how the left and right side of our brains works. With the deepest appreciation and respect to both of you for keeping the awareness of the destruction, our powers of greed have got it terribly wrong. Human life and nature may we listen together and grow with empathy and joy for everyone. "Nature loves to hide." Heraclitus 🙏❤️🌍🌏🌎🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵💫✨️💫✨️
@firesuite
@firesuite Ай бұрын
Important to note the world wont end, the human race will. Our planet was here before and will be long after we've gone.
@wadeinn463
@wadeinn463 Ай бұрын
We’ll… that’s reassuring
@xstensl8823
@xstensl8823 Ай бұрын
it would be better of without us. humans are just a tiny blip in planets evolution. we are Dodo birds
@pietwandelaar1743
@pietwandelaar1743 Ай бұрын
LK: "yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak." ... "Maybe you can talk about this a little bit as well."
@IIConspiracy2
@IIConspiracy2 Ай бұрын
"Ive narrowed them down to 5 unthinkable options" "Number 3" "You dont wanna read them first?" "I was elected to lead not to read, number 3!" If you know you know
@ozgurbirey5402
@ozgurbirey5402 Ай бұрын
Thank you very much for the great podcast.
@edwardwong654
@edwardwong654 Ай бұрын
That is why I always wear clean underwear. Just in case.
@paulbk7810
@paulbk7810 Ай бұрын
fyi.. Somewhat sophisticated, city-leveling nuclear device is no bigger than a public school classroom fire extinguisher. Very difficult to detect. I lived with 48 of them inside missile tubes and never got a click on my side of the launch tube. Using DOD grade beta/gamma and neutron detectors.
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Finally a useful comment. Thumbs up.
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34 5 күн бұрын
this is fascinating and terrifying
@finalfandy4766
@finalfandy4766 Ай бұрын
.. that's truly scary. Unthinkable. And if you survived the initial blasts you will wish you hadn't.
@paulbk7810
@paulbk7810 Ай бұрын
One of Senator Edward Kennedy's favorite defense budget hearing quips, "How high to you want the rubble to bounce."
@juliepowell9065
@juliepowell9065 Ай бұрын
Enlightened, and scared shitless. Ordered the book.
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
I don't know if you read these comments or not, but it would be a perfect follow-up to interview Jake Broe. He's a previous ICBM missileer and could fill inn many details that you missed out in this mostly excellent dialogue.
@user-bg5dw2nk4x
@user-bg5dw2nk4x Ай бұрын
I listened to MIT professor Theodore Postol describe the sequence of events following a detonation of a nuclear bomb- it's terrifying.
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
I see what you are saying. But how can we get rid of our nuclear weapons unless we are certain that everyone else is doing the same? People don’t trust each other. This is the root of the problem. We need a new generation of leaders and a new world peace movement. Once the people of all the country’s of the world get tired of this madness it will end.
@liliasotoaragon
@liliasotoaragon 5 күн бұрын
Something makes a bit of noise about the proposal to do with North Corea attacking the US, but the US not retaliating to them.... but Rusia? In this scenario why North Corea keeps attacking the USA after they detect (1 second later) they launch a ICBM? Doesn't make sense.
@vonneely1977
@vonneely1977 Ай бұрын
One problem with being a scientist is that when one is constantly in the company of highly intelligent people it is easy to forget just how stupid the average human really is. This often leads to what can seem like amusingly naive optimism about the motivations & morality of others due judging those outside that tiny bubble based on the mental acuity of those within it. One does not become a dictator by being smart. One becomes a dictator by being ruthless and paranoid. That such individuals would do the smart, logical or rational thing in any situation is not something that I'd wager money on.
@BrianFedirko
@BrianFedirko Ай бұрын
This lady is everywhere all of a sudden, but please listen to what she has to say. I've been consumed with nuclear Armageddon my entire life since age 6... it has consumed my nightmares and focus. Understand that people with power in this country DON"T understand this stuff, they don't know the first thing about it and they provide support for clicking the nuke button more efficiently quicker. There are people in politics, who have a wish for end of world, as their book promises them somehow. Belief in magic, and being magically saved fuels focus in the white house. Please listen. Peace ☮💜Love
@johngibson4753
@johngibson4753 23 күн бұрын
Larry needs to let his ego go and allow Annie to present her work.
@thecroftericmiller496
@thecroftericmiller496 20 күн бұрын
According to a Chinese academic, detonating around 400 atomic bombs could wipe out humanity. This estimate is based on calculations that assume the same effect as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which could destroy around 2 billion lives. So why do we need any more than say 20 nuclear weapons or 30 or 10? Because if we launch and Russia launches and Israel, launches and Pakistan launches and United Kingdom and France launches The entire planet is annihilated So what’s the point of 1700 or 1600 nuclear weapons with an arsenal of another 2000 sitting in a warehouse ? It’s freaking pointless. There is no winner in nuclear war so having more weapons is a pointless path to follow Everybody on the planet, even those who have no aggression towards anybody fall victim If any president in the future has the balls to say, I’m dropping our nuclear arsenal down to 50 weapons Who knows what the results might be globally. Because even at 50 American weapons, the entire planet would be destroyed
@jeriatrick
@jeriatrick Ай бұрын
But Adversaries dont play by the rules so how long do you really have when there are sub's stationed off shore.
@janetmcguffey1394
@janetmcguffey1394 Ай бұрын
I read the book...this is not "fiction" folks...why do none of us know these publically available facts?
@mikehills2588
@mikehills2588 Ай бұрын
It's not often mentioned that once the power goes out, the Nation's 54 nuclear power plants would all eventually meltdown.
@jmsjms296
@jmsjms296 Ай бұрын
I still do NOT believe it will happen.
@AtlanticPicture
@AtlanticPicture Ай бұрын
Lawrence, this episode was quite frustrating. WHY did you even invite Annie Jacobsen? You talked for 15 minutes straight, then gave her a minute to speak before interrupting and taking over again. This wasn't a podcast conversation with an esteemed guest; it was you monologuing with Annie as a prop to back you up. You could have simply talked about her book yourself and had her introduce it separately, then stitched the two parts together. I like the channel and enjoy listening to you while I'm editing, so you talking isn't the issue. You talking 80% while your guest talks 20% is!
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34 5 күн бұрын
Because Krauss is a bauss..😎
@GeezerBoy65
@GeezerBoy65 Ай бұрын
As a rude interrupter would rather yak himself, Lawrence is second only to Dan Ariely. The worst ever. A legend in his own mind.
@tilik13
@tilik13 Ай бұрын
Annie can phrase that for layman and so can Larry. The small difference Larry knows what he is talking about.
@ChrisPBacon-vk7sj
@ChrisPBacon-vk7sj Ай бұрын
With the way "humans" think, I'm surprised it hasn't already happened. But, what's the downside?
@karlgoebeler1500
@karlgoebeler1500 Ай бұрын
Looking for a story. You already have it. Yet the nuances that would reflect the emotional context of the story became a Maria Antoinette perspective in the future. Let the future eat bread.
@controversial1994
@controversial1994 Ай бұрын
:Progress' starts with being honest & loyal to the facts when discussing these grave matters. It has been the US exclusively that unilaterally withdrew from arms control treaties and doesn't include a raft of other international agreements it withdrew from throughout the same period. It started with Bush in 2002 who withdraw the US from the ABM treaty. Trump followed suit by withdrawing from the INF Treaty in 2019 & the OST in 2020. Russia has been the mature & rational actor throughout.
@michaelcook6185
@michaelcook6185 Ай бұрын
Disappointed with this “interview”. He did all the talking and the author barely got a word in.
@rhondacase7194
@rhondacase7194 19 күн бұрын
I would have liked to hear more from this fascinating guest and far less from the host. I’ll buy the book!
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
At least the ambassadors from Russia and the United States have not been withdrawn. The Russian ambassador in still in DC and the Russian ambassador is still in Moscow.
@jamesonpace726
@jamesonpace726 Ай бұрын
Well, there's a happy thought....
@michaelneal900
@michaelneal900 Ай бұрын
Of course they first thought a nuclear bomb would set the atmosphere on fire so why would we think anyone exactly knows how devastating nuclear war would be. Chernobyl is in full bloom.
@treefrog3349
@treefrog3349 Ай бұрын
Is humanity's established nuclear warfare capabilities any more insane and incomprehensible than our ecological conundrum or our egregious income disparities? It seems that, as a species, we have bungled every opportunity to do wiser things. Instead of ever-greater cohesion and wisdom we are reverting gut-level tribalism not seen since the "stone age".
@behr121002
@behr121002 Ай бұрын
At aaround 25:20, concering the 'call back' of nuclear weapons and what Reagan thought, with my limited level of knowledge of the nuclear force triad, I think what you are talking about when you're talking about 'recalling' a nuclear weapon is actually _recalling strategic bombers carrying nuclear bombs to be dropped._ Obiviously, nuclear missles cannot be recalled--whether they are land based _or submarine launched_ Reagan likely was talking about strategic bombers, not ICBMs (Although with Reagan and the Republican mind, you may be right about him not knowing.)
@fredblogs6704
@fredblogs6704 Ай бұрын
The art of presenting the audience with an enlightening discussion is to coerce the guest into revealing their insights and expertise. Allowing them to do most of the talking by feeding them with a short question has proven to be a good technique.
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
I don’t think nuclear war is a matter of time. I think a nuclear weapon MIGHT be used again by someone in the next 10 years but I don’t think nuclear war is inevitable. I can’t think that. If I thought that I would just give up on life. And I am well versed in what would happen in such a full scale war. In 1967 the United States had a book about what exactly would happen in the event of nuclear war. It was declassified in 1992 and I read it. It’s much worse than you could probably possibly imagine. The lucky people will be the ones that are vaporized instantly.
@AFROJOE2323
@AFROJOE2323 Ай бұрын
Its inevitable
@jmsjms296
@jmsjms296 Ай бұрын
@@AFROJOE2323 Nope
@psikeyhackr6914
@psikeyhackr6914 Ай бұрын
What is interesting is that these nuclear arsenals have supposedly been built because of differences in economic ideologies and yet no one can advocate mandatory accounting in the schools or tally the annual depreciation of durable consumer goods. Can scientists figure out planned obsolescence in automobiles? LOL
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
The United States can shoot down a rogue ballistic missile or 2 or 3 from North Korea. We have interceptors right now in Alaska, California, and Guam specifically because of North Korea. These interceptors I think there are 50 of them in total can shoot down ballistic missiles In their mid course phase so right after the boost phase and before the terminal phase. These missiles aren’t perfect and are about 60% success rate so at least 2 per ballistic missile would have to be launched. In the terminal phase we have Patriot Missiles and THAAD throughout the country. THAAD is in Texas I know for sure not sure where else it can shoot down warheads in their terminal phase our to about 500 miles and they are very accurate. It’s easier to shoot them down in their terminal phase. And if for whatever reason THAAD is unsuccessful we have Patriot which again is VERY accurate. But this is only going to work for a couple of rogue missiles from North Korea or somewhere else. In a full scale war with Russia these defenses would be overwhelmed pretty quickly and while some would be intercepted most would not. It’s a very small comfort at lease. We need a new mass peace movement to sweep the world. Biden will win re election and the Democrats will take back the House of Representatives in November. If this I have little doubts. We need to relegate the maga fascist movement to the dustbin of history. And Putin must be stippped. He must be stopped and he must go if you know what I mean. Russia isn’t going to use a nuclear weapon. I think the chances of that are extraordinarily low. But an accident is what I worry about. In 1983 nuclear war was averted because 1 Russian Colonel did not do as he was told and did not obey orders. His radar said there was a full scale attack by the US underway and his orders were to launch his missiles. He didn’t. It turns out it was geese migrations up to Canada that was mistaken for a missile attack. Most people don’t know about this. EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW. If not for this Russian Colonol disobeying orders civilization would have ended. We need a new peace movement. We need to formally declare we have a no first use policy. China has this policy.
@user-op3je1ve3k
@user-op3je1ve3k Ай бұрын
❤❤
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
We do have interceptors that can and do intercept ballistic missiles in their mid course and terminal phase. The ones that target the mid course phase aren’t very effective. 52% success rate. ICBMs are harder to shoot down this is true. But on the whole it’s useless.
@NathanDean79
@NathanDean79 Ай бұрын
1500 weapons on hair trigger alert status to be exact Lawrence. And only 450 of them are in silos in the United States. The minutman 3 ICBM can hold and deploy up to 3 warheads but we are treaty limited to have only 1 on them now. Although I think Russia withdrew from that treaty so I don’t know now. The rest are on Ohio class ballistic missile submarines of which we have 14 that carry 16 treaty limited missiles but the subs can carry 20 missiles and the Trudident SLBM’s in the subs are of 2 varieties. Some of them have up to 14 warheads and others have 7. And the rest are deployed with Bombers and yes we have forward deployed weapons in Europe. There are US nuclear gravity bombs in England, Germany, and Italy and tumoured to be in Poland too. Our submarine force by itself would be enough to totally destroy Russia. We still have more ballistic missile subs than the Russians. A lot more. It is the ultimate weapon and keeps the peace. Russia could completely wipe out the continental United States and Russia would still be utterly destroyed. And I head they are loading the subs back with 20 missiles be air again Russia chose to withdraw from a treaty we signed. And as part of that treaty we got rid of all of our nuclear tipped Tomahawk cruise missiles. They are coming back. And the B-52’s can carry 22 Air Launched Cruise missiles with a range of 1700 miles and the missiles have a fail a yield warhead meaning it can be pre selected to have a 5 KT blast or a 50 kt blast. A 16 kt blast destroyed Hiroshima Japan and a 20 Kt blast destroyed Navgasaki.
@Monkismo
@Monkismo Ай бұрын
Get the museums and archives out of D.C. I hate driving past the Pentagon to get to the Smithsonian anyway.
@isakhelvi
@isakhelvi Ай бұрын
Her voice was muted for few seconds, wonder what she was saying
@megakeenbeen
@megakeenbeen Ай бұрын
Not with a whimper but with a bang?
@Dayta
@Dayta Ай бұрын
i miss watching startrek
@fritzbang4805
@fritzbang4805 Ай бұрын
Anti Missile lasers and masers travel at light speed. Soon missile attack will be useless.
@donfleming3534
@donfleming3534 Ай бұрын
Maybe the world will end because the people who talked about it did it with smirky, know-it-all smiles on their faces. Thanks for killing us .
@saeidaliyounkhajehdizaj9903
@saeidaliyounkhajehdizaj9903 Ай бұрын
👍
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Thank you for a good and important podcast. But what's the thing with all the russian trolls, bots and peaceniks in the comment section?
@temujinay8831
@temujinay8831 Ай бұрын
The nuke's are end of the war, not the beginning .
@michaeltoyad
@michaeltoyad 22 күн бұрын
Stop the gaslighting, Annie. There's no madman in North Korea. The madman is in Washington. Right now he's having a wargame in the Korean peninsular and poking the bear in Ukraine.
@garystreet5881
@garystreet5881 Ай бұрын
Listen and Learn. Then Weep.
@susanbane2747
@susanbane2747 Ай бұрын
Stop talking about yourself and let your guests free
@thecroftericmiller496
@thecroftericmiller496 20 күн бұрын
Great podcast and I think you did a good job. I’m gonna point out something that all of your viewers are probably noticing maybe have have not told you. You need to trim your hair because that is all. I’m seeing what I’m watching and listening to this podcast.
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34
@SylviabombsmithUjhy75bd34 5 күн бұрын
Krauss's hair is majestic and wizardry. Every hair is perfectly placed..😎👌
@michaelneal900
@michaelneal900 Ай бұрын
Every thing I see by Annie Jacobsen is very vague and like shes trying to turn a short story into a 400 page book
@eventsandentertainment4594
@eventsandentertainment4594 Ай бұрын
gotta let WHOPPR play tictac toe
@MarkLynch-ru9ln
@MarkLynch-ru9ln Ай бұрын
for the love of god, Lawrence, let your guest speak. I love your channel, but enough is enough man.
@AuditorInvestor
@AuditorInvestor Ай бұрын
You keep saying it's "INSANE", etc. but Russia's policy is perfectly SANE considering the Western penchant for dominance, and backed by historic colonialism and theft. It's the only language the West will understand.
@xstensl8823
@xstensl8823 Ай бұрын
mr. Kraus please let the lady talk
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Buy the book. And read it. Problem solved.
@CODEDSOUNDS
@CODEDSOUNDS 25 күн бұрын
Lawrence Rizz
@Time4Peace
@Time4Peace Ай бұрын
This is a difficult but necessary conversation. Humanity can end anytime the way things are going on with geopolitics with the US in endless wars. My only problem is that the discussion proceeded on the basis of the enemy initiating the nuclear missles and the US is the victim. Therefore, war mongers will clamour for more fund to modernise its nuclear arsenal, again feeding the weapons industry. The only way for humanity to survive is to build greater trust and understanding between nations and engage in more diplomacy. We need an anti-war movement to ensure that the war mongers do not have the upper hand.
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Have you ever seen pictures from russia's mass graves in occupied Ukraine? I have seen some, with grandmothers, kids and other civilians. I'm not even allowed to describe them on youtube, but you can stuff your butt with your russian 'peace'. It's nothing else than ISIS with nukes.
@meeranraees3183
@meeranraees3183 Ай бұрын
1:12
@peterz53
@peterz53 Ай бұрын
Good podcast but would have liked to hear more from Annie Jacobson. If Lawrence hasn't learned to bite his tongue by now it'll never happen...
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Lawrence had a lot of useful information and thoughts to add, so I don't see your problem. You can always buy and read the book if you want to know it in detail.
@Wolfie-p7q
@Wolfie-p7q Ай бұрын
This would be a great subject for a grownup Doctor Who to tackle, you know someone like David Bradley playing the role of William Hartnell's Doctor Who.
@anamariatiradogonzalez
@anamariatiradogonzalez 19 күн бұрын
Aso que haveis metidi al cirinel diaz caela a crrerse lo del bbva
@alan-dx2zf
@alan-dx2zf Ай бұрын
Sexiest voice, hubba❤
@ga3680
@ga3680 Ай бұрын
Let the woman talk.
@rhythmandgreens
@rhythmandgreens Ай бұрын
LET YOUR GUEST SPEAK AND STOP TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF! When the guest has to apologize for saying something, you know that your interviewing has gone off the rails. Despite the excellent guests, I had stopped listen to the Origins Podcast because Dr. Krauss' constant telling us "when I was chair..." "when I I I ...." I thought that my now he might have learned his lesson, but if anything he's gotten worse. I'm done with this podcast.... again.
@azaharlionhart7084
@azaharlionhart7084 Ай бұрын
This episode is a shit show
@MichaelBrown-me3bh
@MichaelBrown-me3bh Ай бұрын
We are lucky that Russia is more level headed than America when it comes to nuclear war
@eskilolsen3783
@eskilolsen3783 Ай бұрын
Huh? russia has threatened to use nukes all over the place for several years. Except for north korea and russia. No one else has threatened to nuke anyone for decades.
@alexissercho
@alexissercho Ай бұрын
terrible edit. Monologue by LK
Jeffrey Sachs: Economics, Conflict, and Real-World Diplomacy
1:22:04
The Origins Podcast
Рет қаралды 63 М.
THE JACK CARR BOOK CLUB: NUCLEAR WAR: A SCENARIO by ANNIE JACOBSEN
1:05:13
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:40
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
Happy birthday to you by Tsuriki Show
00:12
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Unveiling my winning secret to defeating Maxim!😎| Free Fire Official
00:14
Garena Free Fire Global
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
天使救了路飞!#天使#小丑#路飞#家庭
00:35
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 89 МЛН
Robert Sapolsky: The Illusion of Free Will
2:58:34
The Origins Podcast
Рет қаралды 329 М.
Martin Rees: If Science is to Save Us, Part 1
1:53:40
The Origins Podcast
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Annie Jacobsen Reveals How RUSSIA WILL NUKE USA
1:04:22
MOMENTUM PODCAST
Рет қаралды 112 М.
PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order | Dr. Robert Malone
1:14:12
misesmedia
Рет қаралды 977 М.
What Happens If the President of the US Dies in Nuclear War...| Annie Jacobsen
10:41
The Diary Of A CEO Clips
Рет қаралды 85 М.
Ukraine - a tragedy of conflicting narratives | #1632 with Nicolai Petro
1:54:45
Andy Knoll: The First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth
2:54:27
The Origins Podcast
Рет қаралды 189 М.
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:40
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН