Why, so he can lie more? Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

@@2fast2block Never seen so many words being wasted for nothing. Thanks for the effort anyway.

@@TheGadfly85 this is considered evidence by you that got around the laws I gave... "Never seen so many words being wasted for nothing. Thanks for the effort anyway." I'm not making that up, that was it.

@@2fast2block Still wasting words? Keep trying. Anyway I wish Dawkins longevity and that he gets rest of the years of your life as well.

TheGadfly he tryd to trick and black mail Prof. Rupit Sheldrake but Sheldrake out smarted him as fouls such as Dawkins can be outsmarted and it hurt Dawkins Developing ego for years may have caused his stroke

Pathetic celebrity cult worship. Dawkins, a vicious product of colonial privilege who believes in the dominant culture (a dog eat dog word). Great White Duh At Best. A selfish gene that too!

@@AudioPervert1 colonial privilege and dominant culture.।? How? I am seriously interested man.!

So there's a brainless person in that country too. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

Ok, so you like being mindless too. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

@bad1dobby See Gerald schroeder age of the universe And six day science website Peter stoner science speaks free online book Nyt David Albert review Lawrence krauss book Richard dawkins interview with Ben Stein Richard dawkins talks deistic god John Lennox debate That'll get you started That'll get

@bad1dobby I'm sorry you don't know how to look stuff up... that would save me a lot of time not having to retype what's already typed You'll learn good buddy....it just takes practice

@bad1dobby Why is it When atheist loose arguments ... they they throw out cursing and insults When you die.... you better be sure your right though

John Doe i do not think he is completly sure as he such as touther religious leaders do not know them selvs eyther

I can hardly blame him. Just wondering if you could pass that written letter from God on to Mr. Dawkins' address. It's not nice opening other people's mail and I'm sure God intended the letter to be delivered to the right person. Or if God told you to tell Mr. Dawkins then you should let God know that it might be best to tell him personally next time. You see, the two have never actually met and I'm not sure Richard even thinks God is real. A simple letter or phone call would clear this all up. If you could just let God know next time you see him. We don't really know how to get in contact with him. The magic telepathy hasn't really been working for us no matter how we fold our hands.

God created him but he loves to be mindless and ignore that part. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

do not be silly but funny hummer

Yeah, mindless Tim singing about mindless Dawkins. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

@@2fast2block i have herd or read or seen or what have you his favourite tune is the operning of charits of fire he adds lyrics ''we come out of nothing just by magic we come out of nothing just by magic then how can people belive in magic it does not exsist we came from magic and people by into that now i am an Atheist my self as i do not belive in gods but not a dawkins who thinks multiversises come by a magic wound

@@timothywait9457 you're such a perfect atheistic type, you can't get around what I gave and yet you respond as if you gave something worthy. You should get into comedy.

@@2fast2block i am into comedy so do not be silly

@@timothywait9457 all atheists are into comedy, their whole life is a big laugh.