he's making machines in Korea

There's a similar story about an Italia physicist, Google about Ettore Majorana.

Like the guy who invented the PCR test and said it wasn't a tool for seeing if ur sick or not? He died early 2020. Ye ur to fake woke to talk about real issues.

* coffs * Well, it is simple: He made a Pact with the Devil for that Invention - an invention that polluted the Air of Gods Creation and is mainly used for War and misfortune. The Pact said to grant him a fixed Amount of Time as a rich Inventor, so he killed himself on the last Day - so the Devil was unable to claim his Soul even though he suicided himself.

Noooo.

Even when I disagree with the direction of his conclusions, I still find @Thoughty2 incredibly entertaining.

Lol, Thoughty2 can talk about the science of flushing toilets and make it sound interesting. He really found his gift in life.

Yeah him and fact boy are my two favorites

Didn't mention Akroyd much.

😂

And seems to have shrunk considerably.

😂😂

I think doing it out in the open is part of it. they get off on committing crimes and nobody being able to do anything about it

@@poindextertunes sends a message

from just watching the video i can easily believe he commited suicide. just bc on the surface everything looked nice, financially well off, friends, family, famous inventor,... doesnt mean that he was happy and never had any mental troubles. it may sound weird, but emotions simply arent rational. people cam feel like absolute dogshit even though they are living a seemingly comfortable and successful life. It is also totally possible that he got murdered though.

Lots of advantages to diesel over gas/petrol... Diesel BURNS where gas EXPLODES... for just one. Diesel has a higher energy per weight ratio, for another. Diesel engines rotate slower, producing more torque with less wear, for a third... AND all this on internal combustion, so at least on a sub', you have to consider that every stroke of the engine costs air, exactly the same as every breath by the people onboard. Finally, consider that these sub's were machines of war, same with the surface fleet. Diesel REALLY HAD build his original engines to run on a chemical cocktail, but it was easily derived from vegetable oils, including soy, peanut, and hemp, AND even as far as coal-dust. Practicality rules for mil-spec'... or at least, it did. Being able to set up a refinery to get home just about anywhere for fuel is almost a deal you can't possibly pass by. ;o)

Actuallybits a quick burn not explosion on petrol, detonation is explosion tho, source: david visard​@@gnarthdarkanen7464

Was my first guess as well. Those in power already expected a war to come - not in the dimensions it actually came in 1914 but still a war.

I blame some ancestor of Hillary Clinton or another.

well, the "oil" motive seems far fetched because it requires a well established foreknowledge of fuels competition, which at the time would be sci-fi. however, the "WW" motive requires the same degree of foreknowledge of the war nobody wanted, planned, nor anticipated (and that was factually triggered by a distant third party (Russia))

@@sillysad3198 Those evil Russkis are always behind everything it seems.

Strange that he was leaving France but the Germans are the ones that got him. I suppose it’s possible if word had spread far enough about his invention. Classic engineer blunder to run out and tell everyone right after you create something so transformative.

The petrochemical industry "developed" diesel fuel because it's really just a petroleum distillate that is highly efficient in diesel engines (and, on a side note, home heating fuel- yeah, in most Western countries, home heating oil is really just a lower grade of diesel fuel) and flows well through piping (which is also one reason why it's used for home heating), but wasn't terribly high demand for other uses (for example, kerosene, which also works well in diesel cycle engines - and jet engines - it was also in high demand for *lighting* and *cooking* , two things diesel isn't nearly as good for). In other words, "diesel fuel" is just what they named that segment of the petroleum distillation chain that didn't previously have a huge market use... and here was a breakout market that it was quite well suited for.

They would still go to great lengths to silence it or discredit it, plus punishing the inventor in some ghastly way. They would almost certainly be ruined.

@yestfmf true, just look at Tesla and his story. But that is one person, if more would stand up, it would be harder to silence.

Same here brotha. In like a two months time I have almost covered all his content ❤

so much conjecture though

Um, guys? Look at the name. It's a bot, and you will get massively spammed by it.

Hmmm....maybe...the guy doesn't seem to age much 😮🤐

Gay

How can you binge his videos, always watch them as they come out 😂

@@stopsign515 that's the very point of bingeing 🤌

That's how it goes, you stumble on his video and then can't stop watching

Journey Into Fear, by Eric Ambler, is a good WW2 story on this theme.

There are maybe 8 inventers of alternative fuell engines who died in creative ways.

@@1SciFiGeek508 Really? Do you have any information on this? I find this stuff fascinating!!

@@requiscatinpace7392 the best synopsis is in a you tube channel, the why files. Episode "how to build a ufo". It's a great channel but for the alternative fuel, any good book on the subject will cover the "accidents". If you don't want sit through the entire episode fast fwd to the 20 minute mark

Yeah it was, allegedly he was poisoned

The greatest drawback you did not mention is cost. Production is just too expensive to be economically viable. Shame, because everything you mentioned is more or less true and it has great potential.

@@PhazonBlaxor Thank you for bringing up a good point. So let's see where in the production line the cost might add up. 1. Growing algae. It's so cheap and easy that it happens by accident all the time. What's required is a tank of water (it doesn't have to be potable water; in fact dirty water is better) and sunlight. It also requires nutrients, but dumping back the leftovers after pressing oil from the last batch of algae has turned out to work very well. So far so good. 2. Pressing the oil out of the algae. That requires machinery and power. So does extracting petroleum. Of course if worst came to worst there are methods of oil extraction that date back to prehistoric times, so it can't be all that complicated. But yes, scaling it up requires expending some of the biodiesel that you create in order to extract still more biodiesel. That's called investment. 3. Removing every last trace of water from the oil. In a desert location (of which America has plenty) this could happen without human intervention. Other places would require human intervention, but not nearly as much as is required to refine petroleum, and with way less pollution. 4. Producing lye to break the oil into biodiesel. Our grandmothers used to do that with wood ash. Wood lye (potassium hydroxide) would in fact be preferable to commercial lye (sodium hydroxide) which makes a harder soap but who needs hardened fuel? Some pollution would result, but most of that can be recaptured in the smoke and reburnt, using modern catalytic technology. 5. Break the oil molecule. This is basically the same process as is used for making soap. The difference is using oil that has had every trace of water removed; if any water gets in, you wind up with soap instead of biodiesel. We already have factories that produce soap that aren't going out of business anytime soon, so I don't think that would be expensive. 6. Shipping off the byproduct (glycerine) to be made into non-petroleum based plastic by a process involving potato starch. How cheap or expensive these steps are seems to largely depend on whether you want to go plain or fancy--for instance, sun-drying versus kiln-drying. The fancier you get, the swifter or more productive, but you have to weigh whether the increase in production or speed will ultimately pay for the increase in expense.

@@PhazonBlaxor Why care about cost when you can make it yourself? It only reqwuires a basic knowledge of chemistry.

@@mernokallat645 You think it's cheaper to make something by yourself, than with economics of scale in play? Well, you'll be a billionare soon, congrats. :D

@@PhazonBlaxor It'n not about money. It's about fun. Chemistry is a great hobby and if it was not among your favorite subjects we have nothing to talk about.

Yeah but if he wanted to make it that obvious why didn't he also write "bye y'all " ?

i mean it was obviously gonna be looked at after so if it was a suicide wouldn’t he write something to his wife instead of just crossing a date

This shouldn’t have made me laugh 😂

A true *family* man

@justincarreras7753 Thank 😊 you and now he's fast and furious with cars 🚗

I think, that they're actually related.

Ok dad. Lol.

He has wrote his own book. If that might interest you.

That was my only guess 😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

But Ol’ Rudolph, with his nose so bright, wasn’t allowed to play with the ‘other’ (BIG OIL) Reindeer! He was to busy messing around with sustainable, very cheap biofuels… 🚢☠️

What?

Ha

Good question. He was the motivation for him to invent an invention that would be his own. It is a different sort of motivation to come up with something so fantastic.

Awareness and open mind 🙂

Nobody’s trying.

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Lets collab on a screenplay fam 😅

I've heard about this as well. The Biotech inventors were probably bumped off, or coerced into selling their ideas to the oil companies, who then just sat on said ideas, actively preventing their use.