Yea

And M103 was in Vietnam war! Next Fault.

Ronson burns. ALWAYS. Its a medium tho you are right.

0.1% is this

Yes i agree

I know lol, i also play war thunder XD

1 second into the vid and I already knew

Lol

Me too

Warthunder best game

Same

I actually waited 10 minutes ust for a game

this music makes me feel like a B-18 teammate is tryna shoot me down in war thunder arcade (yes, I main American.)

So truep

Lmao so true

@ALEX HUANG yes M-84 not T-84 my bad

Does make sense. All U.S. tank destroyers were equipped with aiming devices for indirect fire simmilar to atillery.

@@jakobc.2558 Interesting

@@jakobc.2558 yeah aiming devices for indirect fire interesting

What's the most nodern tank on yugoslav war?

@Simp Police that was the wrong way to do it though

Soviets:hold my vodka

@@natalieorlando6583 Yea because they had the oil reserves to make the same tank that would of probably got outclassed a year into the war... their strategy game was completely different because of limited resources

@Simp Police do you know the name of a Sherman with a flamethrower on it, or is it just considered as a normal Sherman

*Angry soviet noises*

Yeah... Because that's the American tank designation system. It's akin to saying "Literally almost every human has a first, middle, and last name.".

MURICA

Soviet: Use T Japan: Use Type German: I'mma use animal name.

@@dereenaldoambun9158 thats wrong

Gifty no

Me to

Same here

Everyone gangsta till soviet army produce way too many t34

@@arsenicisgood101 quantity is a quality of its own

That data can be hard to collect

*angery player intestifies*

Me who plays any ww2 game: *Now listen here you little s---*

It’s common tank knowledge bro, we’re all mad

Fuck coronavirus

You can’t carpetbomb corona do

yes

Shoot toilet paper out of the turret

rioters*

And the Sherman

What the heck is “????”

IS-1/2/3 were more powerful than German's tanks

@@cleopatravii2385covid

@@user-oq7wd6js1c most of them were late war tanks

Haha funny Coronavirus joke haha, why aren't you guys laughing, It's funny

I believe this is referring to the war between the US and the Philippines before WW2. Shermans were used to retake them during WW2 but they were not operational before that.

The Philippines Campaign was in ww2, during the pacific theater of war. Yes the US marines employed the Sherman in the battle, but the battle of the Philippines is the same as ww2

The music from war thunder

It doesnt look like MTLS 1G14

My favourite

It all depends on your definition of a MBT. It also depends on the sources you use. There’s debates about if the Panther, a WW2 era tank, is a medium, heavy, or even the first main battle tank. There is also a minority of people who say the Sherman line of tanks, especially the jumbo or easy 8 models, are the first main battle tanks.

As far as i know MBTs were classified after the British L7 gun, that were used in many tanks like Leo 1, Type 74 , Centurion and M60... that generation of tanks were the First MBTS

Since the M103 coexisted with the M46/M47/M48 those tanks can not be called main battle tanks. The fact that the M103 existed showed that there was a need for a more heavyly armored assult tank. When such a vehicle exist this means that the M46/M47/M48 could not fullfill the assult tank roll and thus were not MBTs. MBTs actualy realy only exist when heavy tank armor could be put on medium tanks. At the time when the Pattons existed shaped charge warheads and sabot rounds were simply so strong that they would easly deal with patton tank armor(aswell as any other armor that existed at that point). Thats why the Centurion was a MBT. It came out at a time before those munitions were invented/made effektive so that it could actualy earn the MBT status.

all copy of best tank ever tiger 2

@@wtfgamer8742 oh yeah. Especialy the M46 which is just a M26 with a better engine. And the M26 started development in 1941. And the M47 and M48 were based on the M46. Get out of here with your wehraboo delusions.

they were implemented by british in ww2 in order to mock usa.

But usa gave Britain china and ussr 27000 tank with the lend-lease pact

@@someonefromnowhere6473 What I was trying to say is that it's the US that actually contributed the most to defeat axis, and that soviet union wasn't that industrially powerful as many people think

The Soviet union produced twise the artillery as us and germany combined. The same number of heavy tanks as us and germany combined. More machine guns than germany and us combined

Why do i have to keep telling people that SPG's are tanks because they have tracks and armor.

@@wolfganglepschy4084 You don't have to since I've already gotten it the first time.

No,every type of spg is more hated.

Cottereau en a déjà fait une.

@@DieuleRoi a ok bin merci pour ta réponse gg a toi

@@DieuleRoi et je voulais te poser une question avec tout les vidéos faite la France l'Allemagne le royaume unie espagne et tout quel et le pays dans sont histoire et sa culture et le plus riche?

@magic-_-roma2241 Drôle de question. Je ne crois pas qu'on puisse dire qu'un pays ai vécu plus d'histoire qu'un autre.

@@DieuleRoi bin pour mois exemple les états-unis et la France il on pas la même histoire l'histoire de France et beaucoup plus riche qu'en tu vois que au début de la France et de l'angleterre il y a une frait réalité entre c'est deux pays puis un peux plus tard avec l'Allemagne ou c'est un peuple qui a beaucoup changé dans l'histoire comme l'Italie en plusieurs royaumes et l'Espagne franchement a part la conquete en amérique latine je vois pois d'autres choses puie les langues aussi il y aussi une réalité la langue française et beaucoup plus vivantes et riche en histoire c'est pour sa d'ailleurs que c'est une langue la plus aimé dans le monde et en 2050 sa sera la langue la plus parlé dans le monde et la langue anglaise bin enfaîte la moitié des mots anglais vien du français qui on modifier.

Because it's made out of steel, which weigh less than regular armor and is shittier at protecting

Soviet tanks:and we took it personally

Every historian to exist ever: *so did we*

Mistake

There is no T95 super heavy tank in history. There's only T28 which has more track and medium tank.

And where is a t28

It is called the T28 super heavy tank. Calling it T95 is completely incorrect. Thats some bulls*** that tank games have made up. Also he is only looking at non prototype vehicles(and yes the M6 heavy was not a prototype)

@Benjamin Sigouin yes but the larger sized T28(the one with 4 tracks and side armor) was never called the T95. The T28 with 2 tracks was just named the T28 and the T28 with 4 tracks was called the "T28 Super heavy tank". After all why should the US army jump from prototype vehicle number 28 to prototype vehicle number 95 on the same tank? The latest world war 2 prototype was the T34 Heavy tank. The real T95 was something completely different and would not appear untill 1955 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/T95_Medium_Tank

@@jakobc.2558 Actually it was at first named T28. then it was requested to change to 105mm Gun Motor Carriage T95 and was made official in March 1945. Unfortunately it renamed back to super heavy tank T28 in June 1946.

Yay orang indo

Ketemu ni

To be fair there’s over 20 different variants of the m4 Sherman

@@zacharytrevino6321 I know, but The Jumbo is a very well known tank know for its heavy frontal armor, same thing with the firefly being known for its powerful gun. So why shouldn't the Jumbo be in this video aswell?

What the f-

the lvt is the shitiest tank in war thunder

Daniel Mendoza because really was a amphibian troop transport and later they put a turret

@@danielmendoza2275 you can survive lot of shells before dying, and there's very few tanks using HEAT or HE as a main shell, so you won't be bullbreaking that fast unless you are dumb enough to be rushing in a light tank

Graaaaaaa

Kartoshak kartoshka kartoshka aaaggaaa

Bum bunks bum ninja TURRRRRTAAAAA

Yeah woo ooo. Bim bumka bim bumka AAAAGGGGAAAA. Margata gar gar GAAAA!!

@@cleopatravii2385 ...